|
|
03-30-2020, 11:01 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Western Phraudsylvania
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 837
Liked 1,237 Times in 449 Posts
|
|
American Rifleman K22 Error?
This month's magazine has a nice article (April, 2020, page 41) about a reader's first experience with a 1941 K-22, called "A Cattail and a K-22". Nice story, but the accompanying photo does not appear to be a 1940-ish K22; neither an Outdoorsman nor a Masterpiece. Rather, it appears to me to be a post-war, improved I-frame 22/32 kit gun with some anomalies. Specifically pre-war grips, a Shared front sight, main spring tension screw with a fifth screw in front of the trigger guard (I thought that Imp-I's had coil springs). No big surprise and no big deal that NRA may have applied an incorrect photo, but with so much time on my hands what with this CV19 virus quarantine business, such errors provoked my curiosity. Am I wrong with my assessment of this photo? Hopefully some kit-gun and/or K22 experts will opine. Thanks - S2
Last edited by Speedo2; 03-30-2020 at 11:04 AM.
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-30-2020, 11:16 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 1,050
Liked 2,532 Times in 461 Posts
|
|
You are correct. The gun pictured is a pre-war 4" kit gun.
Bob
|
03-30-2020, 11:20 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Northern Middle Tennessee
Posts: 2,915
Likes: 3,427
Liked 4,120 Times in 1,462 Posts
|
|
I would have to agree the grips, and front sight are a dead giveaway it isn't a K22 or a Outdoorsman.
__________________
Randy
|
03-30-2020, 11:58 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Western Phraudsylvania
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 837
Liked 1,237 Times in 449 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by red9
You are correct. The gun pictured is a pre-war 4" kit gun.
Bob
|
Thanks Bob, but a couple of things are still unresolved: 4-line "Marcus Registradus" stamping and straight barreled extraction rod make me think it's a post-war, rather than a pre-war kit gun. Perhaps some post-war modifications? Likely that AR simply attached the writer's photo of his gun that he may have incorrectly identified as a K22. Regardless, I would have hoped that AR would have done better research. -S2
|
03-30-2020, 12:12 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 4
Liked 8,916 Times in 4,135 Posts
|
|
It's important to remember the NRA has not had a technical staff in a good while, I think since the days when C. E. Harris and others in his league were there. They likely have a few fairly knowledgeable people, but I'm unaware if they have any true experts on anything now, other than Bruce Canfield, but his specialty is military stuff.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-30-2020, 02:04 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,595
Likes: 239
Liked 29,104 Times in 14,072 Posts
|
|
I caught those errors immediately and intended to make a posting here. But I never got around to it. I imagine the AR staff has already received many notifications about it.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-30-2020, 02:18 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Northern California
Posts: 965
Likes: 1,022
Liked 1,281 Times in 407 Posts
|
|
I have noticed a lot of errors in the last few years in several firearms magazines that I subscribe to. There seems to be a lot less proof reading being done before the magazines go to press. Seems to be another sign of the times.
__________________
Ken
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-30-2020, 04:01 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Eastern WA
Posts: 3,304
Likes: 1,766
Liked 7,286 Times in 1,898 Posts
|
|
Funny, they don't seem to get Rugers wrong much...must be that large check every year
I only get two gun magazines anymore, Firearms News and AR. Since the loss of the gunsmithing articles, even FN is less interesting though still a great publication. I think print's days are numbered though. By 2030 they'll all be history in paper form.
__________________
Psalm 27:2
|
03-30-2020, 04:22 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Central VA
Posts: 8,648
Likes: 1,567
Liked 9,404 Times in 4,215 Posts
|
|
I join you in mourning the loss of real gun experts writing in real gun magazines. I’ve completely discontinued my market targeted gun magazines and only get AR (because I’m a life member) and journals from the various specialty groups to which I belong. It’s gotten so bad that even a couple of these journals call on me for the occasional article. Talk about scraping the bottom of the barrel!
My current research method is to first scan the InterWeb and ask questions on specialty sites, then go through my library of old AR and other magazines, then look through the few old books I own for other info. Current mass market magazine? Not so much.
Froggie
Last edited by Green Frog; 03-31-2020 at 07:50 AM.
Reason: Repair the autocorrect!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-30-2020, 05:05 PM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,995
Likes: 8,975
Liked 48,744 Times in 9,251 Posts
|
|
I noticed that.
It is not an improved I frame.
It is just an early Post War Kit Gun. They made some Post War Kit guns that are virtually the same as the Pre Wars. I'm not sure if they had the new hammer block or not. It obviously has the 4 line address, so 48 or later.
Jim will be along to discuss all points including the metallurgy.
__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett
Last edited by handejector; 03-30-2020 at 05:06 PM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-30-2020, 05:41 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 4
Liked 8,916 Times in 4,135 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Green Frog
I join you in morning the loss of real gun experts writing in real gun magazines. I’ve completely discontinued my market targeted gun magazines and only get AR (because I’m a life member) and journals from the various specialty groups to which I belong. It’s gotten so bad that even a couple of these journals call on me for the occasional article. Talk about scraping the bottom of the barrel!
My current research method is to first scan the InterWeb and ask questions on specialty sites, then go through my library of old AR and other magazines, then look through the few old books I own for other info. Current mass market magazine? Not so much.
Froggie
|
It appears these people are struggling to stay in business with paper publications and I hope they succeed because a number of us prefer reading paper. AMERICAN RIFLEMAN, ironically, will outlive the others, and certainly not because it's a worthy gun magazine as it once was.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-30-2020, 07:08 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,521
Likes: 89,639
Liked 24,867 Times in 8,516 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockquarry
It appears these people are struggling to stay in business with paper publications and I hope they succeed because a number of us prefer reading paper. AMERICAN RIFLEMAN, ironically, will outlive the others, and certainly not because it's a worthy gun magazine as it once was.
|
Yeah, I hate dragging the monitor to the "reading room." I don't have a tablet nor a smart phone.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-30-2020, 07:11 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 4
Liked 8,916 Times in 4,135 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muley Gil
Yeah, I hate dragging the monitor to the "reading room." I don't have a tablet nor a smart phone.
|
I never thought about that. It would be most inconvenient.
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|