Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 3-Screw PINNED Barrel SWING-OUT Cylinder Hand Ejectors WITH Model Numbers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-20-2018, 11:00 PM
CH4's Avatar
CH4 CH4 is online now
Member
M53 Question M53 Question M53 Question M53 Question M53 Question  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Mojave Desert
Posts: 10,343
Likes: 18,026
Liked 24,196 Times in 6,847 Posts
Default M53 Question

I stumbled upon a “minty” 6” M53 with inserts, factory grips, but no box or extra cylinder. LGS is holding firm at $1199. I would appreciate any info about the M53 and if it’s worth having. I know it’s a benefit to reload.

Thanks...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-20-2018, 11:12 PM
M29since14 M29since14 is online now
SWCA Member
M53 Question M53 Question M53 Question M53 Question M53 Question  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 11,938
Likes: 10,102
Liked 10,099 Times in 4,784 Posts
Default

IMO, the Jet is a tinkerer’s gun. If you like to experiment with stuff like that, it’ll be right up your alley. If you’re just a shooter and not so much into the tinkering thing, look for something else.

The real problem with the gun is that it’s made for small targets but it’s not sufficiently accurate or powerful enough to use much beyond 25-yards.

It’s a beautiful revolver. I’ve always enjoyed just looking at mine. From a utility point of view, well, just say I’m a tinkerer, as far as the 53 goes.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #3  
Old 06-20-2018, 11:52 PM
CH4's Avatar
CH4 CH4 is online now
Member
M53 Question M53 Question M53 Question M53 Question M53 Question  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Mojave Desert
Posts: 10,343
Likes: 18,026
Liked 24,196 Times in 6,847 Posts
Default

Thanks! Is $1199 a decent price for a near perfect example with inserts?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-21-2018, 12:21 AM
Jersey Doug Jersey Doug is offline
Member
M53 Question M53 Question M53 Question M53 Question M53 Question  
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 215
Likes: 121
Liked 210 Times in 83 Posts
Default

Well,,, the good news is PPU makes ammo for the gun. Best to know many (or should I say most) used M-53's have some degree of cone damage from the intensity of the round. At the entry of the barrel, will be beveled not flat across, noticeable even in photos, good question to ask seller.

I've compared the PPU against Remington's ammo had since the 70's and found PPU's have substantially less power, hence less apt to burn out that cone area.

Mine came with the extra .22 LR cylinder and is super accurate in that configuration, not near as well with in Jet though. The casing can get stuck in the camber, I bring along a simple hand tool I made,, when won't eject all six at once do them one at a time with the tool, simple.

First photos the M-53.. Have basically the full S&W line, my M-48 and M-53 .22 mags use the least.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg model 53.jpg (56.8 KB, 35 views)
File Type: jpg Guns scoped.jpg (96.4 KB, 38 views)

Last edited by Jersey Doug; 06-21-2018 at 12:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #5  
Old 06-21-2018, 12:24 AM
CH4's Avatar
CH4 CH4 is online now
Member
M53 Question M53 Question M53 Question M53 Question M53 Question  
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Mojave Desert
Posts: 10,343
Likes: 18,026
Liked 24,196 Times in 6,847 Posts
Default

Thanks

The gun looks to have been fired very little. Faint turn line, forcing cone and muzzle look new.

Last edited by CH4; 06-21-2018 at 12:39 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-21-2018, 07:37 AM
M29since14 M29since14 is online now
SWCA Member
M53 Question M53 Question M53 Question M53 Question M53 Question  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 11,938
Likes: 10,102
Liked 10,099 Times in 4,784 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CH4 View Post
Thanks! Is $1199 a decent price for a near perfect example with inserts?
That seems a bit high to me. If I could negotiate away a few hundred of that I’d be a lot happier if I were buying. With box it would be a bit more tolerable. With box and extra cylinder maybe a couple hundred more. In any case, they aren’t making more of them and it’s a scarce item. If you want one, it might take you a while to find one as nice for much less.

BTW, is this an early or later 53? That’s way more than I’d want to pay for a later gun.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-21-2018, 08:20 AM
Willeys Willeys is offline
Member
M53 Question M53 Question M53 Question M53 Question M53 Question  
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 166
Likes: 1
Liked 77 Times in 31 Posts
Default

With out the box and extra cylinder, the price is a bit too high. However if you like odd rounds that you can reload and experiment with, it may be worth it. Prices of those guns are only going up.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-21-2018, 08:49 AM
steelslaver's Avatar
steelslaver steelslaver is offline
US Veteran
M53 Question M53 Question M53 Question M53 Question M53 Question  
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Central Montana
Posts: 13,688
Likes: 12,836
Liked 39,351 Times in 10,021 Posts
Default

If you get it, I have lots of new brass. Had several hundred then bought 2000 new from a member. Not going to ever use it all up.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-21-2018, 09:09 AM
ken158 ken158 is offline
Member
M53 Question M53 Question  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 4,674
Likes: 1,449
Liked 4,505 Times in 1,931 Posts
Default

As noted, the 53 is not a load and shoot gun. The factory inserts are expensive if you can find them and the extra cylinder that came with many 53's is a big bonus. You would need the box to make it a real collector's item. I would pass... and save my $$$ for something with less drama.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-21-2018, 12:31 PM
austintexas austintexas is offline
SWCA Member
M53 Question M53 Question M53 Question M53 Question M53 Question  
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 1,345
Likes: 123
Liked 1,651 Times in 640 Posts
Default

I have a 4 inch m-53 I bought when I found out the were gonna discontinue them. Mine is very accurate with factory and reloads, i shot it way farther than 25 yards. I wipe the ammo before loading and mop the cylinder charge holes every few reloads. There are aftermarket .22 inserts out there that are reasonably priced. If you want a M-53 get it, they are not made anymore and they will increase in value. The old saying is you don't pay too much just too soon. Wear very good hearing protection.
SWCA 892
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #11  
Old 06-21-2018, 02:18 PM
Dave.357 Dave.357 is online now
Member
M53 Question M53 Question M53 Question M53 Question M53 Question  
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Ohio valley
Posts: 2,016
Likes: 3,581
Liked 4,187 Times in 1,410 Posts
Default

I also shoot a jet groundhog at 50 yd.
no problem off hand 75 or more with a rest
The price seems a little hi for no box
or papers but 3years from now it
will sound cheep
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-21-2018, 02:52 PM
dave1918a2's Avatar
dave1918a2 dave1918a2 is offline
US Veteran
M53 Question M53 Question M53 Question M53 Question M53 Question  
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Black Hills of SD
Posts: 2,786
Likes: 2,171
Liked 4,206 Times in 1,802 Posts
Default

I have been loading for and shooting My Jet since 1975. The only thing I do is wipe the ammo with carb cleaner and wipe the cylinders also. I have a 4 screw 6 inch and it shoots just fine. I hunt grouse with it during deer season. Right now if the gun is a 4 screw it is worth that price. The inserts are being made and sold by Numerich Arms, (Gun Parts) for $19.95 each.
Factory ammo is coming down a bit with the stuff being sold by PPU. If You can find a spare cylinder for 22LR expect to pay $400+. There was a box on fleabay with 4 inserts and the paperwork that sold for I think $675. Mine likes the Remington viper HV in the inserts, shoots about 1.5 inches @ 25 yds.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question About Smith Model 360PD Scandium/Titanium Question Rhetorician S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 2 03-28-2015 09:25 AM
Nickel Baby Chief: W/Photos: New Question: Question Answered WCCPHD S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 29 01-26-2015 11:31 PM
Taurus Brand Question: An Honest Question? Rhetorician Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Gun Topics 108 12-21-2014 11:23 AM
Question about a Ladysmith 60LS .357 mag 2 1/8" - A Christmas Present for my Wife that came into my FFL. I have a recoil question and a couple of other questions to anyone that has one of these! .460V & XVR Magnum Man S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 35 09-24-2014 09:19 AM
email question *Question Answered, Thanks! timn8er FORUM OFFICE 2 08-26-2013 08:22 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:16 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)