Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 3-Screw PINNED Barrel SWING-OUT Cylinder Hand Ejectors WITH Model Numbers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-15-2015, 06:35 PM
JeffNW's Avatar
JeffNW JeffNW is offline
Member
M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?)  
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: North Idaho
Posts: 207
Likes: 233
Liked 273 Times in 94 Posts
Default M48-2(really?)

Just acquired a stamped M48-2 which I got with a trade + cash at a LGS(big box) and was out the door feeling fairly happy with the trade(still am)as it came with end-labeled box, papers, serial numbered grips and about 95% bluing.

Subsequently via some research mostly here(am relatively new to S&Ws)I saw that the serial number-3K736XX-put my M48-2 manufacture date in around 1971-about 4 years after the model 2 changed to 3.

Furthermore, as the photos below show, the rear site leaf screw is mounted directly over the forcing cone which, I understand, is one of the changes S&W made on the -3 series K frames.

So, what I've actually got is a M48-3 marked as a -2.

What to take away from all this?:what a great informational site this is!(and a lot of fun too ). And hope this info can be helpful-and is correct-for future forum members interested in the M48 and other dash numbered K frames(BTW-bought a good supply of 22 mags last summer).









Here it is w/target stocks(just purchased these only last night from the classified section of this forum-another example of the speedy efficiency of the USPS! ).


Last edited by JeffNW; 02-15-2015 at 06:45 PM. Reason: Left out a word
Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Like Post:
  #2  
Old 02-15-2015, 06:56 PM
2hawk's Avatar
2hawk 2hawk is offline
Member
M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?)  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,403
Likes: 4,558
Liked 2,141 Times in 770 Posts
Default

I LIKE it! That looks like more fun than would be legal, in most states.
Oh, nice target grips, too. They do set off the blue!
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-15-2015, 09:29 PM
dcopper dcopper is offline
Member
M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?)  
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Jessieville, Arkansas
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 556
Liked 675 Times in 355 Posts
Default

Very Nice! Enjoy!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-15-2015, 09:58 PM
Doc44's Avatar
Doc44 Doc44 is offline
Moderator

M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?)  
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 9,408
Likes: 1,323
Liked 30,539 Times in 4,375 Posts
Default

You are correct, a 48-2 stamped frame that should be stamped 48-3. Not an uncommon occurrence.

Bill
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-15-2015, 10:11 PM
bigmoose's Avatar
bigmoose bigmoose is offline
Member
M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?)  
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Central New York State
Posts: 1,619
Likes: 3,468
Liked 2,113 Times in 632 Posts
Default

Very nice .22 mag. I really like the 4" barreled version also. Congrats, that's a keeper for sure.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-15-2015, 11:23 PM
remusn remusn is offline
Member
M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?)  
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 24
Likes: 1
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Default

I have a 48-4, 4". Love it. I looked for 5 years before finding it. I think not being a pinned gun is what makes mine a dash 4. Not sure.

Mine shoots really well. Also shoot the CCI WRF in it and it shoots fantastically well with it. You might try it if you find some.

I have three K frames, mod 19. mod 18 and mod 48. Four inch barrel K frame revolvers just seem to be my favorite.

Enjoy yours.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-17-2015, 12:46 AM
Izzydog Izzydog is offline
Member
M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?)  
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 291
Likes: 26
Liked 315 Times in 135 Posts
Default

My 4"48 should be marked 48-2, but is actually marked Model 48. don't think this really matters. How does yours shoot? mine shoots good for the first cylinder, but need to be wiped of under the extractor, before any more ammo can be loaded. Kinda takes a lot of the fun out of it.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-17-2015, 12:18 PM
JeffNW's Avatar
JeffNW JeffNW is offline
Member
M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?)  
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: North Idaho
Posts: 207
Likes: 233
Liked 273 Times in 94 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Izzydog View Post
My 4"48 should be marked 48-2, but is actually marked Model 48. don't think this really matters. How does yours shoot? mine shoots good for the first cylinder, but need to be wiped of under the extractor, before any more ammo can be loaded. Kinda takes a lot of the fun out of it.
Haven't had the pleasure of shooting it yet-plan to do so tomorrow.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-17-2015, 12:53 PM
Retired W4's Avatar
Retired W4 Retired W4 is offline
US Veteran
M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?)  
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 8,988
Likes: 16,217
Liked 19,841 Times in 4,480 Posts
Default

Nice find! I just know you are going to store those numbered magnas in the box.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-17-2015, 09:30 PM
JeffNW's Avatar
JeffNW JeffNW is offline
Member
M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?)  
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: North Idaho
Posts: 207
Likes: 233
Liked 273 Times in 94 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Retired W4 View Post
Nice find! I just know you are going to store those numbered magnas in the box.
You betcha!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-17-2015, 11:20 PM
ayetee's Avatar
ayetee ayetee is offline
Member
M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?)  
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Reno Nevada
Posts: 133
Likes: 1
Liked 67 Times in 39 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Izzydog View Post
My 4"48 should be marked 48-2, but is actually marked Model 48. don't think this really matters. How does yours shoot? mine shoots good for the first cylinder, but need to be wiped of under the extractor, before any more ammo can be loaded. Kinda takes a lot of the fun out of it.
That's a strange "defect" to have on your Model 48. Wonder what caused it. My 48-4 has had at least a thousand rounds through it and never a hiccup.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg P1010138.jpg (66.7 KB, 17 views)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-18-2015, 06:14 AM
Izzydog Izzydog is offline
Member
M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?)  
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 291
Likes: 26
Liked 315 Times in 135 Posts
Default

The problem with my 4" model 48, is the barrel is too short to cause the powder load to fully burn. The unburnt powder then is left in the barrel, chambers, and around the forcing cone. When the empties are extracted the powder flecks are then introduced under the extractor star. when the fresh rounds are pushed into the cylinder they never seem to sit flush in the chambers, this makes it impossible to close the cylinder until the wayward powder and residue is removed. I havn't shot that revolver in close to 10 years, due to the cost and availability of ammo. I think that an intrepid ammo manufacturer would have a wonderful product, if they produce a lead nosed .22 cal round specifically designed to function in .22 mag revolvers and bolt action rifles.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-18-2015, 08:32 PM
JeepinSoldier JeepinSoldier is offline
Member
M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?)  
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Occupied Colorado
Posts: 609
Likes: 384
Liked 660 Times in 236 Posts
Default

Izzydog,

I wonder if the new Speer short barrel .22 Mag ammo would cure the problem with your 48?

I think that the load uses faster burning powder to get max performance in 2" from the .22 WMR. Might be worth a try.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-19-2015, 12:37 AM
JeffNW's Avatar
JeffNW JeffNW is offline
Member
M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?)  
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: North Idaho
Posts: 207
Likes: 233
Liked 273 Times in 94 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Izzydog View Post
The problem with my 4" model 48, is the barrel is too short to cause the powder load to fully burn. The unburnt powder then is left in the barrel, chambers, and around the forcing cone. When the empties are extracted the powder flecks are then introduced under the extractor star. when the fresh rounds are pushed into the cylinder they never seem to sit flush in the chambers, this makes it impossible to close the cylinder until the wayward powder and residue is removed. I havn't shot that revolver in close to 10 years, due to the cost and availability of ammo. I think that an intrepid ammo manufacturer would have a wonderful product, if they produce a lead nosed .22 cal round specifically designed to function in .22 mag revolvers and bolt action rifles.
I may be experiencing the same problem as yours and I actually started a thread about it here but then reread your post.

Here is a picture of my cylinder chambers and extractor star today at the range. Are those whitish granules you see what you refer to as powder flecks? I also had trouble seating the rounds and closing the cylinder.





I probably need to get some of that Speer short barrel .22 Mag ammo that JeepinSoldier suggested.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-19-2015, 03:20 PM
Izzydog Izzydog is offline
Member
M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?) M48-2(really?)  
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 291
Likes: 26
Liked 315 Times in 135 Posts
Default

Thats' exactly what's happening! I'd love to get some Speer short barreled .22 mag ammo, However here in beautful SC it's purt near impossible to get any .22 mag ammo at all. I will definatly keep my eyes open for some.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:17 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)