Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-09-2010, 07:52 PM
Robert B Robert B is offline
Member
Range Test 442  
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 422
Likes: 6
Liked 46 Times in 35 Posts
Default Range Test 442

I just put 20 rounds down range of 38+P short bbl out of my brand new 442. Once I got used to the trigger pull, I could put 3 rounds around the 9 ring. I then shot double taps at a silouette target. I shot these fairly fast just using the front site. All 5 shots were potential stops. I am very pleased with this little revolver. I like it better than my M&P 360. I know the 442 is only 1.7 ounces heavier, but I really noticed a reduction in felt recoil between the two revolvers. The 360 hurt my thumb with 38+P's, but the 442 was actually fun to shoot. From now on, I'm sticking with this airweight for CCW. I can't believe how much easier this gun is drawn from the pocket. Don't have to cover the hammer with my thumb. I learned a really great lesson practicing with my J frame today. I pulled the trigger only half way through before letting it reset. The gun obviously did not go bang. I had to reset the cylinder, and begin firing again. Glad that this happened today as a learning experience. From now on I'll be sure to pull that trigger strong all the way through.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-09-2010, 09:05 PM
500 Magnum Nut's Avatar
500 Magnum Nut 500 Magnum Nut is offline
Member
Range Test 442 Range Test 442 Range Test 442 Range Test 442 Range Test 442  
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Connecticut, USA
Posts: 1,525
Likes: 0
Liked 145 Times in 48 Posts
Default

Glad you had a good day!
I dumped all my stainless J frames for the 442. I like it that much.
__________________
NRA Benefactor Member
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-09-2010, 10:10 PM
alank2 alank2 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Hi,

I've had two 442's, the first one I sold for a no lock second one. Both have been awesome revo's. I think there is something special about the 442/642 weight and 38+P's - it makes them very workable recoil wise.

Good luck,

Alan
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
442, 642, airweight, ccw, j frame, lock

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
25-7 Range Test ultramag44 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 4 11-02-2014 10:21 PM
New 3.5” 460 S&W Range Test ruggyh S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 1 03-19-2014 08:28 PM
M&P 22 Range Test RPeacock1128 Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols 6 06-29-2013 09:30 PM
Range Test with the 457 ColColt Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 5 08-07-2010 11:00 AM
Range Test HalfSwiss Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22 2 07-03-2010 04:16 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:34 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)