|
|
03-25-2013, 12:14 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Salmon, Idaho
Posts: 3,232
Likes: 4,065
Liked 9,396 Times in 1,441 Posts
|
|
Model 14-3 Single Action Only from factory
Curious if there is much of a market for these?
I have one that appears new in box from 1973, yes the box is marked SA, but there is no marking on the revolver.
If I decide to sell, would there be an added premium for the single action?
The catalog does not mention this as I am sure it was not a regular stocking item.
Tom
__________________
Tom Graham SWCA #2303
Last edited by THREEDFLYER; 03-27-2013 at 12:45 AM.
|
03-25-2013, 12:27 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Minneapolis,MN
Posts: 668
Likes: 38
Liked 104 Times in 65 Posts
|
|
Model 14 S\A
I am not sure how much of a premium but I would sure think anything out of the ordinary is worth somewhat extra.
I have same thing in a Colt Officers Model Match.
The book shows a large premium for it.
But states a letter showing its documented it is necessary.
I know on a Colt it is merely taking the hammer strut out, I am not positive of my terminology but I am sure of how easy it is.
I sent mine to Colt as trigger was under a # and it seemed unsafe. They "fixed" it but also put this small part in no charge. When I called to complain , they said It was probably done after it left, when I insisted it was genuine they said they would look it up and if it was they would pay shipping back and would repair it.They quickly called back and sent a call tag for shipping.
When I asked for documentation they said I would have to pay to letter it but assured me it would be worth it. It shipped to Fort Meade to Ordnance Property Officer July 29th 1960.
Sadly though, my Smith version is a fake, I bought a Single action Target hammer and trigger set here on the forum and put it in a no dash Model 14 four screw I have had for years.I really enjoy shooting it, in single action that is.
|
03-25-2013, 07:48 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Flint Ridge, MO
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 660
Liked 374 Times in 153 Posts
|
|
SA do demand a premium if genuine.
|
03-25-2013, 09:33 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Addison IL.
Posts: 735
Likes: 9
Liked 167 Times in 93 Posts
|
|
Premium
If you expect to get a premium you need to insure it is original, and not modified after the factory, as people did purchase the items to change one over from DA to SA only. There are a few parts needed,and often times they would take a short cut, and not buy a new hammer, somewhere there is a notch or clearance that would not be there on the SA model hammer.
Best if it were lettered, there goes your premium.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-25-2013, 10:23 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Salmon, Idaho
Posts: 3,232
Likes: 4,065
Liked 9,396 Times in 1,441 Posts
|
|
As mentioned, the box lable notes that this is an SA model.
Curious if teh S&W records would have the information needed to confirm this in fact was done at the factory? I will post a query with Roy to confirm.
Also curious if the premium added to the value would be more than the $50 cost of a letter?
Tom
__________________
Tom Graham SWCA #2303
|
03-25-2013, 11:25 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Santo las nubes, Florida
Posts: 8,968
Likes: 9,179
Liked 14,622 Times in 4,682 Posts
|
|
Top 14-3 is SAO, in the 12K ser # range. I think it's factory, can't see where someone (with the exception of a previous poster) would go through the trouble to convert the gun to SAO. I don't have the box or any accessories as I got this gun in repayment of a $200 loan. Joe
__________________
Wisdom chases me; I'm faster
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-25-2013, 01:52 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,480
Likes: 5,114
Liked 18,984 Times in 6,864 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by THREEDFLYER
Curious if the S&W records would have the information needed to confirm this in fact was done at the factory? I will post a query with Roy to confirm.
|
I'll save you the trouble, Tom. The records will show the SAO configuration if the gun shipped that way. I had this discussion with Roy a couple years ago when I acquired an SAO Model 14-3. I subsequently obtained a factory letter, confirming the gun shipped single action. You should specify the question when you submit your request, to make sure it doesn't get missed. If you have box, docs and tools and the gun is in the high 90s condition, I'd say the cost of the letter is at least a wash and may be less than the premium. But, of course, that assumes a knowledgeable buyer and one who wants an SAO example.
I'll attach a photo of mine with its letter. The photo does not show the entire letter, but in the non-displayed final paragraph, Roy confirms the gun shipped as an SAO. The stocks on this revolver are correctly numbered.
Jack
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-25-2013, 01:58 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 14,480
Likes: 5,114
Liked 18,984 Times in 6,864 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pharmer
I think it's factory, can't see where someone (with the exception of a previous poster) would go through the trouble to convert the gun to SAO.
|
A surprising number of people did exactly that. The kits could be purchased in gun stores back in the 1960s and 1970s. I've run across examples that were converted using the correct replacement hammers, and examples that did the conversion but left the original stepped, double action hammer in place.
The only way to be certain that a Model 14 was originally configured as SAO is to get a letter - although the OP's marked box is a very encouraging sign!
Jack
__________________
Jack
SWCA #2475, SWHF #318
|
03-25-2013, 05:05 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Bolivar, MO
Posts: 6,360
Likes: 3,558
Liked 3,241 Times in 1,099 Posts
|
|
IMHO I don't think the premium would be any more than the ~$150.00 the SAO kit used to cost. I have an SAO 14-3 I traded for before either the dealer or I realized it was SAO. I would not have paid any more for the feature as personally I look upon it as a novelty. Comparing it to my other conventional guns I see no difference in trigger pulls in SA mode.
All that being said, it is a variant which is collectable in its own rite if you are putting together a Masterpiece collection. If you are I feel for you...the K32 is gonna hurt.
|
03-25-2013, 06:00 PM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 976
Liked 3,973 Times in 600 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pharmer
I think it's factory, can't see where someone (with the exception of a previous poster) would go through the trouble to convert the gun to SAO.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP@AK
A surprising number of people did exactly that. The kits could be purchased in gun stores back in the 1960s and 1970s. I've run across examples that were converted using the correct replacement hammers, and examples that did the conversion but left the original stepped, double action hammer in place.
The only way to be certain that a Model 14 was originally configured as SAO is to get a letter - although the OP's marked box is a very encouraging sign!
Jack
|
It is my opinion that many more were done outside the factory than inside. The kits were readily available and easy for the end user or the local gunsmith to install. Why go to the hassle of a special order gun when you local gun shop could fix you up? These were a blister package that would hang on the pegboard behind the counter. Hammer and trigger together. Simple swap.
We look at these things as collectors, but "back in the day" it was a shooter who wanted his gun SAO for competitive shooting. The quickest way would be to convert the gun you had using a kit at the local store, or to buy the gun already at the local store along with the kit.
I have personally been involved in at least 1/2 dozen Model 14's that were SAO and only one lettered as factory. I have gotten to the point where if it isn't on the box label and doesn't have a letter, I assume it isn't factory. I recently bought this gun thinking it wouldn't letter as an SAO and was surprised when it did. I didn't pay a premium for the SAO or the non-factory engraving. Paid the price of a shooter:
Here is a picture that shows the difference between a stock hammer and a SAO hammer:
Some folks would just remove the double action sear from the hammer and make their own SAO without purchasing the kit. There may have been more to it than that but you can see the visual evidence of the sear/spring/pin removal.
I would think the premium for your gun would be minimal (~$50) and more that it is "like new" in the original box than anything else. Still nice examples in original box from that period are bringing $500-$600 in these parts. Be advised there are plenty of unscrupulous individuals who would put a fake end label on a box so getting a letter is about the only way to prove it.
__________________
Dave
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-25-2013, 09:51 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Salmon, Idaho
Posts: 3,232
Likes: 4,065
Liked 9,396 Times in 1,441 Posts
|
|
SAO
Quote:
Originally Posted by 29aholic
IMHO I don't think the premium would be any more than the ~$150.00 the SAO kit used to cost. I have an SAO 14-3 I traded for before either the dealer or I realized it was SAO. I would not have paid any more for the feature as personally I look upon it as a novelty. Comparing it to my other conventional guns I see no difference in trigger pulls in SA mode.
All that being said, it is a variant which is collectable in its own rite if you are putting together a Masterpiece collection. If you are I feel for you...the K32 is gonna hurt.
|
Good news is.....the K-32 is already in the stable!
Tom
__________________
Tom Graham SWCA #2303
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-25-2013, 11:00 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Santo las nubes, Florida
Posts: 8,968
Likes: 9,179
Liked 14,622 Times in 4,682 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 45Wheelgun
Here is a picture that shows the difference between a stock hammer and a SAO hammer:
.
|
Thanks for sharing all this detailed knowledge. My gun has the lower left hammer face. Even if it is proper a letter is proof. Joe
__________________
Wisdom chases me; I'm faster
|
03-26-2013, 12:40 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: northern ontario, CANADA
Posts: 104
Likes: 73
Liked 48 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
I purchased one of those kits some time ago.
Notice there is no sear in the hammer....
I installed this kit in my model 14-4 but it was never as smooth as the original parts, so
it was converted back!
__________________
A true american
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-27-2013, 12:45 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Salmon, Idaho
Posts: 3,232
Likes: 4,065
Liked 9,396 Times in 1,441 Posts
|
|
Great photos, thanks for sharing!
I have several K-38's to shoot so I may just go ahead and sell my SAO soon.
My target guns are all European and this one needs a good home!
Tom
__________________
Tom Graham SWCA #2303
|
03-27-2013, 01:35 AM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Bolivar, MO
Posts: 6,360
Likes: 3,558
Liked 3,241 Times in 1,099 Posts
|
|
All of the K Masterpiece guns are wonderful shooters and in my case exceed my capabilities. I have owned about every target handgun you can buy for less than $3000 and dollar for dollar in my hands I could tell no difference.
PS I would love the chance to wring out a K32 some day.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
03-28-2013, 07:04 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Rocky River OH
Posts: 919
Likes: 849
Liked 831 Times in 292 Posts
|
|
About 25 years ago I spotted a nice model 14 (don't remember what dash) at a LGS. I handled it and cycled it single action. I never tried the double action. It was in nice shape so I bought it. Later, I was surprised when it would not function in the double action mode. What the heck? It was either a factory SAO or converted. I was oblivious to the knowledge of SAO model 14's. I bought the parts to convert it to double action. It was a nice gun that I should have kept (really?) but traded it for an early 1897 Winchester shotgun that I no longer have either. After this experience, I always check the double action!
__________________
Tony
|
03-28-2013, 08:07 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 212
Liked 838 Times in 262 Posts
|
|
I am certainly no expert on them, but I've watched the threads about these over the years. There doesn't seem to be a premium on them to me. Not much if there is one.
I'd love to stumble across one some day, and I make it a point to check every 14 I see. Most of my shooting I do single action.
__________________
Geoff. Since 1960.
|
03-28-2013, 08:27 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 7,852
Likes: 11,782
Liked 13,763 Times in 3,347 Posts
|
|
I picked up a mint K-38 SA 14-3, in the late 80s at a show.
The dealer said that there was something wrong with the gun. He then picked it up to show me that when you pulled the trigger, it would not cycle properly. I paid him his asking price. I still have it.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
03-28-2013, 10:55 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 732
Likes: 1,302
Liked 714 Times in 273 Posts
|
|
I have a SA Model 14-2 that I bought new in 1966 at Caldor (a K-Mart type discount store that sold firearms at a 10% discount - this was unusual in that era). The gun is one of the most accurate handguns I've ever owned, including my Model 52. I've fired many thousands of reloads from wadcutters to Speer #8 +P+ loads through the gun and it's as tight as ever.
The trigger pull was about 2 pounds when I got the gun and is now a bit scary - you just think about it and it fires. I'd like to have the trigger restored to 2 pounds, but I'm afraid if I sent it back to S&W it would be returned with a politically correct 4 pound trigger.
I still have the original box with the paperwork and screwdriver; the end label identifies the gun as SA. I've never bothered lettering this gun since I bought it new, still use it, and have no intention of selling it.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
07-23-2018, 03:37 AM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: South Florida, USA
Posts: 3,577
Likes: 7,970
Liked 4,671 Times in 1,606 Posts
|
|
Hey, guys. I found a few ol, related thread on the k38 Single Action. Thought I'd bump them to the top. good stuff in here. Sal
__________________
ANTIQUESMITHS
LM1300 SWHF425
|
07-23-2018, 03:42 AM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: South Florida, USA
Posts: 3,577
Likes: 7,970
Liked 4,671 Times in 1,606 Posts
|
|
__________________
ANTIQUESMITHS
LM1300 SWHF425
|
07-23-2018, 12:59 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Henderson,Nevada
Posts: 2,615
Likes: 1,864
Liked 9,038 Times in 1,282 Posts
|
|
A side note about the single action K series. When I went through the armorers school we were advised to order return spring part number 5387 made for the single action kit and revolvers. We were advised it had a lower pound rate that the standard recoil spring. This would allow a reduced double action pull with out cutting the length of the recoil spring.
This was 1979 and now reduced poundage springs are available from many sources.
__________________
SWCA 1932 SWHF 135
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|