S&W Forum  
Automatic Translations (Powered by Powered by Google):
Afrikaans Albanian Arabic Belarusian Bulgarian Catalan Chinese Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Estonian Filipino Finnish French Galician German Greek Hebrew Hindi Hungarian Icelandic Indonesian Irish Italian Japanese Korean Latvian Lithuanian Macedonian Malay Maltese Norwegian Persian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Serbian Slovak Slovenian Spanish Swahili Swedish Taiwanese Thai Turkish Ukrainian Vietnamese Welsh Yiddish

Go Back   S&W Forum > Main > S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980
Register Expert Commentary Members List EnglishTranslations


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-04-2009, 01:13 PM
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Alabama
Posts: 66
Default Model 58? Am I nuts...

for wanting to have a Mod. 58 converted to .45 acp? I want a fixed sight and, I don't really care for some of the features on the new stuff coming from the factory, and I want some thing stronger than the old 1917.
I just really like the 58, and think it would be perfect in .45. I like the .41 magnum but for some purposes think the .45 would be better. Like ammo availability and variety. I know I can load the .41 to do the same things, but some times the availability of factory ammo is a plus.
I know that would be controversial, and I would only do it to one that was well worn...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-04-2009, 01:24 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 207
Default

Realize, you are going to take an $800 revolver, spend $400 (at least) to get it modified and end up with a $450 revolver.

Its your gun, if that what you want, you can get it done, and, I'll bet you will be happy with it.

I wouldn't do it though. I would find an old beater 1917 and have it cut down and fixed up to my liking.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-04-2009, 01:27 PM
Iggy's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wy.
Posts: 1,087
Default

Somebody get a rope!!!

Well, with the demand for 58's and such, and having survived some squabbles because of one of them, I would hate to see another one disappear from the ranks.

I can understand your liking the gun and it's attributes, but with what they are bringing today, you need to really look at the options.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-04-2009, 01:29 PM
Rugskipper's Avatar
Gold
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kansas
Posts: 182
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromedhearts View Post
for wanting to have a Mod. 58 converted to .45 acp? I want a fixed sight and, I don't really care for some of the features on the new stuff coming from the factory, and I want some thing stronger than the old 1917.
I just really like the 58, and think it would be perfect in .45. I like the .41 magnum but for some purposes think the .45 would be better. Like ammo availability and variety. I know I can load the .41 to do the same things, but some times the availability of factory ammo is a plus.
I know that would be controversial, and I would only do it to one that was well worn...
You know, you could do the same thing to an old Heavy Duty, and probably end up with less invested. Just a thought.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-04-2009, 01:40 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Insufficeint space.
Posts: 1,215
Default

What can you do with a 45 you can't do with a 41?

You will spend a lot of money to lower the value on the gun and wind up with a pistol that has nothing I can see as an advantage.

I am at a loss to understand the thinking on this one.

Are you nuts? Um... good be...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-04-2009, 01:46 PM
jj2am44's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 575
Default

Nuts??? Yeah-- I think so. I wouldn't do it, but, then, I'm not you.
__________________
jj
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-04-2009, 01:53 PM
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Alabama
Posts: 66
Default

I just think the .45 makes a better fighting round, and an old heavy duty would probably have the same steel as an old 1917, and like I said factory ammo availability. Plinking with Ball, carring some 200 grain jhp +p+, moon clips, etc. Reloading is fine but it sure is convenient to run into X-mart and pick up a few boxes when needed.
I probably would not do this but, just can't seem to find what I have in mind.
Maybe I should have posted some thing like this on the "Wish List"
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-04-2009, 01:56 PM
US Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South Florida, A Third Wo
Posts: 80
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Iggy View Post
Somebody get a rope!!!

Well, with the demand for 58's and such, and having survived some squabbles because of one of them, I would hate to see another one disappear from the ranks.

I can understand your liking the gun and it's attributes, but with what they are bringing today, you need to really look at the options.
I'll supply the rope ...

There are few enough M58s out there as it is ...

Sit in a dark room for a little while, hopefully the feeling will pass ...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-04-2009, 02:04 PM
NKJ nut's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 186
Default

I would not do this conversion on a 58 for most of the reasons mentioned. I considered such a conversion on a Heavy Duty at one time, but was told by Hamilton Bowen that the extractor would be left rather thin after providing enough clearance for the rim of 45 AR or the moon clips.

As an alternative to a conversion why not try to find a Brazilian? That's what I did.
__________________
tennesseevalleybullets.com
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-04-2009, 02:05 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 277
Default

[QUOTE=Chromedhearts;1161126]I just think the .45 makes a better fighting round, and an old heavy duty would probably have the same steel as an old 1917, and like I said factory ammo availability. Plinking with Ball, carring some 200 grain jhp +p+, moon clips, etc. Reloading is fine but it sure is convenient to run into X-mart and pick up a few boxes when needed.

Just where is this well supplied x-mart??
__________________
Big bang, much smash'em.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
1917, ahrends, bowen, bullseye, cartridge, classics, colt, ejector, extractor, flutes, model 25, model 27, model 28, model 52, model 625, model 65, model 66, recessed, scroll, shroud, smith & wesson

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 Thread, Model 58? Am I nuts... in Main; for wanting to have a Mod. 58 converted to .45 acp? I want a fixed sight and, I don't really ...

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:35 PM.


© S-W Forum, LLC 2004-2009