|
|
12-02-2009, 09:19 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 1,516
Liked 1,068 Times in 348 Posts
|
|
4" M66 w/stainless rear sight
In my wanderings today I found a small gun shop just outside the metro area. Since it was on the way home I stopped to see what they had, hoping to find some small pistol primers. They had some nice Colt and S&W handguns in the case including a 4" M66. The gun was in real nice shape but the $700 price tag was too rich for my blood. When I questioned the price I was told that it was super rare because of the stainless rear sight. I know that a small number of S&W's were built with the stainless sight but does it really add that much to the guns value? I figured it was a $500-$600 gun at best...
__________________
"Shall not be infringed"
|
12-02-2009, 09:28 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: MURFREESBORO TN.
Posts: 5,384
Likes: 90
Liked 402 Times in 177 Posts
|
|
I don't think I would like a SS rear sight. It would be
hard to see in the daylight. I do know they are more rare
but I don't think they are $700 rare. Keep looking! Don
__________________
"Don't worry be happy"
|
12-02-2009, 10:06 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Moscow, Idaho USA
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 9,623
Liked 1,696 Times in 679 Posts
|
|
First year production of the 66 had stainless front and rear sights. Not good for target work, later changed after all the cops bitched about the silver sights.
|
12-02-2009, 10:07 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 1,516
Liked 1,068 Times in 348 Posts
|
|
The sight has a very dull finish so I don't think glare would be an issue Don...
__________________
"Shall not be infringed"
|
12-03-2009, 10:13 AM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 9,409
Likes: 1,323
Liked 30,546 Times in 4,375 Posts
|
|
I have an early Model 66 with stainless front and rear sights. The problem isn't so much with the rear sight blade, it is really with the stainless ramp front sight that is hard to see in certain lighting conditions.
Bill
|
12-03-2009, 12:07 PM
|
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Craig, Montana
Posts: 3,093
Likes: 363
Liked 2,346 Times in 893 Posts
|
|
I've still got my first year production 66 with the SS frt & rear sights. I found the grey sights very difficult in certain light conditions. I can recall seeing a few of those early guns in the hands of cops...who simply masked off the sight ramp and sprayed them with some matte black paint.
FN iin MT
|
12-03-2009, 02:04 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 18,773
Likes: 6,048
Liked 5,762 Times in 1,992 Posts
|
|
I have both a model 66 no dash and a model 67 no dash and they both have the stainless sights and as already stated the problem is seeing the front sight. Both of mine are shooter grade and the 67 has red paint on the front sight and the model 66 has a red ramp front sight.
They are rarer then the later models but no where near $700 worth of rare. The gun is a $500 gun at most if it's a shooter.
|
12-03-2009, 02:23 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Red fingernail polish does wonders for a front sight ramp.
|
12-03-2009, 05:29 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 7,785
Likes: 2,487
Liked 8,326 Times in 2,922 Posts
|
|
Here is a model 67 no dash with stainless sights next to a 66-1.
I like the uniqueness of the early SS rear site.
It is sometimes more difficult to see them due to the lack of contrast, epsecially in certain light conditions.
As for adding value, My opinion is not worth extra $$ on a shooter,
But I would spend a few more bucks for a clean SS site model in new condition because they are harder to find.
Last edited by Engine49guy; 12-04-2009 at 08:34 PM.
|
12-03-2009, 05:33 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Indiana USA
Posts: 1,148
Likes: 3
Liked 207 Times in 109 Posts
|
|
I had an early M/66 with stainless sights, I installed a blue rear sight blade and red ramp front sight. That took care of the hard to see sights for me.
|
12-03-2009, 08:50 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 610
Likes: 194
Liked 128 Times in 66 Posts
|
|
Most shooters who had the stainless sights got rid of them asap. As to it's "worth", I don't believe it is worth a nickle more than any other M66.
__________________
Martin Co,FLA(finally made it)
|
12-04-2009, 12:02 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
Liked 40 Times in 25 Posts
|
|
I have a 66 no dash with stainless front and rear sights. As a couple of other posters have noted, the stainless rear sight presents no problem. The stainless front sight, on the other hand, is a whole different story. In low light it's fine, it shows up in my eyes as a nearly black sight. But, in bright light, especially when the light is coming from behind me, the sight essentially disappears. I've kept the stainless sights on my 66 (which I truly love) for sentimental reasons and also because they look pretty cool. But, the stainless front sight obviously has its drawbacks and I'm guessing that's why Smith discontinued it so soon after introducing it.
|
12-04-2009, 12:36 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bronco45
First year production of the 66 had stainless front and rear sights. Not good for target work, later changed after all the cops bitched about the silver sights.
|
I have my model 66 with stainless sights that I bought new as a young police officer. I had no trouble putting six rounds in a tea cup size circle at 30 yards with it. One of the most accurate handguns I ever carried. I bought it when I retired my 1968 colt python which was as accurate.
Ed
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|