|
|
01-02-2021, 05:12 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 32 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
1917 S serial number question
I recently acquired a 1917 S prefix post war. In pretty good condition and I “think” the original holster purchased with it. Don’t know a whole lot about these. We’re the cylinders of a post war different from the pre wars? Hardened differently?
Thanks for any info regarding this
|
The Following 20 Users Like Post:
|
cndrdk, daddio202, delta-419, Hondo44, Hunter Keith, JH1951, Kinman, Lee Barner, M E Morrison, mh51, Moo Moo, Muley Gil, OldRN, RevolverP320, Russell Cottle, snowman.45, StrawHat, Thinnes, VaTom, Wiregrassguy |
01-02-2021, 05:58 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,251
Likes: 11,929
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
|
|
Welcome to the forum.
That's a beauty! I'm sure you know not to store the gun, any gun, in a leather holster.
Yes a very early post war, early enough to be a Transitional Model, i.e., just like a pre war except it has the post war sliding bar improved hammer block. It even still has the pre war barrel knob on the extractor rod and sharp shoulder Magna stocks.
When introduced in 1917, that model was the first S&W hand ejector to have a heat treated cyl. However, beginning during WWII, improved steel was used that no longer required heat treatment by ~1945 when heat treating was eliminated except for mag cartridge chambered guns and apparently including the 38-44 models.
However, I would not be concerned about any difference in cyl strength whether heat treated or made of improved steel. As a practical matter, it's a non-issue.
Hope that helps,
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-02-2021, 06:02 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 32 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Thanks Jim!
Yes I wont store it in the holster(I think that’s where its been most of its life)
I was trying to narrow down what I could shoot through it, If I do I will just stick with standard velocity 230 ball.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-02-2021, 06:11 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,224
Likes: 34,866
Liked 10,790 Times in 3,676 Posts
|
|
Welcome to the forums from the Wiregrass! You should be able to shoot any standard pressure or +P commercial ammo in it. It was designed to shoot .45 ACP military ball which was a little more powerful than current .45 ACP +P.
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-02-2021, 06:17 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 32 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Thanks for the info, I got a few packs of Wilson’s moon clips to go with it. Can’t wait to try it out
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-02-2021, 06:21 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,911
Likes: 991
Liked 19,044 Times in 9,316 Posts
|
|
It should shoot jacketed .45 Auto well, especially 230 gr (for which it was designed). I recall reading that lead bullets don't work as well with the shallow barrel rifling.
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-02-2021, 06:28 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,224
Likes: 34,866
Liked 10,790 Times in 3,676 Posts
|
|
Mine don't shoot my cast lead bullets as well as jacketed bullets. They tend to tumble and keyhole.
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-02-2021, 06:38 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,251
Likes: 11,929
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
|
|
I would not worry about +P .45 ACP. But I would not use a steady diet of it even in a gun rated for it! It's not going to blow up the gun, it's just unneeded excess wear that does cumulative damage. Not unlike wear to your car if you always drive it at full throttle.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-02-2021, 07:03 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,546
Likes: 89,894
Liked 24,941 Times in 8,537 Posts
|
|
Welcome to the Forum.
Holsters of that style were being sold on the commercial market from the '40s at least in to the '70s. It is not a military style.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-02-2021, 07:08 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The kidney of Dixie.
Posts: 10,509
Likes: 49
Liked 13,410 Times in 3,290 Posts
|
|
New one on me. Never knew there was a post WW II 1917 with an S serial prefix. I thought the 1937 Brazilian Model was the last incarnation of the 1917.
__________________
No life story has happy end.
|
01-02-2021, 07:12 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,224
Likes: 34,866
Liked 10,790 Times in 3,676 Posts
|
|
Instead of 70 mph speed limits, let's all drive at 55.
Ooops. Been there, done that.
Frank, the .45 HE Model of 1950, pre-model 22.
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
Last edited by Wiregrassguy; 01-02-2021 at 07:14 PM.
|
01-02-2021, 07:41 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,320
Likes: 34,027
Liked 10,993 Times in 3,961 Posts
|
|
It looks great, I can't believe it has been stored very long in the holster.
The standard .45 ACP is a pretty potent round in its own right. Plus you're not restricted to FMJ. Bullet profile doesn't cause feeding problems in a revolver so any soft point, hollow point, etc., will work fine.
My point is, no need to worry about +P unless you want to start a yet another "best handgun for bear" thread.
__________________
You're shy a few manners.
|
01-02-2021, 07:46 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ashtabula County, Ohio
Posts: 6,080
Likes: 9,349
Liked 13,771 Times in 4,041 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Art Doc
New one on me. Never knew there was a post WW II 1917 with an S serial prefix. I thought the 1937 Brazilian Model was the last incarnation of the 1917.
|
Nope, the 1950 Army was built on the new, short action N frame starting in 1950 along with the 1950 Target Model in 45 ACP The fixed sighted 1950 Army became the Model 22(?). The adjustable sighted 1950 became the Model 26 and the heavy barreled 1955 became the Model 25-2. Pictured is a 1950 Army and a Model 25-2.
Kevin
__________________
Unshared knowledge is wasted.
|
The Following 8 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-02-2021, 10:53 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth
Posts: 4,243
Likes: 8,088
Liked 12,202 Times in 2,777 Posts
|
|
Very nice 1917, do the stocks number to it? Looks like you have one of the 990 commercials with the new postwar hammer block designated with the S sn made up after the war in the S209792-S210782 range. Yes, the 1950 Army/Targets are much the same gun but I think of these 990 as the last of the 1917s. Here's one of the last few manufactured; S210775. I've been thinking about having the poor nickel job removed and returning it to its former glory. . . . but so far thinking is all that has been done.
Jeff
SWCA 1457
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-02-2021, 11:16 PM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 27,023
Likes: 8,998
Liked 48,770 Times in 9,262 Posts
|
|
There is one feature on these post-war 1917s BESIDES the new hammer block that is not seen on any other variant of the 1917..............
__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-03-2021, 12:18 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 32 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Yes the stocks have the same serial number stamped on the inside. After I researched the serial number and as you said it was one of the 990ish made in this configuration in the late 40’s
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-03-2021, 12:20 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: central Texas
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 2,782
Liked 1,288 Times in 637 Posts
|
|
The 1917 Army (post war transitional) was made from 1946-49 using many frames and parts made prior to WWII that S&W purchased back from the govt. As 22hipower said, they fall into a very specific serial number range.
I have S210353, that shipped 11/47. Thanks to SCSW 4th edition for much of this info.
Welcome to the forum....nice entrance!!
__________________
Mike H
Last edited by mh51; 01-03-2021 at 12:23 AM.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-03-2021, 12:53 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 32 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Thanks for all the info guys!
The serial number on this one is S 210561, luckily the stocks also match. Glad to have bought it
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-03-2021, 06:24 AM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,911
Likes: 991
Liked 19,044 Times in 9,316 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by handejector
There is one feature on these post-war 1917s BESIDES the new hammer block that is not seen on any other variant of the 1917..............
|
Some came without a butt swivel?
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-03-2021, 11:08 AM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The kidney of Dixie.
Posts: 10,509
Likes: 49
Liked 13,410 Times in 3,290 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiregrassguy
Instead of 70 mph speed limits, let's all drive at 55.
Ooops. Been there, done that.
Frank, the .45 HE Model of 1950, pre-model 22.
|
Never seen the 1950 called a 1917. Totally different guns as far as I know.
__________________
No life story has happy end.
|
01-03-2021, 11:10 AM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The kidney of Dixie.
Posts: 10,509
Likes: 49
Liked 13,410 Times in 3,290 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JChandler
Thanks for all the info guys!
The serial number on this one is S 210561, luckily the stocks also match. Glad to have bought it
|
Wouldn't that serial be from around 1960? Doesn't sound right at all on a 1917. What am I not understanding?
__________________
No life story has happy end.
|
01-03-2021, 11:23 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,224
Likes: 34,866
Liked 10,790 Times in 3,676 Posts
|
|
Found this info.
Quote:
Believed that fewer than 1000 commercial versions were made in a serial number range of S209792-S210782 with an S serial prefix to indicate the new postwar hammer block, and continued within the 1917 serial number range. One knowledgeable collector reports that these guns are sometimes encountered without the “S” serial number prefix. These commercial versions had the S&W trademark on the sideplate and may or may not have a lanyard ring.
(SCSW, 4th Ed., Page 194).
|
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-03-2021, 12:04 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Eads, Tn, Unites State
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 2,866
Liked 881 Times in 281 Posts
|
|
Was the ejector rod knob shape the other difference you were referring to Lee?
Roger
__________________
Eph 2:8-9
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-03-2021, 12:21 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,546
Likes: 89,894
Liked 24,941 Times in 8,537 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Art Doc
Wouldn't that serial be from around 1960? Doesn't sound right at all on a 1917. What am I not understanding?
|
Remember Doc, the 1917s had their own serial number range. The addition of the new safety caused the "S" prefix to be added, just like the M&P revolvers had their own range and the "S" was added towards the end of WW II.
Yes, the civilian N frames with an "S" prefix would have been built in the 1960 time frame.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-03-2021, 01:36 PM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 27,023
Likes: 8,998
Liked 48,770 Times in 9,262 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis
Was the ejector rod knob shape the other difference you were referring to Lee?
Roger
|
We have a winner. The post-war S numbered 1917s are the only 1917 variant that have the barrel shaped ejector knob. All others have the mushroom.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mh51
The 1917 Army (post war transitional) was made from 1946-49 using many frames and parts made prior to WWII that S&W purchased back from the govt.
|
No, the frames are not WW I buy backs because they are Flat Tops. WW I frames are Round Tops.
No, the barrels are not WW I buy backs because they are not cut for the mushroom ejector rod knob.
I do not think even the cylinders are WW I buy backs. I've handled dozens of these guns and I have never seen an S gun cylinder with a Gov't inspection stamp.
I believe all the WW I parts were used up in the post-war Brazilian guns.
I think these 991 S guns were built from scratch to feed a starving market that had not been fed for nearly 6 years.
__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett
|
The Following 11 Users Like Post:
|
22hipower, Hondo44, Jack Flash, Kansasgunner, Kinman, kwill1911, Memphis, Muley Gil, Russell Cottle, Toyman, Wiregrassguy |
01-04-2021, 06:22 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 32 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Thanks for all the great info, I will shoot and enjoy this 1917,
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-05-2021, 01:23 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: central Texas
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 2,782
Liked 1,288 Times in 637 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by handejector
We have a winner. The post-war S numbered 1917s are the only 1917 variant that have the barrel shaped ejector knob. All others have the mushroom.
No, the frames are not WW I buy backs because they are Flat Tops. WW I frames are Round Tops.
No, the barrels are not WW I buy backs because they are not cut for the mushroom ejector rod knob.
I do not think even the cylinders are WW I buy backs. I've handled dozens of these guns and I have never seen an S gun cylinder with a Gov't inspection stamp.
I believe all the WW I parts were used up in the post-war Brazilian guns.
I think these 991 S guns were built from scratch to feed a starving market that had not been fed for nearly 6 years.
|
Lee, I didn't mean that these were built from surplus WWI parts.
From what I've learned, these were built from existing parts purchased under govt. contract just prior to WWII, but had not been assembled when the war ended. S&W bought the parts back to use in immediate commercial production after WWII.
__________________
Mike H
Last edited by mh51; 01-05-2021 at 01:43 AM.
|
01-05-2021, 02:10 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,251
Likes: 11,929
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mh51
Lee, I didn't mean that these were built from surplus WWI parts.
From what I've learned, these were built from existing parts purchased under govt. contract just prior to WWII, but had not been assembled when the war ended. S&W bought the parts back to use in immediate commercial production after WWII.
|
Nope, they would have the same problem; cut for the mushroom knob, not for the barrel knob.
The 1917s used the mushroom knob all thru the 1930s, unlike all the other models that switched to the barrel knob after the change order of:
• 1/22/27 change order to replace 'mushroom' extractor knob, with the ‘barrel’ style (with single milling cut under barrel), on all HE non-shrouded barrel models. (Except the 1917s* and all models with an extractor rod shroud which always had the barrel style knob from the shroud introduction in 1908 on the .44 HE 1st model, TL.)
*Probably as you noted, and just speculating, there were so many surplus 45 barrels in inventory already cut for the mushroom knob, and also used on PW Brazilian '46 contract guns.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Last edited by Hondo44; 01-05-2021 at 02:22 AM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|