Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 3-Screw PINNED Barrel SWING-OUT Cylinder Hand Ejectors WITH Model Numbers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-21-2014, 02:23 PM
SandSpider SandSpider is offline
Member
Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped  
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 129
Likes: 1
Liked 155 Times in 36 Posts
Default Model 17-3 mis-stamped

I'm going to be looking at a revolver tomorrow. Really interested in buying it, but there's one oddity.

It is a K-22 Masterpiece Model 17-3 from 1970, 6" barrel. Complete with original box and paperwork. However, it is "mis-stamped" 18-3.

Is this something that will cause me grief should I decide to sell the gun again down the road? I have no intention of doing so, I'm selling my 617-5 to get this 17-3 instead, hoping for a keeper. But I don't want to get something I'll be stuck with in case I don't bond with it.

It's not cheap, either. $750, but it's really, really nice and local.

What do you guys think?


SandSpider
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-21-2014, 02:46 PM
Art Doc's Avatar
Art Doc Art Doc is offline
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped  
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The kidney of Dixie.
Posts: 10,509
Likes: 49
Liked 13,410 Times in 3,290 Posts
Default

With so many models made on the same frames S&Ws having the incorrect model number stamped on them are actually fairly common. Some dealers will try to claim they are rare factory errors and try to charge a huge premium for such guns but most knowledgeable S&W folks don't pay much attention one way or the other to the mistake. Nothing more than a minor oddity that doesn't affect value much if at all.
__________________
No life story has happy end.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 03-22-2014, 01:42 AM
r3captain r3captain is offline
Member
Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped  
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Low Desert of CA
Posts: 511
Likes: 419
Liked 421 Times in 134 Posts
Default

I'd try to get the price down $100 or so. Depending on your location,$750 isn't CRAZY high even if it's not mis-stamped, as long as you're looking for one and it's as clean and complete as you say it is.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-22-2014, 02:01 AM
jonny13sb jonny13sb is offline
Member
Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped  
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: San Bankruptadino, So Cal
Posts: 115
Likes: 50
Liked 61 Times in 38 Posts
Default

Sounds like a good deal to me, I bought a nice model 17-4 about a year and a half ago for $600 without box or original grips. The seller was asking $650 and I offered less. Most sellers have some room to negotiate and you can save a few bucks by making a reasonable offer and usually cover your transfer fees and treating yourself to a nice lunch.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-22-2014, 09:58 PM
SandSpider SandSpider is offline
Member
Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped  
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 129
Likes: 1
Liked 155 Times in 36 Posts
Default

Thanks everybody for your advice. I went ahead and bought the gun. It is gorgeous, nicest one I have now.

Haven't shot it yet, but will report back after I do. Pictures to come tomorrow in daylight.

I'm slowly replacing all my "new" revolvers with nice old ones. Was kind of sad to see my 617 go. Truth be told, it was a great shooting gun (it was an early 2000s model with the lock). But this one is gorgeous and has a great feel to it. I think I did the right thing. I'm not a collector, but I like old school quality and this has it for sure. Can't wait to see how it shoots...


SandSpider
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-22-2014, 10:30 PM
Engine49guy's Avatar
Engine49guy Engine49guy is offline
Member
Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped  
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 7,782
Likes: 2,486
Liked 8,318 Times in 2,919 Posts
Default

Mismarked or overstamped frames do not add or reduce value IMO as long as they are mistamps and not barrel swaps.

A Model 17 can fit a Model 18 barrel but not visa versa because of the barrel and frame tapers.
If it is a barrel swapped frame it does reduce value IMO

Here is a comparison of a Model 17-5 (top) and a Model 18 for frame comparison.


Note that a 17-3 has a slightly narrower barrel rib but uses the same frame as the top gun.

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-22-2014, 10:56 PM
SandSpider SandSpider is offline
Member
Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped  
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 129
Likes: 1
Liked 155 Times in 36 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Engine49guy View Post
Mismarked or overstamped frames do not add or reduce value IMO as long as they are mistamps and not barrel swaps.

A Model 17 can fit a Model 18 barrel but not visa versa because of the barrel and frame tapers.
If it is a barrel swapped frame it does reduce value IMO

Here is a comparison of a Model 17-5 (top) and a Model 18 for frame comparison.


Note that a 17-3 has a slightly narrower barrel rib but uses the same frame as the top gun.


Thanks for that picture. I'm learning...

This particular gun has the original box with matching serial number. It is marked 17-3 on the box, but 18-3 on the gun. So it's pretty clearly a mis-stamp.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-23-2014, 01:03 AM
r3captain r3captain is offline
Member
Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped  
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Low Desert of CA
Posts: 511
Likes: 419
Liked 421 Times in 134 Posts
Default

Congrats and happy shooting!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-23-2014, 10:44 PM
SandSpider SandSpider is offline
Member
Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped  
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 129
Likes: 1
Liked 155 Times in 36 Posts
Default

Pictures as promised.

That 17 is almost new looking, but I'm having a hard time taking pictures that show how nice it actually is.

I met the seller outside a local gun show. After I bought the 17-3, I went inside the show and walked straight into a 19-3 in identical condition. Like it was meant to be, a perfect pair.

So there:











SandSpider
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #10  
Old 03-23-2014, 10:49 PM
fyimo's Avatar
fyimo fyimo is offline
Member
Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped  
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 18,773
Likes: 6,048
Liked 5,762 Times in 1,992 Posts
Talking

Congratulations as that is a beauty and I would have snapped it up at that price.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-23-2014, 10:54 PM
weatherby's Avatar
weatherby weatherby is offline
SWCA Member
Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped  
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Western ,Ma.
Posts: 6,233
Likes: 12,714
Liked 13,462 Times in 3,396 Posts
Thumbs up

I think you will like the 17-3 not as muzzle heavy as a 617 IMHO.

Congratulations you are on a nice roll keep going
Regards
Paul
__________________
Paul
S&WCA #2726
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-24-2014, 08:57 PM
SandSpider SandSpider is offline
Member
Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped  
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 129
Likes: 1
Liked 155 Times in 36 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by weatherby View Post
I think you will like the 17-3 not as muzzle heavy as a 617 IMHO.

Congratulations you are on a nice roll keep going
Regards
Paul
You are absolutely correct. Made a quick trip to the range during lunch break today and tried the model 17 out. I couldn't be happier. It is much more accurate than I am. And yes, it does balance better that the 617.

Only thing I don't like are the little bitty stock grips. I put a Hogue Monogrip on it to try and it worked much better for me.

Problem is, on every blue gun I've ever seen that had Monogrips on it for an extended period of time, you could see the outline of the grips on the blue. I guess moisture gets trapped under there, or it's just the grips rubbing against the frame. I don't want that to happen to this gun. Trying to think what I could do. Put oiled felt between the grips and frame maybe?


SandSpider
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-24-2014, 09:35 PM
Engine49guy's Avatar
Engine49guy Engine49guy is offline
Member
Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped  
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 7,782
Likes: 2,486
Liked 8,318 Times in 2,919 Posts
Default

The rubber grips trap moisture and that little metal screw horseshoe thing rusts,
The 19 grips will swap onto the 17 if you bring a screwdriver to the range until you purchase a pair of factory targets,

BTW can you post a couple pictures showing the top of the 17 barrel and frame looking down and from the front back ?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-25-2014, 12:04 AM
weatherby's Avatar
weatherby weatherby is offline
SWCA Member
Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped Model 17-3 mis-stamped  
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Western ,Ma.
Posts: 6,233
Likes: 12,714
Liked 13,462 Times in 3,396 Posts
Wink

Only thing I don't like are the little bitty stock grips.

That's a good thing now you get to shoe shop.

I'm always shoe shopping
__________________
Paul
S&WCA #2726
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Model 53 over stamped IWK2HT S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 4 09-10-2014 04:04 PM
Model 64 Stamped CDC etexas S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 14 04-06-2014 04:27 PM
Model 67-1 stamped D.P.D. 210 Garywapx S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 0 03-16-2012 10:34 PM
K.H.P stamped model 66 snakeman32 S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 10 12-30-2011 03:32 PM
model 67 stamped as 617-6 kjs1974 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 3 12-20-2011 11:48 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:16 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)