|
|
08-29-2018, 12:45 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 9,001
Likes: 16,254
Liked 19,869 Times in 4,490 Posts
|
|
14-3. Single Action Only
Picked this up the past weekend on approval/consignment, but I know very little about these guns outside of what I can read in SCSW. It works as advertised and it is in remarkable condition. SN is in the 3K 90xxx range. I normally don't use the xxx's in the SN but because it's not mine yet??? I will post pic's in the AM, to see if anyone knows more about it than myself. I'm guessing it shipped around '72.
I know they made a SAO conversion kit, but did they (S&W) put a mark on the gun or kit parts to indicate that kit? I'm now thinking I should have asked Roy first but I welcome any input before I send this to Roy.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-29-2018, 09:02 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 232
Likes: 255
Liked 160 Times in 110 Posts
|
|
Excellent, accurate, meticulously built target revolver. I've never heard of a complaint with a model 14. I believe S&W only put their best gunsmiths to work on their masterpiece line.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-29-2018, 09:26 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 67
Likes: 70
Liked 88 Times in 32 Posts
|
|
I dont know where I picked this up, maybe its from this Forum, but I have the roughly 1964 price listing for the SA model 14. It was quite more expensive than the DA. My revolvers are all from 1964, but the SA seemed to be a premium option.
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-29-2018, 09:27 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 67
Likes: 70
Liked 88 Times in 32 Posts
|
|
and here's page 2.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-29-2018, 10:59 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 4,684
Likes: 19,020
Liked 4,190 Times in 1,865 Posts
|
|
@OP,
I have a SA kit for my K38s (still in the shrink wrap display card) and I cannot see any special markings on the parts.
__________________
Judge control not gun control!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-29-2018, 11:24 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Pensacola,FL
Posts: 1,720
Likes: 4,198
Liked 999 Times in 536 Posts
|
|
As stated the kits were available aftermarket . If gun was shipped from factory SA only then they do command a premium , but if kit was added later IMHO no premium .
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-29-2018, 05:21 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 9,001
Likes: 16,254
Liked 19,869 Times in 4,490 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrrifleman
@OP,
I have a SA kit for my K38s (still in the shrink wrap display card) and I cannot see any special markings on the parts.
|
OK. Very interesting. I appreciate the information.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-29-2018, 06:03 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 9,001
Likes: 16,254
Liked 19,869 Times in 4,490 Posts
|
|
Pictures, Everybody Loves Pictures
These don't do the gun any justice with reflections and glare. I need to re-hone my photography Skills. Maybe I can get better shots in different lighting.
Considering the gun is in much better shape than shown, any ideas on value?
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-29-2018, 06:58 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 67
Likes: 70
Liked 88 Times in 32 Posts
|
|
You inspired me to re-photograph my 14-2.. might be a finger print, but of the revolvers I have I wish I could shoot this one.. I am told that I should not, so I don’t shoot it very much at all. Grandpa gun, and the gun I used to qualify for my Illinois CCW.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-29-2018, 07:03 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,814
Likes: 4,242
Liked 15,219 Times in 4,166 Posts
|
|
I believe LAPD issued the Model 14 in the ‘60s, same time my department issued the Model 15.
__________________
Old Cop
LEO (Ret.)
|
08-29-2018, 07:13 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 67
Likes: 70
Liked 88 Times in 32 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old cop
I believe LAPD issued the Model 14 in the ‘60s, same time my department issued the Model 15.
|
Maybe you can clarify this a little, I read the reason the 15 was more of an issued weapon was because of the sights.. where the 14 was an edged sight, that could get caught in the edge of a holster, the 15 had a nice tapered sight to slide out of whatever holster it was in?
|
08-29-2018, 08:26 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 9,001
Likes: 16,254
Liked 19,869 Times in 4,490 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave IL
You inspired me to re-photograph my 14-2.. might be a finger print, but of the revolvers I have I wish I could shoot this one.. I am told that I should not, so I don’t shoot it very much at all. Grandpa gun, and the gun I used to qualify for my Illinois CCW.
|
Very nice, especially an inherited gun, if I read you right.
|
08-29-2018, 10:47 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 4,684
Likes: 19,020
Liked 4,190 Times in 1,865 Posts
|
|
@Dave,
The Model 15 (a.k.a. Combat Masterpiece) had the Baughman ramp front sight while the Model 14 had the Patridge front sight. Up into the '80s, when you ordered a Smith from the factory, you could order any one of up to 8 or so different styles of front sight. Theoretically, you could have a: red ramp, red patridge, McGivern bead, McCall bead, Patridge, Baughman, or a standard bead front sight.
__________________
Judge control not gun control!
|
08-30-2018, 01:22 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 9,001
Likes: 16,254
Liked 19,869 Times in 4,490 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrrifleman
@Dave,
The Model 15 (a.k.a. Combat Masterpiece) had the Baughman ramp front sight while the Model 14 had the Patridge front sight. Up into the '80s, when you ordered a Smith from the factory, you could order any one of up to 8 or so different styles of front sight. Theoretically, you could have a: red ramp, red patridge, McGivern bead, McCall bead, Patridge, Baughman, or a standard bead front sight.
|
I had (sold them) a 14 with a red square on the Patridge, and one with a gold bead. Which one's would they be?
|
08-31-2018, 09:20 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Hillsdale, Mi.
Posts: 7,502
Likes: 7,046
Liked 7,090 Times in 2,944 Posts
|
|
I was really happy to pick up my 14-3. Got it on G.B. 4 years ago. Price was right. Good looker & performer! ( not a SAO ) Everybody should have 1! Bob
Last edited by bananaman; 08-31-2018 at 09:21 AM.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-31-2018, 10:01 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Tincup, CO
Posts: 3,694
Likes: 6,291
Liked 7,472 Times in 2,287 Posts
|
|
Retired W4 - This probably cannot be priced correctly without a letter showing it shipped in the SAO configuration (or not) as stated by Boatbum101. Beautiful gun in any case.
__________________
Some collect art; I shoot it!
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-31-2018, 02:23 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sunny Florida, USA
Posts: 1,833
Likes: 126
Liked 4,151 Times in 820 Posts
|
|
There is quite a bit of information here on the Forum about the Model 14 SAO revolvers. Here is a representative thread with some good info:
K-38 SINGLE ACTION
__________________
Charlie Flick
SWCA 729 HF 215
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-31-2018, 09:26 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 9,001
Likes: 16,254
Liked 19,869 Times in 4,490 Posts
|
|
Thank you guys. I'll be looking into this some more based on your input. What a site.
|
08-31-2018, 09:59 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 9,001
Likes: 16,254
Liked 19,869 Times in 4,490 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ordnanceguy
There is quite a bit of information here on the Forum about the Model 14 SAO revolvers. Here is a representative thread with some good info:
K-38 SINGLE ACTION
|
Thanks for the link. Any one interested in these guns should check this out. Very educational! The concern I have about this gun is it obviously has had the side plate off. The screws are somewhat buggered. I have lots of screws for replacements but the question of originality/kit can only be answered by the letter. Per PeaK53 We shall see.
Last edited by Retired W4; 08-31-2018 at 10:07 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
01-22-2019, 11:43 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 9,001
Likes: 16,254
Liked 19,869 Times in 4,490 Posts
|
|
Got the letter today and it did ship as a SAO. I was very happy to get that news. BTW, the turn around on the letter was under 6 weeks. Now it's off to the range.
|
01-23-2019, 01:36 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 814
Likes: 22
Liked 1,914 Times in 467 Posts
|
|
I sold my pawn shop rescued 14-3 SAO recently for $450. The original magnas had a large chunk missing on the left side so i replaced them with a well used set of K frame presentation stocks. There was also some rust damage and blue loss on the sideplate. Great shooter.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|