|
|
01-16-2021, 06:57 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: S W GA
Posts: 876
Likes: 4,093
Liked 1,719 Times in 461 Posts
|
|
Registered Magnum Cylinder??
Approx 2 months ago I posted that I bought..
what appears to be a registered magnum cylinder off of a gunbroker ad..
So yesterday with a lot of tracking and follow
up...Our post office finally delivered my MO
Payment to the seller and the seller finally sent
the cylinder to me.
The cylinder is in pretty good shape. It is a recessed 38 caliber cylinder. It does have the
factory serial number marked # 46310..
So I'd like the help of our learned members
to help me ascertain if this is a reg magnum
cylinder ..and any information on its history..
year made.. and any provenance info about it.
My good buddy daddio202 helped me out
on aquiring it. One comedic thought would be to have it fitted to my recently aguired pre war
outdoorsman I just did a post about to have a reg magnum 357 capable step child..being the closest I'll come to having a real registered magnum😁..
Thanks very much on any help you can provide
about this cylinder.. The Cylinder Pics😊😊..
Last edited by fleabus101; 01-16-2021 at 07:06 AM.
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2021, 07:12 AM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Beach Side West Florida
Posts: 12,324
Likes: 26,836
Liked 19,404 Times in 4,090 Posts
|
|
" The cylinder is in pretty good shape. It is a recessed 38 caliber cylinder. It does have the
factory serial number marked # 46310.."
Have you tried to place a .357 round in the cylinder? You state that it is a .38 cal. cylinder, the Registered Magnum is .357 not .38 cal.
Hope this helps.
__________________
SWCA #2306
DAV in honor of POP
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2021, 07:23 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,224
Likes: 34,841
Liked 10,790 Times in 3,676 Posts
|
|
Well, I'm no expert but I have a couple of observations. The SN is at the low end of the Reg. Mag. range which began with 45756. That would seem to indicate it shipped in 1935 but I don't know the rate at which these expensive guns were made and the SN range was shared with the .44 caliber guns. So, 1935 or 36 is my SWAG.
Is the cylinder 1.62" in length and does it chamber a .357 Mag cartridge? If so, it almost certainly has to be a Reg. Mag. cylinder since it has the recessed chambers.
Anyway, those are my thoughts on it. I'm interested to see where you go with this.
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2021, 08:12 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Central Montana
Posts: 13,715
Likes: 12,858
Liked 39,476 Times in 10,046 Posts
|
|
Looking at the cylinder you can see recesses. I am nor registered magnum or pre war anything expert, but I don't know of anything else that early with recesses except 22s. If you reamed a 38special cylinder to 357 you would not recess it as its rim needs to stay at original location. Were any of the HD type cylinders ever recessed??
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-16-2021, 08:24 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 1,017
Liked 10,655 Times in 3,388 Posts
|
|
Registered Magnum Cylinder??
Serial number 46310 is listed in the S&WCA Database as a Registered Magnum Reg# 176.....
__________________
Terry Lester
Last edited by lestert357; 01-16-2021 at 08:29 AM.
|
The Following 8 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2021, 09:41 AM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The kidney of Dixie.
Posts: 10,509
Likes: 49
Liked 13,410 Times in 3,290 Posts
|
|
Wonder what happened to the gun?
__________________
No life story has happy end.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2021, 10:28 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,320
Likes: 34,027
Liked 10,993 Times in 3,961 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fleabus101
...
So I'd like the help of our learned members
to help me ascertain if this is a reg magnum
cylinder ... One comedic thought would be to have it fitted to my recently aguired pre war
outdoorsman I just did a post about to have a reg magnum 357 capable step child..being the closest I'll come to having a real registered magnum😁 ...
|
About all I've "learned" around here is to keep my mouth shut. ... But ...
You didn't buy it to just let it sit, so I don't think that bold text idea is comedic at all. I would just think that since this cylinder is recessed, it is slightly longer than the OD's cylinder and thus some alteration of the forcing cone / barrel would be required(?) If so, there goes the originality of the OD.
__________________
You're shy a few manners.
|
01-16-2021, 10:55 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,320
Likes: 34,027
Liked 10,993 Times in 3,961 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Art Doc
Wonder what happened to the gun?
|
Wouldn't it be great to know that? Maybe someone had it converted to .44 Mag during the Dirty Harry craze?
If the cylinder is any indication of the gun's overall condition, it must have been a fine one. I don't even see much of a ring!
__________________
You're shy a few manners.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-16-2021, 12:13 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Iowa
Posts: 450
Likes: 9,950
Liked 1,718 Times in 247 Posts
|
|
I’ve got an RM barrel. Maybe we can assemble an RM piece by piece. A Registered Frankengun! Dave
__________________
Illegitimi non carborundum
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2021, 12:21 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26,905
Likes: 989
Liked 19,026 Times in 9,309 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Art Doc
Wonder what happened to the gun?
|
Perhaps Ed Cornett or Kevin Williams (who entered the data into the system) can recall.
__________________
Alan
SWCA LM 2023, SWHF 220
|
01-16-2021, 12:26 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Beach Side West Florida
Posts: 12,324
Likes: 26,836
Liked 19,404 Times in 4,090 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lestert357
Serial number 46310 is listed in the S&WCA Database as a Registered Magnum Reg# 176.....
|
Just as a point of reference RM# 379 Serial # 46387 was shipped August 27th 1936.
As Mr. Jinks would say
" I hope this helps. "
__________________
SWCA #2306
DAV in honor of POP
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2021, 12:44 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,541
Likes: 89,854
Liked 24,926 Times in 8,533 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Flash
About all I've "learned" around here is to keep my mouth shut. ... But ...
You didn't buy it to just let it sit, so I don't think that bold text idea is comedic at all. I would just think that since this cylinder is recessed, it is slightly longer than the OD's cylinder and thus some alteration of the forcing cone / barrel would be required(?) If so, there goes the originality of the OD.
|
The cylinder would be longer on the back end, not the front. The cylinder lug would have to be altered.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2021, 12:53 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 9,408
Likes: 1,323
Liked 30,527 Times in 4,375 Posts
|
|
The cylinder on RM 46310, damaged by the firing pin, was replaced by S&W in November 1965. Someone later sold or gave the replaced cylinder away as old parts were usually returned with the gun.
Bill
|
The Following 17 Users Like Post:
|
29-1, ddixie884, ditrina, fleabus101, Gardner11, Hair Trigger, handejector, Jack Flash, kscharlie, Memphis, mod29, Onomea, opoefc, rubiranch, SAFireman, Thinnes, Vidd |
01-16-2021, 01:03 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Pikeville, Tennessee
Posts: 6,068
Likes: 923
Liked 9,963 Times in 3,661 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ditrina
Just as a point of reference RM# 379 Serial # 46387 was shipped August 27th 1936.
As Mr. Jinks would say
" I hope this helps. "
|
And just as yet another point of reference to help you understand S&W's system (s)----or lack thereof, RM #643 Serial# 47121 was shipped December 19, 1935-----------to be delivered to Frantziuz Sporting Goods located in Chicago, Illinois.
Note: Extra prize points will be awarded to any and all who can correctly pronounce Frantziuz----unless your name is Frantziuz---in which case you're automatically disqualified.
Ralph Tremaine
Last edited by rct269; 01-16-2021 at 01:04 PM.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2021, 02:22 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,541
Likes: 89,854
Liked 24,926 Times in 8,533 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Collects
It appears as though Bubba took a dremmel to your cylinder.
|
I think we are seeing the damage done by the firing pin. I wonder why it only occurred in three places.
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
Last edited by Muley Gil; 01-16-2021 at 02:24 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-16-2021, 03:11 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: S W GA
Posts: 876
Likes: 4,093
Liked 1,719 Times in 461 Posts
|
|
Hello Guys
Thanks for all the comments and info provided
so far!!
I bought the cylinder as more of a neat curiousity more than anything..Seeing the
early ser# ed recessed cylinder.
I dont have any plans concerning doing anything to my new to me outdoorsman.
I did do the 357 shell insertion. Its def an early
357 cylinder by the insertion and extraction test. It looks as if the firing pin drag lines could
be carefully repaired. Im sure S&W did the sensable repairs replacing the cylinder and other repairs needed at that time.
As I mentioned..My closest I'll have with a Registered Magnum😁😁 A few more Pics😁
Last edited by fleabus101; 01-16-2021 at 03:12 PM.
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2021, 03:23 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 633
Likes: 509
Liked 581 Times in 321 Posts
|
|
I would think that the current owner of that particular registered magnum would be benefited to own the original cylinder as an aside. Doesn't that make the original revolver a bit more appreciated?
Get the word out !
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-16-2021, 05:01 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Massachusetts USA
Posts: 9,596
Likes: 3,711
Liked 8,951 Times in 3,558 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Note: Extra prize points will be awarded to any and all who can correctly pronounce Frantziuz----unless your name is Frantziuz---in which case you're automatically disqualified.
|
It is pronounced "Frantziuz" OK Ralph, what do I win???
__________________
James Redfield
LM #497
|
The Following 7 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2021, 05:14 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 7,783
Likes: 2,487
Liked 8,320 Times in 2,920 Posts
|
|
38-44 cylinders were not recessed so are shorter "at the rear" than 357 mag cylinders (until SW stopped recessing 357 mag cylinders in the 1980's)
The .357 cylinder is longer at the rear to compensate for the recessed chambers, but both 38-44 and recessed 357 mag cylinders position the cartridge case head in the exact same position so that the firing pin strikes the primer perfect.
Besides minor fitting the pre war 38-44 and 357 mag cylinders should fit eachother
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-16-2021, 07:30 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Central Montana
Posts: 13,715
Likes: 12,858
Liked 39,476 Times in 10,046 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Flash
About all I've "learned" around here is to keep my mouth shut. ... But ...
You didn't buy it to just let it sit, so I don't think that bold text idea is comedic at all. I would just think that since this cylinder is recessed, it is slightly longer than the OD's cylinder and thus some alteration of the forcing cone / barrel would be required(?) If so, there goes the originality of the OD.
|
The extra length for the recesses is in the rear. Just adjust the frame lug and it may go. Then again you never know just what might have to get a minor adjustment when switching cylinders
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
02-09-2021, 09:45 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Avery,Tx
Posts: 2,561
Likes: 3,812
Liked 1,863 Times in 938 Posts
|
|
I am amazed that the info from the SWCA was so complete. Good deal...........
__________________
dd884
JMHO-YMMV
|
02-10-2021, 12:33 AM
|
US Veteran SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: upstate SC / Mtns SW Va
Posts: 4,789
Likes: 3,064
Liked 9,875 Times in 1,986 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSR III
It is pronounced "Frantziuz" OK Ralph, what do I win???
|
Now that's funny, I don't care who you are.
__________________
Charlie
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
02-10-2021, 01:19 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 316
Likes: 4
Liked 1,257 Times in 131 Posts
|
|
RM sn.46459 reg.260 was shipped July 1935. Also an 8 3/4" barrel
Richard
|
02-10-2021, 02:18 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 7,783
Likes: 2,487
Liked 8,320 Times in 2,920 Posts
|
|
The N frame .357 Magnum and 38/44 cylinders will interchange as they are the same length at the front, the difference at the rear is not an issue since the case head is positioned in the exact same place ( the 38/44 cylinder is the same length as the later 27-3 and up non recessed .357 cylinders ).
On a side note I acquired a 4" RM barrel years ago and fit it to an early post war 38-44 OD.
LOVE that gun, the fact that it has a non recessed cylinder and so only fires .38 special makes no difference to me.
Last edited by Engine49guy; 02-10-2021 at 02:24 AM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
02-10-2021, 02:35 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Avery,Tx
Posts: 2,561
Likes: 3,812
Liked 1,863 Times in 938 Posts
|
|
The part that amazed me was that they could tell the OP the cylinder had been replaced and the original had firing pin damage................
__________________
dd884
JMHO-YMMV
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
02-10-2021, 02:54 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The SW Va Blue Ridge
Posts: 17,541
Likes: 89,854
Liked 24,926 Times in 8,533 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Engine49guy
The N frame .357 Magnum and 38/44 cylinders will interchange as they are the same length at the front, the difference at the rear is not an issue since the case head is positioned in the exact same place ( the 38/44 cylinder is the same length as the later 27-3 and up non recessed .357 cylinders ).
On a side note I acquired a 4" RM barrel years ago and fit it to an early post war 38-44 OD.
LOVE that gun, the fact that it has a non recessed cylinder and so only fires .38 special makes no difference to me.
|
Don't you think the .357 cylinder is going to hit the cylinder lug that is pressed into frame because the .357 cylinder is longer than a .38 cylinder, due to having the recesses for the case heads?
__________________
John 3:16
WAR EAGLE!
|
02-10-2021, 03:04 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 7,783
Likes: 2,487
Liked 8,320 Times in 2,920 Posts
|
|
It might....there is a little bit of play there but it just might...
If I was determined to fit the longer cylinder I'd first size up how hard it would be to remove just enough off the front of the lug to allow it to clear the longer cylinder, if it was too much I'd abort the swap.
Last edited by Engine49guy; 02-10-2021 at 03:05 AM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
02-10-2021, 06:49 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ashtabula County, Ohio
Posts: 6,074
Likes: 9,342
Liked 13,759 Times in 4,037 Posts
|
|
(Not sure if it would work but don’t see why not.)
In an early Gun Digest, there was an article a out fitting a 45 long Colt cylinder to a Model 117 for a dual cartridge revelover. One of the things they did was turn about .005” step off the rear face of the cylinder to clear the lug. The lug remained intact and functioned with both cylinders. Worth a thought anyway.
Kevin
__________________
Unshared knowledge is wasted.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
02-10-2021, 08:47 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Massachusetts USA
Posts: 9,596
Likes: 3,711
Liked 8,951 Times in 3,558 Posts
|
|
It may be my old eyes or it might be my monitor but the raised pieces on the extractor star (not sure what they are called) do not look all the same. If you look at photo #4 the "lug" at 5 o'clock looks to be a different shape from the rest.
Since the firing pin damage that shows up at the seam of the star and cylinder would suggest a timing issue, I wonder if it has anything to do with the misshaped "lugs".
I am not a gunsmith and don't play one on TV. Just making an observation. Since I am more a student of the history and not the mechanics of firearms, I will leave this to folks above my pay grade to examine.
__________________
James Redfield
LM #497
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
02-10-2021, 09:16 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: western NC
Posts: 3,055
Likes: 2,543
Liked 6,888 Times in 2,153 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fleabus101
Hello Guys
Thanks for all the comments and info provided
so far!!
I bought the cylinder as more of a neat curiousity more than anything..Seeing the
early ser# ed recessed cylinder.
I dont have any plans concerning doing anything to my new to me outdoorsman.
I did do the 357 shell insertion. Its def an early
357 cylinder by the insertion and extraction test. It looks as if the firing pin drag lines could
be carefully repaired. Im sure S&W did the sensable repairs replacing the cylinder and other repairs needed at that time.
As I mentioned..My closest I'll have with a Registered Magnum😁😁 A few more Pics😁
|
If the rounds properly chamber, and the extractor star doesn't get hung up on a burr when it's pushed back, the damage looks to be more cosmetic than functional. If you've got a N frame .357, put it on the gun and see how it times, and if it rubs at the FC or breech end.
Otherwise, mount it face down on a block of wood and make a pencil holder out of it..
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
02-10-2021, 10:58 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Central Montana
Posts: 13,715
Likes: 12,858
Liked 39,476 Times in 10,046 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Engine49guy
It might....there is a little bit of play there but it just might...
If I was determined to fit the longer cylinder I'd first size up how hard it would be to remove just enough off the front of the lug to allow it to clear the longer cylinder, if it was too much I'd abort the swap.
|
It is not difficult at all, just time consuming. You just need a small flat file with one face safed (teeth ground off). Then put tape on the frame around lug and use the side of file to take back the lug about .06. I have put several recessed cylinders in guns that were originally non recessed. Both K frames and N frames.
a recessed 44 mag cylinder reamed to 45 colt and fit in a 25-5 with the barrel cut to 5"
A recessed model 19 cylinder fit in a model 10 frame with a Python barrel
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
02-15-2021, 03:16 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 93
Likes: 1,397
Liked 103 Times in 51 Posts
|
|
I like the Model 10/19/Python! That will be fun for experts to figure out in 100 years. Now if you could just get a Ruger DA hammer to fit the frame somehow.....
|
02-15-2021, 11:42 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Northeast FL
Posts: 5,793
Likes: 7,451
Liked 15,163 Times in 3,623 Posts
|
|
.....
Robert
__________________
Robert
SWCA #2906, SWHF #760
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|