|
|
12-18-2010, 04:13 AM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
57 VS 29-2
I saw some posts on 41 vs 44 magnum.
In this one I would like to compare them in two specific revolvers. Four inch 29-2 ( late 70's) and four inch 57 no dash.
Also ammo used is only factory. No reloading.
|
12-18-2010, 04:30 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 6,026
Likes: 1,061
Liked 774 Times in 375 Posts
|
|
The results in this one will be even more in favor of the .41 due to the lighter weight of both guns.
|
12-18-2010, 08:41 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 476
Likes: 1
Liked 53 Times in 39 Posts
|
|
A 57 will always be a little heavier than a 29 of same barrel link. But when you start talking factory ammo only, it becames a win for the 44mag. I am a 41 fan, going back to a 57 no dash bought new way back when, plus a few others over the years. Either one is great if you handload.
|
12-18-2010, 11:43 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 6,026
Likes: 1,061
Liked 774 Times in 375 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fkimble
A 57 will always be a little heavier than a 29 of same barrel link. But when you start talking factory ammo only, it becames a win for the 44mag. I am a 41 fan, going back to a 57 no dash bought new way back when, plus a few others over the years. Either one is great if you handload.
|
I believe he is still asking about durability issues between the two that he asked in his other thread.
If I misunderstood the question this time, then yes, availability of .44 ammo makes it the clear winner.
|
12-18-2010, 12:30 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The wet side of Oregon
Posts: 6,292
Likes: 8,816
Liked 7,785 Times in 2,377 Posts
|
|
In my opinion, they are very close so either would be a good choice. As you don't reload, the .44 is a better choice due to the wide choice of compatible ammunition.
I have a 29-2 I bought new and have put probably 10,000 rounds through it. Later, I fired a friend's new 57. Very impressive. If I had a do-over, I believe Id choose a 57, but I DO reload.
__________________
-jwk-
US Army '72-'95
|
12-18-2010, 02:42 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gun 4 Fun
I believe he is still asking about durability issues between the two that he asked in his other thread.
If I misunderstood the question this time, then yes, availability of .44 ammo makes it the clear winner.
|
You are very close.
I am asking how they compare as a self defense carry gun .
In the woods , on the street , at home etc.
WIN 175 STHP is VERY easy to shoot in a 57 with a 4 inch barrel and yet is a great load for protection.
Is there a great defense 44 mag factory load that is JUST as easy to shoot in a four inch 29?
|
12-18-2010, 03:05 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 6,026
Likes: 1,061
Liked 774 Times in 375 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fighter62
You are very close.
I am asking how they compare as a self defense carry gun .
In the woods , on the street , at home etc.
WIN 175 STHP is VERY easy to shoot in a 57 with a 4 inch barrel and yet is a great load for protection.
Is there a great defense 44 mag factory load that is JUST as easy to shoot in a four inch 29?
|
Yep.
That would be the equivalent 210 grain Silvertip loading for the .44 mag.
|
12-18-2010, 03:11 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: PA.
Posts: 578
Likes: 31
Liked 130 Times in 76 Posts
|
|
I suggest the .44 because of the larger selection of off the shelf ammunition choices. It is easier to find a mid-range load in .44, (.44 special) which will be better suited to self defense. Remember, the main reason the .41 never caught on with the police, was the lack of a mid range self defense load.
If I were looking for a large bore self defense revolver I would look at a model 625 (.45 ACP). They can be had in barrel lengths of 3, 4, and 5 inches, and the .45ACP is specifically a self defense round. Lots of good self defense choices out there, Hornady TAP, or Speer Gold Dots, and many others. If you ever had to use the .41 or .44 with magnum loads in a self defense situation the muzzle blast and noise would be a major drawback. If that self defense situation took place indoors, the noise and blast would be much worse. Unless you are in big bear country, the 625 would also work well as a woods gun.
|
12-18-2010, 03:52 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Liked 116 Times in 44 Posts
|
|
Model 57 all the way - the .41 is the perfect size for the N frame; .44 (.429 actually) is somewhat small for a steady diet of .44 Magnum ammunition.
Get a 57, then go all the way and load for it. You'll be part of a happy cult. You might also be inclined toward that best of all shotgun gauges, the 16, and the 7x57 in rifle calibers, once you step down the road in caliber cults.
|
12-19-2010, 03:23 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SW Washington
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 616
Liked 288 Times in 168 Posts
|
|
Since you ask, my opinion would be for the 29. I'd be happy with a 57, but would prefer a 29. You specified factory ammo, and the choices in .44 Mag are much greater than .41. Also, as far as durability goes, you probably aren't going to be able to afford to wear any revolver out shooting factory ammo. And if you can, you can probably afford a new gun.
Chris
|
12-19-2010, 03:59 AM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Bolivar, MO
Posts: 6,360
Likes: 3,558
Liked 3,242 Times in 1,100 Posts
|
|
no contest...the 29. Betcha you can go anywhere in the world (almost) and find 44 ammo. I know a LOT of local shops that dont have any 41.
|
12-19-2010, 03:23 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 373
Likes: 98
Liked 226 Times in 98 Posts
|
|
I love my Model 57, but I reload. For a non-reloader the Model 29 is the only way to go.
|
12-20-2010, 09:22 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
I'm a 41 fan myself, but if you aren't reloading I'll go with the 44 as well.
|
12-21-2010, 07:30 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ask the NSA
Posts: 2,208
Likes: 111
Liked 119 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
I carry a 3" 657 loaded with Speer Gold Dot's in 210 grains in the winter (for large or heavily clothed criminals) and it was my outdoor revolver for years. I have seen the results from taking a few deer down with that round and a 4" and 6" 57 and was/am thoroughly impressed. An average sized deer is close to the same body weight as a man so that is the extent of my scientific data as I have luckily never had to shoot another human being. Recoil is stout but is manageable with a good grip and practice. I want my rounds to penetrate so I can put two holes to speed up the bleeding process, both on an animal and someone intent on doing me harm. Recoil is very similar to the short barreled 240 grain .44 loads. I feel very well armed with the round and weapon.
To clarify the overpenetration subject just about any premium SD ammo will penetrate clear through and then some on a human on a frontal shot. You are not always afforded that luxury of that perfect shot when defending yourself and that .41 mag Gold Dot will do its job.
I'll keep on buying .41 ammo (for self defense) which is avialable online and in some gun shops and keep reloading till my fingers fall off for my .41 mags. Been down the .44 road and enjoy the .41 much more so looks like I'm in the minority here. It's all in the right bullet and load to do everything you need a large bore revolver to do in North America.
Even if you don't reload you need some deep pockets to shoot em both. A good supply of 210 gr, LSWC's and a can of Unique will keep you shooting at the range and in the woods for a long time.
JMO
__________________
V/R
Roger / SG
Last edited by Sportsterguy; 12-21-2010 at 08:19 PM.
|
12-22-2010, 05:15 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 481
Likes: 3
Liked 85 Times in 26 Posts
|
|
It you find yourself reloading at some point, which I expect you will given the cost of factory ammo, the 44 will still be the better choice in my view. The range of bullets....from 180 grain to over 300......provides you a far greater variety of loads. While I totally agree with others here that the 41 is a great choice, the lack of available components, brass, and bullet choices will only get worse as time passes. That alone makes the 44 magnum the most practically choice.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|