|
|
03-27-2009, 03:30 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Winston-Salem NC
Posts: 1,447
Likes: 3
Liked 205 Times in 83 Posts
|
|
Hi, Guys and Gals I am looking at a model 15 for carry purposes. I am wanting to know if the 2"HB is very durable. Does it have the same flat bottom barrel as the model 19 and 66??
any problems with them? I would be using
.38 special short barrel rounds in the gun.
__________________
M.J.Hanna
|
03-27-2009, 03:30 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Winston-Salem NC
Posts: 1,447
Likes: 3
Liked 205 Times in 83 Posts
|
|
Hi, Guys and Gals I am looking at a model 15 for carry purposes. I am wanting to know if the 2"HB is very durable. Does it have the same flat bottom barrel as the model 19 and 66??
any problems with them? I would be using
.38 special short barrel rounds in the gun.
__________________
M.J.Hanna
|
03-27-2009, 03:57 PM
|
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The kidney of Dixie.
Posts: 10,509
Likes: 49
Liked 13,410 Times in 3,290 Posts
|
|
You are comparing a 21,500 PSI 38 Special with a 35,000 PSI 357 Magnum. The 38 doesn't require any sort of special barrel for longevity.
Short barrel rounds? New one on me. What are these? Fast burning powder to reduce muzzle flash?
__________________
No life story has happy end.
|
03-27-2009, 04:12 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Central FL
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 12,895
Liked 4,199 Times in 1,677 Posts
|
|
Saxon --
Speer has been selling the short barrel rounds for a while now. linky Low-flash powder, Gold Dot bullets; good for snubbys and small semiautos.
__________________
50 Years of DSOTM
|
03-28-2009, 12:47 AM
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 5,060
Likes: 739
Liked 3,275 Times in 1,282 Posts
|
|
My department adopted the Combat Masterpiece soon after it was introduced. We issued them until about 1991, when we began switching to the Model 4006 .40 S&W Auto.
Some of the guys carried and shot the same sixgun for more than 30 years. The armorer said they only broke when people messed with them, and it was usually from the "messing" not the shooting. I saw one a deputy rechambered to .357 Magnum. I don't know how many magnums he shot but the gun was still pretty tight when I saw it in about 1985 (he had it from about 1965 until then).
I doubt you will be able to wear one out without using ammo hotter than Plus-P, and lots of it. If it does develop wear, minor tune-up parts are usually enough to restore it to like-new condition.
|
03-30-2009, 12:38 AM
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 5,060
Likes: 739
Liked 3,275 Times in 1,282 Posts
|
|
"barrel shrouds"... The Model 15 (and the same gun in stainless is the Model 67) do not have an ejector rod shroud under the barrel, just a short lug that holds the front latching pin and spring that holds the ejector rod in place when the cylinder is closed. Yhe Model 19 (and stainless Model 66) have an ejector rod shround on the bottom of the barrel that holds the ejector rod lock and protects the rod when the cylinder is closed.
While the M-15 and -67 were made with both tapered and bull barrels, the barrels on the M-19 and -66 were still just a bit heavier.
|
03-30-2009, 08:09 AM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Bolivar, MO
Posts: 6,360
Likes: 3,558
Liked 3,242 Times in 1,100 Posts
|
|
I have personally seen a M-15 consume way over 500,000 rounds of target loads with no adverse affects
The only drawback to the lack of shroud the 19 has is the chances of bending an ejector rod are higher. However, the snubby has a short ejecter rod and you'd have to be pretty much trying to bend one to do it.
|
03-30-2009, 09:29 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Colorado Rocky Mountains
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 631
Liked 109 Times in 52 Posts
|
|
Hard to beat a M15. The problems that the K frame magnums have is due to shooting full power magnums with light bullets. Shooting anything in even .38+P will not hurt these guns. Remember the K frame and the .38 special were designed for one another.
__________________
Formerly know as Lucky Derby
|
03-30-2009, 09:24 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: DFW TX
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Liked 34 Times in 16 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Remember the K frame and the .38 special were designed for one another.
|
A marriage made in heaven!
|
03-30-2009, 09:44 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Backwoods Louisiana
Posts: 763
Likes: 210
Liked 285 Times in 113 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by BUFF:
I saw one a deputy rechambered to .357 Magnum. I don't know how many magnums he shot but the gun was still pretty tight when I saw it in about 1985 (he had it from about 1965 until then).
|
A M-15 rechambered for .357 Magnum? Is that what you mean't to say?
|
03-31-2009, 12:39 PM
|
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 5,060
Likes: 739
Liked 3,275 Times in 1,282 Posts
|
|
Originally posted by Doug.38PR:
"A M-15 rechambered for .357 Magnum? Is that what you mean't to say?"
Yep. Not a course of action that I would endorse, though.
|
03-31-2009, 05:57 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,782
Likes: 1,239
Liked 5,839 Times in 2,365 Posts
|
|
The M-15 is basically the service version of the K-38 target revolver. I suspect target revolvers get far more rounds put through them than service revolvers. In his book Ed McGivern
shows pictures of tight groups fired through K-22s with 200,000 rounds through them.
|
|
Tags
|
357 magnum, combat masterpiece, ejector, k frame, lock, masterpiece, model 15, model 19, model 66, shroud, snubby |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|