|
|
|
11-09-2020, 12:10 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 7
Likes: 3
Liked 10 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
5 inch barrel
This is my first S&W, an M&P from the 20's. I keep seeing auctions highlighting how uncommon/rare/desirable the 5" barrel is on these. Any truth to that, or is it pretty much just fluff to drive up the bids? I was thinking of polishing the Cordial Rhythm And Poetry out of it. (Was going to use the acronym instead, but evidently that word is censored...?)
|
The Following 9 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-09-2020, 12:29 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,201
Likes: 34,555
Liked 10,739 Times in 3,659 Posts
|
|
Welcome to the forums from the Wiregrass! Folks like the balance of the 5" barrels, but it doesn't seem to factor heavily in added value. The Standard Catalog doesn't give a premium to 5" over 4 or 6". Is yours a round or square butt?
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
|
11-09-2020, 12:41 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: southern illinois
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 2,248
Liked 2,389 Times in 1,008 Posts
|
|
Welcome to the forum, nice revolver! seems to me that 5" was rather common on the early M&P
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-09-2020, 01:03 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,471
Likes: 88,955
Liked 24,775 Times in 8,480 Posts
|
|
Welcome to the Forum.
I'm really fond of 5" barreled revolvers.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|
11-09-2020, 01:10 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Flathead Valley, Montana
Posts: 2,814
Likes: 2,554
Liked 12,611 Times in 1,809 Posts
|
|
The 5" barrel is as people have noted, pretty common fixed sight M&Ps.
It is however uncommon on target sighted guns, and very desirable. You might be mixing up N and K frames however, as 5" N frame target guns are considered by many to be about the most desirable of all Smith & Wessons and very scarce (especially pre-war).
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-09-2020, 03:10 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The kidney of Dixie.
Posts: 10,509
Likes: 49
Liked 13,408 Times in 3,290 Posts
|
|
Not an expert but I think 5" barrel M&Ps have always been less common than 4 or 6. Bought this 10-7 new in 1979. Paid $133. It's had exactly 6 rounds fired through it.
Wait, this is pre 62 forum. Here's a 1942 VM 38 Special with a 1939 commercial 5" barrel swapped on. Total investment $65.
__________________
No life story has happy end.
Last edited by Art Doc; 11-09-2020 at 04:55 PM.
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-09-2020, 03:43 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,477
Likes: 5,111
Liked 18,981 Times in 6,862 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Art Doc
Not an expert but I think 5" barrel M&Ps have always been less common that 4 or 6.
|
I think that is generally true. But, it does not appear to be the case in the brief S prefix period (1946-1948). My research shows the 6" to be the least common among those M&Ps. The highest count is of 4" barrels (naturally), with 5" being the second most common.
It is an interesting period to study, for lots of reasons.
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
|
11-09-2020, 03:55 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 986
Liked 1,966 Times in 837 Posts
|
|
Welcome Tac.
That is a nice old M&P you have there. Hard to tell much from the one image , but it looks as though there is a fairly nicely developed patina to the finish.
Your gun , not mine but --- PLEASE do not rush into polishing that revolver! You would quickly eliminate the patina that was many decades in the making , and then you would have exposed steel.
I own a 5" M&P from about 1909 - and I wish the finish looked like yours.
Elsewhere , those target grips look way out of context with the gun , but I bet they shoot function real well for shooting. FITZ , by any chance? If you wish to go more original , period appropriate grip panels can be found , check E-bay. Lots of repros out there too , but the newness would stick out sharply.
|
11-09-2020, 03:56 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,995 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP@AK
I think that is generally true. But, it does not appear to be the case in the brief S prefix period (1946-1948). My research shows the 6" to be the least common among those M&Ps. The highest count is of 4" barrels (naturally), with 5" being the second most common.
|
With the OP‘s gun being from the 1920s, I am not sure that this applies.
I have no data to back this up, just some years of observation. The 4“, 5“, and 6“ were always available, but it is my impression that the dominance of the 4“ barrel is a phenomenon of the post-WW II years. The longer barrels were at least as common, if not more so, prior to the four years of nobody manufacturing .38 Special revolvers with anything but a 4“ barrel (disregarding the minuscule number of 2“ models).
Obviously, that could be a misperception; one would need to collect some data to confirm it.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-09-2020, 05:03 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,477
Likes: 5,111
Liked 18,981 Times in 6,862 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Absalom
With the OP‘s gun being from the 1920s, I am not sure that this applies.
|
Agreed. I was just responding to, 5" barrel M&Ps have always been less common than 4 or 6
Quote:
it is my impression that the dominance of the 4“ barrel is a phenomenon of the post-WW II years
|
This could be correct. As you say, we lack sufficient data to know for sure. But it is easy to get that impression. Available evidence shows a large number of 5" examples hanging around from the 1910 to 1930 period.
Less common are 5" target models, like this one from 1904.
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
|
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-09-2020, 05:06 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,477
Likes: 5,111
Liked 18,981 Times in 6,862 Posts
|
|
I have to say that I enjoy this sort of speculative discussion. I'm grateful to Art Doc for bringing it up. Unfortunately, all we can do is ponder available evidence, since we do not have exhaustive knowledge of the past.
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
|
11-09-2020, 06:12 PM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 27,010
Likes: 7,103
Liked 48,559 Times in 9,216 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Absalom
With the OP‘s gun being from the 1920s, I am not sure that this applies.
I have no data to back this up, just some years of observation. The 4“, 5“, and 6“ were always available, but it is my impression that the dominance of the 4“ barrel is a phenomenon of the post-WW II years. The longer barrels were at least as common, if not more so, prior to the four years of nobody manufacturing .38 Special revolvers with anything but a 4“ barrel (disregarding the minuscule number of 2“ models).
Obviously, that could be a misperception; one would need to collect some data to confirm it.
|
I agree. Before 1940, I would call the 5" M&P a very common barrel length, perhaps more common than 4". Also remember that it was a popular cop gun length, like the Louisville PD guns we see turn up here.
On another note-
I find it laughable that every 5" Pre 27, 27, and 27-2 on GB has the "RARE" 5" barrel.
I worked in a gun shop in the 70s and actively traded guns on the side then, and ever since. MOST of those models traded at the time were 5". The 3-1/2s were TURKEYS- loud, smoky, twisting, firebreathing little ______ that nobody wanted. You got beat to death when you traded one. The 6s, 6-1/2s, and 8-3/8s were too long to pack handily, so they were less common. Again, MOST of the 27 family floating around back then were 5s.
__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-09-2020, 06:41 PM
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,362
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,154 Times in 7,408 Posts
|
|
I asked an RCMP official why their Model 10's were fivers after police guns had trended toward four-inch. He didn't know, but guessed that someone in the Regina depot thought a good compromise, or that maybe recruits shot the longer ones better.
Overall. I think four-inch replaced longer barrels as cars replaced walking beat officers. Shorter barrels drag less on car seats for most cops.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-09-2020, 07:34 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Flathead Valley, Montana
Posts: 2,814
Likes: 2,554
Liked 12,611 Times in 1,809 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by handejector
I agree. Before 1940, I would call the 5" M&P a very common barrel length, perhaps more common than 4". Also remember that it was a popular cop gun length, like the Louisville PD guns we see turn up here.
On another note-
I find it laughable that every 5" Pre 27, 27, and 27-2 on GB has the "RARE" 5" barrel.
I worked in a gun shop in the 70s and actively traded guns on the side then, and ever since. MOST of those models traded at the time were 5". The 3-1/2s were TURKEYS- loud, smoky, twisting, firebreathing little ______ that nobody wanted. You got beat to death when you traded one. The 6s, 6-1/2s, and 8-3/8s were too long to pack handily, so they were less common. Again, MOST of the 27 family floating around back then were 5s.
|
And the reason they aren't floating around now is that no one is willing to give them up!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-09-2020, 09:40 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 451
Likes: 380
Liked 477 Times in 234 Posts
|
|
I have 3 5 inch revolvers. I have a1899 M&P a S&W 27-2 and a Colt Official police. I cant remember if I have any others. I think the 5 inch guns were often carried in plain clothes and on duty so one gun served 2 purposes. Remember back in the day Cops did not make much money. people dressed more dressed up the today. Coats Hats Ties and those baggy dress Pants were the norm.
|
11-09-2020, 10:58 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,477
Likes: 5,111
Liked 18,981 Times in 6,862 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rincar
Remember back in the day Cops did not make much money. people dressed more dressed up the today. Coats Hats Ties and those baggy dress Pants were the norm.
|
Interesting point. Recently, I watched the 1960 World Series on YouTube. The scans of the crowd showed most of the men wearing white shirts and ties - at a ballgame! I grew up in the 1950s and ties were standard wear for men, just about everywhere. I rarely saw my grandfather when he wasn't wearing a tie. Most of them were wool and I have a few of his that I still wear occasionally.
My grandfather passed away from a heart attack shortly before I left for 'Nam. When I returned two years later, they were just finishing up settling his estate and dad gave me a few of his ties. I have his picture on my dresser, and he is wearing his WWI American Expeditionary Forces uniform. No tie, but the uniform is woolen.
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
Last edited by JP@AK; 11-09-2020 at 11:02 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-10-2020, 12:30 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Carrollton GA
Posts: 769
Likes: 1,862
Liked 2,067 Times in 435 Posts
|
|
Not the most pristine example, and a much newer version than yours (1957), but I love the way my 5” K38 shoots, and to my taste it’s almost a perfect length, at least for me.
While this version of the K38 is not nearly as common as the 6” Masterpiece, it didn’t seem to increase the value very much, if at all when I bought it.
Having said all that, I’m not a great pistol shot, even with an extra inch, but it sure is fun trying!
__________________
Danny
SWCA #3370 - SWHF #672
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-10-2020, 01:08 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 7
Likes: 3
Liked 10 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiregrassguy
Standard Catalog doesn't give a premium to 5" over 4 or 6".
|
Ah well. It sparked some discussion, anyway.
Quote:
Is yours a round or square butt?
|
Square.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SixgunStrumpet
You might be mixing up N and K frames
|
This is entirely possible.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Art Doc
1942 VM 38 Special with a 1939 commercial 5" barrel swapped on. Total investment $65.
|
Wow, what a steal! I paid $220 for this one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waveski
Welcome Tac.
That is a nice old M&P you have there.
|
Thank you!
Quote:
PLEASE do not rush into polishing that revolver
|
Ok, point taken. I was thinking about it from a "rare antique" standpoint, (i.e. none to speak of) but hadn't considered the protective aspects.
Quote:
Elsewhere, those target grips look way out of context with the gun , but I bet they shoot function real well for shooting. FITZ , by any chance?
|
Took them off and on the inside they are marked "POINTER By W. Murad, San Carlos, CA, S&W 303"
I think I'll go for function over form in this instance - might look a little wonky, but I'm planning on taking it to the range as opposed to keeping it a shelf piece.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP@AK
I have to say that I enjoy this sort of speculative discussion. I'm grateful to Art Doc for bringing it up.
|
And I will take full credit for providing the platform from which he could expound on said discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by rincar
Coats Hats Ties and those baggy dress Pants were the norm.
|
I guess they would have considered me a hobo, then. I've never liked wearing a tie, and probably wouldn't have even back then
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-10-2020, 01:24 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 7
Likes: 3
Liked 10 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NavySCPO
I love the way my 5” K38 shoots, and to my taste it’s almost a perfect length, at least for me.
|
Good to know, seems like there are a few who prefer it
Quote:
I’m not a great pistol shot, even with an extra inch, but it sure is fun trying!
|
Very much agreed
|
11-10-2020, 01:30 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Flathead Valley, Montana
Posts: 2,814
Likes: 2,554
Liked 12,611 Times in 1,809 Posts
|
|
Looking at this new picture I have a bit of a question, probably just due to the pictures but I still feel like I should ask; is the barrel bulged?
It looks like something is a bit odd about the barrel right behind the end of the extractor.
|
11-10-2020, 01:34 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: desert
Posts: 78
Likes: 46
Liked 210 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
I have this one from somewhere in the teens, pre heat treat
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-10-2020, 01:34 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: desert
Posts: 78
Likes: 46
Liked 210 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
I’ll wear a tie when they bury me
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-10-2020, 02:17 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,471
Likes: 88,955
Liked 24,775 Times in 8,480 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bondjamesbond
I have this one from somewhere in the teens, pre heat treat
|
Nice looking old Smif. What happened to the screw heads? They are supposed to be round.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|
11-10-2020, 02:41 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,912
Likes: 3,028
Liked 14,244 Times in 5,432 Posts
|
|
As for barrel lengths, there are enough guns in the SWCA database to make some valid observations.
38 M&Ps from 1910 to 1930 have the following percentages listed in the database:
3% - 2"
35% - 4"
20% - 5"
41% - 6"
1% - 6.5"
"S" prefix K frames from 1946 to 1948 have the following percantages:
2" - 18%
4" - 25%
5" - 33%
6" - 24%
Nothing seems to be scarce in the S prefix guns, while the 2" (3%) and 6.5" (1%) guns in the early K frames are likely scarce and the 6.5 might even be bordering on rare. It is my understanding that only a few early 38 M&Ps, 3rd Change revolvers were made with that long barrel, probably leftovers from pre-1910 2nd Change inventory.
__________________
Gary
SWCA 2515
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-10-2020, 02:49 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Carrollton GA
Posts: 769
Likes: 1,862
Liked 2,067 Times in 435 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by handejector
I agree. Before 1940, I would call the 5" M&P a very common barrel length, perhaps more common than 4". Also remember that it was a popular cop gun length, like the Louisville PD guns we see turn up here.
On another note-
I find it laughable that every 5" Pre 27, 27, and 27-2 on GB has the "RARE" 5" barrel.
I worked in a gun shop in the 70s and actively traded guns on the side then, and ever since. MOST of those models traded at the time were 5". The 3-1/2s were TURKEYS- loud, smoky, twisting, firebreathing little ______ that nobody wanted. You got beat to death when you traded one. The 6s, 6-1/2s, and 8-3/8s were too long to pack handily, so they were less common. Again, MOST of the 27 family floating around back then were 5s.
|
Lee, I can almost see the sarcasm dripping 😉, but I’m still learning so I’ll bite. From my limited observation, the Model 27 (or pre) in the 3.5” barrel seems to be the most desirable and highly valued. Every time I see one offered the price seems to go up, and they don’t last long.
__________________
Danny
SWCA #3370 - SWHF #672
|
11-10-2020, 03:10 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,477
Likes: 5,111
Liked 18,981 Times in 6,862 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by glowe
"S" prefix K frames from 1946 to 1948 have the following percantages:
2" - 18%
4" - 25%
5" - 33%
6" - 24%
|
Thanks, Gary.
I'd be interested in knowing how big that sample size is. My database accounts for more than 6,000 examples, and I get a different set of data.
Quote:
Nothing seems to be scarce in the S prefix guns
|
Generally speaking, I would agree. The only caveat is if you break down the 2" guns into RB and SB. The RB examples seem to be far less common.
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
|
11-10-2020, 03:30 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,834
Likes: 10,103
Liked 27,995 Times in 8,452 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP@AK
Thanks, Gary.
I'd be interested in knowing how big that sample size is. My database accounts for more than 6,000 examples, and I get a different set of data.
....
|
Sometimes perceptions guide reality
Considering that the SCWA database was accumulated based on input from active members/collectors, there is a good chance the numbers are skewed by what was/is being considered more desirable/collectible.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-10-2020, 03:41 PM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 27,010
Likes: 7,103
Liked 48,559 Times in 9,216 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NavySCPO
Lee, I can almost see the sarcasm dripping 😉, but I’m still learning so I’ll bite. From my limited observation, the Model 27 (or pre) in the 3.5” barrel seems to be the most desirable and highly valued. Every time I see one offered the price seems to go up, and they don’t last long.
|
Now, yes.
Then, no.
In the 70s, I would decline a trade on a 3-1/2" gun.
A friend brought one into the shop in 75 and wanted to trade it for one of my guns. I declined. He came back with it 3 or 4 days later. I still had the gun he wanted. He'd been trying to sell his 3-1/2. He was a cop and knew how to move guns. He said "Get me out of it." I said "I'm gonna hurt you." He said "Hurt me" and we traded. That was in Atlanta, which is not a small gun market. They were actually that hard to move back then. Anybody wanting to pack a 357 wanted a 2-1/2" 19 or 66.
The publicity given to 3-1/2 Reg Mags packed by G-Men and Lawmen before WW II, to a large extent done on this very board, have added the mystique to the 3-1/2" guns. BUT, don't forget, they didn't have a choice of a smaller, lighter magnum. How many would have chosen a 3-1/2" N frame to wear with a suit if a 2-1/2" K frame had been available?
The Mod 19, a smaller, lighter 357 came about largely through the recommendations of Bill Jordan, just about the LARGEST man that ever packed a gun all day, every day.
__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett
Last edited by handejector; 11-10-2020 at 03:44 PM.
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-10-2020, 04:09 PM
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,362
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,154 Times in 7,408 Posts
|
|
I handled a five-inch M-27 at the Dallas FBI field office on a HS field trip. The tour guide agent said the action hadn't been slicked to his knowledge, but it was a delight , a real step up from my only revolver, a Webley MK VI.
He said few agents wore N-frame .357's unless working an especially dangerous case. But he liked the heavy bbl. M-10, M-10-6.
An agent speaking to my class on a career day left his M-49 in his car, but told me it was his average day gun.
|
11-10-2020, 04:46 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,912
Likes: 3,028
Liked 14,244 Times in 5,432 Posts
|
|
The whole exercise is an estimation at best. Whether there were hundreds or a few thousand in the sample size, both offer a small percentage of those models manufactured. It was merely to help the OP with his 5" question and to see if there were any scarce "S" numbered gun barrel lengths.
What is really sad is that people feel they have to keep their own private databases in the first place.
__________________
Gary
SWCA 2515
|
11-10-2020, 05:01 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: desert
Posts: 78
Likes: 46
Liked 210 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
Don’t know about the screw heads, never noticed they were flat, it has been refinished, but only paid a couple hundred for it.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-10-2020, 05:29 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,477
Likes: 5,111
Liked 18,981 Times in 6,862 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by glowe
What is really sad is that people feel they have to keep their own private databases in the first place.
|
Yeah. I get that. Keep in mind, mine is part of a huge, multi-year research project that is intended to become the basis for a Journal article. Roy agreed to help me with it. Once the research is complete and the article submitted, it is my intent to make the database available to all. Perhaps Lee will provide some space for it here on the Forum, or at least in the members only section.
Making it public now, while the research is ongoing, would simply complicate my work and I don't have enough "spare time" to devote to it is as it is.
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-10-2020, 05:45 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 854
Liked 4,379 Times in 1,078 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP@AK
Agreed. I was just responding to, 5" barrel M&Ps have always been less common than 4 or 6
This could be correct. As you say, we lack sufficient data to know for sure. But it is easy to get that impression. Available evidence shows a large number of 5" examples hanging around from the 1910 to 1930 period.
Less common are 5" target models, like this one from 1904.
|
Jack, I never thought I'd see another 1902 Target 5" in close to the condition of the one I have. Mine is worse, if you can fathom it.
Stu
|
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-10-2020, 05:59 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,477
Likes: 5,111
Liked 18,981 Times in 6,862 Posts
|
|
Stu
That is cool. I like the fact it has checkered walnut round butt stocks. The stocks on mine, obviously, are newer than the gun by several years. Roy says mine shipped with hard rubber.
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-10-2020, 07:31 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Occupied California
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 1,512
Liked 5,558 Times in 1,602 Posts
|
|
I have a 1946 .38 M&P in 5", a 1964 Model 14-2 with a 5" Special Order barrel and a 1972 Model 27-2 with a 5" barrel. They all have handling characteristics that to me are better than the same models with 6" barrels.
You can be sure that when they time comes for me to sell them, I will definitely be asking a premium for that barrel length on the Model 14-2 and Model 27-2. While I dislike the overuse of the word "scarce" the Model 27-2 has a Patridge front sight and judging from all the examples that I have seen on this site of other 5" Model 27's, it certainly isn't as common as the Baughman ramp front sight.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-10-2020, 09:20 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 986
Liked 1,966 Times in 837 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SixgunStrumpet
Looking at this new picture I have a bit of a question, probably just due to the pictures but I still feel like I should ask; is the barrel bulged?
It looks like something is a bit odd about the barrel right behind the end of the extractor.
|
Hmmmmm ... I zoomed in and now I see it too.
|
11-10-2020, 11:15 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 7
Likes: 3
Liked 10 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Hmm, good catch. It actually is, when i run my fingers over it i can feel it slightly.
|
11-10-2020, 11:40 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Flathead Valley, Montana
Posts: 2,814
Likes: 2,554
Liked 12,611 Times in 1,809 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tacticalshooter
Hmm, good catch. It actually is, when i run my fingers over it i can feel it slightly.
|
I personally don't have much experience with bulged barrels, but I did want to point it out in case its a safety risk. I expect much more knowledgeable people then myself can fill you in on that.
You might break out a flashlight and see if you can spot how big the bulge is inside the barrel in the meantime.
|
11-11-2020, 01:39 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Liked 66 Times in 30 Posts
|
|
Yeah
I have to go along with so many above ...5" is kinda just right
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-11-2020, 09:21 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: SW Virginia
Posts: 2,012
Likes: 9,135
Liked 5,177 Times in 1,309 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Star
I asked an RCMP official why their Model 10's were fivers after police guns had trended toward four-inch. He didn't know, but guessed that someone in the Regina depot thought a good compromise, or that maybe recruits shot the longer ones better.
Overall. I think four-inch replaced longer barrels as cars replaced walking beat officers. Shorter barrels drag less on car seats for most cops.
|
Agree with the car seat issue. In 1976 when I became a LEO we carried 5" nickel Model 10. Our patrol cars still had bench seats. When we got cars with bucket seats around 1978 not as much a problem as holster could ride down side of seat. In 1979 the department transition to all 4". Much more comfortable. I didn't notice any difference in his they shot as far as accuracy.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-11-2020, 02:26 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,471
Likes: 88,955
Liked 24,775 Times in 8,480 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SixgunStrumpet
I personally don't have much experience with bulged barrels, but I did want to point it out in case its a safety risk. I expect much more knowledgeable people then myself can fill you in on that.
You might break out a flashlight and see if you can spot how big the bulge is inside the barrel in the meantime.
|
I have owned a few .32 S&W HEs that had bulged barrels. I had no issues with them and accuracy was fine.
I have a 1899 5" in .32-20, a 1902 5" in .32-20, a 5" M&P in .38 special, a 1st model, a 2nd model and a 3rd model .44 Special, all three are 5". I have a M544 .44-40, which is a 5". I have a M27 converted to .44 Special. It is also a 5". I have a .38/44 Outdoorsman converted to a 5" .357. I even have a 5" Colt Official Police in .32-20.
Can we count my 1917 Commercial, which is a 5 1/2"? And my six single actions that measure 4 3/4"-4 5/8"?
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-11-2020, 04:10 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 7
Likes: 3
Liked 10 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
So, the question now becomes, who has a 5 inch barrel for sale seeing as mine is liable to blow up in my hand.
|
11-16-2020, 04:31 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 7
Likes: 3
Liked 10 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Crickets...
I called my local shop, they gave me an estimate of $200, but they're completely booked up until the spring. I would like to send it directly to S&W, but they said they couldn't give me an estimate until one of their gunsmiths had it in their hand.
Would anyone be willing to speculate what kind of turnaround time I might be looking at, and whether or not the cost will be in the ballpark of what the local shop quoted me?
|
11-16-2020, 06:28 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,201
Likes: 34,555
Liked 10,739 Times in 3,659 Posts
|
|
S&W won't work on it and it'll take them 6 months to tell you that. That's what happened when I contacted them about my K-32 Model 16. It was made in 1959 but they consider it obsolete and refused to work on it. Your guns hasn't been made since around 1930.
Handguns with bulges more severe than yours continue to be shot without safety concerns. I'd relax and shoot it but monitor the physical condition and only stop if I identify deterioration. In the interim, go to some local gunshows and look for a replacement barrel. If your local shop is going to install their barrel for $200, that might be a decent price as you will likely incur around $75 labor charges...depending what area of the country you are in.
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-16-2020, 11:38 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,912
Likes: 3,028
Liked 14,244 Times in 5,432 Posts
|
|
It will not blow up. I have owned and, unfortunately, put a barrel bulge in a gun I own myself. If there is no indication of a failure or crack, think of that stuck bullet as a pressure proof test. If it was going to fail, it would have already did it when that second bullet pushed out the first one!!! The S&W I once bought with a bulged barrel shot great and with standard loadings, never caused any problems.
Back when I shot Cowboy Action, I bought an Uberti Henry rifle. It was a ball to shoot and the "accident" I had was during competition shooting steel plates, as I was shooting steel plates. All shots were heard, but one must have been a weak one that sent the bullet half-way down the barrel and the second shot sent both bullet on target and everyone heard two plate hits. I quit shooting and immediately discovered a bulge, no failure and no cracks. Those familiar with the Henry barrel/magazine part probably know how expensive it would have been to replace, so I ultimately filed the flats down and refinished, the bulge disappeared. The gun still shoots on target and I have been using it without concern for over 20 years.
__________________
Gary
SWCA 2515
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-16-2020, 12:15 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Conroe Texas...
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 0
Liked 9,021 Times in 2,546 Posts
|
|
I can only relate an experience with a Glock 21 I took in a trade...The barrel was found to be not only bulged, but even shaved down afterwards (obviously an older fix from the discoloration present) to allow the slide to operate freely...I didn't want to sell it as-is, but I went and shot a bag of reloads through it myself, and found it not only functioned, but was very accurate...
After mulling it over, I decided to put it out as a rental gun on the range...It never had a failure in the next two years, but a customer liked it so much he wanted to buy it...After taking it apart and showing him everything I knew, he still wanted it...Being the type who pleases a customer, I sold it, and he never had a complaint about it...
In another case, a local constable (not a deputy but the elected official) brought in his very old M&P and said he had a squib while qualifying and still had a bullet in the barrel...He left it with me and I drove out not one, but four bullets...I cleaned it and shot it just to see if it would still function...He picked it up later, and to my knowledge never had a problem with it (except he was probably still dumb enough not to stop on the first squib... ...Ben
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-16-2020, 12:24 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,289
Likes: 33,744
Liked 10,944 Times in 3,944 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Truckman
... and to my knowledge never had a problem with it except he was probably still dumb enough not to stop on the first squib... ...Ben
|
Oh come on, don't say "dumb", he was persistent!.
__________________
They lack our altruism.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-16-2020, 12:59 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Conroe Texas...
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 0
Liked 9,021 Times in 2,546 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Flash
Oh come on, don't say "dumb", he was persistent!.
|
I think he was lucky it was only a six-shooter... ...Ben
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-16-2020, 10:41 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brooklyn,Ms. 39425
Posts: 4,793
Likes: 2,422
Liked 9,440 Times in 2,048 Posts
|
|
When I started in 1969 we had to furnish our own. Most went with a 4" barrel of some sort and only two officers had 3 1/2" barrels. Both were pre 27's and both officers were motorcycle patrolmen. One of my friends started a couple of years after I did. He had a 1905 4th change with a 5" barrel and a lanyard ring that was once owned by his uncle, who was the town marshall in a nearby small town. The uncle had been sent to prison for manslaughter for killing his brother in law for beating his sister. He did a few years at Parchman State Pen in Mississippi and was pardoned by the governor upon request of the mayor of the aforementioned small town which I see no reason to reveal. The mayor made him the town marshall as soon as he got back from Parchman to clean up the lawlessness that the town had become famous for. Clean it up he did. That old 5" 1905 had seven notches on it by the time he retired after almost 40 years of service. I'm not sure if he counted the brother in law. I saw my friend, the owner of the 1905, a few months ago and asked him if he still had the 1905. He did. I again offered to buy it from him and he again refused. I wasn't expecting him to sell it but I had to ask. This officer had to take an early retirement because of injuries received in a gun fight. He took four slugs from a .380 auto and the perp took two between the eyes with a model 686. I'm guessing he inherited a few of his uncle's genes. By then our department had issued the 686. The perp is no longer with us but thankfully my friend and former fellow officer still is. I love a lanyard ring on the old cop guns and have a few. This 1905 was equipped with one also.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-17-2020, 10:33 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,289
Likes: 33,744
Liked 10,944 Times in 3,944 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by handejector
... I worked in a gun shop in the 70s and actively traded guns on the side then, and ever since. MOST of those models traded at the time were 5". The 3-1/2s were TURKEYS- loud, smoky, twisting, firebreathing little ______ that nobody wanted. ...
|
Very interesting comment, which is very seldom addressed here. It begs the follow up question:
If a 3-1/2 inch barrel on a .357 Magnum makes for a most unpleasant shooting experience, how much better, if at all, is a 4" barrel for same?
My motivation in asking is that often seen on these pages are glowing comments on the wonderous properties of an M28, especially its ability to "soak up recoil" from the stoutest loads. Usually in the same breath the poster lets us know how the 4" version is his favorite. I feel like a voice in the wilderness when I comment "Well, for shooting the 6" M28 is a lot better."
I was in my mid-thirties when I bought my first revolver, a 4" M19. I read an article in a gun magazine that this was the best all-around handgun, especially if you only had one. I stuck to .38 Specials for target practice. On occasion I would shoot full power .357 Magnums and just assumed that the recoil, blast and flash were the price you paid. As the old saying goes, you don't get power for nothing.
As my horizons began to expand, the more I came to appreciate the 6" M28. The same rationale applies to the 6" M29.
Naturally, collectors here want all the barrel lengths, especially the rarest ones. I get that. But if you do much shooting, a 5" barrel is pretty much the minimum, and a 6" barrel is better.
__________________
They lack our altruism.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|