Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 3-Screw PINNED Barrel SWING-OUT Cylinder Hand Ejectors WITH Model Numbers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-26-2017, 12:29 PM
Herman1973 Herman1973 is offline
Member
Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading  
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: The Netherlands Europe
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 8 Posts
Default Barrel leading

Good day

I have a model 27 from 1980 and I get exsessive leading when I shoot LSW. After about 20 shots I can scrape lead out the barrel, I shoot 158 grain LSW with a hardness of 22 brinel.

I did slug the throut of the cylinder and they are .359 and so are my bullets

Does someone know if this is the cause of the problem and if the throut is to large.

Brgds
Herman
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-26-2017, 12:35 PM
HKB's Avatar
HKB HKB is offline
US Veteran
Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading  
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: East Coast
Posts: 150
Likes: 145
Liked 131 Times in 48 Posts
Default

Drop it down to 0.357" or 0.358".
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 03-26-2017, 01:00 PM
steelslaver's Avatar
steelslaver steelslaver is offline
US Veteran
Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading  
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Central Montana
Posts: 13,688
Likes: 12,836
Liked 39,348 Times in 10,021 Posts
Default

How are bullets lubed or coated? How hot are they loaded? Like mentioned try some smaller. Is guns timing good,? Just that many rounds causing bad lead is all wrong
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-26-2017, 01:08 PM
rockquarry rockquarry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,574
Likes: 4
Liked 8,910 Times in 4,134 Posts
Default

If your throats are truly .359", .359" bullets should work okay, but a .358" bullet might work better. Worth trying. You don't mention whether you're using .38 Special, .357 Magnum, load, or velocity. Makes a big difference. Even with maximum .357 Magnum loads, the bullet alloy could be too hard and that in itself can cause leading.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-26-2017, 03:35 PM
ikarus1 ikarus1 is offline
Member
Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading  
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 33
Likes: 93
Liked 31 Times in 11 Posts
Default

Yep that is a hard alloy.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-26-2017, 04:32 PM
Herman1973 Herman1973 is offline
Member
Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading  
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: The Netherlands Europe
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 8 Posts
Default

38 special loads with titegroup, n320, and Ba9 all give leading.
Loads are between min and max.

Timing seems ok no problem that I can see

Last edited by Herman1973; 03-26-2017 at 04:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-26-2017, 05:10 PM
rockquarry rockquarry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,574
Likes: 4
Liked 8,910 Times in 4,134 Posts
Default

Alloy is much too hard for .38 Special loads. About 10-12 BHN would work far better, particularly if bullet fit (diameter) is right. You should have no leading with this combination even using maximum .38 Special loads. Most commercial bullets have hard lubes. They will work fairly well, but a soft lube would probably be even better.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #8  
Old 03-26-2017, 06:30 PM
reddog81 reddog81 is offline
Member
Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading  
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: IA
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 990
Liked 1,626 Times in 799 Posts
Default

22 BNH would be good for rifle velocities - 38 special not so much. What kind of load are you doing?

If the throats and barrel are .359 then .359 should be the best diameter but sometime you just have to experiment to find out what works best.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #9  
Old 03-26-2017, 08:35 PM
MichiganScott MichiganScott is offline
Member
Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: God's Country
Posts: 4,711
Likes: 1,235
Liked 3,535 Times in 1,770 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rockquarry View Post
Alloy is much too hard for .38 Special loads. About 10-12 BHN would work far better, particularly if bullet fit (diameter) is right. You should have no leading with this combination even using maximum .38 Special loads. Most commercial bullets have hard lubes. They will work fairly well, but a soft lube would probably be even better.
22 Brinell is way too hard and probably the reason for leading.
Brinell vs. velocity is discussed here;

Brinell level vs. velocity guidelines
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #10  
Old 03-26-2017, 08:57 PM
planojack planojack is offline
Member
Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading  
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Southwest Virginia
Posts: 255
Likes: 458
Liked 111 Times in 64 Posts
Default

I've found that very hard alloy causes more leading than it prevents. Try softer alloys and Lee Liquid Alox lube. The liquid alox has almost totally solved my leading problems.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #11  
Old 03-26-2017, 09:08 PM
chief38's Avatar
chief38 chief38 is online now
Member
Barrel leading  
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 17,787
Likes: 7,842
Liked 25,686 Times in 8,680 Posts
Default

I use Dardas RNL (.358") bullets with a hardness of 15 - 16 and don't really get much leading. I like the RNL configuration because they seem to deposit a lot less lead than SWCL does due to its sharp shoulder. The RNL shape is not sharp and eases its way into the forcing cone easier and with less leading.

When you are removing the lead, the Lewis Lead Remover (sold by Brownell's) is the best and most efficient way to get it out.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-26-2017, 09:39 PM
rockquarry rockquarry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,574
Likes: 4
Liked 8,910 Times in 4,134 Posts
Default

I've experimented with different alloys in the .38 Special and many other handgun and rifle cartridges. I think others who have done extensive work in this area will support my findings... using light, moderate, or maximum standard pressure loads, a soft 1 in 16 or a 1 in 25 (tin / lead ratio) bullet almost always shoots more accurately and with less leading than a Lyman #2 mix which is about 15 BHN. Plain wheelweight alloy, about 12 BHN, will also do better than Lyman #2. In fact, with moderate .357 Magnum loads, the softer alloys still often beats the harder Lyman #2. I don't shoot magnum handgun loads of any kind any more, but Lyman #2 will come into its own and show an advantage with warm .357 Magnum loads (or magnum loads for other cartridges).
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #13  
Old 03-27-2017, 03:35 AM
Herman1973 Herman1973 is offline
Member
Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading  
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: The Netherlands Europe
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 8 Posts
Default

The bullets are about the only ones I can by and acc the manufacture they are 22. I use the same brand in my .45 colt Blackhawk 255 lsw light loads and in 300 grain ruger loads and I have no leading at all.

The bullets can be pushed with a little force thru the the cylinder.
Will get some other bullets from a friend that makes his own bullets and these ar sized at 358 with a gas check.

The loads that I use are
3.5 grain titegroup, heavy leading
5.0 grain Ba9, leading
3.5 grain N320, leading
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #14  
Old 03-28-2017, 03:36 AM
rockquarry rockquarry is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,574
Likes: 4
Liked 8,910 Times in 4,134 Posts
Default

Increasing a powder charge will often serve to decrease or eliminate leading, but Titegroup and N320 are roughly Bullseye powder equivalents and your 3.5 grain charge of either powder is probably around maximum, so I would not increase either charge. I am unfamiliar with Ba9.

Pushing bullets through a cylinder with slight force is a good measure of fit, but the alloy must be "right" or close to it for the intended pressure of the load. The .358" gas checked bullets may be too small in diameter but are certainly worth trying. Gas checks won't eliminate leading in most cases, but they will often reduce it. However, one shouldn't "need" a gas checked bullet even for recommended maximum .38 Special loads.

I don't know about the .45 Colt loads you describe. I suppose very light loads may be exempt from leading if bullet fit is fine, but I have little or no experience with very hard bullets fired at low to minimal pressure.

There are exceptions to everything including cast bullet usage. Accepted "conventional wisdom" and rules don't work 100% of the the time. Experimentation is usually worth the effort. Good luck-
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-30-2017, 12:08 PM
Herman1973 Herman1973 is offline
Member
Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading  
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: The Netherlands Europe
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 8 Posts
Default

I gave some of the bullets to a friend that has a Saeco hardness tester and acc to him they are between 10 and 12 BHN wich is far below the value I got from the maker. Did send them a mail about this but they did not replied yet.

But this means they are to soft for magnum loads I guest but should still be oke for .38 special loads or not.

Ba9 has almost the same burn rate as N320 when I look at the vithavuori burn chart.

I have to start over again with my test loads I think.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #16  
Old 03-30-2017, 02:00 PM
cowboy4evr cowboy4evr is offline
Member
Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading  
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: for now ,Texas
Posts: 2,741
Likes: 186
Liked 3,300 Times in 1,525 Posts
Default

Occasionally I find pushing a bore slug down the barrel that it abruptly stops at the junction point where the barrel threads onto the frame . When indexing the front sight , if they over tighten the barrel to get the sight alignment correct it causes a " tight spot " there . It down sizes the cast bullets , causing sometimes severe leading .
Leading is a " subjective " issue . I don't call pulling a few flakes out of the barrel when cleaning " leading " . If I get pieces an inch long , or more then I realize there are some issues that need attention .
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-02-2017, 07:25 AM
Herman1973 Herman1973 is offline
Member
Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading  
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: The Netherlands Europe
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 8 Posts
Default

The lead deposits are just after de forcing cone, and they are not that long. I never had a problem with leading before, i am use to shoot FMJ 9mm, .45 acp. With my 686 I shot lead wadcutter .38. Targetloadsand had no probblems with leading with those. With the model 27 I want to shoot .38 plus loads and 357 magnum loads and than the leading apeared. Does some one can give me a example of server leading and leading the is acceptable (pictures)

Brgds
Herman
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #18  
Old 04-02-2017, 09:13 AM
gwpercle's Avatar
gwpercle gwpercle is offline
Member
Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading Barrel leading  
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Baton Rouge, La.
Posts: 6,870
Likes: 7,475
Liked 8,125 Times in 3,676 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Herman1973 View Post
The bullets are about the only ones I can by and acc the manufacture they are 22. I use the same brand in my .45 colt Blackhawk 255 lsw light loads and in 300 grain ruger loads and I have no leading at all.

The bullets can be pushed with a little force thru the the cylinder.
Will get some other bullets from a friend that makes his own bullets and these ar sized at 358 with a gas check.

The loads that I use are
3.5 grain titegroup, heavy leading
5.0 grain Ba9, leading
3.5 grain N320, leading
BINGO.........358 with a gas check , that should cure it.

Another trick you might want to try is loading 9 mm bullets, use a taper crimp (I use my 9 mm taper crimp die to do this)
I found a cast 120 or 124 grain truncated cone 9 mm , sized .357 , shot extremely well in 38 special-357 magnum.
Jacketed .355 might also work, load a few and give them a try .

Gary

Last edited by gwpercle; 04-02-2017 at 09:23 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Barrel leading in a new model 29-10 Catfish Jimmy S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 14 01-13-2015 09:56 AM
barrel leading SW CQB 45 Reloading 4 03-18-2012 11:15 PM
Leading in Barrel Durabledan Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 8 12-28-2011 04:20 PM
Barrel leading 38, not 9mm dkp9782 Reloading 6 12-04-2010 01:52 AM
617 barrel leading up pea shooter S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 11 08-08-2010 12:09 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:01 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)