|
|
11-22-2009, 04:23 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: chicago area
Posts: 399
Likes: 51
Liked 394 Times in 150 Posts
|
|
Colt trooper = what S&W ?
I have seen a few Colt Troopers locally that look pretty nice. What is the S&W equivalent? K-frame,L, or n-frame? I am also looking at S&W 27 and 28's and like the looks of the S&W a little better. I already have a 14 and 15, 1960's vintage. Thanks...
|
11-22-2009, 04:40 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
L-Frame today.
In the heydey of the Trooper, its competition would have been something like the Highway Patrolman/N-Frame.
The old Troopers, with the V-Mainspring, formed the basis of the Python.
And of course the L-Frame was produced to take away Python/Trooper business. Holsters, speedloaders will generally work interchangeably.
The L-Frame was designed to allow police to use their leather/speedloader equipment if they had had Pythons/Troopers.
|
11-22-2009, 09:29 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 1,419
Likes: 0
Liked 943 Times in 411 Posts
|
|
Colt's direct competitor was the S&W Model 15.
Both were adjustable sighted, .38 Special, "service" type revolvers of a similar size and competed for the same police market.
After 1961 the Trooper was available in .357, and the Model 19 became the "other brand" Colt competed against.
|
11-22-2009, 10:39 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Southern OH USA
Posts: 878
Likes: 43
Liked 69 Times in 44 Posts
|
|
Danski has the correct answer regarding frame size comparison of the guns available in todays market. The model 15 may have been the police market competitor at the time the 38 trooper was in production, but the model 15 is built on the 'K' frame and somewhat smaller than the Colt Trooper. You didn't mention which version of the Trooper, but the S&W 'L' frame is a closer match to either the older 'E' frame Trooper or the later 'J' frame Trooper MKIII.
|
11-23-2009, 12:10 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,907
Likes: 3,513
Liked 6,728 Times in 2,620 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willyboy
I have seen a few Colt Troopers locally that look pretty nice. What is the S&W equivalent? K-frame,L, or n-frame? I am also looking at S&W 27 and 28's and like the looks of the S&W a little better. I already have a 14 and 15, 1960's vintage. Thanks...
|
It seems to me that the Trooper is closest to the L frame, and the closest L frame is probably the 620 or the 686 Mountain Gun in terms of weight.
|
11-23-2009, 12:36 AM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: utah
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 2,547
Liked 7,201 Times in 3,064 Posts
|
|
I have several troopers and they always felt pretty close to a K frame to me. Here is one along side a M&P.
|
11-24-2009, 11:16 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,575
Likes: 2,235
Liked 3,476 Times in 1,475 Posts
|
|
I have shot a few Colt Troopers and I can say with certainty, that no Colt Trooper equals any S&W revolver I've ever shot.
|
11-24-2009, 12:36 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: las vegas, nevada
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have shot a few Colt Troopers and I can say with certainty, that no S&W equals any Colt revolver I've ever shot.
|
11-24-2009, 02:58 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
Liked 40 Times in 25 Posts
|
|
I've fired a Trooper and it seemed pretty hefty to me. But, the photo submitted by Feralmerril causes me to wonder if the Trooper was actually slightly smaller than the K-frame. In any event, I wasn't impressed by the one that I fired. The trigger had this weird stacking sensation which at least made it feel to me as if I had to keep increasing pressure on it throughout its cycle in order to get the gun to fire. Smith triggers are much smoother.
|
11-24-2009, 10:58 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: chicago area
Posts: 399
Likes: 51
Liked 394 Times in 150 Posts
|
|
Colt Trooper vs S&W
Thanks for all your comments. I am looking at a Trooper 357 (not a III) made in 1965, with box and target, probably 98%.The trigger felt really crisp but you never know until you actually shoot a few cylinders worth at a bullseye. But the price is high and for a few more bucks I can probably pick up a later P&R model 27 if I shop around a little.
|
11-24-2009, 11:53 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 1,419
Likes: 0
Liked 943 Times in 411 Posts
|
|
Pictures are deceiving sometimes.
The Colt E&I frame was heavier and slightly larger than the S&W, especially in key areas.
What the picture doesn't show is that the Colt cylinder is significantly larger in diameter than the S&W "K" frame.
Smith triggers and Colt triggers have a totally different feel, with the Colt stacking as its pulled.
People who grew up on Colt's like it, people used to S&W may not.
The S&W trigger is not "smoother" then the Colt, smoothness has nothing to do with stacking.
Again, different strokes (trigger) for different folks.
|
11-25-2009, 02:29 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: utah
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 2,547
Liked 7,201 Times in 3,064 Posts
|
|
Many years ago I reloaded and experimented a lot more than now. I mainly carried a old .357 trooper at work. Off the job I shot my .357 S&Ws a lot too. I noticed sloppy reloaded cases wouldnt go in my colts would usualy go in the smiths. Yet high primers wouldnt function in the smiths but the colt would.
If I shot braced over the bench with pads etc., I still claim my colts to be a little more accurate. I am big with fair size hands. Yet if factory standard grips are used on both makes, the S&Ws always "feel" better.
With most my shooting I shoot SA, only when qualifying would I shoot DA. In that case, shooting SA, it doesnt matter whether, S&W or colt, I doubt if there is a differance.
I like both brands, yet must admit colt is almost defunct in DA revolvers, but with two pythons and a couple troopers I am set for life, as I am with my fourteen or so smiths.
|
11-25-2009, 06:23 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: South East , PA . USA
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 485
Liked 1,610 Times in 884 Posts
|
|
Well , I have a first year Colt .357 Magnum , same size as a Trooper , and it does not fit into a holster molded for a K-frame. It could probably be wetted and stretched to fit. But then again , it swims in an N-frame holster.
And a K-frame is a loose fit in my Python holster.
BTW , all holsters are Bianchi 5BHLs.
|
11-26-2009, 12:02 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,895
Likes: 736
Liked 1,208 Times in 737 Posts
|
|
i carried a trooper mklll @ work for several years...a very nice gun....i still have one...i equate it closer to an L frame smith
|
11-26-2009, 12:15 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: River Edge, NJ USA
Posts: 216
Likes: 5
Liked 18 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
When I came on the job if you were a Smith guy you bought a Model 19. if you were Colt guy and couldn't afford a Python (all entry level cops) you bought the Trooper. I went with the Model 19.
|
11-26-2009, 01:33 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,762
Likes: 1,224
Liked 5,803 Times in 2,355 Posts
|
|
I always thought S&W introduced the L frame to compete directly with the Colts.
|
11-26-2009, 03:01 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Liked 42 Times in 17 Posts
|
|
Model 27 all the way
If you can get a nice P&R model 27 for just few bucks more than a similar Trooper , I say go mod 27 even if it is more that a few . I have one trooper left and I like them fine and I used to listen to Python guys , the few who would shoot theirs ,tell me how superior their weapon is , but I never had one out shoot my old model 27, and the trooper is no Python. IMHO There is no revolver more pleasing to hold , carry and own and shoot than the N frame Smith and there are some good reasons to choose the model 27 among all Ns . Besides that the Colt cylinders turn the wrong way .
__________________
Idaho , Elmer and Milt
Last edited by borntoraisehogs; 11-26-2009 at 04:38 AM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-26-2009, 04:39 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Liked 42 Times in 17 Posts
|
|
__________________
Idaho , Elmer and Milt
|
11-27-2009, 09:51 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 421
Likes: 137
Liked 168 Times in 50 Posts
|
|
I'm not versed on the sales competition between S&W's and Colt Trooper guns, but I do know that My Trooper MkIII would not fit (without forcing) into a Bianchi K-Frame holster for a 6" barrel.
Some years ago, I gave My late 70's Colt Trooper MkIII to My son for his first handgun. Although I had wanted a nickeled gun when I bought that MkIII, I didn't have enough funds at the time. I traded My Ruger Security-Six 6" blue, and $130 for that demo-gun, & included was the factory carton, & a new Safariland basket-weave, suede-lined holster.
My blued Trooper with a 6" heavy barrel, would outshoot nearly every handgun that I owned (at that time), sans My Thompson Contender.
|
11-27-2009, 10:47 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: DUNNELLON, FLORIDA USA
Posts: 11,102
Likes: 1,690
Liked 16,302 Times in 4,231 Posts
|
|
Hi:
I purchased a Blued Colt Trooper w/ 4" barrel in 1958 that was .357mag.
Standard grips, hammer, and trigger. $75.00 new.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-27-2009, 11:30 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: horse cave, ky
Posts: 958
Likes: 427
Liked 2,255 Times in 505 Posts
|
|
i have a 6" mark III, that i have had for many years, and it is one of the two guns that i will not sell, because of my ability to hit what i want with it, the gun is my go to gun, the one that goes hunting on my hip, while i have some nice smiths that stay put up, the only drawback that i have seen with the gun is sometimes the ejector rod will shot loose and back out of the cylinder a little, when shooting but this old pistol has seen many many rounds go down the pipe, but it still hits where i want it to,
|
11-27-2009, 12:59 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: CSRA
Posts: 2,125
Likes: 869
Liked 1,629 Times in 779 Posts
|
|
siiiiiiiiiiiiii
Last edited by sw282; 07-03-2011 at 08:37 AM.
|
11-27-2009, 01:11 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central Kentucky
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Unless I've missed it, no one has yet mentioned that the .357 version Trooper with the rebounding firing pin has the same lock-work as the Python.
In fact, I looked for a nice .357 Trooper for years because I had an extra 4 inch Python barrel and envisioned cobbling up a less expensive Python, but, by the time I finally found the Trooper I wanted, I was out of the notion!
|
11-27-2009, 01:24 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Just a bit of history.
In my earlier posting, I said the Trooper and the Highway Patrolman were closer to each other; by that, I meant both beefy but the HP is an N frame and is larger than the Trooper.
In the 1970s, S&W made up some prototype L-frame 586, complete with heavy underlug on the barrel, with an eye to taking on the Python head to head. But S&W reportedly backed off since in those days the competitors were "gentlemen" and didn't copy each other in styling.
But by 1980, S&W changed its mind and hence, the birth of the 586/686.
Again, as I said earlier, the 586 was designed to fit Python leather and could use Python speedloaders, all a way of making it easy for police to drop the Python-sized revolvers (sometimes called .41-frame size).
Today, the Ruger GP 100 also takes the 586/Python speedloader and will generally be a good fit in either gun's leather.
|
02-22-2013, 11:14 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 884
Likes: 13
Liked 302 Times in 116 Posts
|
|
I see the word 'Trooper' used alot with and without qualifiers (Trooper, MK III, MK V) but that's neither here nor there for my purposes -- you know what you meant. I read with interest, though, the posts about holster fit because I'm trying to line something up for a MK III 6". Bianchi and Safariland surely made leather for this gun, since it was in production for 14 years, but I'm having a hard time nailing down the model nomenclature. Dfariswheel is helping over on 1911 Forum, but maybe y'all know something.
I prefer the safety strap models, so I'll limit this to vintage Bianchi 10Ls and Safariland 25s.
What else will the holster say besides the model number? COLT? COLT .38/.357? I don't want to experiment with Python holsters on the theory that they're 'close' in frame size, and don't need the underlug leather anyway. It's rumored that the King Cobra is the same frame size, but modern Bianchis (who list for a KC) are out for me because the MIM (Made in Mexico) linings are like particle board.
Has anyone got any 'back in the day' experience with this? Thanks.
|
02-23-2013, 12:08 AM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: utah
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 2,547
Liked 7,201 Times in 3,064 Posts
|
|
Anything made for the python will fit. I am guessing that anything made for the s&w 586 should too. Years ago at work I had the offical police, 586 and ruger speed six all available to me. They were company guns all in 4". We were isued company holsters from several makers. One holster fit all three just fine. I also carried a colt trooper probley the most. I still have 3 or 4 of those holsters yet. I still have several troopers and pythons. I also have a holster or two for K frame smiths. They are a little too tight for my colts.
|
02-23-2013, 12:50 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 30
Liked 698 Times in 391 Posts
|
|
I have a Trooper .357 from 1967. The closest S&W in size and function is the Model 19 Combat Magnum. The M27/28 is a size larger. My 686 is in between, and definitely larger than the Colt.
|
02-23-2013, 01:33 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 884
Likes: 13
Liked 302 Times in 116 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neumann
I have a Trooper .357 from 1967. The closest S&W in size and function is the Model 19 Combat Magnum. The M27/28 is a size larger. My 686 is in between, and definitely larger than the Colt.
|
Interesting. I read a post last night from a guy who had to force a Trooper into a K frame holster. Consensus seems to be it is roughly equivalent to the L frame.
SAEmetric: That's what I'm looking for right there. Thanks! I'm on my way to the WTB Forum.
Last edited by brokenprism; 02-23-2013 at 01:38 PM.
|
02-23-2013, 01:35 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 884
Likes: 13
Liked 302 Times in 116 Posts
|
|
And worthy of its own thread, look at this pic of a Colt test target shipped with a Trooper MK III. I'm not saying an M27 can't do this, but I've never seen it. In any case, God bless the craftsmen of old who made guns like this.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-15-2013, 05:46 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 13
Likes: 4
Liked 9 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Just Bought a Colt Trooper MKIII Today
Just was in the right place at the right time.
Walked into the gun store and a fellow wanted to trade his 1973 MKIII for a S&W Body Guard $419. ( At This Shop )
The guy behind the counter offered him $325 for a 98% gun.
He decided that he would think about it and maybe come back later. I asked him to look at it. Told him I would pay for his Body Guard if he traded me the Colt. Nice Pistol - Can't wait to shoot it. This is my second Colt and I love the first one !
__________________
" Right to be Free..."
|
05-15-2013, 06:44 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 42
Likes: 6
Liked 15 Times in 11 Posts
|
|
My father has a 6" Python, my brother has a 6" Trooper III, and I am in the process of getting a Model 28. Both of the Colts shoot very nice, and are quite accurate, I prefer the feel of the DA trigger on the Python to the Trooper, but I find most S&W triggers to be just as good, although different. I too would say that the Trooper III is nearly identical in size to an L frame, its certainly not as big as an N. Honestly, I think that both of the Colts are slightly better looking than the Smith, but I find that the Smiths fit my hands slightly better and just feel right.
|
05-15-2013, 10:12 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: S.Eastern, PA.
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 2,563
Liked 1,624 Times in 564 Posts
|
|
[QUOTE=mkk41;1187845]Well , I have a first year Colt .357 Magnum , same size as a Trooper , and it does not fit into a holster molded for a K-frame.
Would your Colt be a Shooting Master from 1936 ? There were 500 made in .357 Mag. I saw one at a LGS that was for sale by one of the employees. I never knew about them until he told me about it.
|
05-16-2013, 07:36 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 4,896
Likes: 3,295
Liked 4,962 Times in 1,950 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BE Mike
I have shot a few Colt Troopers and I can say with certainty, that no Colt Trooper equals any S&W revolver I've ever shot.
|
Colts are nice but...
Kinda off topic and not to hijack, but having owned some police positives, det. spec. lawman, trooper MKIII's and several snakes (pythons, diamondbacks, anaconda, cobra), etc. I tend to agree but it's likely you favor what you started with.
Currently only own the lawman mk3 (traded into 2" RB) and IMO there's a reason the colt wheelies are extinct (excluding the SAA) while S&W is still very much in the DA revolver business. Not a colt hater but my regret is that I don't still own a herd of colts so could re-sell them at absurd prices they seem to bring today.
I may catch heck here but there's no way I'd post this on a colt forum.
|
05-16-2013, 08:30 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Central Georgia
Posts: 91
Likes: 7
Liked 166 Times in 34 Posts
|
|
The first handgun I purchased as a Police Officer was a 4 inch nickel Trooper Mark III in 1978. It was and still is a fine revolver. I still have it today, but if I was going to pick only one 357 for everday use it would be the S&W 686. I have a 2 1/2 inch and a 4 inch version (no dash) The 2 1/2 is the Lew Horton edition. As far as size comparison the Trooper MK III is kinda between the K and L frame.
|
05-16-2013, 09:36 AM
|
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 511
Likes: 63
Liked 651 Times in 269 Posts
|
|
I own Colt, Ruger, and S&W revolvers. The Colt Python, Trooper 357, Trooper MK III, Ruger GP100, and S&W 686 Mountain Gun all fit in a Bianchi #5 Black Widow marked Ruger/S&W 357.
My Colts.
LE6920
Series 70 1911 Wiley Clap Talo
Anaconda (1992)
SAA 45 Colt (1959)
Trooper MK III (1976)
Python (1978)
Trooper 357 (1965)
__________________
U.S. Navy - U.S. Army, ret
|
05-16-2013, 06:44 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal/native Montanan
Posts: 549
Likes: 1,407
Liked 469 Times in 232 Posts
|
|
I think the Trooper and Python were built on what was referred to often as the "41" frame for the old .41 Colt da which was smaller than the larger .45's and 44's, but larger than the positives and other .38's & .32's of the era.....
|
05-26-2013, 10:21 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Dayton Ohio
Posts: 95
Likes: 112
Liked 37 Times in 19 Posts
|
|
Lovem all !! N Frames,Colt Snakes .... got a Trooper feels alot like my 27-2. Not like the Python.
|
05-26-2013, 10:55 AM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: South East , PA . USA
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 485
Liked 1,610 Times in 884 Posts
|
|
[QUOTE=wetdog;137225663]
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkk41
Well , I have a first year Colt .357 Magnum , same size as a Trooper , and it does not fit into a holster molded for a K-frame.
Would your Colt be a Shooting Master from 1936 ? There were 500 made in .357 Mag. I saw one at a LGS that was for sale by one of the employees. I never knew about them until he told me about it.
|
Nope , it's a 1954 ' Colt .357'. That was the model.
Last edited by mkk41; 05-26-2013 at 10:58 AM.
|
05-26-2013, 11:14 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Idaho
Posts: 976
Likes: 1,947
Liked 1,533 Times in 334 Posts
|
|
I own a Colt Trooper in .38 Spl (mfd. 1960) with a 4" barrel. Very nice action and a very accurate revolver. I also own a 4 screw K-38 and a pre-WWII Colt Officers Model Targer. Both a very nice target revolvers. I'd be hard pressed to choose between them so therefore I won't.
__________________
I type. Therefore I am.
|
05-26-2013, 01:14 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: S.Eastern, PA.
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 2,563
Liked 1,624 Times in 564 Posts
|
|
Nope , it's a 1954 ' Colt .357'. That was the model.
[/QUOTE]
That's a beauty. I didn't know about that model either.
Thanks for posting.
|
05-26-2013, 02:10 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: South East , PA . USA
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 485
Liked 1,610 Times in 884 Posts
|
|
|
05-26-2013, 02:33 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 8,801
Likes: 15,779
Liked 19,356 Times in 4,351 Posts
|
|
I had a Colt model 357 in the 80's and 90's. Sold it in 1998. It was a good gun, but I still much prefer a Smith (27/28).
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-26-2013, 03:17 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Pa.
Posts: 765
Likes: 822
Liked 1,090 Times in 429 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeruns
I think the Trooper and Python were built on what was referred to often as the "41" frame for the old .41 Colt da which was smaller than the larger .45's and 44's, but larger than the positives and other .38's & .32's of the era.....
|
You are correct sir. The OP was built on this frame as well. I've got a Trooper MkIII and a Lawman. Excellent weapons and built to take as many magnums as you care to fire, in my opinion. I believe S&W comparison is the L frame series.
|
|
Tags
|
357 magnum, 686, bianchi, bullseye, colt, ejector, highway patrolman, k frame, k-frame, l frame, leather, lock, model 15, model 19, model 27, mountain gun, n-frame, patrolman, ruger, s&w, safariland, sig arms, thompson, trooper |
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|