|
|
09-22-2011, 09:44 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: DUNNELLON, FLORIDA USA
Posts: 11,113
Likes: 1,691
Liked 16,318 Times in 4,239 Posts
|
|
S&W M19-4 verus Colt Python
Hi:
How much differences in frame size between a S&W Model 19-4 and a Colt Python?
My reason is I have a chance to purchase a holster made for a Colt Python
w/2.5" barrel. Will this holster fit a S&W Model 19-4 w/2.5" barrel?
Thanks,
Jimmy
|
09-22-2011, 09:46 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Out for the duration
Posts: 4,870
Likes: 62
Liked 520 Times in 264 Posts
|
|
Depends on how and if there is a strap. If it is fitted, it likely won't work too well. The 19 will be loose.
__________________
Lost it all in a boat accident
|
09-22-2011, 09:51 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Eastern Washington
Posts: 4,913
Likes: 3,226
Liked 6,813 Times in 2,543 Posts
|
|
I've fit 4" K-frames in Python holsters several times. A thumb-strap will (usually) work but a thumb-break sometimes will and sometimes won't. The other way around is less likely
|
09-22-2011, 01:14 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: up-state SC
Posts: 759
Likes: 134
Liked 90 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
I think an L-frame would be a better fit in a Python holster.
|
09-22-2011, 03:03 PM
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,361
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,154 Times in 7,408 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe in SC
I think an L-frame would be a better fit in a Python holster.
|
Yeah, a Python holster will be a little too big for a K-frame.
The same holster is often marketed for the Python and other Colt .357's, the S&W L-frames, and the Ruger GP-100.
My GP-100 is worn in a Bianchi holster that I think is marked for MED REV. I used that same holster when I owned a M-686.
|
09-22-2011, 05:29 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tupelo, MS
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 3
Liked 68 Times in 43 Posts
|
|
Andy said it right. I believe the Model 19 might be bumping around a little in a Colt Python holster.
|
09-22-2011, 08:37 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SE-SC
Posts: 1,645
Likes: 1,508
Liked 271 Times in 171 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe in SC
I think an L-frame would be a better fit in a Python holster.
|
I agree an L- frame is just right.
|
09-22-2011, 08:53 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: St Augustine
Posts: 2,362
Likes: 2,314
Liked 5,696 Times in 848 Posts
|
|
I tried my 2 1/2" Python in a 2 1/2" Galco K-frame holster.
The fit was somewhat tight and snug. The biggest difference was the positioning of the rear sight. The Python rear sight sits more forward than the K-frame S&W sight and the cut of the holster made it difficult to properly holster the Python because of the rear sight. I don't know if that would be an issue the other way around.
|
09-23-2011, 08:42 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 1,421
Likes: 0
Liked 947 Times in 413 Posts
|
|
Remember too, the Colt has a significantly larger diameter cylinder than the S&W "K" frame.
A "K" frame in a Colt Python holster is going to be pretty loose.
A Colt in a "K" frame holster will stretch out and ruin the holster for use with the "K" frame again.
|
|
Tags
|
686, bianchi, colt, galco, k-frame, m19, model 19, model 686, ruger, s&w, sig arms |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|