|
|
05-26-2010, 10:32 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 75
Likes: 3
Liked 17 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Durability of matte black finish on 442?
Living in Florida, I prefer stainless snubbies, since I carry them close to my body and often. All my non-stainless Smiths are blued. How does the matte black finish hold up on the recent production no-lock 442's? What's it compare to?
|
05-26-2010, 11:45 AM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 0
Liked 41 Times in 25 Posts
|
|
Just by feeling it, I would say it's not gonna last long. At least mine feels thataway (442-2). But I still prefer it over the 642. The colors just look more even and uniform than the stainless steel barrel, cylinder and crane of the 642 in contrast to the aluminum body.
I figure it's a carry gun. If it gets some saddle wear on it...so what.
|
05-26-2010, 11:54 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: MURFREESBORO TN.
Posts: 5,384
Likes: 90
Liked 402 Times in 177 Posts
|
|
I find that matt or flat black finishes show minor marks more than blue or SS guns. Don
__________________
"Don't worry be happy"
|
05-26-2010, 12:04 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 0
Liked 41 Times in 25 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HAWKEYE10
I find that matt or flat black finishes show minor marks more than blue or SS guns. Don
|
Yes, they do.
|
05-26-2010, 12:06 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: WV
Posts: 3,584
Likes: 487
Liked 4,372 Times in 1,008 Posts
|
|
Been carrying one for over a year and it's been holding up pretty good . . .
|
05-26-2010, 12:41 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 8,158
Likes: 3,605
Liked 5,199 Times in 2,172 Posts
|
|
After over a decade of pocket holster wear, my pre-lock 442 shows it. I could care less. It is a survival tool, not a showpiece.
Since I shoot it regularly, it also has a very slick action, so that others who shoot it ask who did the "trigger job."
|
05-26-2010, 02:29 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 0
Liked 41 Times in 25 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OKFC05
After over a decade of pocket holster wear, my pre-lock 442 shows it. I could care less. It is a survival tool, not a showpiece.
Since I shoot it regularly, it also has a very slick action, so that others who shoot it ask who did the "trigger job."
|
That's the same way I feel about mine. If it gets worn, it gets worn.
Scars are tattoos with better stories.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-26-2010, 02:34 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
Liked 27 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Odessaman
Living in Florida, I prefer stainless snubbies, since I carry them close to my body and often. All my non-stainless Smiths are blued. How does the matte black finish hold up on the recent production no-lock 442's? What's it compare to?
|
Neither finish will hold up that great but these are relatively inexpensive carry guns. You can always have it refinished in something more durable down the road.
I used to live in FL... pick whichever one you like better, then wipe it down with a rag and some oil once or twice a week. Even if you sweat on it it should be fine.
__________________
Aaron Terry
|
05-26-2010, 05:28 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 75
Likes: 3
Liked 17 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Thanks for the input, everyone. I don't mind a little honest wear - I actually like the look of a well used blued revolver. Guess I'll just have to get one and try it out. (Tell my wife it's "market research.")
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|
05-26-2010, 07:11 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 3,260
Likes: 1,224
Liked 2,526 Times in 1,043 Posts
|
|
Sasme as above--mine has about ten years of constant wear in a pistol pocket and shows considerable edge wear. But most of that occurred in the first three years or so, and it probably won't look much different in 10 or 20 more years.
Mechanically it's just fine and that's all I care about.
|
05-26-2010, 09:45 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 620
Likes: 85
Liked 523 Times in 199 Posts
|
|
Mine is about 4 years old with almost daily carry. It does show some holster wear around the edges. Does not affect how it shoots. Like another person said, I have shot this enough that others do ask who did the trigger job. It is well broken in.
|
05-28-2014, 12:04 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
I've got the twin...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Electraclyde
Mine is about 4 years old with almost daily carry. It does show some holster wear around the edges. Does not affect how it shoots. Like another person said, I have shot this enough that others do ask who did the trigger job. It is well broken in.
|
After four years of daily carry in a Galco pocket holster, mine looks pretty rough. Some of the corners are even getting little triangular flat spots.
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|
05-28-2014, 10:12 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 4
Liked 1,024 Times in 510 Posts
|
|
When I carried a 442 IWB on a daily basis here in MO, I found that little beads of moisture would form between the yoke and frame every day and start rust spots on the (carbon steel) yoke unless I wiped the space down every night with a silicone cloth. Never had a problem with the (also carbon steel, supposedly) cylinder, just the inside surface of the yoke. So keep an eye on that space if you do get a 442.
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|