| |  | 
12-26-2012, 05:50 PM
| |
Member
| | | Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 7
Likes: 1
Liked 4 Times in 1 Post
| | Purchasing dilema..19-3 or 66-1 Can't decide. Both are excellent condition. $495 each. No, I can't afford both. This will be shot with mid-range 357 loads. Not a safe queen. I live
Arizona, so stainless isn't a big factor. Opinions? Thanks. | 
12-26-2012, 05:53 PM
|  |
Member
| | | Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: West Virginia panhandle
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 422
Liked 849 Times in 479 Posts
| | I've always preferred blued guns. Personally I'd go with the 19-3, it'd make a good companion to my wife's 66-3. | 
12-26-2012, 05:53 PM
| |
Banned
| | | Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 2,028
Likes: 5
Liked 347 Times in 253 Posts
| | Stainless guns sure are easy to clean and care for. If it's going to be shot a bit, the 66 would likely be my choice. | 
12-26-2012, 05:56 PM
| |
Member
| | | Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Florida Panhandle
Posts: 184
Likes: 17
Liked 12 Times in 8 Posts
| | 66-1. $ 495 would be a steal in my neck of the woods. Bill. | | The Following User Likes This Post: | | 
12-26-2012, 06:25 PM
| |
Member
| | | Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 798
Likes: 28
Liked 251 Times in 163 Posts
| | I'd run a serious pre-purchase revolver check (if you don't know the fin points, do a forum search).
If they're truly equals in fit, finish and specs, it comes down to aesthetics versus practicality.
Blued 19? More aesthetically pleasing to me.
Stainless 66? More practical carrying, maintaining, and working on.
If one edges the other in any significant mechanical or cosmetic way after a good going over, forget the rest and take that one. | | The Following 2 Users Like Post: | | 
12-26-2012, 06:35 PM
|  |
Member
| | | Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,577
Likes: 36
Liked 414 Times in 210 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Hapworth I'd run a serious pre-purchase revolver check (if you don't know the fin points, do a forum search).
If they're truly equals in fit, finish and specs, it comes down to aesthetics versus practicality.
Blued 19? More aesthetically pleasing to me.
Stainless 66? More practical carrying, maintaining, and working on.
If one edges the other in any significant mechanical or cosmetic way after a good going over, forget the rest and take that one. | Yep !
Condition , Condition and condition....
If condition is the same which color do you like better?
Of course you realize the 66-1 is actually the equivilant of the 19-4 not the 19-3,
The 19-3 equivilant is the 66 no dash.
If you shoot alot the 66-1 has the gas ring on the cylinder and its finish will hold up better,
If the 19-3 has a serial that "Begins" with the letter "K" (like K999,999 or lower) I prefer the pre 1970 guns. | 
12-26-2012, 11:00 PM
| |
Member
| | | Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 7
Likes: 1
Liked 4 Times in 1 Post
| | Thank you all for the info & advice. I'll post my decision & pics tomorrow. | 
12-26-2012, 11:15 PM
|  |
SWCA Member
| | | Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 413
Liked 409 Times in 216 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by msmyth01 Thank you all for the info & advice. I'll post my decision & pics tomorrow. | I look forward to seeing the photos!
If it were me, I'd take the Model 19-3. It would pair up nicely with the nickel plated 19-3 already in my stable. But I don't think you can get hurt either way if they are in high condition.
Let us know what you decide!!!
JP
__________________ Jack
SWCA #2475 | 
12-26-2012, 11:38 PM
| |
Member
| | | Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: NE Iowa
Posts: 3,465
Likes: 365
Liked 821 Times in 361 Posts
| | I'd go for the M66-1 also.
What is the barrel length?
Jim | 
12-26-2012, 11:49 PM
|  |
Member
| | | Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: E. Washington State
Posts: 775
Likes: 95
Liked 339 Times in 171 Posts
| | Either one would do for me.
__________________  The worst is yet to come | 
12-27-2012, 07:57 AM
|  |
Member
| | | Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 872
Likes: 18
Liked 178 Times in 64 Posts
| | You can't go wrong with either one.
The 19 won't show as much gunpowder residue as the 66 will, and it will take some elbow grease to remove the residue from the front of the cylinder on the 66. Not really a deal breaker though.
Good luck. | 
12-27-2012, 03:10 PM
| |
Member
| | | Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 7
Likes: 1
Liked 4 Times in 1 Post
| | Picked the 19-3. It was only fired 25 times by the original owner. He still had the remaining 25 cartridges in the box! Lock up is tight. No end-shake what so ever. No top strap gas cutting, no wear ring around the cylinder, no holster marks, and no brass ring around the firing pin hole. Yes, I'm very pleased, and yes, I'm going to feed it with mid-range 158 grain lswc. I don't believe in safe-queens. I'll post gratuitous pic after work. Thank you all for the advice and opinions. | | The Following 4 Users Like Post: | | 
12-27-2012, 03:17 PM
| |
Member
| | | Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 4,262
Likes: 80
Liked 195 Times in 155 Posts
| | Flip a coin! | 
12-27-2012, 03:35 PM
|  |
SWCA Member
| | | Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 413
Liked 409 Times in 216 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by msmyth01 Picked the 19-3. It was only fired 25 times by the original owner. He still had the remaining 25 cartridges in the box! | Not bad at all. A barely used Model 19-3 for just 5 bills? You can't complain about that.
I don't want to tell you what I paid for this little cutie. But I absolutely love shooting it. It is a 19-3 from 1976.
Jack
__________________ Jack
SWCA #2475 | | The Following User Likes This Post: | | 
12-27-2012, 04:01 PM
| |
Member
| | | Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 7
Likes: 1
Liked 4 Times in 1 Post
| | Very nice! | 
12-27-2012, 04:03 PM
|  |
Member
| | | Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: South Texas and Mexico
Posts: 1,534
Likes: 1,744
Liked 1,291 Times in 633 Posts
| | Good choice- here's the -3 I just picked up
__________________ David had only 5rds(1Sam17:40) | | The Following User Likes This Post: | | 
12-27-2012, 06:36 PM
|  |
US Veteran
| | | Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Jonesboro, GA
Posts: 1,951
Likes: 1,499
Liked 674 Times in 282 Posts
| | I am glad you went with the M19-3. Can't wait to see the pics. I like M19-3s. Here are a couple of mine with a M66-1 and a M12 thrown in. | | The Following 3 Users Like Post: | | 
12-27-2012, 06:40 PM
| |
Member
| | | Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 4,262
Likes: 80
Liked 195 Times in 155 Posts
| | I've got a nickle 19-3. They are sweet revolvers. Congratulations! | 
12-27-2012, 06:44 PM
| |
Member
| | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Va Beach
Posts: 1,517
Likes: 221
Liked 308 Times in 147 Posts
| | Get the 19. Blue is more awesome over longer time. | 
12-27-2012, 07:06 PM
|  |
Member
| | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: S&W Ohio
Posts: 4,275
Likes: 4,016
Liked 2,042 Times in 791 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by JCS&W I am glad you went with the M19-3. Can't wait to see the pics. I like M19-3s. Here are a couple of mine with a M66-1 and a M12 thrown in.  | Show off!!!!
__________________ Bob SWCA #2539 | | The Following User Likes This Post: | | 
12-27-2012, 07:39 PM
|  |
Member
| | | Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Auburn WA
Posts: 4,908
Likes: 4,684
Liked 2,307 Times in 1,117 Posts
| | Congratulations on your -3! I haven't been much of a Kframe fan, but I ran across a -3 last year for a price I couldn't turn down and man, was that a good decision! It's great to carry, shoots like a laser, and it's just plain purty! I know you will love yours, don't forget a range report once you get the chance to shoot it!
__________________ Get off my lawn! | 
12-28-2012, 09:07 AM
| |
Member
| | | Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 7
Likes: 1
Liked 4 Times in 1 Post
| | Cell phone pic. | 
12-28-2012, 09:15 AM
|  |
SWCA Member
| | | Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 413
Liked 409 Times in 216 Posts
| | Yep! Certainly a good buy at 500 bucks.
You know, I just noticed on your picture how nice the target stocks look on this revolver with the heavy barrel. Somehow it looks better balanced than target stocks on a tapered barrel revolver. I like! (Not that I'm about to take the target stocks off any of my tapered barrel models - just an observation.)
JP
__________________ Jack
SWCA #2475 | 
12-28-2012, 09:39 AM
| |
Member
| | | Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 7
Likes: 1
Liked 4 Times in 1 Post
| | I have to be honest. I'm a 1911 guy. I've owned a few S&W revolvers in the past including a 28 w/6" barrel, a pre-lock 686 w/4" barrel, & a 686 with the lock & 4" barrel. I really liked the 28, but this 19 is by far my favorite. Balance is wonderful, fits my hand perfectly, and it's just plain gorgeous. In my opinion, it doesn't get any better than old school S&W bluing. | 
12-28-2012, 09:47 AM
|  |
US Veteran
| | | Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Jonesboro, GA
Posts: 1,951
Likes: 1,499
Liked 674 Times in 282 Posts
| | msmyth01, congrats on the purchase. You will not be disappointed! | 
12-28-2012, 09:48 AM
|  |
SWCA Member
| | | Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 413
Liked 409 Times in 216 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by msmyth01 I have to be honest. I'm a 1911 guy. | I understand. About 52 years ago, I started shooting handguns with an armory rebuilt 1911A1. I loved it then and I love it now. There are a few more 1911s in my safe now.
But a few months later, I started shooting a Combat Masterpiece and a Highway Patrolman and a K-22 (a 4 screw that belonged to my older brother). I absolutely fell in love with S&W revolvers and I've been shooting them and accumulating them ever since, beginning in earnest after I returned from 'Nam, where I carried a Model 15.
Nothing says we can't have eclectic tastes, right?
But I will say this for the revolvers: it is nice to go for a range session and not spend a third of my time picking up brass!!!
Jack
__________________ Jack
SWCA #2475 | 
12-28-2012, 12:02 PM
|  |
SWCA Member
| | | Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 624
Likes: 41
Liked 289 Times in 141 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by msmyth01 I have to be honest. I'm a 1911 guy. I've owned a few S&W revolvers in the past including a 28 w/6" barrel, a pre-lock 686 w/4" barrel, & a 686 with the lock & 4" barrel. I really liked the 28, but this 19 is by far my favorite. Balance is wonderful, fits my hand perfectly, and it's just plain gorgeous. In my opinion, it doesn't get any better than old school S&W bluing. | I love 1911s. I love Smith revolvers. I wouldn't want to be without either. Nice 19. I need one!
__________________ Peter
S&WCA #2620 | 
12-29-2012, 12:18 PM
|  |
Member
| | | Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,577
Likes: 36
Liked 414 Times in 210 Posts
| | Congrats on your new Combat Magnum have you estimated its DOB by the serial number yet?
I love all CMs but have had a keen interest in pre 1970 varients lately. | 
12-29-2012, 06:57 PM
| |
Member
| | | Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 7
Likes: 1
Liked 4 Times in 1 Post
| | It dates to manufacture date of 1973. | 
01-06-2013, 06:33 PM
| |
Member
| | | Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Phoenix
Posts: 12
Likes: 31
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
| | I still kick myself for not buying a 66 for $200 when my department switched to wonder-nines back around '91. Us officers were given first dibs but with my now ex-wife I didn't have the money. | 
01-06-2013, 06:45 PM
|  |
US Veteran
| | | Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Midwest
Posts: 428
Likes: 277
Liked 169 Times in 71 Posts
| | Great choice on the Model 19! |  | | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| | | | S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 Thread, Purchasing dilema..19-3 or 66-1 in Smith & Wesson Revolvers; Can't decide. Both are excellent condition. $495 each. No, I can't afford both. This will be shot with mid-range 357 ... |