Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980
Forum Register Expert Commentary Members List


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-19-2009, 08:12 PM
campfire's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: North Queensland. Australia
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Question S&W Model 53 Remington Jet Question

I have been curious about the Remington jet for some time and occasionally I browse through some of the auction sites on the internet looking at the different ones on offer. (I nearly choke when I see the prices the sellers are hoping to get).
I suppose if I wanted to buy a 22 I could settle for a Model 17 or a 617 but I particularly like the look of the Jet with the 8 3/8” barrel and the half under-lug; The actual Jet cartridge doesn’t appeal to me so much because I think I may have difficulty getting reloading components for it but I am sure it would be a fine gun for plinking in 22 Long.
I have noticed that some guns were manufactured with a Jet cylinder and supplied with 22 Long inserts and others are made with the Jet cylinder and an additional interchangeable 22 Long cylinder.
Can someone here tell me;
If the Jet is a centrefire cartridge, is the same firing pin used to set-off the rimfire 22 Long or is there some alteration to the hammer so this can happen.
Campfire
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-19-2009, 08:16 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: West Coast of Arizona
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
Liked 34 Times in 14 Posts
Default

If you closely at the hammer of a model 53 Jet, you'll see at the top of it it has a "switch" that you pull back on to engage the rimfire portion of it. There is no firing pin on the hammer, they are "floating" mounted in the frame, two of them. Quite a slick set up. And don't bother with the 22lr inserts that come with 53s, they are a pain to use. If you want to shoot LRs, make sure you get one with the extra cyl.
__________________
ken
SWCA #1959
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-19-2009, 08:29 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Addison IL.
Posts: 478
Likes: 1
Liked 16 Times in 16 Posts
Default 22 Jet

Reloading tools are readily available for the 22 Jet. Brass is manufactured seasonally by Remington. Reed's sells a quality reload for the 22 Jet.
IF the 22 Jet cartridge doesn't really do anything for you, then an 8 3/8 model 17 would be just fine for your purpose.
To me wanting to shoot 22 LR out of a model 53 is a waste. I have many with the 22 LR cylinder and inserts, I will never use them. I have only fired the 22 Jet rounds out of any of my model 53s. The 22LR I save for my model 41s and 17s.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-19-2009, 08:33 PM
Smithhound's Avatar
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SE Tennessee
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
Liked 267 Times in 88 Posts
Default

I was fortunate enough to stumble into one a couple month's ago at a reasonable price, 97% or better with box and inserts, no ppwrk tho (looking). I found brand new brass @ Lock,Stock and Barrel for $18 per hundred and ordered 500, found .222 and .223 dia bullets on Midway and ordered 1K of each.
The Jet takes either the .222 or .223 dia oddly enough and not the common .224, either 40 or 45 grain seem to be standard.
I just today started loading for it so that is all the info I can offer, other than I plan to leave the inserts in the box where they belong. If you just want a .22 lr go with a nice K-22. It will cost you much less and serve you better.
RD
__________________
Got a Phd from Hard Knocks U
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-21-2009, 03:23 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times in 11 Posts
Default Model 53 Paperwork

I've seen Model 53 paperwork advertised on GunBroker and eBay recently. Not sure if it is original, but you can check it out.

I have a six inch 53 that l like to shoot and reload for. It's not difficult. I use the Remington cases, .223 45 grain bullets, Federal small rifle primers and WW-296 powder. I load the cartridges somewhat less "hot" than factory loads and it is quite accurate. I recently found a .22 LR cylinder for the gun (correct length) and intend to try it out soon.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-21-2009, 08:24 PM
SWCA Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NC Arkansas
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 735
Liked 765 Times in 183 Posts
Default

I caught 2 last weekend a 53 no dash and 53-2.
No extra cylinder but all the inserts.
Can't wait to shoot a jet;-)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-21-2009, 09:29 PM
Member

 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Near Birmingham
Posts: 4,940
Likes: 2,051
Liked 1,818 Times in 666 Posts
Default M53 Jet

Someone say M53 Jet. I tried to get a picture of the trigger but I think the picture shows my lack of photography skills. Oh well, can I get an A for effort?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	FA Pictures 095.jpg
Views:	1213
Size:	39.8 KB
ID:	5091   Click image for larger version

Name:	FA Pictures 092.jpg
Views:	455
Size:	28.6 KB
ID:	5092  
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-21-2009, 09:38 PM
Sebago Son's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sebago Lake, Maine, USA
Posts: 5,307
Likes: 6,266
Liked 5,920 Times in 1,713 Posts
Default

The Jet is at best a curiosity. There's not much you can do with the Model 53 and the .22 Magnum Centerfire that can't be done with a Model 19 in .357 without the extraction issues... Mine just lays in the box.

As was said earlier, the cartridge adaptors are difficult to use and while they do accomplish the task, they are at best slow and cumbersome. The interchangeable .22 LR cylinder is neat, but in the end it simply makes the Jet a K-22.

Not worth the bother in my book.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-22-2009, 06:33 PM
campfire's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: North Queensland. Australia
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Default

Thanks for the replies,I think I have satisfied my curiosity.
I will save myself the agravation of messing about with changing inserts and cylinders and just buy a new S&W 617 and be done with it.
Campfire
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-22-2009, 08:56 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Rochester, NH USA
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 26
Liked 467 Times in 187 Posts
Default

..agravation? Changing cylinders on a Jet is just like doing a proper cleaning on any S&W...loosen or remove the crane screw, slide crane and cylinder off, slide cylinder off the crane, replace with other cylinder and slide the assembly back on the frame...tighten down the screw and you are done...

I've had a 1962 Model 53 since the mid-1970s and it is still my favorite S&W .22...and I have a bunch of them. The 6" looks like a Model 19 with a ramp front sight...and the balance is much better than a Model 17. And speaking of balance..you may want to handle a 617 before you buy...the 6" is especially nose heavy.

They are just fun and interesting guns...Bob
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-25-2011, 11:25 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: PA
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Model 53 Jet info

Quote:
Originally Posted by campfire View Post
I have been curious about the Remington jet for some time and occasionally I browse through some of the auction sites on the internet looking at the different ones on offer. (I nearly choke when I see the prices the sellers are hoping to get).
I suppose if I wanted to buy a 22 I could settle for a Model 17 or a 617 but I particularly like the look of the Jet with the 8 3/8” barrel and the half under-lug; The actual Jet cartridge doesn’t appeal to me so much because I think I may have difficulty getting reloading components for it but I am sure it would be a fine gun for plinking in 22 Long.
I have noticed that some guns were manufactured with a Jet cylinder and supplied with 22 Long inserts and others are made with the Jet cylinder and an additional interchangeable 22 Long cylinder.
Can someone here tell me;
If the Jet is a centrefire cartridge, is the same firing pin used to set-off the rimfire 22 Long or is there some alteration to the hammer so this can happen.
Campfire
I purchased an 8 3/8" barrel Model 53 in 1962 which I still have along with an additional 6" which I purchased approximately 25 years ago. The Model 53's came with and without the extra separate 22 rim-fire cylinder. At the time of purchase the majority came with only the Jet cylinder and the inserts and if you wanted the extra 22 rim-fire cylinder frequently the dealer had to special order the 53 with the extra rim-fire cylinder from S&W. It took me approximately 6 months to obtain my 8 3/8" on special order through Gil Hebbard (a large volume dealer).
With the Jet having a potential velocity similar to the 22 Hornet, there is a significant loss for every 0.01" increase in the cylinder/sizing cone gap. This loss is approximately 5% of the velocity for every 0.01" increase in the distance between the cylinder and the sizing cone. (This distance can easily be measured by using an ignition feeler gauge, and should never exceed 0.08") I have obtained some newer wheel guns with a distance of 0.09" - including some Smith's. I never purchase a revolver without taking my ignition feeler gauge to the gun shop and check everything out. ( This can annoy some gun dealers, particularly if you tell them they have a worthless revolver). I WOULD STRONGLY RECOMMEND A PURCHASER DOING THIS.
When I received my 8 3/8" the gaps were 0.08-0.09" and I considered that inadequate and poor quality. I wrote to S&W about the problem and they had me return the gun for alteration. When I received if back all gaps were 0.02, which probably gained me approx. 125 feet per second muzzle velocity. With the smaller gaps there is also a lot less flash at the head of the cylinder. Toward dusk or on a dark day this flash from a large gap can be very visually disturbing. I did not return the 6'', which came without the auxiliary rim-fire cylinder as I bought it used but like new and it has c/sc gaps of 0.06"-0.07"
One problem with the bottle neck case is that the case very frequently backs up on firing and locking up the cylinder so that it will not turn. This problem can be eliminated by carrying a small bottle of ethyl alcohol or acetone and some cotton tipped applicators and swabbing out the cylinder after a couple of rounds have been fired from the each of the six sites. WORKS GREAT!!!!
In regard to the hammer there is a selector cam/pivot that must be moved to determine if you want to fire rim-fire or center-fire.
Needless to say despite it's idiosyncrasies, I love my 53's and find them to be accurate, interesting and of a quality that you don't see in Smith's today.

Last edited by redboneben; 10-30-2011 at 03:02 PM. Reason: Typing error
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #12  
Old 10-26-2011, 12:03 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: utah
Posts: 12,486
Likes: 2,151
Liked 5,735 Times in 2,538 Posts
Default

I have owned this jet since about 1972. I dont have the extra clyinder but wish I did. I havent had any trouble with the inserts, slow but so am I. I have dies and have reloaded for it. You can find bullets and everything you need. They are a ear ringer, no recoil. I must admit, I havent shot it a lot for no good reason.

Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-26-2011, 12:51 AM
SWCA Member

 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 6,417
Commentaries: 3
Likes: 961
Liked 1,384 Times in 830 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by campfire View Post
Thanks for the replies,I think I have satisfied my curiosity.
I will save myself the agravation of messing about with changing inserts and cylinders and just buy a new S&W 617 and be done with it.
Campfire

I liked the lugged barrel as well but have no use for a Jet. Found a 4" Jet lugged barrel on Gunbroker and swapped barrels on my K22 Combat Mstp. Looks cool. Interesting that the Mod 48 .22 Mag doesn't have a lugged barrel but that's another option for you. Occasionally they are found with an auxillary 22 LR cylinder or can be sent back to have one fitted.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-26-2011, 10:50 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: utah
Posts: 12,486
Likes: 2,151
Liked 5,735 Times in 2,538 Posts
Default

Hondo, that sounds like a nice conversion! Got a picture of it?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-26-2011, 01:37 PM
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 1
Liked 382 Times in 173 Posts
Default

My 6" 53 is extremely accurate with the 22lr cylinder and it a great gun to carry. It balances very well. Changing cylinders takes all of two minutes.



Buy one, you won't regret it. I would buy one that has both cylinders and not count on finding the 22lr cylinder to add.
__________________
Jim
Many K and N Frames
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-26-2011, 04:32 PM
SWCA Member

 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 6,417
Commentaries: 3
Likes: 961
Liked 1,384 Times in 830 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by feralmerril View Post
Hondo, that sounds like a nice conversion! Got a picture of it?
My son takes my pics for me. Will post when I do.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-16-2011, 07:53 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I recently brought my 53 out of storage to play with it. I tried loading 22LR, but they would not fit in the insert. Left a good 3/32 casing out the back. Could not even close the cylinder. Almost as bad with a 22L, ended up shooting 22 Shorts.
What is the problem? Will shooting 22 shorts hurt the revolver?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-16-2011, 09:05 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Default

Many say just buy a K-22 if you want a rimfire, but the 53 has one advatage to me that the K-22 does not have, the enclosed underlug, it for me makes the guns line look like I have a direct companion to my model 28, hahaha!!
Really the model 53 shoot rimfire is not as accurate as my K-22 of Pre-17, like many, mine sits to be admired in the box, cheers Dale Z in Canada
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
223, 22lr, 617, cartridge, k-22, k22, lock, model 17, model 19, model 28, pre-17, remington, rimfire, s&w, selector, sig arms

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 Thread, S&W Model 53 Remington Jet Question in Smith & Wesson Revolvers; I have been curious about the Remington jet for some time and occasionally I browse through some of the auction ...
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://smith-wessonforum.com/s-w-revolvers-1961-1980/101436-s-w-model-53-remington-jet-question.html
Posted By For Type Date
American Rifleman - The Varmint Revolver This thread Refback 12-24-2013 06:31 PM
NRA Mobile This thread Refback 06-07-2013 11:01 PM
Model 53 - Info.com This thread Refback 12-24-2012 08:44 AM
Clapp on Handguns | by: Clapp on Handgun This thread Refback 11-07-2012 03:50 PM
The Varmint Revolver This thread Refback 04-08-2012 09:12 PM
La coleccion completa de revolvers y pistolas de Don Lucas This thread Pingback 03-29-2012 05:59 PM
5earch This thread Refback 03-23-2012 02:59 PM

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Old Remington pump shotgun question. MackTech Firearms & Knives - Other Brands 9 12-10-2011 06:32 PM
Question on Remington UMC .44 Mag 180gr JSP Person Ammo 15 06-11-2011 04:14 PM
Remington 710 question.... TACC1 Firearms & Knives - Other Brands 0 02-05-2011 10:47 PM
remington headstamp question leon riverrat Ammo 2 04-16-2010 04:53 PM
Vintage Remington .22 Ammo Question. Memphis Ammo 6 12-15-2009 08:59 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:46 AM.


© S-W Forum, LLC 2000-2013
Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)