|
|
08-11-2019, 07:46 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 10,453
Likes: 3,929
Liked 50,520 Times in 6,022 Posts
|
|
Factory stamping boo-boo...
This Model 48 (.22 magnum rimfire) was plainly stamped in the frame's yoke cutout as a "MOD. 48-2."
The Model 48-3 was authorized in 1967, and a check with the SCSW showed that by its serial number, the gun was shipped in the mid-1970s, putting it well within that dash number's range.
I checked with Roy on this, and he confirmed that the gun was indeed shipped in October, 1975, about 8 years after the "dash 2" markings should have stopped.
His only explanation was that the gun was probably mis-stamped. My only question is "How did a dash-2 stamp fall into the hands of a maybe-drunk stamper in 1975???? "
They say never say never with Smith & Wesson, and I believe it!
John
P.S. Do I have a rare and extremely valuable anomaly here?
__________________
- Cogito, ergo armatus sum -
Last edited by PALADIN85020; 08-11-2019 at 08:11 PM.
|
The Following 14 Users Like Post:
|
29-1, 6518John, 75Vette, arjay, CH4, deanodog, GerSan69, JSticks, NY-1, ParadiseRoad, parsonbw, RKmesa, S&WIowegan, SFIDEC |
08-11-2019, 07:55 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Twin Cites, Minnesota
Posts: 5,154
Likes: 10,998
Liked 10,886 Times in 3,282 Posts
|
|
Yeah, the mis-stamped guns don't really have any value, but I'll give you $50 for it.
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-11-2019, 10:32 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Moved to Oklahoma
Posts: 96
Likes: 125
Liked 111 Times in 52 Posts
|
|
Beautiful 22 Magnum you have there.
__________________
Klaatu Barada Nikto
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-12-2019, 08:41 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ashtabula County, Ohio
Posts: 6,082
Likes: 9,350
Liked 13,777 Times in 4,043 Posts
|
|
I have had 4 or 5 misstamped S&W revolvers. Interesting but not remarkable and, unfortunately, no additional value.
Kevin
__________________
Unshared knowledge is wasted.
|
08-12-2019, 09:05 AM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Great Lakes State
Posts: 29,959
Likes: 12,835
Liked 34,138 Times in 8,026 Posts
|
|
Stamping boo-boo's aren't unique to S&W.
I'll bet you didn't know that Colt made an "APMY SPECIAL"!
It's not in any of my reference books, so it must be worth BIG DOLLAPS!
__________________
"I also cook."
|
The Following 12 Users Like Post:
|
29-1, arjay, GerSan69, Kurusu, PALADIN85020, ParadiseRoad, parsonbw, PeteC, rct269, RKmesa, S&WIowegan, Warren Sear |
08-12-2019, 10:25 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,426
Likes: 1,108
Liked 5,154 Times in 1,581 Posts
|
|
My 48-2 has S/N that dates it to 1971. Go figure.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-12-2019, 10:42 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Georgetown, Tx
Posts: 2,350
Likes: 2,564
Liked 2,881 Times in 1,189 Posts
|
|
Before it got stolen years ago, my son had a S&W 357 mag stamped with caliber 22 lr on the barrel. I don't recall what model the 357 was, but it definitely was a 357 magnum.
Last edited by Bozz10mm; 08-12-2019 at 10:45 AM.
|
08-12-2019, 11:05 AM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 9,410
Likes: 1,323
Liked 30,553 Times in 4,376 Posts
|
|
The relocation of the rear sight leaf screw slightly forward resulted in the -3 model variation. Is it possible your revolver does not have this change and is actually a -2?
Bill
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-12-2019, 11:29 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 10,453
Likes: 3,929
Liked 50,520 Times in 6,022 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc44
The relocation of the rear sight leaf screw slightly forward resulted in the -3 model variation. Is it possible your revolver does not have this change and is actually a -2?
Bill
|
Nope - it's a dash 3 in all discernible respects. The screw is forward of the barrel/cylinder gap - the same as on a Model 67 I have from 1978. The gun came to me in 99% condition in its original box with tools and papers, and the stocks are also definitely dash 3 (no central diamond). The label on the box says dash 2, but that could have just been read off the stamping. I'd guess that -2 frames were pretty well used up by 1975!
Pretty sure it's what Roy surmised - just a mis-stamp. Someone on this thread mentioned a 1971 gun with a -2 stamp. I note that the "2" in the stamping is larger than the rest of the characters in the stamp, indicating that the "2" was separate punch and was simply picked up by mistake rather than the "3." Must have been a Monday morning and a hangover...
John
__________________
- Cogito, ergo armatus sum -
Last edited by PALADIN85020; 08-12-2019 at 11:42 AM.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-12-2019, 02:22 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Northern California
Posts: 965
Likes: 1,023
Liked 1,281 Times in 407 Posts
|
|
PALADIN85020,
I have 48-2, serial # 6K4898. I purchased this new in January of 1975. I had posted about this anomaly on other posts before now.
It also should be a 48-3. Mine has the 8 3/8" barrel. I will ask Roy when it shipped as soon as there is an opening.
__________________
Ken
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-12-2019, 02:45 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 10,453
Likes: 3,929
Liked 50,520 Times in 6,022 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kennethg
PALADIN85020,
I have 48-2, serial # 6K4898. I purchased this new in January of 1975. I had posted about this anomaly on other posts before now.
It also should be a 48-3. Mine has the 8 3/8" barrel. I will ask Roy when it shipped as soon as there is an opening.
|
Your serial # is pretty close to the one on my 48. Please keep us posted on what you find out from Roy in this thread. Can you post a photo of the stamping, similar to the photo in the original post?
John
__________________
- Cogito, ergo armatus sum -
Last edited by PALADIN85020; 08-12-2019 at 04:02 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-12-2019, 03:37 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MA
Posts: 7,350
Likes: 7,540
Liked 5,590 Times in 2,562 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by s&wchad
Stamping boo-boo's aren't unique to S&W.
I'll bet you didn't know that Colt made an "APMY SPECIAL"!
It's not in any of my reference books, so it must be worth BIG DOLLAPS!
|
I'm probably missing a detail (or maybe major part) of the posting, but I thought that the Army Special was the immediate predecessor and very close relative of the Official Police. Maybe I'm mixing that up with a similar real name?
BTW, beautiful example.
__________________
Formerly Model520Fan
|
08-12-2019, 05:52 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Great Lakes State
Posts: 29,959
Likes: 12,835
Liked 34,138 Times in 8,026 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Model520Fan
I'm probably missing a detail (or maybe major part) of the posting, but I thought that the Army Special was the immediate predecessor and very close relative of the Official Police.
|
I’m aware of the “ARMY SPECIAL” and its history. Look closely at the barrel marking in my photo. Mine is an APMY SPECIAL.
We’re talking about stamping “Boo-Poo’s”.
You may think that a “P” looks like an “R”, but you’d be missing a leg to stand on in court!
__________________
"I also cook."
|
The Following 6 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-12-2019, 06:04 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,725
Likes: 1,606
Liked 6,324 Times in 2,300 Posts
|
|
Sounds like there was a rack of 48-2 frames that got shoved in a corner somewhere, only to be found years later.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-12-2019, 06:27 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MA
Posts: 7,350
Likes: 7,540
Liked 5,590 Times in 2,562 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by s&wchad
I’m aware of the “ARMY SPECIAL” and its history. Look closely at the barrel marking in my photo. Mine is an APMY SPECIAL.
|
Figuped I was missing something. Thanks fop stpaightening me out!
__________________
Formerly Model520Fan
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-12-2019, 06:48 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 10,453
Likes: 3,929
Liked 50,520 Times in 6,022 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by glenwolde
Sounds like there was a rack of 48-2 frames that got shoved in a corner somewhere, only to be found years later.
|
Don't think so. 48-2 frames would have had the rear sight leaf screw hole farther back - over the barrel/cylinder gap. Gas cutting there is why they moved it forward with the dash 3 version.
I think a stamper screwed up and used his "2" stamping punch instead of "3" for a while before someone straightened him out.
John
__________________
- Cogito, ergo armatus sum -
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-12-2019, 08:23 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,725
Likes: 1,606
Liked 6,324 Times in 2,300 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PALADIN85020
Don't think so. 48-2 frames would have had the rear sight leaf screw hole farther back - over the barrel/cylinder gap. Gas cutting there is why they moved it forward with the dash 3 version.
I think a stamper screwed up and used his "2" stamping punch instead of "3" for a while before someone straightened him out.
John
|
Why? Do you know for sure they were always drilled after they were stamped? Maybe they were stamped before they were drilled.....hard to believe a stamper used the wrong number after eight years. Easier for me to believe a bunch of raw stamped frames were later drilled for the then current specs. But we'll never know.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-12-2019, 10:32 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Northern California
Posts: 965
Likes: 1,023
Liked 1,281 Times in 407 Posts
|
|
PALADIN85020,
Here is the photo you requested. I will post shipping info when I get it.
__________________
Ken
|
08-13-2019, 11:42 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 10,453
Likes: 3,929
Liked 50,520 Times in 6,022 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kennethg
PALADIN85020,
Here is the photo you requested. I will post shipping info when I get it.
|
Pretty much an exact duplicate of mine.
New development in this puzzle - Yesterday I examined the bottom of the topstrap on mine with a magnifying glass and a strong light. There is a faint outline of a filled hole where the earlier rear sight mounting hole was located, pretty much right over the barrel-cylinder juncture. I really had to look for it, but it's there.
I therefore have a new theory. These were originally dash 2 frames and so marked. S&W may have pulled these out of inventory at later dates, filled the old screw hole and drilled a new one to dash 3 specs. The frames remained marked as dash 2s.
I suggest you examine the same area on yours, again with a magnifying glass and a strong light. I used a small high-power flashlight, and the filled hole is best seen with the light at a strong angle.
John
__________________
- Cogito, ergo armatus sum -
Last edited by PALADIN85020; 08-13-2019 at 11:44 AM.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-13-2019, 01:49 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: A Burb of the Burgh
Posts: 14,792
Likes: 1,673
Liked 19,897 Times in 8,797 Posts
|
|
Once again.....S&W never throws out anything that can be used!!!!!!!!
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-13-2019, 02:35 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 4,106
Likes: 14,444
Liked 3,763 Times in 1,784 Posts
|
|
John has it nailed
I was in the camp who thought the gun had probably languished in inventory well past its' born-on-date. It never would have occurred to me that a screw hole would be filled in order to fit a dash 3 rear sight. Kudos to John for brilliant detection skills!
After many years of gathering S&Ws, the company clearly was frugal but also sloppy with inventory control.
__________________
Bob.
SWCA 1821
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-16-2019, 04:26 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,252
Likes: 11,935
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
|
|
Roy will tell you that taking the time for better inventory control of thousands of frames (such as by serial # order, etc.) held no benefit to S&W's ability to get guns assembled and shipped out the door; that was the priority. If there was a benefit S&W would have done it.
Sure in this case it caused a need to fill a hole in the wrong location because they had no more earlier rear sights to use that matched. But I'm certain hole filling wasn't done one-by-one but rather done to the frames that needed it in one batch.
Dash #s indicating an engineering change not present on the gun and dash #s not indicating a change that is on the gun are common. John's case is just a new wrinkle of an old issue.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
Last edited by Hondo44; 08-16-2019 at 04:29 AM.
|
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-16-2019, 06:04 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 6,926
Likes: 179
Liked 4,301 Times in 2,112 Posts
|
|
I suspect that what we are seeing is due to Batch Manufacturing. When producing items that sell in small yearly volumes it's common for manufacturers to run a large volume of detail parts to distribute the cost for setting up the production line over a larger number of complete products. So way back in 1965 or so S&W ran what was essentially a 10 year supply of frames and stamped them with the model number.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
08-16-2019, 10:49 AM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,252
Likes: 11,935
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
|
|
Even for large volume items, they just made bigger batches.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-16-2019, 10:59 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Northern California
Posts: 965
Likes: 1,023
Liked 1,281 Times in 407 Posts
|
|
FOLLOW UP TO MY ORIGINAL POST:
I got shipping info from Roy. My 48-2 shipped in December of 1974. John's 48-2 shipped in October of 1975. As we have known for years, S&W did not ship in serial number order.
My 48-2 is 7 numbers higher than John's but shipped 10 months earlier.
Also, I could not detect any marks on the underside of the top strap indicating that a screw hole had been welded in (to changes the rear sight front screw location).
__________________
Ken
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
09-16-2020, 08:38 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Hot & Humid Charleston SC
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Well here's one more that was apparently mis-stamped. Interesting that so many of these were shipped like this.
|
09-16-2020, 09:04 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,252
Likes: 11,935
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kennethg
FOLLOW UP TO MY ORIGINAL POST:
I got shipping info from Roy. My 48-2 shipped in December of 1974. John's 48-2 shipped in October of 1975. As we have known for years, S&W did not ship in serial number order.
My 48-2 is 7 numbers higher than John's but shipped 10 months earlier.
Also, I could not detect any marks on the underside of the top strap indicating that a screw hole had been welded in (to changes the rear sight front screw location).
|
When they ran out of the old style sight I'm sure there were 1000s of frames in different stages of production. No doubt your frame along with many others were in an early stage of production which didn't have screw holes drilled and tapped yet. So when it reached the stage for hole drilling, it got the sight hole drilled in the new location.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
09-17-2020, 12:49 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,695
Likes: 2
Liked 3,456 Times in 988 Posts
|
|
I have this 4" 48 that is marked as a no-dash but by serial number etc should be a dash 3. Based on posts here on the forum 48's seem to have a lot of mismarked guns. Who knows why. Just part of the fun of collecting. (sorry for the ****** photo)
__________________
Jim
Many K and N Frames
|
09-17-2020, 01:03 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,426
Likes: 1,108
Liked 5,154 Times in 1,581 Posts
|
|
I have a 48-2 that dates to 1971. Go figure. I bought it thinking I would like to get into 22 mag, but alas I didn't. Sits in the safe until I get the opportunity to move it.
|
09-17-2020, 03:09 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Hot & Humid Charleston SC
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Add another one to the list. I have one too.
|
09-17-2020, 03:13 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,252
Likes: 11,935
Liked 20,598 Times in 8,583 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by glenncal1
I have this 4" 48 that is marked as a no-dash but by serial number etc should be a dash 3. Based on posts here on the forum 48's seem to have a lot of mismarked guns. Who knows why. Just part of the fun of collecting. (sorry for the ****** photo)
|
Because they were slow sellers. Which means changes took place while they were bare frames still in inventory but already stamped with an earlier Model dash #.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|