S&W Forum  
Automatic Translations (Powered by Powered by Google):
Afrikaans Albanian Arabic Belarusian Bulgarian Catalan Chinese Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Estonian Filipino Finnish French Galician German Greek Hebrew Hindi Hungarian Icelandic Indonesian Irish Italian Japanese Korean Latvian Lithuanian Macedonian Malay Maltese Norwegian Persian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Serbian Slovak Slovenian Spanish Swahili Swedish Taiwanese Thai Turkish Ukrainian Vietnamese Welsh Yiddish

Go Back   S&W Forum > Main > S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980
Register Expert Commentary Members List EnglishTranslations


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-04-2009, 08:57 PM
Duke426's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 538
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromedhearts View Post
I just think the .45 makes a better fighting round, and an old heavy duty would probably have the same steel as an old 1917, and like I said factory ammo availability. Plinking with Ball, carring some 200 grain jhp +p+, moon clips, etc. Reloading is fine but it sure is convenient to run into X-mart and pick up a few boxes when needed.
I probably would not do this but, just can't seem to find what I have in mind.
Maybe I should have posted some thing like this on the "Wish List"
I understand what you are wanting to do but I don't think its a great idea.

You are going to destroy the value of a sought after S&W and have a ton of money into it in the process.

As for carry ammo, why would you convert a 41 magnum to 45acp only to turn around and load the 45acp to +p+ level with a 200gr JHP? Now you are getting back toward 41 Magnum level ballistics anyway.

If you want to have a 58 moonclipped, send an extra cylinder to Pinnacle High Performance and they can do the deed for you and its only $80. A lot less money and you aren't destroying anything.

JMO for what its worth.

Last edited by Duke426; 11-04-2009 at 09:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-04-2009, 09:25 PM
Tom K's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 112
Default Model 22

Quote:
Originally Posted by cowboydave View Post
S&W has already made the gun you are looking for, a 22-4 and you don't have to destroy a 58 to get it. JMHO.
Dave
+101

Go to gunsamerica.com and do a search for "wesson 22 45". Sort by "lowest price first" and scroll down. You'll find 4", fixed-sight N frames in .45ACP anywhere from $6-700 on up. They have a shrouded ejector rod, but other than that it's what you're describing. If the lock bothers you, remove it - that's a lot less butchery than you'd be doing to a desirable M-58, and a lot cheaper. If you really, really don't want the shrouded ejector rod, you can get a modern M-22 1917 and have the 5" barrel cut back to whatever length suits you.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-04-2009, 09:28 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 1,440
Default

Count me school of "What in wide wide world of sports are you thinking?!!!"

Now granted, it is your gun and you have every right to do whatever you want.

BUT - if you want a 45 ACP or 45 Colt revolver, you can get one without changing your model 58. If can't afford to get both, sell your 58 and get a 45.

I really do not think you get any advantage from this conversion.

But - it's not about me nor my opinion.
__________________
I am a sheep dog!
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-04-2009, 09:32 PM
Sportsterguy's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: On the River
Posts: 777
Default

Yep. 100% in my book.
__________________
Sportsterguy
Molon Labe!
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-04-2009, 10:09 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Rochester, NH USA
Posts: 408
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iggy View Post
Somebody get a rope!!!

Well, with the demand for 58's and such, and having survived some squabbles because of one of them, I would hate to see another one disappear from the ranks.

I can understand your liking the gun and it's attributes, but with what they are bringing today, you need to really look at the options.

...I'm with Iggy on this one...and I will bring the rope. Mess with us Cult of the .41 guys and it will be the last S&W to be pried from your cold dead hands....

But seriously you would be better off looking at a M22 or maybe even a 625 Mountain Gun. I spoke with one of the techs at Buffalo Bore and they said many of the customers run .45 Super through their M625s and 22s...

Bob
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-04-2009, 10:10 PM
SWCA Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cross Timbers
Posts: 39
Default

I’ll play devil’s advocate here. I think Chromedhearts’ concept is a good one.

Maybe a cylinder and a shortened barrel from a Model 25 would be a way to get where he wants to go?

In the mid 1970’s Model 58 conversions to .44 Special and .45 Colt were somewhat trendy.

Here is a 58 converted in 1974 by Spokhandguns to .45 Colt. I bought it a few years ago for less than the price of having one converted.



The 3.25” barrel is handy, but I’m not a fan of round butts, and this one now has some Square-Butt Ahrends on it. It is a great shooter. This converted 58 weighs within an ounce of my 625-6 .45 ACP Mountain Gun, so other than the .75" longer barrel on the 625, the two guns are comparable. Oh yeah, fixed sights on the 58 vs. adjustable on the 625.

I would rather have a converted 58 than a new 22-4. Beyond the lock, the changes to the “sweep” of the frame from the rear sight to the top of the grip (allowing room for the lock mechanism) just don’t look as good as the older guns.

Just my two cents worth

Last edited by AKtinman; 11-04-2009 at 10:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-04-2009, 10:11 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10
Default

S&W Model 25
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-04-2009, 10:22 PM
GoHogs's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 34
Default

Don't butcher the M58.
A friend found me one, he is a real friend.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 11-04-2009, 11:11 PM
m657's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: sunny Orygun
Posts: 918
Default

....don't make me come over there.....
__________________
Dum vivimus Vivamas
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 11-05-2009, 12:56 AM
dsf dsf is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 156
Default

How about getting an old 1917 and attaching a 58 barrel to it, have the 41 magnum barrel bored out to 45 ACP? That way you get your ACP chambering, don't screw up a nice old 58 and have the barrel profile you want?

Not saying it's easy to find, but it keeps folks from chasing you down with the flaming pitchforks, right?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
1917, ahrends, bowen, bullseye, cartridge, classics, colt, ejector, extractor, flutes, model 25, model 27, model 28, model 52, model 625, model 65, model 66, recessed, scroll, shroud, smith & wesson

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 Thread, Model 58? Am I nuts... in Main; Originally Posted by Chromedhearts I just think the .45 makes a better fighting round, and an old heavy duty would ...

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:10 PM.


Multilanguage community supported by vBET Translator
© S-W Forum, LLC 2004-2009