Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 3-Screw PINNED Barrel SWING-OUT Cylinder Hand Ejectors WITH Model Numbers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-08-2010, 11:46 AM
mod15 mod15 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default model 17-3 accuracy

I got a model 17-3 .22 6" barrel. Single action pull is 3 lb. and very nice. Double action pull is 14 lb. and not that smooth. What would expect double action pull to be for this revover?
What group size would you expect at 15, 25 yards (off sandbag rest) single action?
I will be shooting it soon and hope to get good results.
I will probably work on double action pull to get it smoother, Maybe carefully hone the sear or sear ledge. Has anyone smoothed out their double action pull on a mod 17?

Thanks Much for any input.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-08-2010, 12:01 PM
GF's Avatar
GF GF is offline
SWCA Member
model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy  
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southern Indiana
Posts: 4,634
Likes: 2,805
Liked 4,156 Times in 1,126 Posts
Default

I don't know about home gunsmithing just yet, shoot it some more first.

I have best luck in that model with 40gr lead ammo. Eley brand (low end stuff) in my 17's shoot well. Believe it or not the old Winchester Wildcat is good in it too.

GF
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-08-2010, 12:50 PM
StingrayG4's Avatar
StingrayG4 StingrayG4 is offline
Member
model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Grouping should be good and tight shooting the way you describe. My 617 is the most accurate handgun I've ever shot.

-S
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-08-2010, 01:05 PM
H Richard's Avatar
H Richard H Richard is offline
US Veteran
model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,803
Likes: 18,552
Liked 22,421 Times in 8,276 Posts
Default

40 gr. Standard Velocity of a quality brand should work the best. I've been told CCI does well. I have good luck with Fiocchi 320 M or 320 SM. I would expect it to shoot under 2" at 25 yards off a sand bag rest.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-08-2010, 01:32 PM
rburg rburg is offline
Member
model 17-3 accuracy  
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Kentucky, USA
Posts: 7,470
Likes: 2,830
Liked 6,261 Times in 2,170 Posts
Default

22s all seem to be individuals. Its your job to figure out what brand/style of ammo shoots best in it. Just because something works fine in one gun is no guarantee it will work well in the next one. Try different brands until you find one that works in your gun. Ignore others recommendations until you prove the ammo in your very own gun.

Action smoothness can play a huge role in accuracy. You can do your test firing in single action mode. I'm not seeing any reason for accuracy to vary between single and double action based on ammo.

Some problems, and particularly with very heavy double action pulls is pretty common. With many K frame sized guns, a Wolf spring kit can make a world of difference. Just make sure your hammer fall is sufficient to ignite the cartridges every time. Federal ammo has a very good reputation for having sensitive priming compound. Other brands seem to require more hammer fall to get the reliable ignition.

The Wolf kit does require some skill to install. And you probably won't get it right the first try. The kit includes a mainspring and several rebound slide springs. Almost everyone tries the lightest spring for that purpose that is supplied. Then when the gun fails to cycle back, they step up to the next size.
__________________
Dick Burg
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-08-2010, 10:27 PM
model70hunter's Avatar
model70hunter model70hunter is offline
Member
model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy  
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sante Fe Trail, Kansas
Posts: 5,350
Likes: 14,441
Liked 6,562 Times in 2,597 Posts
Default

Try many brands of ammo, I have lots of different brands that only get used to do one group with a 22. When I find one that works well I buy a brick for that gun. Both of my K-22's prefer Ely but both will get a brick of their 2nd best group. One shoots Federal target almost as well and the other shoots remington target almost as well. I also keep a 22 brush on a short rod to clean the chambers and bore while shooting or the chambers seem to tighten up when loading.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-08-2010, 11:02 PM
cp1969's Avatar
cp1969 cp1969 is offline
Member
model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy  
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 279
Liked 63 Times in 42 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mod15 View Post
I got a model 17-3 .22 6" barrel. Single action pull is 3 lb. and very nice. Double action pull is 14 lb. and not that smooth. What would expect double action pull to be for this revover?
What group size would you expect at 15, 25 yards (off sandbag rest) single action?
I will be shooting it soon and hope to get good results.
I will probably work on double action pull to get it smoother, Maybe carefully hone the sear or sear ledge. Has anyone smoothed out their double action pull on a mod 17?

Thanks Much for any input.
I smoothed mine up. It didn't help that much. Just firing it DA a lot will probably do the same thing. You can back off the mainspring but then you might have ignition trouble. A lot of the DA pull weight comes from the rebound spring. Don't know why it is so strong.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-08-2010, 11:19 PM
scooter123 scooter123 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 6,926
Likes: 179
Liked 4,301 Times in 2,112 Posts
Default

Your reported disparity in trigger pulls would indicate to me that someone has fiddled with the SA sear. Normally, in a stock K frame the DA pull should be in the range of 10-12 lbs and the SA pull about 4 lbs. One big problem that your goind to face is that if you reduce the DA pull on your model 17, the SA pull may drop to below 1 lbs. I would suggest that you have a gunsmith who is very well versed with the S&W do the tuning on your gun. I suspect that the SA sear will have to be adjusted to increase the weight of pull so it's more in balance with the DA pull weight.

I put a 12 lbs. rebound spring in my 617 and it took the DA pull down to about 8.5 lbs and the SA pull to under 2 lbs., which is light enough that I've become very attentive to my trigger finger. Even so, I've had 2 flyers due to my bringing the finger to the trigger a bit too heavily. At some point I'll prabably put in a 13 lbs. rebound spring just to increase the SA pull to about 2.5 lbs., to be honest it's currently light enough that I'm just a bit uncomfortable with it even though it won't "push off".

As for groups, with my 617 I've managed to shoot 24 rounds into a 2 inch well centered group at 100 feet from a sandbag rest in single action. This was with Winchester Xpert HV from Walmart, about the cheapest 22LR you can find. I would expect that you could expect the same results or better if you take the time to find an ammunition that shoots well in your model 17. As for me, when I have the time, I plan on experimenting with different ammos but it's difficult to find target specific 22LR in my area.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-08-2010, 11:59 PM
semperfi71's Avatar
semperfi71 semperfi71 is offline
US Veteran
model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy  
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Central New Mexico
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 1,179
Liked 1,116 Times in 409 Posts
Default

Hi,

My 1958ish K-22 will group into 1 1/4 inches with Winchester standard .22 hollow points.

My 1983 M17-4 will group into 2 1/4 inches with CCI Minimags, either solid or hollow point.

My 1953ish K-22 Combat Masterpiece will group into 2 1/2 inches with Federal Lightning and Winchester standard copper-clad ammo.

My 1970-something M34-1 with 2 inch barrel will group into 3 1/4 with Federal Lightning.

My wife's M63 with a 4 inch barrel will group into 2 1/2 inches with Federal Auto Match.

All groups shot at 25 yards from a sandbag rest for five shots.

Good luck.
__________________
Have guns...will shoot'em.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-09-2010, 03:18 PM
mod15 mod15 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks to youall for Great information! Any other input by others is also welcomed.
I think I'll try polishing the rebound slide and maybe the da sear (a little) per the Kunhausen shop manual. But as some of you pointed out I dont want to screw up the single action, as right now its about perfect. I probably wouldnt shoot it much in double action anyway but the 14 lbs. seemed awful heavy for the mod 17.If my polishing helps smooth it out some, I'll leave it alone. I cant wait to group it off sandbags and see just how tight a group I can get. I will compare it to youall's groups and see if its in the ballpark. I am going to try several types of 22 shells. Ill let you know how it turns out.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-09-2010, 08:43 PM
crsides crsides is offline
US Veteran
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: upstate SC / Mtns SW Va
Posts: 4,789
Likes: 3,064
Liked 9,875 Times in 1,986 Posts
Default

You don't want to stone the sear/trigger on the smith. Just smooth up the recoil slide and the area it bears against. Lighten the mainspring and recoil spring all you want, but don't mess with the sear.... or you might be buying a new hammer & trigger.


Charlie
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-10-2010, 08:55 PM
SmithSwede SmithSwede is offline
Member
model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy  
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Terrell, Texas
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Liked 246 Times in 22 Posts
Default

I have a 4 screw Model 17.

From a Ransom rest at 50 yards, it gives about 3.5-4" groups at 50 yards with cheap Federal copper clad bulk pack .22 high velocity stuff.

Remington standard velocity was better.

Some of the other .22 standard velocity stuff was terrible at 50 yards.

I think you really have to experiment with .22s to see what they like. Don't assume the cheaper stuff if bad or the expensive stuff is good.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-11-2010, 02:37 AM
semperfi71's Avatar
semperfi71 semperfi71 is offline
US Veteran
model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy  
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Central New Mexico
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 1,179
Liked 1,116 Times in 409 Posts
Default

"I think you really have to experiment with .22s to see what they like. Don't assume the cheaper stuff if bad or the expensive stuff is good."

SmithSwede is dead on. I have never found the "target" ammo to be able to outshoot the standard and cheap stuff. I will admit to having never shot eley.

I think with the groups posted on my guns I do not have to worry.
__________________
Have guns...will shoot'em.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-11-2010, 06:57 AM
Andyd's Avatar
Andyd Andyd is offline
Member
model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy model 17-3 accuracy  
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 2,002
Liked 3,443 Times in 936 Posts
Default

There is a significant difference between a rimfire K-frame and a centerfire K-frame. While the centerfire will usually work positively with a lightened hammer spring, the rimfires get spotty.

I found that a wide, smooth trigger works wonders without influencing reliability.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
22lr, 617, combat masterpiece, fiocchi, gunsmith, k frame, k-22, k-frame, m17, masterpiece, model 17, remington, rimfire, sig arms, wildcat, winchester


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Model 41 New vs Old Accuracy MangoBango Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 21 07-23-2017 09:23 AM
Accuracy of Model 41 PC ray2849 Smith & Wesson Competitive Shooting 9 06-07-2015 11:30 PM
Model 14-2 Accuracy ray2849 S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 14 10-17-2013 04:57 PM
Model 25-2 accuracy? MDanay S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 51 12-25-2011 10:21 PM
Accuracy on model 36? Kingcobra145 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 12 01-12-2011 12:02 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:02 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)