|
|
11-16-2015, 12:46 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Mid coast Maine
Posts: 65
Likes: 147
Liked 20 Times in 17 Posts
|
|
Pinned barrels?
What's the significance of "pinned barrels"? Is there an advantage or disadvantage? I understand that it's a clue to the vintage of a gun, but wondering if functionally important one way or another.
|
11-16-2015, 01:20 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Where this month?
Posts: 3,604
Likes: 264
Liked 4,215 Times in 1,714 Posts
|
|
Pin needs to be removed to unscrew barrel.
Thus no barrels coming loose while shooting.
|
11-16-2015, 01:30 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Mid coast Maine
Posts: 65
Likes: 147
Liked 20 Times in 17 Posts
|
|
Are you suggesting that barrels sometimes come unscrewed from shooting?
|
11-16-2015, 02:02 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: West Coast
Posts: 113
Likes: 175
Liked 180 Times in 42 Posts
|
|
Here's an earlier thread discussing the subject that may be of interest.....
What is the advantage of Pinned Barrels?
Last edited by Oyaji; 11-16-2015 at 02:04 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-16-2015, 02:28 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Mid coast Maine
Posts: 65
Likes: 147
Liked 20 Times in 17 Posts
|
|
Thanx very much for the thread..............interesting conversation. I think I know what I need to now.
|
11-16-2015, 02:32 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 8,980
Likes: 16,204
Liked 19,829 Times in 4,473 Posts
|
|
S&W eliminated the pinned barrel in 1982 and counter bored cylinder of magnum revolvers at the same time.
|
11-16-2015, 02:41 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: North Carolina, USA
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 1,342
Liked 1,961 Times in 664 Posts
|
|
The pinned barrels are evidence of a bygone era when parts were hand-fitted and aligned to the frame. It was a time when quality was of more importance than quantity. They were phased out around 1982 along with other machining practices that were considered standard at the time (recessed cylinders, and ribbed triggers and backstraps). Through "cost cutting" S&W deemed them unnecessary and too expensive and time-consuming. It is no better than the method used to crush barrel to the frame today, but it seems that the revolvers which were pinned had fewer issues with a well fit barrel to frame.
__________________
Ephesians 6 (Armor of God)
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-16-2015, 02:57 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 5,831
Likes: 3,902
Liked 5,902 Times in 2,543 Posts
|
|
Barrels fitting remains the same pre and post pin era; the pin was overengineering done away with, yes, to cut costs -- but cost-cutting isn't de facto quality cutting.
The significance of the pinned barrels, OP, is sentimentality for a time when revolver building is remembered as superior because the lemons have been forgotten.
Last edited by Hapworth; 11-16-2015 at 03:05 PM.
|
The Following 9 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-16-2015, 04:01 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 8,980
Likes: 16,204
Liked 19,829 Times in 4,473 Posts
|
|
I wonder what the comparison would be reference over/under clocked barrels coming out of the S&W factory these days. I don't know one way or the other, just curious.
|
11-16-2015, 04:09 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: bootheel of Missouri
Posts: 16,890
Likes: 6,992
Liked 28,122 Times in 8,914 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Retired W4
I wonder what the comparison would be reference over/under clocked barrels coming out of the S&W factory these days. I don't know one way or the other, just curious.
|
Well, I'm just going with the number of pictures of misaligned barrels I see on this forum, but I can't recall a picture of a pinned barrel over or under clocked. See lots of the others. The pin was the final step in assuring that the barrel was aligned properly. Not so now . . .
__________________
Wisdom comes thru fear . . .
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-16-2015, 04:21 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 13,869
Likes: 2,079
Liked 13,354 Times in 5,549 Posts
|
|
Does s&w have employee benefits for eye glasses?
|
11-16-2015, 04:42 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Mid coast Maine
Posts: 65
Likes: 147
Liked 20 Times in 17 Posts
|
|
I wasn't trying to "open a can of worms". The facts seem to be that pinned barrels went out some years ago. There seem to be different opinions regarding whether the pins were superfluous or not. I'm happy with the info y'all have provided. With a lot more exposure to both pinned and not pinned I may develop an opinion of my own, in the meantime I'll enjoy the forum conversations and learn what I can.
|
11-16-2015, 04:58 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: bootheel of Missouri
Posts: 16,890
Likes: 6,992
Liked 28,122 Times in 8,914 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Collects
I have observed clocked and pinned S&W barrels.
|
Didn't say it didn't happen, just that I see more pictures on here of non pinned ones . . . .
__________________
Wisdom comes thru fear . . .
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-16-2015, 05:19 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Northeast Texas
Posts: 2,861
Likes: 921
Liked 1,326 Times in 723 Posts
|
|
I have both pinned and non-pinned and am happy with both. I would not use that detail in determining my interest in an item. Generally speaking, as has already been said, it is most useful to me in determining, at a glance, whether or not the gun is pre, or post, 1982.
__________________
But then, what do I know?
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-16-2015, 06:13 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Central Montana
Posts: 13,713
Likes: 12,857
Liked 39,472 Times in 10,045 Posts
|
|
I like the pinned barrel models, but it is because they are older and show a time when detail and craftsmanship were of more importance. I have guns both with and without the pin and all function fine. I do have a model 18 that came out right after the pin was discontinued and had the barrel begin to move. This was before I had a lathe. I made a small punch and made some small punch marks around the barrel shoulder where it meets the frame and torqued it up straight. The punch displaced metal and that contacted the frame and increased the torque needed to clock it correctly. I know this wasn't the "correct fix. But, it has never moved again over many years and many rounds and holster time. Probably wouldn't work as well on something larger than a 22lr.
As far as the pin being important as to keeping the barrel in perfect alignment it ISN'T. The barrel must still be fitted correctly and torqued up correctly. Case in point. I bought a 1917 that didn't have the original barrel. Replacement was also a 1917 barrel in poor outer condition. It was installed in the frame with the pin. You could rotate it maybe 5 degrees either way from timed. I got it cheap. Removed the pin which was perfectly straight and fit the hole tight. The slot for the pin in that barrel looks perfect. I have several other N Frame barrels. Most will screw into that frame and allow the pin to be installed and still move the barrel either way a few degrees. I am going to mill the frame for adjustable sights and install a 1950 barrel I will need to adjust for this frame. A barrel needs to hand tighten to just under a 1/4 turn then be torqued to true before the pin is installed to be tight and remain, so pin or no pin. If it doesn't have enough torque it will come loose even with the pin.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-16-2015, 06:15 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The kidney of Dixie.
Posts: 10,509
Likes: 49
Liked 13,410 Times in 3,290 Posts
|
|
Seems to me that for a number of years S&W had a lot of trouble with barrels when the eliminated the pin. There have been numerous complaints of barrels with front sights of center, sprung frames from over torquing, etc. Maybe they got all the kinks worked out eventually.
To me, eliminating the P&R was nothing more than cost cutting, it did nothing to improve the guns, and is symbolic of retreating from the days of craftsmanship. P&R Smiths have panache. Yes I know not all were recessed, speaking in generalities.
__________________
No life story has happy end.
|
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
|
|
11-19-2015, 05:50 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 17,817
Likes: 7,852
Liked 25,737 Times in 8,695 Posts
|
|
While it is possible for a pinned barrel to be SLIGHTLY OFF center, the process of pinning DID eliminate the drastic canted or clocked barrels that have been of recent interest and discussion here. In order for the pin to line up with both the frame and barrel slot, it has to be somewhere very close to straight. IMHO S&W SHOULD start pinning once again and customer service and their repair department might have a lot more time to do more productive work rather than fix shipped guns. Just my opinion of course...........
|
11-19-2015, 09:23 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Roanoke, Va
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 1,697
Liked 1,284 Times in 640 Posts
|
|
Personally I have never seen a "cranked" pinned barrel, not say they don't exists, just never put eyes on one. Agree with the comments above, a bit more TLC before things were shipped out the door "back in the day"
|
11-19-2015, 10:06 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Warrensburg, MO USA
Posts: 5,415
Likes: 2,868
Liked 3,333 Times in 1,704 Posts
|
|
The L frames were the first guns to ship without the pinned barrel and were that way from their introduction in 1980. Other models were phased in without the pin. I have an early 586 that has been shot a lot since 1980 and it has been perfectly aligned from the day I bought it.
I too prefer the pinned barrels, but I cannot say that it is really needed as Smith has produced them for 35 years. If it was a serious issue, they would have surely corrected it, as they did with the floating hands.
__________________
Richard Gillespie
FBINA 102
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-19-2015, 11:29 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,482
Likes: 550
Liked 1,427 Times in 666 Posts
|
|
I've owned both types and no difference from a shooters point of view. I prefer the 2 piece tensioned barrel to either.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-19-2015, 11:30 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,803
Likes: 18,552
Liked 22,422 Times in 8,276 Posts
|
|
I had a 19-3 with a slightly misaligned barrel. It was my first experience watching an armorer make use of the S&W supplied Babbot Bar. (He asked me in advance if I was sure I wanted to watch).
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
|
11-19-2015, 11:51 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 410
Liked 2,125 Times in 811 Posts
|
|
I can understand the problem with canted barrels. Pin versus no pin makes little difference to me. Seems no real advantage either way.
One question though......why does anybody need to unscrew the barrel on their gun?
|
11-19-2015, 12:37 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Roanoke, Va
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 1,697
Liked 1,284 Times in 640 Posts
|
|
Not so much a question on needing to unscrew the barrel as to the barrel working loose, back in the day early Model 29's used in metal silhouette shooting had a problem of working themselves loose from shooting lots of heavy loads. S&W did beef them up the long barrel (10") models didn't have the problem after the upgrade.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-19-2015, 02:33 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 5,831
Likes: 3,902
Liked 5,902 Times in 2,543 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krell1
...One question though......why does anybody need to unscrew the barrel on their gun?
|
Wouldn't be a regular thing for any particular revolver, but the two most common reasons are barrel replacement, and lathing the barrel shoulder back a turn for resetting forcing cone/cylinder gap.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-19-2015, 06:38 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,369
Likes: 1,552
Liked 4,271 Times in 1,805 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shocker
I've owned both types and no difference from a shooters point of view. I prefer the 2 piece tensioned barrel to either.
|
I just acquired a 66-7 and can't wait to see how it shoots. I'd love to find a 620.
The pin was dropped over 30 years ago, so I think we can quit puckering in fear of barrels coming off.
I have had a barrel unscrew on one gun: a Ruger.
It's also the only gun I ever had to send back to the factory.
The pin is a symbol of a bygone era and probably adds some collectible value.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
11-22-2015, 07:50 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: West Coast
Posts: 113
Likes: 175
Liked 180 Times in 42 Posts
|
|
Pinned and Recessed Smith & Wessons
Found this American Rifleman article dated 10/28/2014 that discusses the "pinned and recessed" revolvers and thought it worth sharing.....
American Rifleman | Pinned and Recessed Smith & Wessons
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|