Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961

Notices

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-01-2009, 07:04 AM
ladder13 ladder13 is offline
Member
Refinished or not? Refinished or not? Refinished or not? Refinished or not? Refinished or not?  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 30,787
Likes: 57,921
Liked 53,033 Times in 16,539 Posts
Default

GB 128040472
The grips look much too worn for the gun they're mounted on. What'ya think?
__________________
Sure you did
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-01-2009, 07:20 AM
DCWilson's Avatar
DCWilson DCWilson is offline
SWCA Member
Refinished or not? Refinished or not? Refinished or not? Refinished or not? Refinished or not?  
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 13,995
Likes: 5,005
Liked 7,700 Times in 2,623 Posts
Default

Definitely worth asking a question or two of the seller. I'd say it is probably refinished.

The buy-it-now price strikes me as low for a Heavy Duty with original finish as good as that one seems to be. But then I look at revolver prices through California eyes.

Are we certain those stocks are numbered to that gun? That cylinder and barrel numbers match the frame?

I hope the HD guys drop in with comments. I'll change my mind if they see it otherwise, but this one doesn't feel original to me.
__________________
David Wilson
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-01-2009, 07:53 AM
deadin's Avatar
deadin deadin is offline
US Veteran
Refinished or not? Refinished or not? Refinished or not? Refinished or not? Refinished or not?  
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ocean Shores, WA, USA
Posts: 5,781
Likes: 201
Liked 5,066 Times in 1,769 Posts
Default

There's too many "bells" that would make me wary on this one.
First there are, as mentioned, the grips. They are just too rough for the rest of the gun.
Second the seller isn't making any claims as to the finish. Sometimes what isn't said is louder than what is.
I also find it interesting that he doesn't show the portion of the factory letter that verifies(or doesn't, as the case may be)
__________________
Dean
SWCA #680 SWHF #446
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-01-2009, 08:19 AM
Junior Member
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
128040472
While it isn't entirely unusual for the Stocks of a Duty gun to show more wear than the gun itself I would frankly want some better close-ups of this gun before I would even consider it.

Some times the wear on the Stocks comes from the sides of the Stocks rubbing up against the body and the Officers' jacket. Also, I've known many PPC shooters and just LEOs who have simply found the Factory checkering to be too rough for long strings of shooting and they would simply sand them down to make them more comfortable and "Practical" for their usage.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-01-2009, 08:24 AM
1Aspenhill's Avatar
1Aspenhill 1Aspenhill is offline
US Veteran
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
Refinished or not? Refinished or not? Refinished or not? Refinished or not? Refinished or not?  
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kansas, USA
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 1,308
Liked 3,521 Times in 577 Posts
Default

I asked the seller and the serial number of the gun is in the 49000 range and it most likely left with Magnas. In my opinion, the grips are not original and if the finish is, it needs better grips on it. Also check out the flat head screw right above the grips, it should be a rounded screw head.
Hope that helps,
Bill
__________________
38-44heavyduty.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-02-2009, 03:54 AM
Peter M. Eick Peter M. Eick is offline
SWCA Member
Refinished or not? Refinished or not? Refinished or not? Refinished or not? Refinished or not?  
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Antonio, TX, USA
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 8
Liked 740 Times in 256 Posts
Default

Another Nickeled 38/44 HD.

Sigh......

As much as I like 38/44's I still can't cotton to a nickeled finish on a Smith.

Back to the topic, I tend to agree with Bill on the screws. They are not right and I would be cautious and inspect carefully.
__________________
SWCA 1646
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-02-2009, 06:09 AM
ladder13 ladder13 is offline
Member
Refinished or not? Refinished or not? Refinished or not? Refinished or not? Refinished or not?  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 30,787
Likes: 57,921
Liked 53,033 Times in 16,539 Posts
Default

Never really thought about bidding on the firearm, just making an observation about the condition. Looks liks a re-nickle to me. Thanks for all the expert help.
__________________
Sure you did
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
checkering, ppc


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Does this appear to be refinished? mchom S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 31 05-18-2015 12:07 PM
New (to me) 686-1. Maybe get it refinished? loveaffair#686 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 21 12-26-2014 02:36 AM
Has it been refinished walter o S&W Antiques 6 12-22-2014 05:32 PM
Refinished Mod. 10 Frank V S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 1 01-13-2013 08:00 PM
Look Refinished? Recoil Rob S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 21 09-08-2010 10:34 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:31 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)