|
|
01-24-2021, 10:46 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Beautiful Pacific NW
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 2,060
Liked 1,819 Times in 706 Posts
|
|
The 32-20 and jacketed bullets
I've got a 32-20 hand ejector model of 1902 1st change that is really enjoyable to shoot, but the metallurgy of the day was such that shooting jacketed bullets generates too much pressure for the gun. I'm wondering what year model 32-20 S&W revolvers became strong enough to shoot jacketed loads. Anyone know?
__________________
What could possibly go wrong?
|
01-24-2021, 11:15 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: AL Wiregrass
Posts: 7,224
Likes: 34,841
Liked 10,790 Times in 3,676 Posts
|
|
Well, since they made them all the same until they stopped producing them around 1930, I guess none of them were strong enough if we subscribe to your hypothesis they were not strong enough to begin with. However, I believe the 32-20 was plenty strong enough to shoot jacketed bullets. They were made the same as the .38 M&P but had more metal in their barrel and cylinder walls due to the smaller diameter of the .32-20 cartridge. That extra margin should be plenty to allow shooting jacketed bullets. Just my humble opinion. YMMV.
__________________
Guy
SWHF #474 SWCA LM#2629
|
The Following 8 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-24-2021, 11:39 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,500
Likes: 5,121
Liked 19,051 Times in 6,879 Posts
|
|
I agree completely with Guy. I've run hundreds of jacketed bullets through my early .32-20 HE revolvers with no problems whatsoever.
It is true that, in 1919, the company started giving the .32-20 cylinders heat treatment, but there are contemporary notes from company officials saying that the steel in the cylinders were plenty strong before heat treatment was used. After the war, heat treated cylinders were no longer used on all but the magnum revolvers.
BTW, this puts the lie to all the blather we read about the "improved heat treating" that was used on .38 Special revolvers beginning in 1957 (as the "reason" that Plus P is okay for the Model 10, but not for M&Ps that lack model marking). It is just so much nonsense.
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
01-25-2021, 12:11 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Beautiful Pacific NW
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 2,060
Liked 1,819 Times in 706 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiregrassguy
Well, since they made them all the same until they stopped producing them around 1930, I guess none of them were strong enough if we subscribe to your hypothesis they were not strong enough to begin with. However, I believe the 32-20 was plenty strong enough to shoot jacketed bullets. They were made the same as the .38 M&P but had more metal in their barrel and cylinder walls due to the smaller diameter of the .32-20 cartridge. That extra margin should be plenty to allow shooting jacketed bullets. Just my humble opinion. YMMV.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP@AK
I agree completely with Guy. I've run hundreds of jacketed bullets through my early .32-20 HE revolvers with no problems whatsoever.
It is true that, in 1919, the company started giving the .32-20 cylinders heat treatment, but there are contemporary notes from company officials saying that the steel in the cylinders were plenty strong before heat treatment was used. After the war, heat treated cylinders were no longer used on all but the magnum revolvers.
BTW, this puts the lie to all the blather we read about the "improved heat treating" that was used on .38 Special revolvers beginning in 1957 (as the "reason" that Plus P is okay for the Model 10, but not for M&Ps that lack model marking). It is just so much nonsense.
|
That's nice to know. I've been warned many times about shooting anything jacketed through my 32-20 HE. I guess that's why you ask questions.
__________________
What could possibly go wrong?
Last edited by DeplorabusUnum; 01-25-2021 at 12:13 AM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-25-2021, 12:48 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 778
Liked 1,974 Times in 694 Posts
|
|
I agree with the earlier posters.
I would not sweat jacketed bullets through those guns. They were generally overbuilt at any rate.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|