Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 3-Screw PINNED Barrel SWING-OUT Cylinder Hand Ejectors WITH Model Numbers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-01-2016, 10:22 AM
Tom K's Avatar
Tom K Tom K is offline
SWCA Member
Range session with the 8-3/8" .327 and .44 Spl Range session with the 8-3/8" .327 and .44 Spl Range session with the 8-3/8" .327 and .44 Spl Range session with the 8-3/8" .327 and .44 Spl Range session with the 8-3/8" .327 and .44 Spl  
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Tulsa, OK area
Posts: 2,875
Likes: 1,461
Liked 7,054 Times in 1,580 Posts
Default Range session with the 8-3/8" .327 and .44 Spl

Went to the range yesterday and tried out my Andy Horvath-created long barrel .327 Magnum and .44 Special. Details on the guns are here:
The seldom-seen 8-3/8" .44 Special
The seldom-seen 8-3/8" K32


Paper targets were shot at about 20 yards, standing. Ammo for the .44 Special was all I had on hand, some old PMC 240 grain swaged lead semi-wadcutter. Pretty mild stuff but unfortunately I didn't bring a chronograph to find out the velocity.




Grouping with the American Eagle 100 grain JSP .327 ammo was comparable, with smaller, cleaner holes.




I also shot some Fiocchi .32 S&W Long 100 grain wadcutters. With the same sight setting, point of impact was considerably higher, as expected. As you can see I yanked one shot.




In addition to the paper targets I shot some cans and plastic bottles filled with water. Interesting contrast and similarities. Recoil seemed about the same, although sharper with the .327. Even though the .44 Special ammo was loaded with lead semi-wadcutters they acted like round nose bullets. The .44 would just pass through a plastic bottle and let the water drain out. Likewise on the paper targets the bullets tore a ragged hole, rather than punching a clean circle.

Muzzle blast and noise was considerably greater with the .327, as was action at the target end. The .327 would provide more explosive effect on the water bottles. The .32 Long wadcutters were comically weak by comparison. Recoil was nil.

Last edited by Tom K; 06-01-2016 at 10:24 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
First range session -- 36-1 and 28-2 Cal44 S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 0 01-06-2014 04:56 PM
Range session "WHAT THAH...!" Fishslayer Reloading 14 09-07-2011 01:10 PM
Best Range Session So Far novalty The Lounge 2 05-03-2011 08:17 PM
New...to me...CS9 range session Win75 Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 4 12-31-2010 09:16 PM
5" mdl 625 - range session Peakbagr S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 3 02-15-2009 04:24 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:38 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)