|
|
01-15-2010, 02:23 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Barrels: pinned vs non-pinned?
Are the pinned models "the best?"
Last edited by tiptoe2lups; 01-18-2010 at 12:59 PM.
|
01-15-2010, 02:49 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Clinton,Illinois
Posts: 595
Likes: 0
Liked 24 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Quote:
I would guess the new S&W revolvers are the best ever as engineering has advanced.
|
Not in my opinion.
But, we all have one, right.
I like the challenge that goes with finding older ones.
Any one can go out and buy a new one.
|
01-15-2010, 02:53 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 948
Likes: 64
Liked 111 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
I believe the pinning was stopped because the way the barrels were fit onto the frames was changed (I could be wrong). It also saved on some labor costs.
I'd say about half of my S&W revolvers have un-pinned barrels, and they've done OK.
|
01-15-2010, 03:43 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 3,450
Likes: 37
Liked 5,435 Times in 1,762 Posts
|
|
For me, it is more what the pin, or lack thereof, symbolizes. I have no doubt the reason for eliminating barrel pinning was economic -- it saves production cost. Good arguments can be made that the no-pin method is better. Good arguments can be made that the pinned barrels are superior. Take your pick.
But it is in some way satisfying to me that the pin gives proof positive that there used to be just a little bit more of a human touch in the making of a revolver. Somebody had to care, just a little bit more, that things were done right.
__________________
Pisgah
|
01-15-2010, 03:43 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Port Bolivar, Tx
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 72
Liked 1,004 Times in 259 Posts
|
|
There is no advantage to a non pinned barrel. S&W started using the technique of crush fitting the barrels therefore eliminating the need for the pin. Of course crush fitting eliminates manufacturing steps which in turn makes the production cheaper (not that the cost savings trickled down to the consumer). I like pinned barrels just for the nostalgia of an older gun when the manufacturing process was more hands on and required more skilled workers.
|
01-15-2010, 03:53 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 2,556
Likes: 882
Liked 1,719 Times in 549 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by qballwill
There is no advantage to a non pinned barrel. S&W started using the technique of crush fitting the barrels therefore eliminating the need for the pin. Of course crush fitting eliminates manufacturing steps which in turn makes the production cheaper (not that the cost savings trickled down to the consumer). I like pinned barrels just for the nostalgia of an older gun when the manufacturing process was more hands on and required more skilled workers.
|
qball has it pretty much right. It was a cost cutting measure, pure and simple. The pin was an extra step that used to be a mark of quality. Dropping it was nothing more than the bean counters demanding less steps/cost in manufacturing.
Dave
__________________
RSVN '69-'71
PCSD (Ret)
|
01-15-2010, 04:08 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NE Iowa
Posts: 5,450
Likes: 1,956
Liked 3,499 Times in 1,287 Posts
|
|
Pinned barrels
As stated pinned barrels (and recessed cylinders) were discontinued in about 1982 as a cost cutting measure, although .22 rimfires continue to be recessed. It's hard to explain, really why we collectors prefer P@R guns. I guess we just like the way things used to be. I know I do, I'm a proud dinosaur. The new revolvers are very good. They just don't "stir the soul" like the old stuff.
|
01-15-2010, 04:47 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 298
Likes: 1
Liked 13 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Sometimes the old ways are better - and pinning the barrel is a good example of that philosophy. A skilled person had to take the time to see that the barrel was installed correctly - and the pinning ensured that it stayed that way ! Even the the phrase "crush fitting" sounds wrong to me .........
|
01-16-2010, 01:31 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central IL
Posts: 22,809
Likes: 18,563
Liked 22,431 Times in 8,279 Posts
|
|
I think the P&R guns were from another time when hand fitted quality was considered the best. As far as shooting, the accuracy of either P&R or crush fit barrels will out-shoot most of us. If they were still made the same way as they were in the 40's - 60's we wouldn't be able to afford them, the labor costs would make them too expensive.
__________________
H Richard
SWCA1967 SWHF244
|
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|