Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present
o

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-09-2010, 06:20 PM
CTPete CTPete is offline
Member
686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense??  
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: FL & CT USA
Posts: 591
Likes: 11
Liked 106 Times in 34 Posts
Default 686 vs 625 for home defense??

I have never fired a 45acp wheelgun such as the 625, but I note that there are a lot of forum members that speak very highly of them. Being that I need to help my son choose a home defense gun, I thought I would consider both a 686 (.357) and a 625 (45acp). I am very familiar with the 686 and plan to rent a 625 to shoot this weekend as a comparison.

My son has been shooting for only a few years - he is 24. He tends to prefer revolvers. Which would you prefer a 686 or a 625 - and why?

Thanks.
__________________
Pete T.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-09-2010, 06:36 PM
cp1969's Avatar
cp1969 cp1969 is offline
Member
686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense??  
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 279
Liked 63 Times in 42 Posts
Default

.45 acp has a pretty good reputation as a defensive cartridge, but no better than the .357 mag. If you handload, that picture may change but only because of being able to load it with a better bullet.

I think I would choose the .357.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-09-2010, 06:37 PM
USAF385's Avatar
USAF385 USAF385 is offline
US Veteran
686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense??  
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NEPA Endless Mountains
Posts: 3,919
Likes: 561
Liked 2,190 Times in 754 Posts
Default

Although I am a huge fan of .357, I don't really use it for home defense..... Too loud and too much muzzle flash for use indoors (at night). Between those two calibers for a home defense gun, I'd go with the .45.
__________________
- The Federalist #46 -
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-09-2010, 06:44 PM
uhlawpup's Avatar
uhlawpup uhlawpup is offline
Member
686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense??  
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 47
Likes: 2
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I have both and I like both. I do keep my 686 loaded with .38 special, though. Magnum rounds for home defense might be a bit of overkill.

Either gun will serve you well. Choose the one you shoot and like the best.
__________________
uhlawpup
Gentle Soul
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-09-2010, 06:51 PM
Shooting4life Shooting4life is offline
Member
686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense??  
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 1
Liked 450 Times in 116 Posts
Default

I would go for the 625 since finding cheap practice ammo is much easier and the practice ammo would match the hd ammo more closely compared to practicing with 38 and keeping 357 mag for hd.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-09-2010, 07:17 PM
one eye joe's Avatar
one eye joe one eye joe is offline
US Veteran
686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense??  
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: New England
Posts: 4,190
Likes: 3,543
Liked 3,996 Times in 1,627 Posts
Default

In my experience, nothin' knocks a bad guy down like a .45ACP.........
__________________
'Nam 1968-69.DAV,VFW,NRA Inst.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-09-2010, 07:23 PM
parabarbarian parabarbarian is offline
Member
686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense??  
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Southern California
Posts: 299
Likes: 12
Liked 34 Times in 26 Posts
Default

Either will do.

I think the 357 magnum is about the best overall straight walled cartridge invented so far. However, I really wouldn't advise full power 357's indoors in a handgun just because of the noise. It is true that auditory exclusion will cause your brain to filter the sound but the hearing damage will still be there. One advantage to the 357 is you can use 38 spl +P without worrying about the gun.

If cost is a factor then the 357 will be the most expensive, the 38 spl the least and 45 ACP falling somewhere between the two.

IMO, the choice between the two should be heavily weighted by which gun he prefers to shoot. Liking the gun does not guarantee he will practice more but if he doesn't like he will certainly practice less. I can shoot my 686P better than the 625 and I like the handling better. Therefore the 686 is my HD/SD gun. If the situation were reversed then I'd be using the 625 in that role.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-09-2010, 07:28 PM
Dale53 Dale53 is offline
Member
686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense??  
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southwestern Ohio
Posts: 2,337
Likes: 209
Liked 1,195 Times in 457 Posts
Default

I have more than one example of both. They are both fine revolvers and really, neither can be considered a mistake.

All of that said, my vote goes to the 625. I have a pair of them and now shoot them more than any other revolver I own. I'll put 5000-7500 rounds through mine in a year.

I cast my own bullets and reload, so both are inexpensive to shoot.

Dale53
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-09-2010, 09:22 PM
beemerphile beemerphile is offline
Member
686 vs 625 for home defense??  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Danielsville, GA USA
Posts: 738
Likes: 27
Liked 401 Times in 152 Posts
Default

Consider the reload. A full moon clip with .45ACPs can just about be thrown into the cylinder. They are chamber seeking missles. Keep a full moon clip beside the gun and when you pick up the gun, you can stab the center of the moon clip with your pinkie and head out with a full gun and a quick reload. Easy drill to train on. If used in low light, the .357 can blind you. If loaded with .38's you are REALLY losing ground to the .45ACP. I own and appreciate both guns, but this one is easy. Let's have a hard question.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #10  
Old 11-09-2010, 09:25 PM
Joni_Lynn Joni_Lynn is offline
US Veteran
686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense??  
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: I'm here, you're not
Posts: 2,955
Likes: 143
Liked 647 Times in 224 Posts
Default

I would go with the 45acp for home use due to a lower level of blast if fired. Otherwise they are probably a toss up for which is better.
__________________
Lynnie, Professional Pest
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-09-2010, 09:30 PM
APS APS is offline
Member
686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense??  
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 461
Likes: 73
Liked 137 Times in 77 Posts
Default

I would normally pick the smaller caliber b/c usually there is a capacity advantage involved. However, in this case I would choose the 625. Any round fired indoors is going to permanently damage your hearing but it will be much worse with .357s. He could always use 38spec but in that case I would give the performance nod to the .45.
He needs to be aware that there's a little more fiddling involved getting a moonclip gun set up and reliable.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-09-2010, 09:32 PM
Erich's Avatar
Erich Erich is offline
Member
686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense??  
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: High Desert of NM, USA
Posts: 6,236
Likes: 9,331
Liked 8,821 Times in 2,555 Posts
Default

I don't think it matters: either is wonderful for the role. My L-frame stays in the safe, though, and my 625 has home-defense duty. My wife likes it more, both for the ease of reloading with the moon clips and for the big fat holes it leaves. It would work fine and my wife likes it and will go to the range to shoot it? That's the one!

Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #13  
Old 11-09-2010, 09:44 PM
Sportsterguy's Avatar
Sportsterguy Sportsterguy is offline
Member
686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense??  
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ask the NSA
Posts: 2,208
Likes: 111
Liked 119 Times in 73 Posts
Default

I love my Smith & Wessons dearly. But my main carry and home defense weapon is a Colt Commander / Springfield Armory in .45 ACP. Pushing a 230. gr. Speer Gold Dot at a reasonable velocity should get it done. Them magnums flash like crazy at night and WILL deafen you indoors.
As beemerphile stated you can reload them moon clips mighty fast for reloads if needed.

If given the two choices you are asking I'd go for the 625. That round has been taking bad guys down with authority coming up on 100 years and is still an excellent fight stopper to this day.

One of these days I will have one myself!
__________________
V/R
Roger / SG
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-09-2010, 09:50 PM
CTPete CTPete is offline
Member
686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense??  
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: FL & CT USA
Posts: 591
Likes: 11
Liked 106 Times in 34 Posts
Default

Great discussion! Thank you for all the replies. Especially on the 357 muzzle flash and noise. I will let you know how we like the 625.
__________________
Pete T.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-09-2010, 11:05 PM
bountyhunter bountyhunter is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,862
Likes: 1
Liked 460 Times in 228 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ted1trading View Post
I have never fired a 45acp wheelgun such as the 625, but I note that there are a lot of forum members that speak very highly of them. Being that I need to help my son choose a home defense gun, I thought I would consider both a 686 (.357) and a 625 (45acp). I am very familiar with the 686 and plan to rent a 625 to shoot this weekend as a comparison.

My son has been shooting for only a few years - he is 24. He tends to prefer revolvers. Which would you prefer a 686 or a 625 - and why?

Thanks.
My defense gun is a 686 Plus (seven shot) with 6" barrel. Super dependable, shot it in competition for many years. You want an old friend watching your back when the SHTF. I shoot 128 grain .38 +p because of not wanting to risk over penetration of the .357. The .38 +p defense loads have plenty of muzzle energy.

If you do choose a .45 defense round, make sure you have at least 5" of barrel or it may not expand properly which makes it pretty ineffective.

Last edited by bountyhunter; 11-09-2010 at 11:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-09-2010, 11:13 PM
bountyhunter bountyhunter is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,862
Likes: 1
Liked 460 Times in 228 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.revolverguy View Post
357 is to loud for me and over penetration is highly likely. A friend and I did testing with 3 layers of denim over 14 inches of wet phone books soaked for 24 hours. The 45 penetrated about 8 inches, the 357 blew out the last phone book and kept traveling down range far enough we could find the round.
We were stationed in the Phillipines in the 50's. my dad was military police. He carried a Colt Python .357. The gun control was so strict even US military had to allow the local civilian cops to shoot their guns and hold spent rounds for ballistic testing. So this local bozo puts the Python up to the test box which was against one wall and fires the thing twice.... and the guy about pees his pants because he had never seen a magnum before. Then he takes the lid off the test box and start combing through the sand to find the bullets. Eventually he realizes there is no bullet. He grabs the box and moves it and there are two little holes streaming daylight in from the outside world. The guy takes the spent brass out and says:

"We will keep these."

idiot.

Last edited by bountyhunter; 11-10-2010 at 02:23 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-10-2010, 01:15 AM
scott625b scott625b is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 188
Likes: 2
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Find out which you are the most familiar with and the most accurate. Its not good if you fumble with an unfamiliar weapon during stress.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-10-2010, 08:14 PM
parabarbarian parabarbarian is offline
Member
686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense??  
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Southern California
Posts: 299
Likes: 12
Liked 34 Times in 26 Posts
Default

The point about the 625 with moon clips being faster to reload is a good one. In a moonclip versus speedloader face off the moonclips will always win. One of my 686's has been converted to use moonclips and it is still slower to reload than the 625. Maybe one or two tenths of a second but I've never tried to measure it.

Regarding the stopping power debate you'll have to pick your own poison there. You can find formulas and tables and "studies" to support just about any conclusion you can imagine. Taylor, Hatcher, Marshall and Sanow, Fackler, the Strasbourg tests, Smith, Momentum versus Energy versus Frontal Area -- the list goes on for a while.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-27-2010, 05:06 PM
Steve Old Boy Steve Old Boy is offline
Member
686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense??  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ted1trading View Post
Which would you prefer a 686 or a 625 - and why?
I'm not an expert on this issue by any means and other members have offered good insights I couldn't improve on. Just some thoughts on why I chose the 625:

• In keeping with the premise that handguns are inherently underpowered to begin with - and therefore should shoot the largest caliber you can manage - I went with .45 ACP. If my hand were smaller or I couldn't control the recoil, a different frame/caliber probably would have been more appropriate.

• I live in an apartment w/ neighboring units on each side, so overpenetration is a concern. Actually I think that's an issue in any setting. Anyway the 625 can be chambered with everything from safety rounds to +P; whereas most magnum ammo tends to be high energy (and regardless of caliber, it's easier for some trial lawyer to portray you as the bad guy when shooting magnum loads).

• Also being the miser that I am, as the owner of only one other handgun - the Glock 36, my .45 ACP concealed carry pistol - I wanted to keep things simple in terms of separating ammo etc. Maybe that's just me.

Having said all that, I would appreciate others' input on holster options for the model 625-8 (5" barrel). I know there are pros and cons to hip vs shoulder rigs; and various manufacturers have innovative features for addressing these. I'm agnostic at this point b/c I don't try to carry this gun concealed, and am more interested in best choices for the field or range.

Thanks and regards

Last edited by Steve Old Boy; 11-27-2010 at 06:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-27-2010, 05:21 PM
Dave T Dave T is offline
Member
686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense??  
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 2,556
Likes: 882
Liked 1,719 Times in 549 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Old Boy View Post
I would appreciate others' input on holster options for the model 625. I know there are pros and cons to hip vs shoulder rigs; and various manufacturers have innovative features for addressing these. I'm agnostic at this point b/c I don't try to carry this gun concealed, and am more interested in best choices for the field or range.
I have two recommendations for 625 holsters for "field and range" and a third for competition. Folks have been carrying fighting revolvers in Threeperson holsters for going on 100 years. El Paso Saddlery makes one of the better versions in my experience. I hear great things about the Simply Rugged version of Roy Baker's "Pancake" holster idea and that would be another choice. For competition I have a Blade Tech Kydex holster that holds a 4" 625 securely but is very quick and easy to draw from.

YMMV as always,
Dave
__________________
RSVN '69-'71
PCSD (Ret)
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 11-27-2010, 05:23 PM
bsms bsms is offline
Member
686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense??  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 103
Likes: 6
Liked 9 Times in 7 Posts
Default

The 686 is an L-frame with K-frame grips. The 625 is an N frame. I like big bullets for home defense, and I use a Ruger Alaskan with the compact GP100 grip and 44 specials in it for that role, but my hands just don't quite handle the N frame very well. An L frame with sanded down grips is about as large as I can instinctively shoot - so if the Alaskan isn't available, then the 686 with 7 shots & a 3" barrel gets the nod.

Truth is, I don't think there is a measurable difference in the self defense value of ammo once you hit the 38+P range. Below that, I don't think you get adequate penetration and reliable enough expansion for good self defense use (although I once pulled a .22). From the .38+P up, I think most any round with modern bullets will do a decent job, so any one a person likes to practice with and carry suits me.

Still, the Alaskan with small grips ain't to be sneezed at...

Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-27-2010, 05:27 PM
stantheman86 stantheman86 is offline
US Veteran
686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense??  
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,468
Likes: 6
Liked 473 Times in 236 Posts
Default

686+ 4", with the IL removed I don't know your state laws, get the 4" so your son can Conceal Carry it as well as use it for HD. 4" is a much more versatile length than 6" and you're not giving up enough velocity to even worry about.

.357 revolvers are the King for versatility.......you can plink away with cheap,light Wadcutter reloads, or bulk ammo like American Eagle .38 LRN. You have +P as an intermediate load for most "serious social" use where .357 may be overkill, milder .357's like MagTech for a little more punch without too much blast, or full snort stuff like CorBon or Buffalo Bore .357's which probably have enough power to take out a T-Rex.......

IMO .45 ACP has limited versatility, although there are some +P loads, and like was said, the revolver isn't ammo sensitive to HP's or SP's like some autoloaders. .45 ACP has been used to good effect in revolvers for going on 95 years now, so you really can't lose on that one either.

Down the road send the cylinder assembly to Pinnacle Customs for a moonclip conversion, 7 rounds of moonclipped 158 gr. .38 +P HP is potent enough for home defense. $150 or so, is a good investment for HD or CC. Or spend $250 for the "multi caliber" conversion so you can shoot 9mm, .38 Super or .380, as well as .38 and .357(although the .357 cases may stick and will not be reloadable)
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-27-2010, 06:05 PM
Wayne M Wayne M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Liked 14 Times in 11 Posts
Default

If you like to load guns and unload guns the 625 is for you. To shoot it a lot you want moon clips, a tool to load them quickly and another to unload or demoon them quickly. Great revolver and fun to shoot but a pain in the neck with ammo. You could use 45AR and get some speed loaders but the brass, when you can find it is EXPENSIVE. I used to clip up ammo all winter so I could shoot all summer without the hassle of demooning and clipping up fresh loads until bad weather set in again. Still a pain I decided to spend the rest of my time on earth avoiding. When I say shoot a lot I mean heading to the range with 500 rounds clipped up and shooting until fatigue set in. If you are going to buy a couple boxes of ammo, sight her in and keep the rest ready to go for the house, it'll do just as well as any and better than most. If you are going to shoot a lot, get a 686, some speed loaders and stock up on reloading supplies.

Last edited by Wayne M; 11-27-2010 at 06:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-27-2010, 06:09 PM
bountyhunter bountyhunter is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,862
Likes: 1
Liked 460 Times in 228 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ted1trading View Post
I have never fired a 45acp wheelgun such as the 625, but I note that there are a lot of forum members that speak very highly of them. Being that I need to help my son choose a home defense gun, I thought I would consider both a 686 (.357) and a 625 (45acp). I am very familiar with the 686 and plan to rent a 625 to shoot this weekend as a comparison.

My son has been shooting for only a few years - he is 24. He tends to prefer revolvers. Which would you prefer a 686 or a 625 - and why?

Thanks.
I currently use a 686 7-shot for home defense with 128 grain .38 +p defense rounds. A .45 is OK, but I like the 686 because you get the option of using sledge hammer magnums or +p rounds.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-27-2010, 06:30 PM
scooter123 scooter123 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 6,919
Likes: 179
Liked 4,294 Times in 2,106 Posts
Default

At this point I don't even own a 625. That will come after I located my current "grail", a 4 inch 610. However, I do have a 6 1/2 inch 610 and I think the moon clips provide a very distinct advantage. If your facing 3 or 4 Home Invaders, having a 2 second reload available may mean the difference in who wins the battle. In addition the 45ACP is a rather low noise round when compared to the 357 Magnum, so my nod goes to the 625.

BTW, I've noticed that barrel length has a distinct effect on noise level. I shoot a lot of 40 caliber in barrels ranging from 3.6 inches up to 6 1/2 inch and my 6 1/2 inch 610 produces a report that is nearly equal to a 38 spl. from my 4 inch 620. It will be distinctly muzzle heavy but if carry doesn't factor in this choice, a 6 inch 625 would be a nearly ideal choice for Home Defense. Unfortunately this hasn't been made yet with an unported barrel in 45ACP. Bit of a shame that, the longer barrel would also assist in getting the 45ACP up to speed.

PS; if you can find one, a 6 1/2 inch 610 is another great option with one distinct advantage, that being you can choose either the 40S&W or the 10mm for Magnum velocities. For cheap practice in a Major caliber, it's hard to beat the 40 S&W and I happen to think it's a superb compromize between velocity, penetration, and power. As for the 10mm, it's a great Hunting caliber but not needed for HD duty and there is a huge array of excellent SD loads available in the 40 S&W.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-27-2010, 06:30 PM
BoDog BoDog is offline
Member
686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense??  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: central Kalifornia
Posts: 176
Likes: 71
Liked 22 Times in 14 Posts
Default

I have fired both in the dark in a fun house, flash is not much of a problem with either. The 357 goes through drywall like it wasn't there so if you get one 38+p is all I would use in the average house. The 45 doesn't need to expand and doesn't penetrate as well. Some one hit with either one should cease any form of anti-social action.

Any home defence gun should be practiced with until it is like part of you, just an extention of your hand. Learn to practice in the dark with a push button flash light with a few trys the sights will be lighed up where your hand is pointing.

My vote has to go to the 645, I don't have big hands but love N frames. Your son should learn to reload to keep the practice ammo costs down,besides it is great theropy when the Mrs. is cranky.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-27-2010, 08:33 PM
stevieboy stevieboy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
Liked 40 Times in 25 Posts
Default

I have several .357s and a 625JM. The 625 is more comfortable to shoot, without question, if we're comparing .45 ACP to .357 Magnum. It's also relatively quieter and, based on what others say, obviously doesn't have the overpenetration problem of .357s. Do not be deterred by the issue of loading and unloading moonclips. RIMZ clips are polycarbonate clips, they are an absolute cinch to load and unload by hand, without the use of any tools, and they perform just as well in the gun as do the traditional steel moonclips. I have both steel and RIMZ clips for my 625 but, 90% of the time or more, I use the RIMZ. If you google them, you'll find their website.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-27-2010, 09:55 PM
Hotlead Hotlead is offline
Member
686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense??  
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: S.F. Bay Area, Ca.
Posts: 50
Likes: 5
Liked 23 Times in 7 Posts
Default

A 625-8 JM sits on Mrs. Hotleads nightstand at night, I got it a few months ago, and it's much more comfortable for her to shoot than her Dads .357s she grew up shooting.

I have to say it's a lot of fun for me to shoot also, a 1911 was the first handgun I ever shot, the first one I bought, we have mostly 1911s in our house today, and when we were looking at revolvers, a JM just seemed to make sense.

The fact that all our other handguns were in .45 acp was a big plus, as we have thousands of hardball and a little stack of HD rounds. Our new "ammunition accountability Law" will restrict availability and license those who want to buy handgun ammo in Ca., and by sticking with .45, we wouldn't have to manage another caliber.

Don't be scared of the steel moon clips either, I got 100 of them from the Sportsmans Guide (they work just fine, sometimes you luck out with SG, sometimes not ), you can load them real easy with a pair of needle nose pliers with tape around the jaws. I made a couple de-mooning tools from 1/2" EMT, it's easy to do and much cheaper than ordering one.

I've spent lots of evening TV time practicing loading with moon clips full of HP dummies, about 1 1/2 hours a week. I'm much faster now, and actually fumble and load slower if I look at it than if I keep my eyes away, looking at the target or what not to wear.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 08-25-2012, 12:02 PM
Practical Practical is offline
Member
686 vs 625 for home defense??  
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 661
Likes: 4
Liked 289 Times in 166 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by parabarbarian View Post
Either will do.

I think the 357 magnum is about the best overall straight walled cartridge invented so far. However, I really wouldn't advise full power 357's indoors in a handgun just because of the noise. It is true that auditory exclusion will cause your brain to filter the sound but the hearing damage will still be there. One advantage to the 357 is you can use 38 spl +P without worrying about the gun.

If cost is a factor then the 357 will be the most expensive, the 38 spl the least and 45 ACP falling somewhere between the two.

IMO, the choice between the two should be heavily weighted by which gun he prefers to shoot. Liking the gun does not guarantee he will practice more but if he doesn't like he will certainly practice less. I can shoot my 686P better than the 625 and I like the handling better. Therefore the 686 is my HD/SD gun. If the situation were reversed then I'd be using the 625 in that role.
Auditory exclusion really means your nervous system is so shocked that it ignores all simuli. Persons don't always focus on the threat, after an assault on their senses like bright light and explosive sound, they shut down.

They do NOT see the threat they do not hear or see much.

This is why police use stun grenades in overcoming a barricaded subject.

Very, very few people can overcome the shock and disorientation introduced by a stun grenade. The idea that using a firearm by less trained individuals will result in auditory exclusion which allows them to prevail in a gun fight flies in the face of practical evidence to the contrary.

I have hunted for years, and not used hearing protection all the time, but when I have used hearing protection, my follow up shots are better if they are used. Using a firearm with great flash and high decibel report seems like a good way to lower your effectiveness.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #30  
Old 08-25-2012, 12:21 PM
da gimp da gimp is offline
Member
686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense??  
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: mid Missouri
Posts: 1,871
Likes: 9,407
Liked 2,560 Times in 1,010 Posts
Default

alot of the .38spec Plus P loads are on a par with .357 mag loads......... That being said, there are .38 loads with frangible bullets (like Glazer Safty Slugs) that might limit over penetration.

I keep 6 rds of .38 spec 148 gr LWC's in old Colt agent (secondary housegun, 20 ga Ithaca mod 37 pump with low brass 7 1/2 shot as primary) & for general street carry anymore, I use an old S&W Chief's loaded with Win. Plus P .38 spec Silvertips....

If serious outdoor social work is possible, I go up to using a S&W mod 29 , 4", laded with 240 gr Keith style LSWC's at about 950fps, or an old Colt 1911A1 in .45ACP.........
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 08-25-2012, 01:01 PM
Badkarma 1's Avatar
Badkarma 1 Badkarma 1 is offline
US Veteran
686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense??  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: East St. Louis, Il.
Posts: 1,698
Likes: 3,592
Liked 617 Times in 343 Posts
Default

686! Most have already talked about its versatility, and it's ability to handle the spectrum of .38-.357s. But what I want to point out is, it is actually SMALLER than the 625! While it doesn't matter on a HD piece, it might if your son decides he wants to carry it later on.
As for the 625, it's a great revolver that shoots better than most rifles! But I can't abide moonclips. They're a pain to load and unload, if they get bent your out of the fight, and even though you can load individual rounds in the cylinder, they're a pain to get out. Auto Rim ammunition is available which does mitigate the situation though.
So for me it's the .357. Dale
__________________
"Long live the S&W 3rd. Gen.!"
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 08-25-2012, 01:20 PM
rw357 rw357 is offline
Member
686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense??  
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

You can get a wider range of loads in a .357/38...you can get light loads 357 loads with more energy than a .45. Not saying that means much. You don't have to be dropping 700+ energy .357 rounds.

On penetration, I used to live in a house that had a pretty thick door frame. If a home invader was shooting around that I dont think .45 hollow points would have made it through it. My .357 would. So sometimes penetration is good.

Btw, why not apples to apples? 627 to 625? 2 extra rounds might not be needed, but it is an advantage.

If it is because he shoots an l frame better, the games is over. What you shoot best is best.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 08-25-2012, 01:40 PM
TAROMAN's Avatar
TAROMAN TAROMAN is offline
US Veteran
686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense??  
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The wet side of Oregon
Posts: 6,290
Likes: 8,789
Liked 7,778 Times in 2,375 Posts
Default

This should deal nicely with anything that goes bump in the night...

...for the great reasons already stated!
__________________
-jwk-
US Army '72-'95
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 08-25-2012, 02:01 PM
carbofan21 carbofan21 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 193
Likes: 2
Liked 12 Times in 9 Posts
Default

I don't know if price is a factor in your decision, but have you considered a pair of .38 specials? Right now you can get a 4" HB model 64 for the low $200's, and a new no-lock 442/642 at sportsmans outdoor superstore for the mid $300's. That's close to what you will pay for 686, and less than what you will pay for a 625. Two guns are better than one. The right .38 +p load is plenty for home defense, and he could ccw the 642. Just a thought.

Nevermind, I just noticed this topic is over 2 years old lol..

Last edited by carbofan21; 08-25-2012 at 02:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 08-25-2012, 02:03 PM
ballistic ballistic is offline
Member
686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense??  
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Posts: 118
Likes: 3
Liked 22 Times in 13 Posts
Default

I love to shoot 357 mags and the ones I have shoot very well. My model 27 may be the most accurate handgun I own. The 625 JM I have shoots well but, does not have the pinpoint accuracy of the 27. That said, I can still shoot a baseball size group with it at any distance I would find in my home. That said, considering the lower blast/flash of the 45acp cartridge, I would have to give the nod to the 625 for indoor personal defense work.

Last edited by ballistic; 08-25-2012 at 02:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 08-25-2012, 02:10 PM
bsms bsms is offline
Member
686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense??  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 103
Likes: 6
Liked 9 Times in 7 Posts
Default

Which one fits your hand better?

A 686+ fits my hand better, and with a 3" barrel is OK for CCW. Don't have a 625, but my 29 w/ 4" barrel sure feels more awkward for carry.

I don't think there is a noticeable difference between a 45 & 357 for defense.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 08-25-2012, 02:30 PM
baccusboy's Avatar
baccusboy baccusboy is offline
Member
686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense?? 686 vs 625 for home defense??  
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Seoul and Iowa
Posts: 307
Likes: 3
Liked 81 Times in 53 Posts
Default

The more I look at the current crop of TNOutdoors9's .357 magnum gel tests, the less impressed I am with the .357 magnum compared to some other calibers. I wouldn't want it indoors either, but the .357 Sig seems to do as well or better in that media, anyway.

I do think that there is a psychological sound/noise effect that causes incapacitation or shock in many individuals, and I feel that has played a part in the .357's great stats for stops.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
1911, 357 magnum, 380, 45acp, 610, 625jm, 645, 686, cartridge, colt, commander, concealed, glock, k-frame, kydex, l frame, military, model 625, ruger, speedloader, springfield, wadcutter

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best Weapon for Home Defense against Home Invasion? JMichaelTX Concealed Carry & Self Defense 215 02-11-2023 01:33 PM
The 500 S&W Mag for home defense.... roscoepc Ammo 99 01-28-2017 12:12 PM
Hornady Critical Defense or Duty for Home Defense In FS M&P9? .. OR SOMETHING ELSE??? falconman515 Ammo 50 09-02-2014 03:20 PM
SD9 Home Defense Kit 4864 Smith & Wesson SD & Sigma Pistols 1 02-05-2011 11:09 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:46 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)