|
|
08-08-2020, 08:10 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 11
Likes: 7
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Model 1917 Ammunition
Is FMJ ammo really bad on the rifling on 1917 revolvers? Several people have recommended using only lead bullets. I was going to load some 45 Auto Rim cases and looking for some recommendations for bullets.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-08-2020, 08:18 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,535
Likes: 6
Liked 862 Times in 379 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sand1991
Is FMJ ammo really bad on the rifling on 1917 revolvers? Several people have recommended using only lead bullets. I was going to load some 45 Auto Rim cases and looking for some recommendations for bullets.
|
I myself have always used Lead Bullets for all my Revolvers and Semi Automatic Pistols.
Lead is indeed a lot kinder to the Bores.
Any .45 ACP or .452-ish diameter Lead Bullet should be just dandy in your m1917 or Commercial .45 ACP N-Frame.
The nice thing about the m1917 and it's kin, any Bullet shape is fine...
If you are not casting your own, "Matts Bullets" has some nice ones to choose from.
45 Handgun : Matts Bullets
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-08-2020, 08:25 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Denver area
Posts: 6,243
Likes: 20,275
Liked 13,107 Times in 4,172 Posts
|
|
FMJ ammo was the stuff the GI’s used and the stuff the 1917 was designed around.
I can’t imagine you’re in danger of wearing out the barrel using FMJ ammo.
There seems to be a persistent urban myth about wearing out handgun rifling with jacketed ammo. I’ve never seen evidence that supports the myth.
That said, most shooters prefer lead cast bullets in older revolvers.
|
The Following 13 Users Like Post:
|
6518John, Beemerguy53, bmcgilvray, desi2358, deyomatic, JH1951, Kinman, Kurusu, Lee Barner, M E Morrison, quinn, Russell Cottle, S&WIowegan |
08-08-2020, 09:44 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,352
Likes: 10,450
Liked 6,095 Times in 1,249 Posts
|
|
I do not believe in the notion that jacketed bullets wear out a bore. Now neglect, corrosive ammunition, improper cleaning, sure. But worn bores from jacketed bullets are for someone else beside me to dither about.
A '17 Colt and '17 Smith & Wesson are kept on hand here and they've been shot a good deal through the years, the Colt in particular. The .45 Auto Rim cases are always loaded with cast lead bullets, but if I'm low on Auto Rim then I may used .45 ACP cast bullet handloads or .45 ACP jacketed indiscriminately.
Lead's for economy here, not out of concerns for bore wear.
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-08-2020, 11:24 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 3,527
Likes: 11,155
Liked 12,130 Times in 1,940 Posts
|
|
I fired the same fmj hand loads in my 1917 that I loaded for my full auto MAC 10. After 1000s of rounds in the M10 I noticed no wear. Ditto the 1917 which hasn't seen as many. The 45acp is a sub sonic round causing less trauma to the bore IMHO. No so with the jacketed rounds I put through my 250-3000 Savage 99. I'm sure there are ballistics experts here who can explain better than me.
__________________
Randy
Provenance nerd
Last edited by quinn; 08-08-2020 at 11:26 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-08-2020, 11:39 PM
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,361
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,154 Times in 7,408 Posts
|
|
I think harder lead works better than factory AR soft bullets. Neither my Colt 1917 or S&W 1950 Target shot those well.
Just refer to Keith's, Sixguns. Elmer dealt with the issue decades ago...
He was very clear that FMJ bullets then wore 1917 bores much sooner. Those 1917 barrels were softer than modern steels and probably do wear faster.
Remember, the whole idea of those WW I revolvers was an emergency war measure! In my view, the .45 ACP revolver concept should never have gone further. I realize that others disagree.
Maybe if good .44 Spcl. factory ammo had been loaded and more popular...
I concede that some preferred FMJ bullets if they might have to shoot dangerous large animals.
Last edited by Texas Star; 08-08-2020 at 11:45 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-09-2020, 01:07 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Northern Middle Tennessee
Posts: 2,915
Likes: 3,428
Liked 4,120 Times in 1,462 Posts
|
|
Will jacketed bullets wear any barrel more than lead well yes. Is it a factor for most of the shooting public to worry about? Absolutely not, most folks simply do not shoot anywhere near enough to make any measurable difference. That ,and the 1917 revolver was designed to use the same ammo as the 1911 which was jacketed ball ammo..
__________________
Randy
Last edited by merl67; 08-09-2020 at 01:08 AM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-09-2020, 06:54 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ashtabula County, Ohio
Posts: 6,074
Likes: 9,342
Liked 13,756 Times in 4,037 Posts
|
|
I have found my older ACP revolvers (Model 1917s) shoot better with jacketed ammunition. When I was younger, I followed Elmer Keith’s advice and cast significantly harder bullets for the 1917s. Now, I cast a bullet a bit larger in diameter and that works also. A longer bearing surface might help but these revolvers were designed around a 230 grain bullet.
Kevin
__________________
Unshared knowledge is wasted.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-09-2020, 09:16 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 3,450
Likes: 37
Liked 5,435 Times in 1,762 Posts
|
|
When the Model 1917 was the latest thing, all they had was jacketed .45 ACP. It was designed specifically for the 230 gr. jacketed standard load and will not be harmed in any way by using it.
__________________
Pisgah
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-09-2020, 09:26 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Central Montana
Posts: 13,714
Likes: 12,858
Liked 39,476 Times in 10,046 Posts
|
|
Actually if you look at a friction coefficient table lead has a higher coefficient than copper, but that is dry and most lead bullets are lubed.
As stated. They were designed and marketed to the US military for use with jacket bullets and the military is known for its difficult acceptance testing.
I think it would take a lot of either to wear out a barrel. Just the cost of primers to wear one out would far out weight the cost of a barrel and having it installed.
More damage is done by firing dirty ammo, dirt in bore, but mainly over zealous and improper cleaning methods.
I have a lot of respect for Elmer Kieth, but I think sometimes he, like many of us, saw what he wanted to see. I am included in this of course,
Last edited by steelslaver; 08-09-2020 at 09:59 AM.
|
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-09-2020, 10:10 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 8,771
Likes: 19,529
Liked 11,874 Times in 5,392 Posts
|
|
I would agree, dirty ammo, corrosive ammo, and improper care or overzealous cleaning do the most damage.
__________________
VCDL, GOA, NRA
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-09-2020, 11:22 AM
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,361
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,154 Times in 7,408 Posts
|
|
Keith noted that it's easier and cheaper to replace a .45 auto barrel than a revolver bbl. He wore barrels to this point in about 5ooo rounds of the old corrosive Natl. Match ammo, ca. 1925.
BUT he shot a LOT, probably daily.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-09-2020, 11:34 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,929
Likes: 3,902
Liked 6,802 Times in 1,851 Posts
|
|
As already stated 1917s were designed to shoot FMJs. My 1917, 1937 and 1950 model all shoot FMJs better then any lead bullets I've tried.
__________________
SWHF #595
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-09-2020, 02:51 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Central Montana
Posts: 13,714
Likes: 12,858
Liked 39,476 Times in 10,046 Posts
|
|
Really changing out a 1917 barrel and fitting it isn't that hard or time consuming with a few of the right tools. But, now days finding a good 1917 barrel is going to be a real problem. But, I do have a long piece of Green mountain .452 barrel if I need it.
|
08-09-2020, 03:18 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Mobile Ala
Posts: 83
Likes: 605
Liked 125 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
My 1917 S&W seems to like either but patterns better with fmj. It was a shooter before I got it and I don't think at my age I will wear it out. I think my eyes and my barrel are probably in cahoots to test me maybe!!
Last edited by docjonson; 08-09-2020 at 03:21 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-09-2020, 04:23 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Tennessee and Alabama
Posts: 1,222
Likes: 2,758
Liked 1,613 Times in 661 Posts
|
|
I shoot 5 grains of Red Dot with any good 200 gr LSWC in my .45 AR guns . I have a Colt and a Brazilian Contract and it shoots well in both . Don't know how many thousands of these I have shot but it's a bunch . I don't by choice shoot any FMJ ammo in anything , not scared of damage but see no need for it for my use.
__________________
Grumpy Old Man With a Gun
|
08-09-2020, 07:20 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Occupied California
Posts: 2,792
Likes: 1,524
Liked 5,588 Times in 1,612 Posts
|
|
I shot my Model 1917 in honor of its 100th birthday. Ammo was Winchester white box hardball. Distance was 10 yards. I tend to pull my shots to the left with double action revolvers that have service style stocks. It worked exactly as Douglas Wesson intended using half moon clips.
|
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-09-2020, 08:16 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,320
Likes: 34,027
Liked 10,993 Times in 3,961 Posts
|
|
Just curious:
Does anyone agonize like this about shooting FMJ .45 ACP through the old M1911s?
__________________
You're shy a few manners.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-10-2020, 06:43 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 8,771
Likes: 19,529
Liked 11,874 Times in 5,392 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Flash
Just curious:
Does anyone agonize like this about shooting FMJ .45 ACP through the old M1911s?
|
No, they don't, even with WW I era M-1911's. I think the jacketed ammo wearing out a barrel thing is a whole lot of nothing.
__________________
VCDL, GOA, NRA
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-10-2020, 08:04 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NC, Yadkin County
Posts: 6,221
Likes: 25,689
Liked 8,550 Times in 3,199 Posts
|
|
IF a 1917 barrel was worn plumb slick I'll bet that at self defense distances that a tumbling 230 gr. fmj would make a nasty hole. Larry
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-10-2020, 09:45 AM
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,361
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,154 Times in 7,408 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Flash
Just curious:
Does anyone agonize like this about shooting FMJ .45 ACP through the old M1911s?
|
The concern with those is more about frame cracking, but a bbl. is easily changed.
Reasonable use with modern ammo won't wear out either gun.
Keith was firing prodigious amounts of 1920's ammo, day after day.
|
08-10-2020, 05:58 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Spokantucky
Posts: 4,131
Likes: 10,413
Liked 6,946 Times in 2,355 Posts
|
|
I have messed around with a few 1917s one a Brazilian. I wanted something I could shoot cheap and settled on copper plated bullets from Ranier or Berry's, I get a slight reduction on Berry's so I use them unless the Raniers are on sale.
I think the shallow rifling on these pieces is conducive to jacketed bullet use. I could not wring any better groups out of lead no matter what alloy I tried. Jacketed bullets just work better in the early .45s for me anyway. I found the 200 gr. plated semi wadcutters worked best, resulting in a much cleaner revolver and ever bit as accurate as lead. I use the 1917 more as a plinker and one shortened model as a carry/defense piece, it is loaded with 185gr. hollow points to +P velocities. The +P stuff has only been fired for effect and does very well at the ranges I would be inclined to use it, it is not target grade by any means.
I push the plated bullets to the levels you would push hardcast and no more, you would need to experiment to find out what load produced the best group with the fixed sights.
|
08-11-2020, 06:49 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 8,771
Likes: 19,529
Liked 11,874 Times in 5,392 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Star
The concern with those is more about frame cracking, but a bbl. is easily changed.
Reasonable use with modern ammo won't wear out either gun.
Keith was firing prodigious amounts of 1920's ammo, day after day.
|
With a pre-WW II 1911, the receiver is usually not the part that cracks. Cracks in the non-heat treated M1911 slides are more common, usually occurring at the sharp corners at the rear of the ejection port.
__________________
VCDL, GOA, NRA
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-11-2020, 08:54 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Baton Rouge, La.
Posts: 6,874
Likes: 7,481
Liked 8,135 Times in 3,678 Posts
|
|
The 1917 was a fill-in the gap measure for not enough 1911's to go around . Shooting jacketed will not damage the gun .
Revolvers can shoot cast lead SWC's & RN-FP bullets ...usually cheaper.
Can they extend barrel life ...maybe ...but you will have to shoot a lot of either to wear it out .
Load whatever type bullet you can find ... I usually find more cast lead because a 2 cavity Lee mould lives at my house and melting lead isn't rocket science .
Gary
__________________
Certified Cajun
NRA Member
|
08-11-2020, 09:06 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Florence, Alabama, USA
Posts: 2,349
Likes: 40
Liked 1,397 Times in 773 Posts
|
|
Elmer Keith said his buddies on the battleship would send him a new 1911 barrel and a case of ammo every time they made port. Barrels and ammo must be better now, the 5000 rounds he said was the life of a barrel is trivial to a competitive shooter now.
But few people are going to shoot an Army surplus pistol that much; I would not worry about it.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-11-2020, 10:13 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Washington State
Posts: 7,475
Likes: 14,587
Liked 9,313 Times in 3,723 Posts
|
|
The number of people who shoot enough to wear out most firearms (with the exception of the really hot small caliber rifle rounds as mentioned above) is tiny. I would not worry about it.
The real advantage to the revolver is its ability to shoot any shape of projectile that will shoot worth a darn. In the 45AR, I would load it with well designed SWC just as I would use for any other revolver round, and be quite happy.
__________________
NHI, 10-8.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-11-2020, 07:44 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ashtabula County, Ohio
Posts: 6,074
Likes: 9,342
Liked 13,756 Times in 4,037 Posts
|
|
One of my favorite ACP loads for my revolvers uses the SAECO 453 mold which casts a 235-240 grain DEWC bullet. Loaded to hardball ballistics it hits hard
Kevin
__________________
Unshared knowledge is wasted.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|