Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961

Notices

S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 All 5-Screw & Vintage 4-Screw SWING-OUT Cylinder REVOLVERS, and the 35 Autos and 32 Autos


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-09-2007, 11:57 AM
PeteQuad PeteQuad is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Near Charlotte, NC
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I finally have something to post here! My 1929 .32 HE 3rd Model arrived today. It's in great condition too, better than my 10-6 from 1963.



I'm up to 3 frame sizes, halfway there! Next up is a J frame, then an L. I'm not sure about the X... At least I'm done with finish types already

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-09-2007, 11:57 AM
PeteQuad PeteQuad is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Near Charlotte, NC
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I finally have something to post here! My 1929 .32 HE 3rd Model arrived today. It's in great condition too, better than my 10-6 from 1963.



I'm up to 3 frame sizes, halfway there! Next up is a J frame, then an L. I'm not sure about the X... At least I'm done with finish types already

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-09-2007, 12:00 PM
PeteQuad PeteQuad is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Near Charlotte, NC
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

By the way, I meant to add - I imagine those are not the original grips. How would I go about finding some - I'm guessing all magnas are not the same and I have to look for a particular type?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-09-2007, 12:05 PM
N_itis N_itis is offline
SWCA Member
First "older" gun First "older" gun  
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Nice start.

Those probably are the original stocks. To make sure, remove them and check them for a stamped serial number.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-09-2007, 12:48 PM
PeteQuad PeteQuad is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Near Charlotte, NC
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Oh you are probably right. Originally I looked at the picture in the SCSW which shows different grips (with a monogram) but then I read a passage that says: "Walnut wood grips with a diamond around the screw escutcheon have been observed as well as black rubber stocks. The rubber stocks all had the S&W monogram while all the wood stocks has the monogram missing."

Although the grips did not have a serial number on them. I took some quick pics:

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-09-2007, 01:07 PM
N_itis N_itis is offline
SWCA Member
First "older" gun First "older" gun  
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Check the right panel. It looks like there is a pencil marking. Handwriting the serial number in pencil was common practice during the era when these stocks were used (1920s more or less). Stamping came along later. I am not sure but I would guess there was a transitional period when both methods were used.

The stocks are commonly called non-medallion service stocks and predate Magnas which first appeared shortly after the introduction of the Registered Magnum in 1935. Magnas then started appearing on K frames just prior to World War II. I am not sure, but I do not think Magnas were used on prewar I frames...I am just not very familiar with I frames.

I have to say, those stocks are in great condition for being roughly eighty years old. Oh, the gun is pretty nice too. Congratulations.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-09-2007, 01:35 PM
PeteQuad PeteQuad is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Near Charlotte, NC
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Wow you are right! I looked right at them and didn't see it. I went back to the high res version of the picture and I could read the serial number clearly. Thanks very much!

You are right, the whole gun is in great condition. The stocks felt like they'd never been off before, and underneath looked excellent also. All I can say is, buy with confidence from ac4142

I really like the I frame. I have short fingers and it fits me excellently. I almost hate to shoot it though - I'll never get it back as clean as it is. But I do want to see what it feels like also.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-09-2007, 04:27 PM
Tijeras_Slim Tijeras_Slim is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: East Mountains, New Mexico
Posts: 111
Likes: 28
Liked 93 Times in 28 Posts
Default

Yep, sometimes the pencil is hard to see unless the angle and light is right. Beware though, it will be removed by any type of cleaning fluids etc if you wipe down the inside of the grips.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-10-2007, 12:11 PM
bmcgilvray's Avatar
bmcgilvray bmcgilvray is offline
SWCA Member
First "older" gun First "older" gun First "older" gun First "older" gun First "older" gun  
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,352
Likes: 10,447
Liked 6,095 Times in 1,249 Posts
Default

I really like your revolver Pete. Very attractive! Thanks for sharing.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-10-2007, 06:24 PM
handejector's Avatar
handejector handejector is offline
Administrator
First "older" gun First "older" gun First "older" gun First "older" gun First "older" gun  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,997
Likes: 8,976
Liked 48,746 Times in 9,253 Posts
Default

Pete,
Your 32 is a '32 Regulation Police', not a '32 HE', IF those stocks are original. The stocks are called 'Square Butt Extension' type. There should be a "step" halfway down the backstrap, and the serial number is on the FRONT strap so it can be seen. Look for a "Pat'd 1917" on the bottom of the stocks.
__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-10-2007, 07:55 PM
PeteQuad PeteQuad is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Near Charlotte, NC
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Well, what do you know, I didn't realize the hand ejector third model didn't have the serial number on the front strap until I read it closely. And I also didn't take note of the fact that the regulation police serial numbers ran concurrently with the HE 3rd model. Thanks very much!

I did take a look and saw the step you were talking about.

As for the stocks... I can't find the stamp. I'm not sure what that means about them. I wonder if there were any exceptions? The pencil marking makes me think they are originals, although I know such a thing could be easily faked. But then, I don't know why someone would bother, since it's not exactly an expensive gun. Also, when I looked again, it is really very hard to read, and actually more legible in the picture I took than in person.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-11-2007, 05:23 PM
opoefc opoefc is offline
Absent Comrade
US Veteran
SWCA Founding Member
First "older" gun First "older" gun First "older" gun First "older" gun First "older" gun  
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Diego, CA. USA
Posts: 10,532
Likes: 3,529
Liked 6,883 Times in 2,796 Posts
Default

You say in your first post that this is a "1929 gun" Is that because you have a factory letter showing a 1929 shipping date, or? The rebated stocks are correct for this gun and are probably original. They would not have the 1917 patent date on the bottom, as stocks with that date were mostly used up by the early 1920s. Your style of stocks, w/o the medallions was last used in 1929-30 period, as S&W went back to inserting the medalions in 1930. Ed.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-12-2007, 07:59 PM
PeteQuad PeteQuad is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Near Charlotte, NC
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I only know that the seller informed me that Mr. Jinks told him it was from 1929, and that the serial number suggests that that is the general time frame. Your post further solidifies it in my mind, so I thank you.

However, I am enjoying the tidbits about this gun so much I will have to get a letter done
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-14-2007, 09:13 PM
handejector's Avatar
handejector handejector is offline
Administrator
First "older" gun First "older" gun First "older" gun First "older" gun First "older" gun  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,997
Likes: 8,976
Liked 48,746 Times in 9,253 Posts
Default

Ed Said:
Quote:
They would not have the 1917 patent date on the bottom, as stocks with that date were mostly used up by the early 1920s.
Sorry, forgot about that! I'm gettin' as old as Ed.
__________________
Regards,
Lee Jarrett
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-04-2007, 02:57 PM
PeteQuad PeteQuad is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Near Charlotte, NC
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I just wanted to give you all an update since you were so informative. I just got my letter back today and the gun is all original and with serial number 3671XX was shipped on March 6, 1923 to E. K. Tryon Co., Philadelphia, PA.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-04-2007, 03:07 PM
JayCeeNC's Avatar
JayCeeNC JayCeeNC is offline
US Veteran
First "older" gun First "older" gun First "older" gun First "older" gun First "older" gun  
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,006
Likes: 18,956
Liked 3,523 Times in 1,126 Posts
Default

Congrats, Pete, nice looking revolver. Nice to have the letter that makes it all "official."
__________________
John
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-05-2007, 06:11 PM
MikeyL MikeyL is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SW Oregon
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Pete: Nice piece! I got into "I" frames a few years ago, have three of them now. Guys on this forum gave me a great "heads up" on how to polish the small scratches on the nickel. Mother's polish (I found mine in an auto parts store) and a very fine Scotch-brite pad. Makes them look like new! I lettered mine as well...makes a nice presentation.

MikeyL
S&WCA #2010
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
ejector, hand ejector, j frame, jinks, presentation, prewar, registered magnum, scsw, walnut

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Older 9mm M&P (what will it need?) rockyinnm Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols 9 04-19-2015 04:51 PM
I don't like getting older. sipowicz The Lounge 65 12-02-2014 03:40 PM
older .22 mswope12 S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 1 11-28-2014 01:08 PM
What is it? ? about older S&W Qmark S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 2 05-13-2011 01:58 PM
Older Is Better (Or Is It)? conchmariner S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 14 02-15-2009 08:10 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:37 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)