Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-30-2010, 11:46 AM
gamedic gamedic is offline
Member
confused about J frame designations.  
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Clarkesville Ga
Posts: 276
Likes: 1
Liked 28 Times in 10 Posts
Default confused about J frame designations.

I have never had a j frame, but I am interested in buying a couple of them for the wife and myself to carry. When I looked at them at the gunshow a few weeks ago I couldn,t believe all the designations which didn't seem to have any rhime or reason at all. Are the designations specific to caliber or did some engineer ay S and W just pick a number to put on the guns.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-30-2010, 02:11 PM
valkyriekl's Avatar
valkyriekl valkyriekl is offline
Member
confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations.  
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 948
Likes: 64
Liked 111 Times in 46 Posts
Default

With regard to finishes, generally, any model number that begins with a "6" is stainless steel or silver-anodized/clear-coated aluminum alloy. Any model number that begins with a "0", "3", "4", or "5" is blued steel or black-anodized/clear-coated aluminum alloy (or scandium alloy). There are exceptions, of course.

With regard to features or caliber...no there isn't really any scheme.

A listing of calibers/models (mostly complete):
.22 Long Rifle caliber: Model 34, 35, 43, 63, 317
.22 Magnum caliber: Model 51, 351, 650, 651
.32 Long caliber: Model 30, 31
.32 H&R Magnum caliber: Model 032, 331, 332, 431, 432, 631, 632
.327 Federal Magnum caliber: Model 632
.38 S&W caliber: Model 32, 33
.38 Special caliber: Model 36, 37, 38, 40, 42, 49, 50, 60, 042, 337, 342, 442, 460 (perf. center), 637, 638, 640, 642, 649
.357 Magnum caliber: Model 60, 340, 360, 640, 649
9x19mm/9mm Luger caliber: Model 940


Hammer Configuration:
Most of the differences have to do with exposed vs. shrouded vs. concealed hammers and the materials the frames (and sometimes cylinders) are made from.

Exposed hammer spur/"Chief's Special":
Models 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 43, 50, 51, 60, 63, 317, 331, 337, 351, 360, 431, 631, 637, 650, 651

Shrouded hammer spur/"Bodyguard" (anti-snag, but can still be cocked for single-action firing):
Models 38, 49, 638, 649

Concealed hammer/"Centennial" (double-action only, internal hammer):
Models 40, 42, 032, 042, 332, 340, 342, 432, 442, 460, 632, 640, 642, 940


Frame/Cylinder Material:
Most 2-digit model numbers are carbon steel-framed, and most 3-digit model numbers are stainless steel or alloy framed (some exceptions, of course).

Carbon Steel frame (blued or nickel-plated):
Models 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 40, 49, 50, 51

Stainless Steel frame:
Models 60, 63, 640, 649, 650, 651, 940

Aluminum Alloy frame w/ steel cylinder/"Airweight" (black anodized, nickel plated, or silver anodized):
Models 37, 38, 42, 43, 032, 042, 431, 432, 442, 460, 631, 632, 637, 638, 642

Aluminum Alloy frame w/ Scandium or Titanium cylinder/"Airlite"
Models 317, 331, 332, 337, 340, 342, 351, 360
(the 317 is a bit of an exception, with its frame, cylinder, and barrel shroud all made from aluminum alloy)


Model Number Lineage:
In many cases, the modern model number (3xx, 4xx, 6xx) is based on the historical model number, for example:
S&W Model 42 (black alloy "Centennial" frame, grip-safety, blued steel cylinder, concealed hammer, .38 Special)
S&W Model 042 (black alloy "Centennial" frame, no grip-safety, blued steel cylinder, concealed hammer, .38 Special)
S&W Model 342 (black alloy "Centennial" frame, no grip-safety, scandium cylinder, concealed hammer, .38 Special)
S&W Model 442 (black alloy "Centennial" frame, no grip-safety, blued steel cylinder, concealed hammer, .38 Special)
S&W Model 642 (silver alloy "Centennial" frame, no grip-safety, stainless steel cylinder, concealed hammer, .38 Special)

Same for the 37 (37, 337, 637) and 40 (40, 340, 640, 940).

Sometimes, the lineage goes from the blued to stainless to alloy models, as in the .38 Chief's Special:
S&W Model 36 -> S&W Model 60 -> S&W Model 360

And to further confuse things, some models were built both as .38 Special-only and .357 Magnum versions, usually with concurrent dash-numbers. For example, the Model 60: S&W Model 60 no-dash through -8 are .38 Special only. S&W Model 60-9, -10, -14, -15, and -18 are .357 Magnum, while S&W Model 60-11, -13, -16, and -17 are .38 Special.


Back when model numbers were first stamped on S&W revolvers (1957), Models 10-19 were K-frame guns, 20-29 were N-frame guns, and 30-38 were J-frame guns. Things changed with the Model 39 (9mm semi-automatic pistol, single-stack, double-action/single-action, slide-mounted safety), and model numbers were assigned as guns were developed:

40 (J-frame revolver, .38 Special)
41 (semi-auto pistol, .22LR)
42 (J-frame revolver, .38 Special)
43 (J-frame revolver, .22LR)
44 (semi-auto pistol, 9mm)
45 (K-frame revolver, .22LR)
46 (semi-auto pistol, .22LR)
47 (semi-auto pistol, 9mm)
48 (K-frame revolver, .22 Magnum)
49 (J-frame revolver, .38 Special)
50 (J-frame revolver, .38 Special)
51 (J-frame revolver, .22 Magnum)
52 (semi-auto pistol, .38 Special)
...you get the idea.

Then the Second Generation semi-auto pistols came along (4xx, 5xx, 6xx) along with the L-frame revolvers (2xx, 5xx, 6xx), stainless N-frame revolvers (6xx), and then the 3rd Gen semi-auto pistols (4xx, 9xx, 1xxx, 3xxx, 4xxx, 5xxx, 6xxx)...and then this explosion of J-frame revolvers (3xx, 4xx, 6xx). As you can tell, it's pretty confusing with the model numbers all running together.

Last edited by valkyriekl; 10-16-2013 at 01:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-30-2010, 02:12 PM
ar15ed ar15ed is offline
Member
confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations.  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: western north carolina
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 0
Liked 165 Times in 62 Posts
Default

i am just sitting here, perusing the world wide web, and i love j frames, so i will talk to you a little about them. i think the vast array of j frames is the reason they are so much more interesting than other manufacturers.

first are the early j frames, which were based on the very early i frames, but had their cylinder elongated for the 38 special cartridge, among other minor changes. the steel framed gun was the chief's special, and the aluminum framed gun was the chief's special airweight. these had the hammer exposed in the conventional revolver manner. here is a picture of a chief's special with target sights:

the bodyguard had the "humpback" frame shrouding the hammer, and the bodyguard airweight was the same design with the frame made from aluminum. here is a flatlatch bodyguard airweight showing the frame hump.

the third frame design was the centennial. it had the hammer assembly totally enclosed by the frame, and had a rear "squeeze" safety system. the aluminum frame guns were centennial airweights. here is a picture of a flatlatch centennial:

in 1958 s&w started using number designations for the various models. the chief's special became the model 36, and the chief's special airweight became the model 37.
the bodyguard became the model 49, and the bodyguard airweight became the model 38.
the centennial became the model 40, and the centennial airweight became the model 42.
in 1969, s&w produced the first stainless j frame. it is basically a model 36 made from stainless steel, and is named the model 60. s&w uses the "6" prefix for stainless revolvers after this.
here is a pic of a model 60:

after this there is an explosion of new models! a "3" prefix usually denotes "lightweight", such as 340pd. this is a centennial model (40) with titanium and scandium used to produce an insanely light variation. the 360 is basically the 60/chief's special configuration with the ti/scandium features.
a "4" prefix usually denotes a black finish (442), where the "6" prefix denotes silver finish (638-humpback/airweight/silver, 637-conventional chief/airweight/silver).

this is a basic tutorial. i am not an expert by any means of the definition!
there are a multitude of j-frames that i haven't mentioned, from early 32s (6 shot)(model 30, 31, etc), 22s (model 34), 38s&w (model 32), and their "pre" models, to the beforementioned modern stuff. almost every numbered model has several "-" iterations where enough of a change has been made for s&w to decide it needs a new model number (36-1with 3inch barrel, 36-2. 36-3, etc,) but, this ought to give you a rough idea of the lineage of most of the designs.

i think they are fascinating!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-30-2010, 03:34 PM
enfield's Avatar
enfield enfield is offline
US Veteran
confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations.  
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cornfield County TN
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 6
Liked 55 Times in 23 Posts
Default

You skipped the Model 638.
__________________
VIVERE MILITARE EST
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-30-2010, 03:58 PM
blujax01's Avatar
blujax01 blujax01 is offline
Member
confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations.  
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: C-Bus
Posts: 6,335
Likes: 4,311
Liked 4,916 Times in 2,086 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by enfield View Post
You skipped the Model 638.
Wait a minute ...S.E. Tennessee location, "Keep Your Stick On The Ice" sig.?!

Gotta be a Preds fan,

CBJ fan here. Hence the "blujax" moniker.

See you in the playoffs - hopefully!

Sorry for the derail, love my J frame.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-30-2010, 04:51 PM
valkyriekl's Avatar
valkyriekl valkyriekl is offline
Member
confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations.  
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 948
Likes: 64
Liked 111 Times in 46 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by enfield View Post
You skipped the Model 638.
I knew I missed one or two in there.

Edit: I think the listing is complete now...maybe!

Last edited by valkyriekl; 12-30-2010 at 05:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #7  
Old 12-30-2010, 07:14 PM
enfield's Avatar
enfield enfield is offline
US Veteran
confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations.  
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cornfield County TN
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 6
Liked 55 Times in 23 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blujax01 View Post
Wait a minute ...S.E. Tennessee location, "Keep Your Stick On The Ice" sig.?!

Gotta be a Preds fan,

CBJ fan here. Hence the "blujax" moniker.

See you in the playoffs - hopefully!

Sorry for the derail, love my J frame.
Nope, Redwings all the way!!
__________________
VIVERE MILITARE EST

Last edited by enfield; 12-30-2010 at 07:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-30-2010, 07:29 PM
Engine49guy's Avatar
Engine49guy Engine49guy is offline
Member
confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations.  
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 7,781
Likes: 2,484
Liked 8,318 Times in 2,919 Posts
Default

Very informative...Thanks for the detailed model listing
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-30-2010, 08:42 PM
SaberOne's Avatar
SaberOne SaberOne is offline
Member
confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations.  
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Yuma, AZ
Posts: 215
Likes: 40
Liked 54 Times in 22 Posts
Default

Excellent post by ‘valkyriek1’ although it reminds me of how old I am as I’ve owned many of those listed. Unfortunately, I was never a collector and sold them in short order for something else. The real confusion has been in the last 2-3 years with the so-called ‘pro-series’ designations.
__________________
Dan Ortego ~
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #10  
Old 12-30-2010, 11:49 PM
gamedic gamedic is offline
Member
confused about J frame designations.  
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Clarkesville Ga
Posts: 276
Likes: 1
Liked 28 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Thanks for your help, makes a little more sense now.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-31-2010, 12:01 AM
valkyriekl's Avatar
valkyriekl valkyriekl is offline
Member
confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations.  
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 948
Likes: 64
Liked 111 Times in 46 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SaberOne View Post
Excellent post by ‘valkyrieKL’ although it reminds me of how old I am as I’ve owned many of those listed. Unfortunately, I was never a collector and sold them in short order for something else. The real confusion has been in the last 2-3 years with the so-called ‘pro-series’ designations.
I'd love to own them all, but to me a J-frame has only one use and therefore I only need to own one at a time. Currently that one J-frame for me is a S&W 640 no-dash:



Though I'm considering picking up a S&W 442 or 642 again for lighter belt-carry/pocket-carry. I used to have a 642 but I let it go once I picked up the 640:



The 640 shoots softer (steel frame = more mass to absorb recoil), but the 442/642 carries lighter. I also used to have a Model 60-7 LadySmith with the most wonderful J-frame single-action trigger I've ever felt (and a very nice double-action trigger, too), but alas it, too, found a new home in favor of the 640 (the hammer spur didn't quite jive well with my method of carry, and I didn't have the heart to bob it):



Hmm.

Last edited by valkyriekl; 12-31-2010 at 01:07 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-01-2011, 10:10 AM
djm djm is offline
Member
confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations.  
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: VA
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SaberOne View Post
Excellent post by ‘valkyriek1’ although.....The real confusion has been in the last 2-3 years with the so-called ‘pro-series’ designations.

With that, what does the 'pro-series' designation indicate?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-01-2011, 01:21 PM
scooter123 scooter123 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 6,926
Likes: 179
Liked 4,301 Times in 2,112 Posts
Default

In most cases the Pro designation means a sight option such as fibre optic front sight. However, I have a strong hunch that somewhere at the S&W factory they have a room full of labels they just throw into the air. Then whatever is on the small table in the center of the room face up is the name or model of that new gun.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #14  
Old 01-01-2011, 06:21 PM
valkyriekl's Avatar
valkyriekl valkyriekl is offline
Member
confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations.  
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 948
Likes: 64
Liked 111 Times in 46 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scooter123 View Post
In most cases the Pro designation means a sight option such as fibre optic front sight. However, I have a strong hunch that somewhere at the S&W factory they have a room full of labels they just throw into the air. Then whatever is on the small table in the center of the room face up is the name or model of that new gun.
At least the "Airweight" (aluminum alloy frame, steel cylinder) and "AirLite" (aluminum alloy frame, scandium or titanium cylinder) names make sense.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #15  
Old 01-01-2011, 06:43 PM
djm djm is offline
Member
confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations.  
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: VA
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default

So in terms of the modern J frames, does the "pro series" indicate nothing more than having the cylinder machined for moon clips?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-02-2011, 01:15 AM
photoman's Avatar
photoman photoman is offline
Member
confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations.  
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Great State of Texas
Posts: 5,057
Likes: 524
Liked 1,909 Times in 788 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by valkyriekl View Post
I'd love to own them all, but to me a J-frame has only one use and therefore I only need to own one at a time. Currently that one J-frame for me is a S&W 640 no-dash:



If I could only have one, that would be the one.
__________________
Centennial Every Day
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #17  
Old 01-02-2011, 01:17 AM
photoman's Avatar
photoman photoman is offline
Member
confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations.  
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Great State of Texas
Posts: 5,057
Likes: 524
Liked 1,909 Times in 788 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djm View Post
So in terms of the modern J frames, does the "pro series" indicate nothing more than having the cylinder machined for moon clips?
That and I think some of them are ported.
__________________
Centennial Every Day
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-02-2011, 01:18 AM
valkyriekl's Avatar
valkyriekl valkyriekl is offline
Member
confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations.  
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 948
Likes: 64
Liked 111 Times in 46 Posts
Default

Hmm...according to the marketspeak on S&W's website:

Quote:
Completing the line between main production and the Performance Center, the Smith & Wesson Pro Series represents the next step from standard models. These firearms are offered with a variety of enhancements yet still remain true to "stock." Bringing competition specifications and features to factory models, the Pro Series offer that ready-to-go package while still maintaining production line integrity.
...it sounds like "Pro Series" is geared toward combat pistol competitors who want to have a "stock gun" and still have an edge. In IPSC and IDPA, there are classes where a shooter may compete with a gun that has had no aftermarket modifications -- no special sights, no cylinder modifications, no nothing. If these mods are done at the factory, then the shooter can use the gun in these 'stock' or 'production' competition classes.

I think I'd like the moon-clip modification on a J-frame, though; it'd be handy to load and unload all in one go without having to fumble with speed-strips or speed loaders.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-02-2011, 01:23 AM
photoman's Avatar
photoman photoman is offline
Member
confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations.  
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Great State of Texas
Posts: 5,057
Likes: 524
Liked 1,909 Times in 788 Posts
Default

I've had too many problems with headspacing problems and bent clips. I don't use moon clips any longer. They're also a real pain to carry.
__________________
Centennial Every Day
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #20  
Old 01-03-2011, 01:58 PM
valkyriekl's Avatar
valkyriekl valkyriekl is offline
Member
confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations.  
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 948
Likes: 64
Liked 111 Times in 46 Posts
Default

Well, I've taken the plunge and I had my dealer order a 442 Pro Series for me. We'll see how it goes!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #21  
Old 01-03-2011, 03:00 PM
photoman's Avatar
photoman photoman is offline
Member
confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations.  
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Great State of Texas
Posts: 5,057
Likes: 524
Liked 1,909 Times in 788 Posts
Default

Keep us posted. Sounds like a nice gun.
__________________
Centennial Every Day
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-14-2011, 01:36 PM
petitelady petitelady is offline
Member
confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations.  
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Northeast Arkansas
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Cool 640-1 centeniel

I have a 640-1 Centeniel model which is very close to the 640 and I love it. It's stainless and a j-frame which makes it a perfect concealment gun for a small women.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-23-2011, 11:28 PM
ol'jarhead ol'jarhead is offline
Member
confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations.  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I have an old (early) Mod 36 Chief's Special that I inherited. Once belonged to a local police detective who had a "trigger job" done on it. The gun is a liability for concealed carry. If fired from a cocked hammer it only takes a breath to drop the hammer. I need to know where to purchase a new factory original hammer for the gun. Any suggestions, anyone?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-24-2011, 12:01 AM
ltxi ltxi is offline
Absent Comrade
confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations.  
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 170
Likes: 15
Liked 21 Times in 16 Posts
Default

Could also be due to a stretched frame if it was run with a lot of hot ammo/reloads. If it's an issue for you, having a good gunsmith evaluate it would be my advice.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-15-2013, 06:20 PM
bdsorcic's Avatar
bdsorcic bdsorcic is offline
Member
confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations.  
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 281
Likes: 205
Liked 180 Times in 59 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Photoman44 View Post
If I could only have one, that would be the one.
Old School is still the best!. ...
__________________
Free people ought to be armed
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-16-2013, 01:44 PM
hotrod150's Avatar
hotrod150 hotrod150 is offline
Member
confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations.  
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: western Washington
Posts: 2,647
Likes: 1
Liked 763 Times in 454 Posts
Default

All vintage S&W's have "hair triggers" in single-action mode IMHO. Replacing the hammer won't help, heavier springs will increase the pull weight but probably not much in SA. You're better off shooting it i DA mode only. I own several Chief Spoecials, all but one have the hammer spur bobbed off. This prevents the spur from being snagged on clothes or poking flesh, the side benefit is making the gun (pretty much) double-action-only. Single action shooting has only very limited application in self-defense. Research the DAO "NYC" S&W's for more info.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #27  
Old 03-18-2014, 03:39 PM
skrazo's Avatar
skrazo skrazo is offline
Member
confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations.  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: gone
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 801
Liked 2,743 Times in 564 Posts
Default Copying This Thread

I tried to copy the part with all the data in it, so it could be taken with me when I go "browsing" S&W revolvers. Wordperfect just make jibberish of it. Is there something "special" that is required?
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 03-18-2014, 04:14 PM
Macinaw's Avatar
Macinaw Macinaw is offline
Member
confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations.  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 464
Liked 1,602 Times in 538 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skrazo View Post
I tried to copy the part with all the data in it, so it could be taken with me when I go "browsing" S&W revolvers. Wordperfect just make jibberish of it. Is there something "special" that is required?
I had the same idea to make a copy for reference. I right clicked to "copy" then opened up Word Office. Then right click to "paste" That worked for me.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 03-18-2014, 04:43 PM
sac-gunslinger sac-gunslinger is offline
Member
confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations.  
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Rancho Cordova, CA
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 1,078
Liked 778 Times in 411 Posts
Default

Thanks to Valkyrierkl and ar15ed for comprehensive listing of J-frame versions, lots of work there.

I would recommend the 640 or 642 for personal defense carry because both are double-action only. No worry about getting challenged for accidentally shooting the gun in single action. And both conceal better without the hammer spur.

I have both, probably should stick to one or the other but like them both to much. Watch for canted barrels on any new ones you buy.
__________________
"Sacramento" Bruce Conklin

Last edited by sac-gunslinger; 03-18-2014 at 06:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #30  
Old 03-18-2014, 09:13 PM
skrazo's Avatar
skrazo skrazo is offline
Member
confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations.  
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: gone
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 801
Liked 2,743 Times in 564 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macinaw View Post
I had the same idea to make a copy for reference. I right clicked to "copy" then opened up Word Office. Then right click to "paste" That worked for me.
I got it to work this time. After copying, the program (Word) displays a bunch of "squiggly" stuff. Just select it and "clear formatting" and all is well. What a great post!
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 03-18-2014, 10:05 PM
rwsmith's Avatar
rwsmith rwsmith is offline
Member
confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations.  
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: (outside) Charleston, SC
Posts: 30,985
Likes: 41,643
Liked 29,236 Times in 13,822 Posts
Default Your perception is right....

Some years back, the continuity of the S&W model numbering system went south.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 04-26-2014, 12:08 AM
AC5SM AC5SM is offline
Member
confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations.  
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 2
Likes: 2
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default

What is this one? I think made in 1954 or 55. There is no model number on it just a serial number in the 50XXX. From what I understand it is a Chief Special. I sure like it for Sunday carry.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
  #33  
Old 04-26-2014, 01:44 AM
ibewbull's Avatar
ibewbull ibewbull is offline
US Veteran
Absent Comrade
confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations.  
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Wisconsin Central State
Posts: 971
Likes: 3,197
Liked 800 Times in 351 Posts
Default Looks to be a:

Quote:
Originally Posted by AC5SM View Post
What is this one? I think made in 1954 or 55. There is no model number on it just a serial number in the 50XXX. From what I understand it is a Chief Special. I sure like it for Sunday carry.
Nice old Chiefs Special flat latch .
I have carried the J frame more often than all my other handguns combined.
The only thing better is TWO of them.



Mine is a bit newer for an older one.


[IMG][/IMG]

Last edited by ibewbull; 04-26-2014 at 01:49 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #34  
Old 04-26-2014, 04:53 AM
Morgan88's Avatar
Morgan88 Morgan88 is offline
Member
confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations. confused about J frame designations.  
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Jasper TN
Posts: 198
Likes: 176
Liked 92 Times in 55 Posts
Default great list

What a great list. Looking back this list would have been and will still be a huge help. I am relatively knew to handguns and this site and still find it difficult when members throw around so many model numbers.
Valkyriekl, I will gratefully accept your gracious help.

Morgan88
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
22lr, 340, 357 magnum, 442, 631, 637, 640, 642, 650, airlite, airweight, bodyguard, centennial, concealed, j frame, k-frame, ladysmith, model 39, model 42, model 60, n-frame, scandium, sig arms, titanium


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Frame designations? locolobo56 The Lounge 9 12-05-2016 10:36 PM
Model 34 - confused about frame size, etc. need help please Levallois S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 10 04-10-2013 08:31 AM
Standard Catalog.....I'm confused...... N-Frame ID robertwhite S&W Hand Ejectors: 1896 to 1961 3 01-09-2013 08:40 PM
Frame Designations? Slow Draw S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 4 02-05-2010 02:13 AM
Confused about grip frame markings on 28-2 OhDannyBoy S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 6 01-06-2009 04:52 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:00 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)