Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 3-Screw PINNED Barrel SWING-OUT Cylinder Hand Ejectors WITH Model Numbers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-12-2017, 06:38 PM
daddio202's Avatar
daddio202 daddio202 is offline
Member
Range report: model 14 6 inch. vs. 8 3/8 inch. Range report: model 14 6 inch. vs. 8 3/8 inch. Range report: model 14 6 inch. vs. 8 3/8 inch. Range report: model 14 6 inch. vs. 8 3/8 inch. Range report: model 14 6 inch. vs. 8 3/8 inch.  
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Bradenton, florida
Posts: 1,655
Likes: 5,318
Liked 3,465 Times in 917 Posts
Default Range report: model 14 6 inch. vs. 8 3/8 inch.

Went very well today! With my new to me 14-3 8 inch I shot pretty good! Did not need to change sights at all. The main thing though that I wanted to compare is my 14-3 6 inch barrel gun to it. I love to shoot my model 14's I do own a 14 no dash but it dont get out to the range but a couple times a year.The model 14's sure make me look good shooting. No noticeble difference in accuracy between the 2 different barrel lengthes was appreciated. The first picture on the left is at about 18 yards or so my range has no markings. I shot the target on the right with the 14-3 6 inch in both cases and the longer barrel new to me gun I shot on the left target. Back to back with 158 grain lrn 4.5 grains hp38 in the first and closer pictured to the left. Then i ran it all the way back to approximately 25 yards for second set. I wasnt 100% today and both guns can shoot way more accurate than i can standing off hand but the results show both are keepers! I used swc bullets in the 25 yard set of targets looks like maybe the longer barrel paid off on the left target at 25 yards.I did do some shooting in between the 2 sets so the targets are a little beat up after covering those shots between tests. I couldnt help my self just really enjoyed shooting that long tube!!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 20170812_125523.jpg (69.3 KB, 65 views)
File Type: jpg 20170812_131619.jpg (72.0 KB, 64 views)
Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
  #2  
Old 08-12-2017, 06:50 PM
daddio202's Avatar
daddio202 daddio202 is offline
Member
Range report: model 14 6 inch. vs. 8 3/8 inch. Range report: model 14 6 inch. vs. 8 3/8 inch. Range report: model 14 6 inch. vs. 8 3/8 inch. Range report: model 14 6 inch. vs. 8 3/8 inch. Range report: model 14 6 inch. vs. 8 3/8 inch.  
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Bradenton, florida
Posts: 1,655
Likes: 5,318
Liked 3,465 Times in 917 Posts
Default

Here is a picture of the 2 subjects. Sorry all I have to take pictures with is my cell phone and have'nt cleaned em up from tange trip yet.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 20170812_184629.jpg (93.9 KB, 64 views)
File Type: jpg 20170812_184439.jpg (79.5 KB, 45 views)
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #3  
Old 08-12-2017, 07:20 PM
EricR's Avatar
EricR EricR is offline
Member
Range report: model 14 6 inch. vs. 8 3/8 inch. Range report: model 14 6 inch. vs. 8 3/8 inch. Range report: model 14 6 inch. vs. 8 3/8 inch. Range report: model 14 6 inch. vs. 8 3/8 inch. Range report: model 14 6 inch. vs. 8 3/8 inch.  
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 595
Likes: 2,899
Liked 1,582 Times in 339 Posts
Default

Great experiment. You're fortunate to have both. Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-13-2017, 12:27 AM
Jersey Doug Jersey Doug is offline
Member
Range report: model 14 6 inch. vs. 8 3/8 inch. Range report: model 14 6 inch. vs. 8 3/8 inch. Range report: model 14 6 inch. vs. 8 3/8 inch. Range report: model 14 6 inch. vs. 8 3/8 inch. Range report: model 14 6 inch. vs. 8 3/8 inch.  
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 215
Likes: 121
Liked 210 Times in 83 Posts
Default

daddio, when you "take a photo with your cell phone"as you just mentioned do you still have to use Photobucket to post them?

Last edited by Jersey Doug; 08-13-2017 at 12:29 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-13-2017, 04:34 PM
Lobster Picnic Lobster Picnic is offline
Member
Range report: model 14 6 inch. vs. 8 3/8 inch. Range report: model 14 6 inch. vs. 8 3/8 inch. Range report: model 14 6 inch. vs. 8 3/8 inch. Range report: model 14 6 inch. vs. 8 3/8 inch. Range report: model 14 6 inch. vs. 8 3/8 inch.  
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 383
Liked 988 Times in 535 Posts
Default

Did you notice the milder recoil with the long barrel?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-13-2017, 09:52 PM
Troystat Troystat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 792
Liked 679 Times in 437 Posts
Default

Nice, I need a model 14 to go with my model 17.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Model 13-2 3 Inch - Range Report opaul S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 16 11-19-2016 10:04 AM
First Range Report, Md 681, 4 inch bbl. loeman S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 7 12-28-2013 09:03 AM
Wife Scored a 10-6, 5 inch for her 10-14 4 inch! Range Report steamloco76 S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 14 08-19-2012 11:06 PM
27-2, 3.5 inch Range Report jubela#4 S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 4 12-12-2011 01:01 PM
Model 63 3-Inch Range Report RAMS S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 7 10-23-2011 10:15 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:53 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)