|
|
|
08-13-2009, 04:03 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,352
Likes: 10,450
Liked 6,095 Times in 1,249 Posts
|
|
Model 10 Fans: Heavy Barrel or Standard Best?
I've been intended to get a "round tuit" and ask this question.
For shooting fans of the Model 10 revolver with 4-inch barrel: Can you tell a difference between the standard tapered barrel and the Heavy Barrel variation when shooting it?
I cut my teeth on the Heavy Barrel but can't really tell much difference when shooting the two. Though I'm more familiar with the feel and balance of the Heavy Barrel I actually think the standard barrel balances a bit better in the hand. Recoil with all loads from target wadcutter to +P rounds feels the same to me with both barrel styles.
|
08-13-2009, 04:58 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SC/TX
Posts: 618
Likes: 339
Liked 82 Times in 55 Posts
|
|
I love the heavy barrel, but it may just be the looks.
|
08-13-2009, 05:22 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 987
Likes: 28
Liked 381 Times in 99 Posts
|
|
My first issued weapon (from the US Army) was a M10, RB HB. Then I found a "couple of "Pencil" barreled guns in the arms room, and asked for one, and got it. I liked the way the weight sat a little further back in my hand. Then they had some 2" barrels both M10s and Colt DSs, and I fell for snubs. Eventually my unit was moved and colocated with the USAF in Ubon. We had to take a sidearm with us. I took a HB M10, and the armorer at the AF did an action job on it that is still the best I have ever had, why I turned that gun in is still a mystery to me, other than I was very young and was lacking the experience (balls) I later acquired.
I still like the "pencil" barrels, and when a 38 is required, I carry my 4" M64 RB I acquired in 1972-in Italy of all places. It also has had an action job, trigger and hammer replaced, and the rear sight notch gouged out as wide as possible.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
08-13-2009, 05:45 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 0
Liked 41 Times in 25 Posts
|
|
I like the way the "pencil" barrel looks and the way it balances the entire revolver better in the hand than the "bull" barrel.
However...
When it comes to range time, I think the heavy barrel shoots better.
But back to good looks...
The standard barrel looks like **** with a big ol' set of Target stocks on it, where the heavy barrel has that classic S&W look about it while sporting the big grips.
Just like the other side of the coin...
The standard barrel looks like a work of art with a gorgeous set of Magnas and a Tyler T-grip.
I dunno man...I NEVER met a Smith & Wesson revolver I didn't like.
Blue, nickel, stainless, short, long, fixed sights, adjustable sights - I love 'em all!!!
|
08-13-2009, 06:28 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Liked 56 Times in 44 Posts
|
|
I've got an M10HB from about 1969. Standard grips, no-name grip adapter. I just preferred the appearance....
My regular range buddy's got an M10 with the pencil barrel. Police pullout, apparently - no idea the age, but it's a bit "used". Mine got some wear, but only a "NIB" enthusiast would turn away.
I don't see any difference on the range.
Regards,
__________________
Stu.
|
08-13-2009, 08:13 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Rocky River, OH, USA
Posts: 9,451
Likes: 1,271
Liked 9,184 Times in 3,621 Posts
|
|
I think the tapered barrel guns look better. I've got an ex-NYPD gun that bought from Vivas a few years ago.
|
08-13-2009, 08:49 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Winston-Salem NC
Posts: 1,447
Likes: 3
Liked 205 Times in 83 Posts
|
|
I like both...The bull barrel looks cool, the pencil barrel is just very classy looking.
__________________
M.J.Hanna
|
08-13-2009, 09:14 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 663
Likes: 7
Liked 22 Times in 19 Posts
|
|
i'm not sure there is any difference in shooting the two, I don't notice that one shhots better than the other.
However, the pencil barrel has the look of a classic, one of the nicest looking revolvers around.
|
08-13-2009, 09:41 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Oak Grove, Oregon
Posts: 798
Likes: 777
Liked 704 Times in 235 Posts
|
|
I like the heavy barrel in the 3" length. My 10-8
|
08-13-2009, 09:57 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 578
Likes: 469
Liked 275 Times in 93 Posts
|
|
I prefer the heavy barrel.
|
08-13-2009, 09:59 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 310
Liked 405 Times in 105 Posts
|
|
I have had both over the years and have come to prefer the skinny barrel. It is lighter, has a really big front sight, and they tend to be cheaper. Plus they have the cool factor.
|
08-13-2009, 10:26 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: OR
Posts: 3,516
Likes: 5,499
Liked 1,026 Times in 350 Posts
|
|
Tough question, Bryan. I suppose I would pick the standard barreled Model 10. I think my eye runs down the tapered barrel to that big front sight and puts me on target just a little bit quicker.
I should admit that I've shot the standard barrel Model 10 much more often than the bigger tubed model... but I'd be very pleased to have either at my side.
Jerry
|
08-13-2009, 11:09 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: central pa
Posts: 5,336
Likes: 2,745
Liked 2,492 Times in 1,182 Posts
|
|
I love the looks of the four inch pencil barrel, but with rapid DA fireing the heavy barrel gets the nod, the extra weight up front keeps front sight bounce to a miminum. With that said, they are all cool!
__________________
Stay safe people!
|
08-14-2009, 10:23 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 185
Liked 214 Times in 72 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpwhel
i'm not sure there is any difference in shooting the two, I don't notice that one shhots better than the other.
However, the pencil barrel has the look of a classic, one of the nicest looking revolvers around.
|
I have had both. I still have a model 10 with the heavy barrel. I did not notice any difference shooting them. I agree that the pencil barrel is the classic that made the miltary & police hand ejector famous. I feel both are accurate. More accurate than I am! It is really a personal decision. If you want one to collect I suggest a victory or a revolver made between 1945 to 1956. These are worth more depending on condition than most model 10 made from 1957 to present. If you want a shooter to have fun then buy the later model 10s.
Hope this helps,
roaddog
|
08-14-2009, 11:00 AM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,463
Likes: 800
Liked 3,052 Times in 1,009 Posts
|
|
I've had many pencil barreled guns over they years and one 10-6. I still have the 10-6 and the only standard barrel I regularly shot is a 32 WCF, which was never offered in a HB version to my knowledge.
|
08-14-2009, 11:28 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 241
Likes: 1
Liked 33 Times in 18 Posts
|
|
I like the looks of the skinny barrel best, they just look good to me.
|
08-14-2009, 12:40 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: KY
Posts: 3,568
Likes: 4,482
Liked 1,189 Times in 509 Posts
|
|
I like both and this 3 inch also. I guess I just like them all.
|
08-14-2009, 04:54 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: SALUDA,SC
Posts: 44
Likes: 1
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
|
|
I like both,but prefer the heavy barrel.
|
08-14-2009, 08:07 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 610
Likes: 194
Liked 128 Times in 66 Posts
|
|
If your going to carry it 8 hrs a day, I go for the std bbl. You can really feel the difference in the weight. If the goal is speed shooting and or using Hi-Vel ammo, go for the heavy bbl. It will slow down the recoil, and give less muzzle lift. You can never tell about accuracy until you fire the gun with match grade ammo - either one can come out on top. Looks mean very little when it comes to match shooting.
__________________
Martin Co,FLA(finally made it)
|
08-14-2009, 09:07 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,352
Likes: 10,450
Liked 6,095 Times in 1,249 Posts
|
|
Can't remember offhand; was the 4-inch standard barrel said to weigh 31 oz. and the 4-inch Heavy Barrel 34 oz.?
Thanks for posting. Some who've posted do notice a distinct difference in perceived recoil. I never really could tell that there was much difference in recoil, only in the balance.
I have several Model 10s around the house but only one is pristine looking and it's a 2-inch gun that I purchased new. These represent the best of 4-inch guns here and they are "well used." After these it goes down hill. All are fine shooters though. Model 10s are amazingly accurate.
|
08-14-2009, 09:37 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Terrell, Texas
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Liked 246 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
If the K-frame has fixed sights (like the M&P), then I prefer the tapered barrel. As other posters have noted, the lighter barrel has the higher front sight. I think there is more advantage to having a higher front sight than a heavier barrel when it comes to shooting really fast.
Buti f the K-frame has adjustable sights (which are already easy to see) then I prefer the heavier barrel. For example, I prefer a straight barrel Model 19 over a Model 15 with a tapered barrel, even if I only shoot .38 Specials in the 19.
|
08-14-2009, 11:25 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Texas Panhandle
Posts: 541
Likes: 240
Liked 380 Times in 103 Posts
|
|
Looking at all these makes me want / "need" a 3" hvy bbl....
rayb
|
08-15-2009, 12:21 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Aiken, SC
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 16
Liked 203 Times in 87 Posts
|
|
Bryan, I tend to agree with Jerry when it comes to using an M10 fast. During initial front sight acquisition, that distinctive front sight on the tapered barrel is much easier to find (especially for old eyes). For fine sight alignment, it likely doesn't matter.
In the end, it's probably the classic question: do you like chocolate or vanilla ice cream best? I am unlikely to turn either down.
Buck
|
08-15-2009, 12:53 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southern Indiana
Posts: 4,634
Likes: 2,805
Liked 4,156 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
|
Here's what Saxon Pig will say to members that use the term "pencil barrel"
YouTube - I must break you
|
08-15-2009, 02:25 PM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,352
Likes: 10,450
Liked 6,095 Times in 1,249 Posts
|
|
I'm gonna have to agree with ol' Saxon Pig on that one. While it's not going to make a difference to the Smith & Wesson fraternity, I dislike that term as well.
|
08-15-2009, 04:00 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SE-SC
Posts: 1,645
Likes: 1,508
Liked 271 Times in 171 Posts
|
|
I like them both,but I think the tapered barrel is neat.
|
08-15-2009, 10:04 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Mass.
Posts: 53
Likes: 1
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
My preference (based only on looks and non-firing handling) is for the tapered barrel. I haven't had the opportunity to fire the tapered on the range, but it's one of the first on the list to purchase soon!
Thanks,
Doug
|
08-15-2009, 10:20 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Back home, for now
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 2,994
Liked 3,661 Times in 617 Posts
|
|
I like them both. The 5" tapered is a favorite, though.
|
08-15-2009, 10:57 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 96
Likes: 1
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
my only model 10 is a five screw tapered barrel, but i think i prefer the heavy barrel. I wish i could find one as cheap as i got the tapered barrel.
|
08-16-2009, 12:44 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
My first Model 10 had the tapered barrel, I like the looks and weight of the bull barrel much more.
|
08-16-2009, 02:12 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Carmen, Idaho
Posts: 4,293
Likes: 5,570
Liked 3,587 Times in 1,298 Posts
|
|
2", 4", 5", or HB, they are all great!
4 Tens
__________________
Memory of Randy Freas-Rimfired
|
08-16-2009, 03:57 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Texas, Houston
Posts: 577
Likes: 885
Liked 889 Times in 296 Posts
|
|
found this one for dirt cheap price but well worn bluing and service grips. So cleaned it up and started polishing and added the targets.
|
08-16-2009, 06:30 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Texas
Posts: 426
Likes: 11
Liked 392 Times in 90 Posts
|
|
I prefer the pencil barrels....because that's what Humprey Bogart, Charlie Chan, Alan Ladd, and the Thin Man carried.....
Last edited by texagun; 08-17-2009 at 02:48 PM.
|
08-16-2009, 09:44 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 152
Likes: 92
Liked 27 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmcgilvray
For shooting fans of the Model 10 revolver with 4-inch barrel: Can you tell a difference between the standard tapered barrel and the Heavy Barrel variation when shooting it?
|
I have both styles and can't tell any difference in shooting. I slightly prefer the looks of the pencil barrel. But I don't think a better handling/shooting revolver has ever been made than the k-frames.
__________________
With S&W, you're holding history in your hand
|
08-16-2009, 10:26 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 766
Likes: 50
Liked 1,207 Times in 177 Posts
|
|
I took the easy way out, and have one of each. What fairer way is there to find out? FWIW, I think my 4" HB is a little easier to shoot than my 4" pencil barrel due to less muzzle flip from the extra weight in the barrel.
|
08-16-2009, 10:42 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 210
Likes: 3
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
I prefer the tapered barrel. Mostly it's because it's the classic design and look and most resembles the original M&P revolver. Just beautiful and classic (and classy). The HB on the Model 10 just looks wrong to me. I'd like to own a current production HB just so I could round out my collection and show people and say "and this ugly thing with the heavy barrel, lock, and Goodyears is what they turned this classic into" but I'm sure not going to pay current production prices. That said, I've never owned or shot a HB, so I can't comment on any of the shootability questions. -Donald
|
08-17-2009, 12:17 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: MURFREESBORO TN.
Posts: 5,384
Likes: 90
Liked 402 Times in 177 Posts
|
|
Heavy barrel for looks only. Don
__________________
"Don't worry be happy"
|
04-24-2013, 06:33 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 8,434
Likes: 2,498
Liked 13,167 Times in 4,569 Posts
|
|
Sadly, I gave my wife a 4" M10 HB and when I lost her the gun went, too. But I have an old Wells Fargo nickle plated 4" standard barrel and at 20 or 25 feet close quarters combat type distance I can take the eye out of a man sized target with it. No complaints from me! I love Model 10s!
***GRJ***
|
04-24-2013, 07:41 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 310
Liked 405 Times in 105 Posts
|
|
I love the standard barrel. I think the HB was just a fad at the time and Smith wanted to make the Model 10 more modern. I love the look, feel, and lighter weight of the standard model guns. Not to mention that giant front sight.
|
04-24-2013, 10:46 PM
|
Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 19,336
Likes: 53,737
Liked 38,387 Times in 11,802 Posts
|
|
My only K-frame presently is a square-butt four-inch standard barrel 10-5 built in 1966. I love the balance and feel of the gun. And yes, the tapered standard barrel just looks right to me on a K. But then I'm 150 years old. In dog years...
__________________
Oh well, what the hell.
Last edited by shouldazagged; 04-25-2013 at 09:55 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-24-2013, 10:56 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,913
Likes: 3,516
Liked 6,738 Times in 2,623 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmcgilvray
I've been intended to get a "round tuit" and ask this question.
For shooting fans of the Model 10 revolver with 4-inch barrel: Can you tell a difference between the standard tapered barrel and the Heavy Barrel variation when shooting it?
I cut my teeth on the Heavy Barrel but can't really tell much difference when shooting the two. Though I'm more familiar with the feel and balance of the Heavy Barrel I actually think the standard barrel balances a bit better in the hand. Recoil with all loads from target wadcutter to +P rounds feels the same to me with both barrel styles.
|
I sort of like the look of the standard barrel. I don't find shooting all that different. Bill Jordan liked the heavy barrel as he said it helped him index better for his point shooting. I use sights as Jeff Cooper taught, as well as Weaver when I can, so truthfully, I notice no difference.
And, if you can watch this film and not fall in love all over again with the standard barrel Model 10, then there is something wrong with you.
Double Action Revolver Shooting - FBI training film - end 1950th - YouTube
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
04-24-2013, 11:16 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Demon-class planet
Posts: 7,403
Likes: 29,169
Liked 8,461 Times in 3,772 Posts
|
|
Nothing, absolutely nothing feels better in my hand than a 4" SB bull barrel 10 or 64 with Magna service-style grips and a Tyler T-grip adapter.
PS: We call them 'pencil barrels' in NY. Gotcha!
|
04-24-2013, 11:48 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 358
Likes: 2
Liked 111 Times in 41 Posts
|
|
Obviously, in reading the responses above, it is a personal choice. My opinion is that the M10/M&P is a historical design and the tapered barrel represents it best.
Leave the .38 M&P how it was supposed to be; Get the heavy on a M13.
To me the heavy M10 was just an reaction to an unnecessary inferiority complex to the .357 models.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
04-25-2013, 12:50 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vancouver USA
Posts: 322
Likes: 636
Liked 203 Times in 106 Posts
|
|
Of course, it's a personal choice....but what's the "right" choice?!!
I prefer the original tapered barrel, but that's because my first S&W 38 was a police Mdl 10 trade-in, and that's what came with it.
I later felt I had to have a heavy barrel, so I bought a Taurus heavy barrel as a temporary substitute, then later got the proper S&W heavy Mdl 10. But I still like the tapered model best.
BTW, you guys are going to hate on me, but that Taurus Mdl 82 I own is very accurate, and has never failed.....
|
04-25-2013, 01:46 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Family ranch in Texas
Posts: 470
Likes: 6
Liked 167 Times in 119 Posts
|
|
I like them both, but would take the standard tapered barrel if I had to choose just one.
|
04-25-2013, 05:51 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6,628
Likes: 3,723
Liked 7,222 Times in 3,013 Posts
|
|
I have several 4" 10s and pre 10s along with a 4" 64. All have the
tapered barrel. I just can't warm up to the looks of the 4" heavy barrel
models. I associate them with tupperware grips and combat style
double action shooting and I guess the weight forward would be an
advantage for that. But for single action shooting and that classic look
the tapered barrel has it all over the heavy barrel.
|
04-25-2013, 08:09 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NW OH
Posts: 2,058
Likes: 3,242
Liked 2,430 Times in 809 Posts
|
|
I prefer the original tapered barrel and responding to 4 year old threads.
__________________
Inconsistently consistent
|
04-25-2013, 08:39 AM
|
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,352
Likes: 10,450
Liked 6,095 Times in 1,249 Posts
|
|
Holy resurrected thread, Batman!
Hey, thanks for the linked video clip, Shawn McCarver.
|
04-25-2013, 08:42 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Coastal NC
Posts: 2,936
Likes: 2,340
Liked 4,673 Times in 1,599 Posts
|
|
Don't have any hvy.-barrelled M10's/M&P's, (except a 3" M65) just tapered.
But my 1958 M&P 3" tapered is well-nigh perfect in balance, shooting, carry and handling. And with one less inch, the taper is far less noticeable.
__________________
Ret'd LEO
SWCA #2275
|
04-25-2013, 08:49 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: N.AZ
Posts: 3,869
Likes: 613
Liked 2,398 Times in 594 Posts
|
|
That isn't a heavy barrel pictured (above)?
Last edited by snw19_357; 04-25-2013 at 09:03 PM.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
|
|
Tags
|
bull barrel, colt, ejector, hand ejector, k-frame, lock, model 10, model 15, model 19, victory, wadcutter |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|