Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present
o

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-09-2009, 10:35 PM
drew-67 drew-67 is offline
Member
Accuracy from a 642! Accuracy from a 642! Accuracy from a 642! Accuracy from a 642! Accuracy from a 642!  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 209
Likes: 216
Liked 22 Times in 13 Posts
Default Accuracy from a 642!

Hey Everyone!

Well I gotta say I am very impressed with my 642-2...
After purchashing it yesterday, I had to wait until today after work to shoot it.
I only had a 1/2 hour of daylight and I was being pelting with snow and ice, but it wasn't going to stop me today;.

I only shot from 10 yards, but my groups were as tight as my 686 with the 6" barrel and I covered all the holes with my fist when I was done shooting.
I guess I just wasn't expecting accuracy out of this snub nose. Now I am more stoked than ever.
Also, it was kinda cool to feel the increased recoil with this revolver! Not something I would think would be a joy for an all day shooter, but after shooting the 38 Special 158 grain LRN ammo out of the 686 and having low recoil and then shooting them out of this 642; felt like it really packed a punch.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-09-2009, 10:45 PM
TNDave TNDave is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 310
Liked 405 Times in 105 Posts
Default

The 642 is a great gun.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-09-2009, 10:57 PM
Spotteddog Spotteddog is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 3,952
Likes: 0
Liked 30 Times in 24 Posts
Thumbs up "Step right up folks!"

"We have anothah winnah"!
Congrats!
I waited far too long, not trying out the accuracy of some 2" J's I had. Till one day a ham handed action on my part dropping one (342PD) on it's front blade, caused me to have to check it's accuracy after the blades replacement. I was and still am astounded. They give as good as they get!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-10-2009, 12:53 AM
tom turner's Avatar
tom turner tom turner is offline
US Veteran
Accuracy from a 642!  
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,814
Likes: 180
Liked 2,270 Times in 285 Posts
Default

Yep . . . if we put scopes on those snubbies we'd discover just how accurate they ARE!

Like all good guns, they are going to consistently launch the bullet to where the bullet is going to be going based upon where the barrel is pointing + the grip and technique of the shooter. The weak link . . . is the shooter.

With a scope I have no doubt that a J-frame snubbie could group all five rounds into an inch at 25 yards or better . . . and four times that large of a group at 100 . . . and MUCH better than that in the hands of a few!

The problem on the J-frames is the very short distance between sights, as well as the increased difficulty of seeing those fixed sights well enough for absolutely FER SHURE perfect sight alignment.


I picked up a nice, 1964 M36 a couple of years ago. Like most folks, I don't shoot it much but the next day after I got it I went to the range and shot it both at 10 yards AND 25 yards.

I use homemade black square targets to test accuracy, since the square is easier to align with the top of both the rear AND front sight, and thus get better results than with a round target. My black squares are 1" for 10 and 2 1/2" for 25 yards.

I only had two types of ammo, some Hornady 140 grain stuff and some 148 grain wadcutter. I shot one target at each range with each of the two types of bullets. Targets were shot standing, unsupported, single action.

Here's my FIRST target, at ten yards. The second picture shows the 140 Hornada @10 yards + both types at 25. Although each type bullet puts the POA to a different spot, the RATIO of the size of the groups are remarkably similar between 10 and 25 yards, with the wadcutters shooting a tighter group in both cases:





Yep, shooting five rounds into an inch on my very first target @ ten yards showed me this gun has "potential!"

I really felt sorry though for the Probation Officer practicing so hard in the next bay when I started shooting the snubbie. The officer had to shoot qualification in a couple of days and had horrid groups from the officer's Glock 23 (not the Glock's fault either). After I shot these four targets I stopped for the day, not wanting to discourage the officer any more, and just visited instead. That was much more important to me than anything else. I'd shoot the snubbie on another day!


Last edited by tom turner; 12-10-2009 at 01:02 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-10-2009, 01:07 AM
TACC1 TACC1 is offline
US Veteran
Accuracy from a 642! Accuracy from a 642! Accuracy from a 642! Accuracy from a 642! Accuracy from a 642!  
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wautoma, WI 54982
Posts: 4,118
Likes: 6,564
Liked 799 Times in 499 Posts
Default

I was originally going to take a CCW class with a Browning semi-auto
in .32 ACP, but wasn't sure if there was a caliber restriction, so I
polished-up my shooting skills with the house gun, a 642. Even with
my old eyes, the 642 puts the rounds right where it's pointed.
Like others, I had doubted the accuracy of a snubbie, until I put
it to the test myself.
I'll never get tom turner results, but I feel positive I can hit what
I want. TACC1
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-10-2009, 08:37 PM
drew-67 drew-67 is offline
Member
Accuracy from a 642! Accuracy from a 642! Accuracy from a 642! Accuracy from a 642! Accuracy from a 642!  
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 209
Likes: 216
Liked 22 Times in 13 Posts
Default

Pretty impressive! Thanks for sharing; once again it gives me a standard to aim for.



Quote:
Originally Posted by tom turner View Post
Yep . . . if we put scopes on those snubbies we'd discover just how accurate they ARE!

Like all good guns, they are going to consistently launch the bullet to where the bullet is going to be going based upon where the barrel is pointing + the grip and technique of the shooter. The weak link . . . is the shooter.

With a scope I have no doubt that a J-frame snubbie could group all five rounds into an inch at 25 yards or better . . . and four times that large of a group at 100 . . . and MUCH better than that in the hands of a few!

The problem on the J-frames is the very short distance between sights, as well as the increased difficulty of seeing those fixed sights well enough for absolutely FER SHURE perfect sight alignment.


I picked up a nice, 1964 M36 a couple of years ago. Like most folks, I don't shoot it much but the next day after I got it I went to the range and shot it both at 10 yards AND 25 yards.

I use homemade black square targets to test accuracy, since the square is easier to align with the top of both the rear AND front sight, and thus get better results than with a round target. My black squares are 1" for 10 and 2 1/2" for 25 yards.

I only had two types of ammo, some Hornady 140 grain stuff and some 148 grain wadcutter. I shot one target at each range with each of the two types of bullets. Targets were shot standing, unsupported, single action.

Here's my FIRST target, at ten yards. The second picture shows the 140 Hornada @10 yards + both types at 25. Although each type bullet puts the POA to a different spot, the RATIO of the size of the groups are remarkably similar between 10 and 25 yards, with the wadcutters shooting a tighter group in both cases:





Yep, shooting five rounds into an inch on my very first target @ ten yards showed me this gun has "potential!"

I really felt sorry though for the Probation Officer practicing so hard in the next bay when I started shooting the snubbie. The officer had to shoot qualification in a couple of days and had horrid groups from the officer's Glock 23 (not the Glock's fault either). After I shot these four targets I stopped for the day, not wanting to discourage the officer any more, and just visited instead. That was much more important to me than anything else. I'd shoot the snubbie on another day!

Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
642, 686, browning, ccw, glock, hornady, m36, snubnose, wadcutter

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
M&P 15 PSX accuracy Matt05_5 Smith & Wesson M&P15 Rifles 7 05-04-2016 01:52 PM
.357 SIG/.40 S&W Accuracy Virginia John Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols 11 09-22-2015 03:19 PM
m&p 9mm accuracy anhdoan Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols 18 03-29-2015 06:43 PM
M&P 10 accuracy UTO Smith & Wesson M&P10 Rifles 30 02-22-2015 10:11 PM
125 vs 158 For Accuracy Jerryatric3 Reloading 17 12-01-2013 09:02 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:44 PM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)