|
|
08-04-2016, 12:41 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Lexington Park, Maryland
Posts: 376
Likes: 817
Liked 502 Times in 121 Posts
|
|
Model 17 as compared to Model 18
Hi guys, I'll be the new caretaker of a very nice model 18-4 after I wait out Marylands 7 day hostage situation. I am curious, what are the differences between the M17 K-22 Masterpiece and the M18 K-22 Combat Masterpiece? Is it only barrel lengths? TIA.
|
08-04-2016, 01:41 AM
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 5,060
Likes: 739
Liked 3,275 Times in 1,282 Posts
|
|
Pretty much. The M-17 series was available with barrel lengths of both 6 and 8-3/8 inches, while the -18 was just 4 inches. Another difference was the M-18 usually had a ramp front sight blade while the M-17 usually had a Patridge.
You will really enjoy shooting your Model 18.
A passing bit of Model 18 minutia: The late Jeff Cooper wrote that the name "Rimfire Combat Masterpiece" was "surely the exaggeration of the century," given that a .22 isn't really suitable for combat and many of S&W's other guns were also masterpieces.
The Colonel had a dry wit, and was seldom wrong!
Last edited by BUFF; 08-04-2016 at 01:45 AM.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-04-2016, 06:25 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,250
Likes: 11,925
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
|
|
I agree with Buff. Also the target trigger, hammer, and stock options are more often seen on the M17.
Just FYI: not long after the 18-4 the M18 was discontinued as a separate model 17 stamped 4" versions.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
08-04-2016, 01:20 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Marion, NY
Posts: 630
Likes: 374
Liked 795 Times in 236 Posts
|
|
18's have tapered barrels similar to the .38 Model 15. 17's have non-tapered barrels. This was my 17-6 that I never should have sold.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-04-2016, 03:31 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,250
Likes: 11,925
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
|
|
The 17-4 began the 4" heavy barrel. The 17-5 and early 17-6 had the same barrel, the later 17-6 had a full barrel lug.
Then there was an early 617 with a heavy barrel and no lug like the 17-4, -5 and early 17-6, and a later 617 with full lug barrel.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Last edited by Hondo44; 08-04-2016 at 03:32 PM.
|
08-04-2016, 03:40 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 10,451
Likes: 3,929
Liked 50,502 Times in 6,019 Posts
|
|
Here's a comparison photo. The two upper guns are Model 17s, while the bottom gun is a Model 18. Hope this helps.
John
__________________
- Cogito, ergo armatus sum -
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-04-2016, 04:24 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,835
Likes: 5,161
Liked 5,242 Times in 2,483 Posts
|
|
Nit Pick'in the Details
The 6" heavy .22 Masterpiece barrel that was standard from about 1950 through 17-4s and its rib both had a straight taper. The taper was even more important in keeping the 8 3/8" 17 barrels well balanced for one handed Bullsye matches. The traditional .22 Combat Masterpiece and Model 18's pronounced barrel taper gave them a handy 36 ounce weight. I see S. Hammer's pictured 4" 17-6 has lost all barrel taper and has the very wide rib of a heavy barrel Model 10. If I recall correctly those were essentially 4" 17-5 barrels that S&W used up during early 17-6 production.
Another not yet mentioned difference between traditional 18s and 17s was the the front end of 18 top straps were beveled to match up with the narrow rib.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|