Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961

Notices

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-21-2020, 12:00 PM
pmanton's Avatar
pmanton pmanton is offline
US Veteran
Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ?  
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Indian Hills Airpark AZ
Posts: 2,765
Likes: 3,708
Liked 3,613 Times in 1,169 Posts
Default Impractical ?

I have a Model 17 no dash. What are your thoughts of obtaining another cylinder, and having it bored out for .22 magnum, and fitted to my revolver?

Fun idea--or really dumb idea/
__________________
Paul
Salome, AZ
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-21-2020, 12:25 PM
Art Doc's Avatar
Art Doc Art Doc is offline
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ?  
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The kidney of Dixie.
Posts: 10,509
Likes: 49
Liked 13,410 Times in 3,290 Posts
Default

22 LR and 22 WMR have slightly different bore sizes. The Magnum is bigger so you may have an excessive pressure issue. When they make a 22 with two cylinders the barrel is bored for the Magnum and the LR rattles around a bit.

But I have read guys say they have done this. I would not. Just buy a Model 48. Cheaper and you'll be happier in the end.
__________________
No life story has happy end.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 10-21-2020, 12:49 PM
armorer951's Avatar
armorer951 armorer951 is offline
Member
Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ?  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Evansville, Indiana USA
Posts: 6,220
Likes: 483
Liked 11,380 Times in 3,519 Posts
Default

Another option would be to buy a new OEM model 48, 0r 648 cylinder hand have it fit to your model 17. Impractical? Perhaps.
Fun? Yes sir.


Total cost for new parts approx. $80.00. Stress while cutting the ratchets yourself.......... priceless.

Cylinder Fitment
__________________
Ret. LE, FA Instr, S&W Armorer

Last edited by armorer951; 10-21-2020 at 01:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #4  
Old 10-21-2020, 02:46 PM
SDH SDH is offline
Banned
Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ?  
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Montana
Posts: 2,142
Likes: 2,064
Liked 3,137 Times in 644 Posts
Default

My experience with extra cylinders is they are little used, cause extra wear or idiot marks exchanging them and often get separated from the gun. The Model 48 is an excellent firearm and a prime candidate for an 8 3/8" barrel~
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #5  
Old 10-21-2020, 03:25 PM
merl67 merl67 is offline
SWCA Member
Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ?  
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Northern Middle Tennessee
Posts: 2,915
Likes: 3,427
Liked 4,120 Times in 1,462 Posts
Default

I have done it. Reaming a 22lr cylinder to 22 mag not too big a deal, timing the new cylinder to your gun a bit more work. In the end I didn't personally see a tremendous amount of benefits to it, but I learned a few things in the process, so there was a benefit in that respect.
__________________
Randy
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #6  
Old 10-21-2020, 07:22 PM
Modified's Avatar
Modified Modified is offline
SWCA Member
Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ?  
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Flathead Valley, Montana
Posts: 2,822
Likes: 2,592
Liked 12,779 Times in 1,815 Posts
Default

Just buy a good 3 screw ruger single six from the 1960s with both LR/Mag cylinders. That should scratch the convertible itch.

When it comes to a S&W if you want a magnum just find yourself a good early model 48 and put it next to your model 17. There is no appreciable cost savings with all the work to have a convertible made, and there are a ton of drawbacks (already detailed in this thread).
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #7  
Old 10-21-2020, 11:55 PM
Hondo44 Hondo44 is offline
SWCA Member

Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ?  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,248
Likes: 11,903
Liked 20,594 Times in 8,582 Posts
Default

I reamed a spare LR cyl to Mag for my pre model 18 Combat Masterpiece.

It happened to be a drop in as far as timing like most are. Overall length was right on which isn't always the case but mine was. Simple to correct if not.

I needed 22 mags to drop rock chucks with one shot, no suffering or scampering off to their hole to eventually die.

Added pressure is negligible. Never any signs of bulged case heads or perforated rims from the firing pin with mine or in anyone else's experience that I've ever heard about.

22 Pressures:

.22RF Long&LR - 24,000
.22WRF -19,000
.22WRM -24,000




The bore diameters (distance between the lands) are:

early .22 rim fire revolver bore on the S&W spec sheet as .217 -.218,

the K-22 bore diameter is listed as .2135 - .2147,

the .22 rim fire Magnum bore is listed as .219 -.220.

It's a non-issue in my opinion.

P.S. Rent a reamer and ream it yourself. This has to be one of the easiest rechambers because there' so little metal to be removed.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819

Last edited by Hondo44; 10-22-2020 at 12:00 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #8  
Old 10-22-2020, 08:44 PM
OLMDDat71's Avatar
OLMDDat71 OLMDDat71 is offline
Member
Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ?  
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: TX
Posts: 67
Likes: 141
Liked 170 Times in 44 Posts
Default

My dad back in the late 1950s took a S&W 38 Special and put a factory 6" 22 cal barrel and cylinder in it and re chambered it to 22 snapper ( a shortened 22 Hornet case and shot Hormet .223 bullets through it with no trouble, I remember not liking it because of the muzzle blast, wasn't till i got my hands on a Ruger old model in 30 cal that I found the same ear splitting muzzle blast. My opinion is if you want a 22 magnum in a revolver just buy another, there is S&W 48s arround to pick up. Never had a Model 53 and don't want one but wouldn't mind finding a old model Ruger 256 Hawkeye to play with.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #9  
Old 10-22-2020, 11:48 PM
Hondo44 Hondo44 is offline
SWCA Member

Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ?  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,248
Likes: 11,903
Liked 20,594 Times in 8,582 Posts
Default

Hawkeye single shot is fun! They are not quite the ear splitters of those you mentioned.

They were poor sellers in the early '60s, because they cost the same $87.50 as the Super Blackhawk. In order to get rid of them many retailers had brand new Hawkeyes rechambered to all manner of cartridges. All it took was a barrel change since the chamber was in the end of the barrel like a rifle.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #10  
Old 10-29-2020, 02:27 PM
georgek472 georgek472 is offline
Member
Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ?  
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 150
Likes: 358
Liked 40 Times in 24 Posts
Default Cylinder fitment

Quote:
Originally Posted by Art Doc View Post
22 LR and 22 WMR have slightly different bore sizes. The Magnum is bigger so you may have an excessive pressure issue. When they make a 22 with two cylinders the barrel is bored for the Magnum and the LR rattles around a bit.

But I have read guys say they have done this. I would not. Just buy a Model 48. Cheaper and you'll be happier in the end.
Thanx.. Art Doc.. Valued information..... George K.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-29-2020, 03:05 PM
georgek472 georgek472 is offline
Member
Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ?  
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 150
Likes: 358
Liked 40 Times in 24 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Hondo44;140938589]I reamed a spare LR cyl to Mag for my pre model 18 Combat Masterpiece.

It happened to be a drop in as far as timing like most are. Overall length was right on which isn't always the case but mine was. Simple to correct if not.

I needed 22 mags to drop rock chucks with one shot, no suffering or scampering off to their hole to eventually die.

Added pressure is negligible. Never any signs of bulged case heads or perforated rims from the firing pin with mine or in anyone else's experience that I've ever heard about.

22 Pressures:

.22RF Long&LR - 24,000
.22WRF -19,000
.22WRM -24,000




The bore diameters (distance between the lands) are:

early .22 rim fire revolver bore on the S&W spec sheet as .217 -.218,

the K-22 bore diameter is listed as .2135 - .2147,

the .22 rim fire Magnum bore is listed as .219 -.220.

It's a non-issue in my opinion.

P.S. Rent a reamer and ream it yourself. This has to be one of the easiest rechambers because there' so little metal to be removed.
Invaluable information that will go a long way in my fitment project. Thanx again....George K.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-29-2020, 03:10 PM
georgek472 georgek472 is offline
Member
Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ? Impractical ?  
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 150
Likes: 358
Liked 40 Times in 24 Posts
Default Cylinder fitment

Thanx for the Invaluable information that will go a long ways with my fitment project....Thanx again for your help.... George K.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Unanimously Absurd and Impractical TennTony Concealed Carry & Self Defense 69 02-08-2020 12:42 PM
Impractical firearms wish list ... mc5aw Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics 62 03-23-2016 09:20 PM
Impractical/ senseless things you say, on purpose....... rojodiablo The Lounge 64 06-10-2014 01:37 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:27 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)