Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961

Notices

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-18-2020, 12:33 PM
Dave.357 Dave.357 is offline
Member
Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question  
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Ohio valley
Posts: 2,016
Likes: 3,581
Liked 4,187 Times in 1,410 Posts
Default Pre 14 question

I have seen several pre 14's
advertised as heavy barrel.
Do they really mean wide rib,
Or did some have tapered barrels.
I have only saw wide rib narrow rib
never a light contour barrel on
a 14 or pre 14 but I am still learning.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #2  
Old 11-18-2020, 01:23 PM
Art Doc's Avatar
Art Doc Art Doc is offline
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question  
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The kidney of Dixie.
Posts: 10,509
Likes: 49
Liked 13,410 Times in 3,290 Posts
Default

Not an expert but I think some had a wider rib. No idea what years or other details. One of the experts will be along with details.
__________________
No life story has happy end.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 11-18-2020, 01:33 PM
JP@AK's Avatar
JP@AK JP@AK is offline
US Veteran
Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,500
Likes: 5,121
Liked 19,049 Times in 6,879 Posts
Default Fixed a typo

Hi Dave

I started out my serious collecting activities nearly 50 years ago with the K-38 and only recently reached my original goal with them. Hence, I have a great interest in them and enjoy them to the hilt. So much for an irrelevant opening comment!

You've asked a reasonable and interesting question.

Yes. The early narrow rib K-38 Masterpiece had the tapered barrel. That was discontinued in the early 1950s (we believe the last of those barrels were used up in 1952-1953, to satisfy a special order - an interesting story in itself).

The replacement version had the wide rib, but also a different barrel profile. We tend not to call it a "heavy barrel" because it is not the same as the heavy barrel used, for example, on the M&P (Model 10). There actually were some Model 14s that used that barrel, known as the Hanen Special, or Dayton Special. What the factory called the wide rib, straight side barrel K-38, was K-38 Heavy Masterpiece, so we prefer that terminology over "heavy barrel." Technically, this nomenclature began to disappear after the tapered barrel version became a thing of the past. However, I own a Model 14 that shipped in 1959. It is in its original box and the box carries the Heavy Masterpiece label.

Here is a picture of a narrow rib K-38 Masterpiece from April, 1949. If you look closely, you will see that it has the tapered barrel.


On the other hand, look at the barrel profile on this K-38 Heavy Masterpiece, five screw variation, from February, 1951.


I hope this helps.
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318

Last edited by JP@AK; 11-18-2020 at 01:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-18-2020, 02:04 PM
Dave.357 Dave.357 is offline
Member
Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question  
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Ohio valley
Posts: 2,016
Likes: 3,581
Liked 4,187 Times in 1,410 Posts
Default

Thanks for the answers, So narrow
Rib is tapered barrel and wide rib
Is untapered and considered a heavy
barrel.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-18-2020, 02:22 PM
JP@AK's Avatar
JP@AK JP@AK is offline
US Veteran
Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,500
Likes: 5,121
Liked 19,049 Times in 6,879 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave.357 View Post
and considered a heavy
barrel.
If you must. I prefer to call it a "straight side barrel."

Quote:
untapered
Yes. Sort of. If you put a micrometer on it, you will see that it does have very slight taper toward the muzzle. But the sides are straight, with no dramatic taper just in front of the frame bridge. That's where we get the term "tapered barrel" on the earlier edition.

Again, the point of the straight barrel and wider rib was to bring the dry weight of the revolver up to the point that it matched that of the K-22 Masterpiece. Hence, the name "K-38 Heavy Masterpiece."
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #6  
Old 11-18-2020, 04:03 PM
Dave.357 Dave.357 is offline
Member
Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question  
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Ohio valley
Posts: 2,016
Likes: 3,581
Liked 4,187 Times in 1,410 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JP@AK View Post
If you must. I prefer to call it a "straight side barrel."


Yes. Sort of. If you put a micrometer on it, you will see that it does have very slight taper toward the muzzle. But the sides are straight, with no dramatic taper just in front of the frame bridge. That's where we get the term "tapered barrel" on the earlier edition.

Again, the point of the straight barrel and wider rib was to bring the dry weight of the revolver up to the point that it matched that of the K-22 Masterpiece. Hence, the name "K-38 Heavy Masterpiece."
Thanks ,good explanation
I never had both in front of
Me at the same time. The rib
Is easy to notice but the barrel
contour went unnoticed by me.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #7  
Old 11-18-2020, 04:13 PM
handejector's Avatar
handejector handejector is offline
Administrator
Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,987
Likes: 8,975
Liked 48,739 Times in 9,248 Posts
Default

A pic is worth a buncha words.




Pre 14 question-img_3298-jpg


Pre 14 question-img_3296-jpg


Pre 14 question-img_3300-jpg
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_3298.jpg (52.4 KB, 129 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_3296.jpg (72.0 KB, 131 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_3300.jpg (95.6 KB, 128 views)
__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-18-2020, 04:28 PM
Krogen's Avatar
Krogen Krogen is online now
Member
Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question  
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 8,874
Liked 5,283 Times in 1,860 Posts
Default

Excellent posts , guys! You clarified issues I’ve read about but never quite understood. Thanks!
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #9  
Old 11-18-2020, 04:50 PM
JP@AK's Avatar
JP@AK JP@AK is offline
US Veteran
Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,500
Likes: 5,121
Liked 19,049 Times in 6,879 Posts
Default

Here is something else.

In Lee's third picture, you can see a slight difference in the frame bridge, where the barrel threads into the frame. With the tapered barrel, it fades off to the sides more. On the Heavy Masterpiece with the straight barrel, it is flat and bevels down only forward.

When the early K-38 Masterpiece transitioned to the Heavy Masterpiece, that change showed up. But on the .38 Combat Masterpiece (which later became the Model 15), the tapered barrel was retained and the frame bridge maintained the correct side taper to match the barrel. This difference between the two models remained until 1982, when the Model 14 was discontinued.

This is why many of us believe the special order 5" revolvers that went to the Missouri State Highway Patrol in 1952-53, were Combat Masterpiece revolvers, not K-38 Masterpieces. Here's a picture of one in my collection. Notice the barrel and the frame bridge.
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318

Last edited by JP@AK; 11-18-2020 at 04:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
  #10  
Old 11-18-2020, 05:15 PM
handejector's Avatar
handejector handejector is offline
Administrator
Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,987
Likes: 8,975
Liked 48,739 Times in 9,248 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JP@AK View Post
In Lee's third picture, you can see a slight difference in the frame bridge, where the barrel threads into the frame. With the tapered barrel, it fades off to the sides more. On the Heavy Masterpiece with the straight barrel, it is flat and bevels down only forward.

When the early K-38 Masterpiece transitioned to the Heavy Masterpiece, that change showed up. But on the .38 Combat Masterpiece (which later became the Model 15), the tapered barrel was retained and the frame bridge maintained the correct side taper to match the barrel. This difference between the two models remained until 1982, when the Model 14 was discontinued.

EXCEPT on the 2" Combat Masterpiece, which has a wide rib (and "Heavy" barrel), and therefore does not have a beveled frame so the rib will match the frame. If you install a heavy (or "wide rib") barrel on a beveled frame, the rear corners of the rib stand away from the frame.
__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett

Last edited by handejector; 11-18-2020 at 05:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #11  
Old 11-18-2020, 05:22 PM
JP@AK's Avatar
JP@AK JP@AK is offline
US Veteran
Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,500
Likes: 5,121
Liked 19,049 Times in 6,879 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by handejector View Post
EXCEPT on the 2" Combat Masterpiece, which has a wide rib (and "Heavy" barrel), and therefore does not have a beveled frame so the rib will match the frame. If you install a heavy (or "wide rib") barrel on a beveled frame, the rear corners of the rib stand away from the frame.
Good point, Lee. But, of course, the Model 15 2" didn't show up until 1964, in the 15-2 range. As you say, it had the heavier barrel. It didn't come to my mind, since we were discussing much older revolvers. Thanks!
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #12  
Old 11-18-2020, 06:28 PM
Art Doc's Avatar
Art Doc Art Doc is offline
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question  
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The kidney of Dixie.
Posts: 10,509
Likes: 49
Liked 13,410 Times in 3,290 Posts
Default

New can of worms...or maybe kettle of fish. Same situation with the K22s or did they all have the same barrel contour? My K22 shipped 12/28/52 and appears to my non expert eye to have the narrow rib/tapered barrel configuration. All like that?
__________________
No life story has happy end.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-18-2020, 06:35 PM
BigBill BigBill is offline
Absent Comrade
Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question  
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 13,869
Likes: 2,079
Liked 13,354 Times in 5,549 Posts
Default

Is one barrel more looked for over the other? Thicker barrel vs thinner barrel?
__________________
Plant garlic in the fall
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-18-2020, 07:21 PM
JP@AK's Avatar
JP@AK JP@AK is offline
US Veteran
Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,500
Likes: 5,121
Liked 19,049 Times in 6,879 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Art Doc View Post
Same situation with the K22s?
Yes. The early examples had the tapered barrel and the narrow rib. Sometime in the early 1950s, they got the straight barrel and a slightly wider rib, but not so wide as the one on the K-38. I'm sure they were still matching the weight between the two calibers. I'm not a K-22 collector, although I have owned several and still have a few, including a narrow rib unit from 1947.

Quote:
did they all have the same barrel contour?
No. See above.

One of our K-22 experts will weigh in, I'm sure. I collect K-38s so I am much more knowledgeable about them. Sorry.
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-18-2020, 07:23 PM
JP@AK's Avatar
JP@AK JP@AK is offline
US Veteran
Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question Pre 14 question  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,500
Likes: 5,121
Liked 19,049 Times in 6,879 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBill View Post
Is one barrel more looked for over the other?
The narrow rib, tapered barrel version was made for only a few years in the postwar era. Hence, they are more scarce, and all of them have five frame screws. So, generally speaking they are a lot more desirable to collectors.
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question for attorney type people - NOT a legal question... Ματθιας The Lounge 23 06-13-2020 09:43 PM
Question About Smith Model 360PD Scandium/Titanium Question Rhetorician S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 2 03-28-2015 09:25 AM
Nickel Baby Chief: W/Photos: New Question: Question Answered WCCPHD S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 29 01-26-2015 11:31 PM
Taurus Brand Question: An Honest Question? Rhetorician Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics 108 12-21-2014 11:23 AM
Question about a Ladysmith 60LS .357 mag 2 1/8" - A Christmas Present for my Wife that came into my FFL. I have a recoil question and a couple of other questions to anyone that has one of these! .460V & XVR Magnum Man S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 35 09-24-2014 09:19 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:19 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)