Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 3-Screw PINNED Barrel SWING-OUT Cylinder Hand Ejectors WITH Model Numbers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-01-2015, 11:52 PM
mjack mjack is offline
Member
29 durability 29 durability 29 durability 29 durability 29 durability  
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 1 Post
Default 29 durability

Hi guys.
In January I posted a question about model 29 durability, and would like to thank everyone for their responses.
Since then, due to the info gained here, and other stuff I have learned, I decided to get the 29. My worry's about heavy loads were unfounded. The targets we use have been updated, and do not have to be hit as hard. I had already reduced my loads, due to powder availability, and the new loads work fine. This will also help save the wrist.
Thanks again MJack
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #2  
Old 03-03-2015, 11:44 PM
yfdcap's Avatar
yfdcap yfdcap is offline
Member
29 durability 29 durability 29 durability 29 durability 29 durability  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: AZ
Posts: 448
Likes: 379
Liked 396 Times in 164 Posts
Default

Enjoy that 29 for many years.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-04-2015, 07:33 AM
Stirling's Avatar
Stirling Stirling is offline
Member
29 durability 29 durability 29 durability 29 durability 29 durability  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 852
Likes: 479
Liked 469 Times in 320 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mjack View Post
Hi guys.
In January I posted a question about model 29 durability, and would like to thank everyone for their responses.
Since then, due to the info gained here, and other stuff I have learned, I decided to get the 29. My worry's about heavy loads were unfounded. The targets we use have been updated, and do not have to be hit as hard. I had already reduced my loads, due to powder availability, and the new loads work fine. This will also help save the wrist.
Thanks again MJack

Nice one MJack. I can't understand why people want to use max loads in their guns at the risk of blowing them up. In my mind I reckon get the right tools for what you want; get the appropriate handgun or go with a larger calibre. Why beat up a gun and yourself unnecessarily?
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #4  
Old 03-04-2015, 01:12 PM
BruceM's Avatar
BruceM BruceM is offline
Member
29 durability 29 durability 29 durability 29 durability 29 durability  
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Southeast Wisconsin
Posts: 1,750
Likes: 7
Liked 657 Times in 369 Posts
Default

Full power ammo built with bullets weighing 250 grains or less will work just fine. Start using magnum level ammo with bullets weighing 275 grains or more and that will change.

Bruce
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-05-2015, 01:19 AM
old 1911 fan old 1911 fan is offline
Member
29 durability 29 durability 29 durability 29 durability 29 durability  
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Virginia
Posts: 171
Likes: 800
Liked 151 Times in 75 Posts
Default

I bought a 6.5" 29-2 after seeing some Clint Eastwood movie I think in the late 70's. Shot a lot of 240G JSP's when it was new. I even took a dear with it. These were magnum handloads. The gun sat for 25 years. Then I loaded a lot of 240g lead KT's and fell in love. My beautiful blue 29 will still put them in the black at 100 yards. Shoot it, be reasonable, and go shoot magnums out of your 29. But please, try the lead loads 800 to 1000 fps. You will learn how versatile the .44 Remington Magnum is.

old 1911 fan
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #6  
Old 03-05-2015, 01:22 AM
DWalt's Avatar
DWalt DWalt is online now
Member
29 durability 29 durability 29 durability 29 durability 29 durability  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Texas & San Antonio
Posts: 33,639
Likes: 242
Liked 29,153 Times in 14,095 Posts
Default

The only Model 29 I now have is a 29-3. And I shoot nothing in it other than .44 Special handloads with 200 grain lead bullets with a MV around 900 ft/sec. Some people enjoy having their wrists twisted. I don't.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Durability of a 642 skrazo S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 10 01-23-2014 06:43 PM
SD 40's durability? BlackRanger Smith & Wesson SD & Sigma Pistols 5 02-18-2012 10:46 PM
J durability Maximumbob54 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 14 10-12-2010 11:37 PM
M&P Durability BUSHPILOT267 Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols 9 09-21-2009 09:44 PM
S&W 642 Durability Emerson S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 7 01-11-2009 04:01 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:10 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)