I'm considering changing my carry from a 642 to one of these.

How does the trigger pull compare to the 642, lighter, heavier, same?

I've read other threads where people give their opinion on the caliber, but not much discussion on how the trigger pull is.

The trigger pull is heavier on all of the Smith & Wesson rimfire revolvers. It's that way to ensure that the rounds fire due to not having a centerfire primer. I would venture to say they are about 3-4 lbs heavier.

"Snubs",

I actually used my 351 (since sold it, darn it!) to qualify for my CCW permit. At the time is was fresh out of the box and the first time firing it. Trigger pull was a bit heavy, but smooth and crisp. I always enjoyed shooting it and can't really remember why I sold it, must have been something special, I just can't remember what

The the double-action trigger pull and hammer pull on my 351PD can be annoyingly heavy during a range session (I may try a lighter spring eventually), but the single action trigger pull is great. It seems the "price" for firing rimfire ammo.

Ron

First you need to search 351PD on this forum for varied opinions.

My opinion....The trigger pull is a SNOT!....my 650 and 34 are almost as light and smooth as my pre-lock 642 and 60. Even my 317-2 is closer to that of my 642 than the 651PD. Therefore I do not buy the explanation that the trigger pull needs to be so stiff for reliable ignition. I plan on experimenting with a set of Wolf springs.

Ejection of the shell cases is sometimes difficult when the gun is dirty. Seems like standard CCI MRF solves this problem...I am still experimenting.
I have plans to experiment with moly lube in the chambers to make this less of an issue.

Why do I still have this gun? I just really like the gun. I like the fact that it also shares the same ammo as two of my favorite rifles.

I purchased this gun with the idea that it would be a good light recoil weapon for arthritic carpal tunnel plagued hands. If I can't overcome its heavy trigger pull, the 642 loaded with wadcutters may be a better choice.

I also thought it would be a good bug out gun considering its light weight and the light weight of 50 rounds of ammunition. When you are walking every ounce you carry weighs you down.

Right now it is a favorite back pocket piece for our evening country road walks.

snubsforme,

Why are you attracted to this revolver? I had a bodyguard hammer installed on mine so that it was a little more snag resistant like my 642. If you are capable, you can order the hammer and sear set and install it yourself...cheaper than shipping it back and forth to S&W.

I purchased the 351PD and have fired about 300 rounds. The trigger pull is a bit hard, but controllable. Even my wife likes it and has become her favorite ccw. In fact, we did have a gunsmith put in a lighter spring, but it did not work. While the pull was much lighter, it would not fire the rounds consistently. So, we re-installed the factory spring. I have found that the 45 grain winchester dynapoint works flawlessly with the revolver. Fun to shoot and would not hesitate to ccw this gun. Also installed the pachmyr grips which helps with additional controllabilty. Hey, its a 22 magnum!!

Hold off buying one. In 45 days you will be seeing the Centennial version. The trigger pull is heavy but very manageable. there is no recoil. I sold my 351PD because it was a pocket gun but with the hammer i wasn't confident that i could draw it snag free. I actually emailed Smith about a year ago about bobbing it (not a good idea if you wanted reliable ignition on the rimfire) and/or there was a Centennial in the works. They told me no plans to do a Centennial back then but sure enough they are introduced this year and my dealer has already ordered me one. The ultimate pocket gun-i don't care what anyone says-7 rounds of the fastest .22 magnum rounds in an 11 oz. reliable revolver package is enough to get you out of the room.