Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 3-Screw PINNED Barrel SWING-OUT Cylinder Hand Ejectors WITH Model Numbers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-25-2017, 08:33 PM
Cossack Cossack is offline
Member
I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1  
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 109
Likes: 9
Liked 110 Times in 39 Posts
Default I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1

I've just been offered (locally) a 3 " 629-1 in trade for my model 58 (can be seen in the marketplace). i don't have a solid grasp of the market value of either. I've seen mid $700s to over $1k.

I don't think either would be for personal use. i already have a 4" M29-2, and I've decided I'm not ready to take on .41 when I already have tons of .357 and .44 around.

Assuming that both are in similar VG+ condition, what are realistic market prices? My first inclination is to take the trade. I suspect there are a lot more folks who "need" a shorty bear-blaster than initiates in the Secret Cult of the .41 Magnum, so the 629 should be easier to sell, even if I can't make any more off of it.

Thoughts?

Last edited by Cossack; 04-29-2017 at 08:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-25-2017, 08:55 PM
jimmyj's Avatar
jimmyj jimmyj is offline
Member
I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1  
Join Date: May 2003
Location: DUNNELLON, FLORIDA USA
Posts: 11,109
Likes: 1,691
Liked 16,314 Times in 4,238 Posts
Default

I would trade
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-25-2017, 09:03 PM
VM VM is offline
SWCA Member
I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: HoosieRama
Posts: 6,979
Likes: 2,396
Liked 3,853 Times in 1,401 Posts
Default

If the 629-1 has the original factory combats, I'd jump on the trade
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-25-2017, 09:08 PM
g8rb8 g8rb8 is offline
Member
I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Kansas
Posts: 2,566
Likes: 5,443
Liked 2,921 Times in 1,222 Posts
Default

Seems like a fair enough trade......especially for you.

If you want to get into a more detailed discussion the 629-1 with 3" barrel might be worth a bit more and might be a bit more desirable ............. unless of course you're the guy looking real hard for a model 58.
__________________
Scoundrel & Ne'er-Do-Well
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-25-2017, 09:44 PM
Cossack Cossack is offline
Member
I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1  
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 109
Likes: 9
Liked 110 Times in 39 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VM View Post
If the 629-1 has the original factory combats, I'd jump on the trade
It has nice wood combat grips, but I think they're aftermarket:

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-25-2017, 09:55 PM
19leben's Avatar
19leben 19leben is offline
SWCA Member
I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1  
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,246
Likes: 3,592
Liked 1,996 Times in 533 Posts
Default

If not interested in the .41 Magnum do the trade. With the 629 not having the factory Combats​, value is closer to equal.

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-25-2017, 11:11 PM
A10's Avatar
A10 A10 is offline
SWCA Member
I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1  
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sadly, Seattle WA
Posts: 10,606
Likes: 22,876
Liked 10,345 Times in 4,288 Posts
Default

I'd say the value is a push. If you like the 629, do the swap. I had a 3" 629 for a while, great for packing. Full house loads certainly made a person sit up and take notice!
__________________
Even older, even crankier....
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-26-2017, 12:09 AM
mod29's Avatar
mod29 mod29 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: WA
Posts: 612
Likes: 1,979
Liked 705 Times in 292 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cossack View Post
...a shorty bear-blaster...
haha! That's awesome, "a shorty bear-blaster"!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-26-2017, 02:05 AM
jebstuart's Avatar
jebstuart jebstuart is offline
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1  
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Foothills (Phoenix), AZ
Posts: 624
Likes: 256
Liked 1,229 Times in 338 Posts
Default

I would take that 629-1 in a flash, and I AM a 41 cult member! I just bought a NIB 629-1, 3" with the factory combats, paid well over $1k and was glad to get it.
__________________
Jeb
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-26-2017, 04:53 AM
moralem moralem is online now
Member
I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,455
Likes: 240
Liked 6,206 Times in 1,574 Posts
Default

I would see if the .41 was a former service pistol and if it had any agency markings that might make it a more interesting option. Those 58s don't necessarily show up as often as a 629......but then again a short barrel 629 doesn't either.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-26-2017, 06:39 AM
SuperMan SuperMan is offline
Member
I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1  
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Rochester, NH USA
Posts: 4,006
Likes: 1,629
Liked 4,914 Times in 1,705 Posts
Default

...also depends on the age of the 58 and if it has the original grips which are serialized to the gun...

The 3" 629-1 without the original grips will run in the $900s last I looked...maybe a little more now. A "N" prefix 58 with the correct grips will be in the $900 area and a "S" prefix usually around a grand...that's for 90%+ condition guns with the original grips.

Bob
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-26-2017, 06:44 AM
Shark Bait Shark Bait is offline
Member
I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1  
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 3,183
Likes: 9,014
Liked 9,908 Times in 2,006 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cossack View Post
It has nice wood combat grips, but I think they're aftermarket:

Those are certainly aftermarket grips, so they don't add much to the value. If you prefer 44 do the trade. I don't think there is a big difference in value between the two, but we haven't seen pictures of the 58 either.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-26-2017, 08:47 AM
Cossack Cossack is offline
Member
I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1  
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 109
Likes: 9
Liked 110 Times in 39 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shark Bait View Post
Those are certainly aftermarket grips, so they don't add much to the value. If you prefer 44 do the trade. I don't think there is a big difference in value between the two, but we haven't seen pictures of the 58 either.
Here's my ad with a bunch of photos:
http://smith-wessonforum.com/guns-sa...ew-photos.html
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-26-2017, 09:28 AM
jebstuart's Avatar
jebstuart jebstuart is offline
SWCA Member
Absent Comrade
I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1  
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Foothills (Phoenix), AZ
Posts: 624
Likes: 256
Liked 1,229 Times in 338 Posts
Default

I'm just a push-over for the big bore, round butt snubs & not crazy for fixed sights. The 44 grips look like Badger to me, and do not help the value. Looks like a pretty even trade to me too. If you take the trade & you don't have a set laying around, you'll probably start looking for factory combats, and that'll cost you also. Ain't gun collecting great?!
__________________
Jeb
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-26-2017, 03:03 PM
cmj8591's Avatar
cmj8591 cmj8591 is offline
Member
I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1  
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 2,804
Likes: 1,184
Liked 4,553 Times in 1,638 Posts
Default

Keep the 58. They are still making 3" 69's but they only made 58's for a short while. You most likely will never see them again. Their value is only going up. Keeping the 58 is a great investment. The 69, not so much.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #16  
Old 04-26-2017, 05:08 PM
Mike1647 Mike1647 is offline
Member
I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1  
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Central Alabama
Posts: 291
Likes: 1,738
Liked 340 Times in 123 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmj8591 View Post
Keep the 58. They are still making 3" 69's but they only made 58's for a short while. You most likely will never see them again. Their value is only going up. Keeping the 58 is a great investment. The 69, not so much.
I have to respectably disagree. I just gave almost $1K for a 629-1 3" without the proper grips and was glad to have found it. I am indeed now on the hunt for the correct combats. I have been watching and following the 629's for a long time and they are definitely not going down in value. As always, YMMV.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-26-2017, 05:32 PM
ralph7's Avatar
ralph7 ralph7 is offline
Member
I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1  
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 4,354
Likes: 9,225
Liked 6,390 Times in 2,216 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike1647 View Post
I have to respectably disagree. I just gave almost $1K for a 629-1 3" without the proper grips and was glad to have found it. I am indeed now on the hunt for the correct combats. I have been watching and following the 629's for a long time and they are definitely not going down in value. As always, YMMV.
Looks like he's talking about the 44 special, not the mag.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-26-2017, 09:07 PM
Cossack Cossack is offline
Member
I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1  
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 109
Likes: 9
Liked 110 Times in 39 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmj8591 View Post
Keep the 58. They are still making 3" 69's but they only made 58's for a short while. You most likely will never see them again. Their value is only going up. Keeping the 58 is a great investment. The 69, not so much.
Honestly, though, I'm not keeping either. I'm selling the M58 now, and if I trade I'll be selling the M629. I admire both greatly, but neither are what I'm looking for, so it's really just a matter of which I could sell more easily or for more money. I'm not in a huge hurry to sell, but this offer came along, and it seems like it might work out well to trade.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-27-2017, 10:45 AM
DeafSmith DeafSmith is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 824
Likes: 376
Liked 1,190 Times in 353 Posts
Default

Wish I still had my 629-1 Backpacker.... so yea, I'd trade.
__________________
Deaf
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-28-2017, 01:46 AM
Cossack Cossack is offline
Member
I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1  
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 109
Likes: 9
Liked 110 Times in 39 Posts
Default

I made the trade this afternoon. The 629-1 seems almost new. Thanks folks! The other gentleman was ex-San Antonio PD and was tickled to get the Model 58, so I feel extra good about he deal.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #21  
Old 04-29-2017, 08:34 PM
Cossack Cossack is offline
Member
I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1 I made the trade (photos up): model 58 vs 3" 629-1  
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 109
Likes: 9
Liked 110 Times in 39 Posts
Default

Here it is - it looks gorgeous, with just a few scratches in the stainless. I've decided not to hang onto it, and listed it in the classifieds here. If nobody buys it right away I'll go try it at the range for fun.


Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Market value check; Model 60-4 3" .38 BAM-BAM The Lounge 2 01-26-2017 03:26 PM
market price for Model 617-1 6" no lock davezander S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 3 01-06-2015 09:47 PM
market price for 2" Model 63 MtCamper S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 6 11-16-2014 11:43 PM
Off the market. Model 627 PC 2 5/8" Leatherhead23 GUNS - For Sale or Trade 2 10-21-2013 04:54 PM
what was the market for the 3.5" Model 27? bushmaster1313 S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 24 02-14-2011 05:38 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:09 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)