|
|
01-10-2021, 07:51 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 9
Likes: 9
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
K-22 Pre Model 18 No Serial # on Cylinder
I just recently acquired a K-22 pre model 18 and have a few questions. First off this gun is my first five screw model and I was happy to get a deal on it knowing it was from the fifties. Serial # K 212934 with a 4" Barrel. The guy said that he checked to see if grips matched and I also pointed out that there was no serial # on the back of cylinder, just an S stamped on it. He said the the cylinders don't have serial # and I took his word for it not knowing better. After doing research I feel like it is a replacement cylinder, or maybe the four inch barrel models, like mine, are different than the rest? Also come to find out the grips don't match!! They are from the same year which is odd to me. Serial # 232***. I cleaned her up and she shoots great, it will stay in the family but I'm curious about how this may affect the value. Any advice will be greatly appreciated. Also an I right calling it a Pre Model 18 because of the shorter barrel, where as the Model 17 had a 6"?
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-10-2021, 08:23 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,224
Likes: 34,838
Liked 10,790 Times in 3,676 Posts
|
|
Welcome to the forums from the Wiregrass! IIRC, the S stamp indicates service work during manufacturing. IOW, at some point when the gun was being made, it was rejected for an issue and sent to the service department for work. Apparently, they replaced the original cylinder, stamped the S on it but didn't stamp the serial number. Someone with more experience will need to confirm this. Also, I don't think that information would be included in an historian's letter of authenticity.
And, yes, you are correct it's a pre-Model 18.
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
Last edited by Wiregrassguy; 01-10-2021 at 08:25 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-10-2021, 08:46 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 4,677
Likes: 1,449
Liked 4,516 Times in 1,934 Posts
|
|
No effect on value unless it was NIB collector quality. Likely a factory replacement cylinder but should be no worries with this pre 18.
__________________
S&W factory revolver armorer
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-10-2021, 08:53 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 9
Likes: 9
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Thank you for the welcome and that information! I am new to the forum and I have been collecting S&W revolvers for a few years now. It all started with a Mod. 31-1 32 Long I got at a flea market. All my S&W are pre 81 with pinned barrels. This K-22 has me in love with five screw models. Regardless of the services cylinder and possible mismatch grips, this Smith is a great piece of history. If only I could know its story.
|
01-11-2021, 10:01 AM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 9,405
Likes: 1,322
Liked 30,468 Times in 4,372 Posts
|
|
As stated in Post #2, the cylinder on your .22 Combat Masterpiece was replaced during manufacture. I have two 44 Magnums that were reworked in the same way. You should look at the underside of the extractor to see if the serial number is stamped on it as it was probably replaced also. Finally, there may be a lightly stamped R on the left hand side of the grip frame. Revolvers were often reworked by S&W during manufacture.
Bill
|
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-11-2021, 08:19 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 9
Likes: 9
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Thank you for the info! I inspected the extractor and found no markings. Now I did find markings on the frame. On the left there is a "W" stamped, I presume meaning " Worked"? The same mark appears above the assembly #.
On the right I found a few markings. An "H" followed by a "1". Also a faint "D".
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-12-2021, 05:39 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 9
Likes: 9
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Does anyone have any insight as to what these marks suggest? Any answers are much appreciated.
|
01-12-2021, 06:47 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,224
Likes: 34,838
Liked 10,790 Times in 3,676 Posts
|
|
They are either Fitters or inspectors stamps.
Guy
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-12-2021, 07:24 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 9
Likes: 9
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Thanks Guy!
|
01-12-2021, 08:31 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan Western UP
Posts: 12,969
Likes: 3,048
Liked 14,360 Times in 5,474 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc44
As stated in Post #2, the cylinder on your .22 Combat Masterpiece was replaced during manufacture . . .
|
As Bill mentioned, you have a K-22 Combat Masterpiece, not a Pre-Model anything. Your gun is from 1954 and was named K-22 Combat Masterpiece target revolver. The stocks date to 1955.
__________________
Gary
SWCA 2515
Last edited by glowe; 01-12-2021 at 08:33 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-12-2021, 11:26 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 9
Likes: 9
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Correct. Thank you Gary.
|
01-13-2021, 11:44 PM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 27,012
Likes: 8,991
Liked 48,761 Times in 9,259 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc44
As stated in Post #2, the cylinder on your .22 Combat Masterpiece was replaced during manufacture. I have two 44 Magnums that were reworked in the same way. You should look at the underside of the extractor to see if the serial number is stamped on it as it was probably replaced also. Finally, there may be a lightly stamped R on the left hand side of the grip frame. Revolvers were often reworked by S&W during manufacture.
Bill
|
Bill,
I have to disagree. I won't argue about your 44s , but regarding other N frames and K frames, I've seen many guns with the S (for Service Dept) or R, but I've never seen a gun shipped in the soft fitting era without a numbered barrel or cylinder. I do not believe that cylinder is original to the gun.
Quote:
Originally Posted by glowe
As Bill mentioned, you have a K-22 Combat Masterpiece, not a Pre-Model anything. Your gun is from 1954 and was named K-22 Combat Masterpiece target revolver. The stocks date to 1955.
|
Uh, if we are being technically correct, the Op's gun is a .22 Combat Masterpiece, NOT a K-22 Combat Masterpiece. Go check your AMCs again. The Factory catalogs never used the "K" in the names for the Combat Masterpiece.
__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|