Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961

Notices

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-23-2022, 12:14 PM
erikpolcrack erikpolcrack is offline
US Veteran
Model 1896 Question Model 1896 Question Model 1896 Question Model 1896 Question Model 1896 Question  
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Sullivan County PA
Posts: 519
Likes: 229
Liked 540 Times in 259 Posts
Default Model 1896 Question

Is there any interesting historical story or engineering rationale behind the use of the top strap cylinder lock in this model? My relatively meager S&W collection contains only a couple of examples of older models and they both have the more conventional lower frame cylinder lock.

Last edited by erikpolcrack; 01-23-2022 at 02:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #2  
Old 01-23-2022, 01:12 PM
Hondo44 Hondo44 is offline
SWCA Member

Model 1896 Question Model 1896 Question Model 1896 Question Model 1896 Question Model 1896 Question  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,243
Likes: 11,890
Liked 20,568 Times in 8,577 Posts
Default

Smith’s original revolvers were the tip ups which all had the top strap cyl locking bolt. When Smith designed the 1896, they’re first hand ejector and first double action, I speculate that all the complications of those two new features in the lower part of the frame caused them to go back to the tried and true top strap cyl stop.

Recognize Colt had their DA small solid frame Lightening model on the market 20 years plus already. Smith was in a hurry! They probably were already working on the model 1903 with conventional cyl stop lock in bottom of the frame window at the same time.

It was all about gaining a leg up on the competition and getting a new product to the market place ASAP.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 01-23-2022, 11:44 PM
James E. McCall James E. McCall is offline
Member
Model 1896 Question Model 1896 Question Model 1896 Question Model 1896 Question Model 1896 Question  
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Teaneck,NJ 07666
Posts: 49
Likes: 7,388
Liked 108 Times in 25 Posts
Default

I have 2 "I" frame Smith &Wesson revolvers in .32 Long . #1 is a Nickel plated (100% condition) 6 shot with 4 1/2 inch barrel which appears to have never been fired . Bore and cylinder are clean as well as forcing cone with no residue. Top of barrel has two lines, #1 SMITH&WESSON SPRINGFIELD MASS.U.S.A.PATD, 2nd line OCT.8.01.DEC.17.01.FEB.6.06.SEPT.14.09.DEC.29.14. Serial number is 286735 stamped on front of grip frame, barrel and cylinder are stamped with same number, wooden grips with S&W logo in gold and serial number is penciled inside right grip. Cylinder stop is at bottom of frame. Ejector rod has barrel shape at end barrel has stop in front of same and barrel is cut to accomodate same Smith& Wesson #2 is Blued with barrel cut behind where front sight should be. It is a 6shot .32 long ctg stamped on right side of barrel. There is 3 lines stamped on top of barrel. Line #1 SMITH&WESSON SPRINGFIELD MASS.U.S.A. Line #2 PATD MARCH 27.94.AUG 4.96.DEC.22.96.DEC.22.96.Line3# OCT.01.01.Feb.8.06.SEPT.14.09. Serial number is 228225 stamped on butt, barrel, rear of cylinder and inside of right grip. Bluing is 100% except where barrel is cut, cylinder stop is at bottom of inside of frame. Ejector rod is barrel shaped and barrel has stop positioned in front of same with barrel cut to accomodate same. NOTE: I AM LOOKIN FOR A 4 1/2 INCH BARREL TO REPLACE THE CUT BARREL SO IS THERE ANYONE IN THE FORUM WHO COULD HELP? My e-mail address is [email protected]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-24-2022, 08:46 PM
erikpolcrack erikpolcrack is offline
US Veteran
Model 1896 Question Model 1896 Question Model 1896 Question Model 1896 Question Model 1896 Question  
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Sullivan County PA
Posts: 519
Likes: 229
Liked 540 Times in 259 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hondo44 View Post
Smith’s original revolvers were the tip ups which all had the top strap cyl locking bolt. When Smith designed the 1896, they’re first hand ejector and first double action, I speculate that all the complications of those two new features in the lower part of the frame caused them to go back to the tried and true top strap cyl stop.

Recognize Colt had their DA small solid frame Lightening model on the market 20 years plus already. Smith was in a hurry! They probably were already working on the model 1903 with conventional cyl stop lock in bottom of the frame window at the same time.

It was all about gaining a leg up on the competition and getting a new product to the market place ASAP.
Thanks, Jim. I bet you are completely correct about them hurrying things along to better compete with Colt. I was just wondering because S&W did produce (I think!) 32, 38, and 44 DA revolvers in the 1880's, and they all had their locks on the bottom. By the late '80s, even the Safety Hammerless models with their bottom locks were out. These revolvers were all top-breaks, though, so I guess a top lock would have been real tricky. Thanks again for your answer.

Last edited by erikpolcrack; 01-24-2022 at 08:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-24-2022, 09:17 PM
Hondo44 Hondo44 is offline
SWCA Member

Model 1896 Question Model 1896 Question Model 1896 Question Model 1896 Question Model 1896 Question  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,243
Likes: 11,890
Liked 20,568 Times in 8,577 Posts
Default

You’re very welcome.

Just FYI, the safety hammerless was still available into the late 1930’s, at least in 32 cal. I have one.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-25-2022, 04:56 PM
McShooty McShooty is offline
Member
Model 1896 Question Model 1896 Question Model 1896 Question Model 1896 Question Model 1896 Question  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Missouri
Posts: 348
Likes: 71
Liked 405 Times in 94 Posts
Default

I guess the top strap cylinder lock is considered to be an inferior locking mechanism,and, yeah, I can understand. I have fired an 1896 a fair amount, however, with no problems. Take a good, close look, if you haven't before, at how it works when you cycle the action. It is an amazing little piece of the mechanism, and one of the reasons I feel I can still admire obsolete guns. My 1896 has a 6-inch barrel and groups less than inch at 7 yds. Interestingly, it shoots 32 S&W (shorts) with about the same accuracy. If you have done some shooting with your HE Model 1, I would like to know the results.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
model 1896 P.W.Herman S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 2 05-15-2018 04:19 PM
My first Model 1896 Modified S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 7 11-21-2014 10:58 PM
1896 HE's Antique/Modern question twaits S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 1 05-13-2011 12:20 PM
Value of .32 HE, Model 1896 blackpowder30 S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 2 07-24-2010 07:10 PM
Question re: value of S&W Model 1896 cubrock S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 5 02-25-2009 06:49 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:57 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)