Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present
o

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-27-2017, 02:30 PM
Ed Fowler's Avatar
Ed Fowler Ed Fowler is offline
Member
686-5 Ported vrs non Ported? 686-5 Ported vrs non Ported? 686-5 Ported vrs non Ported? 686-5 Ported vrs non Ported? 686-5 Ported vrs non Ported?  
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Central Wyoming
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 3,146
Liked 1,569 Times in 635 Posts
Default 686-5 Ported vrs non Ported?

I purchased a 686-5 with a barrel ported just in-front of the front sight about 15 years ago. I have shot thousands of rounds through her and always wondered if there would be a noticeable performance differences between the ported barrel and non ported barrel of the same length.

Yesterday I got lucky, a law enforcement outfit traded in their "obsolete" 686 -5s with the same barrel length, 5&7/8" but not ported for some of the new mother of plastic stuff. I picked up one with a little surface wear but well cared for for a good price. So far I have only had time to shoot several hundred rounds through them and have noticed no significant difference in performance accuracy or recoil.

I intend to shoot some 100 yard groups through them at 88 yards and compare accuracy and anything else I notice in the near future.

I was wondering if anyone else has made any comparison studies between the ported vrs non ported 586's. Any information will be welcome.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-27-2017, 05:56 PM
ridgewalker ridgewalker is offline
Member
686-5 Ported vrs non Ported? 686-5 Ported vrs non Ported? 686-5 Ported vrs non Ported? 686-5 Ported vrs non Ported? 686-5 Ported vrs non Ported?  
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Western USA
Posts: 731
Likes: 902
Liked 514 Times in 261 Posts
Default

Interesting. Do you notice much difference in the noise?
__________________
Accuracy supercedes Speed
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-27-2017, 05:56 PM
AveragEd AveragEd is offline
Member
686-5 Ported vrs non Ported? 686-5 Ported vrs non Ported? 686-5 Ported vrs non Ported? 686-5 Ported vrs non Ported? 686-5 Ported vrs non Ported?  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Enola, Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 591
Liked 2,580 Times in 1,125 Posts
Default

I used to own a 686 PowerPort and still own several 686s including some six-inch guns like the PowerPort except with only two holes in the barrel. My son, some gun club friends and I shot several cylinders of the same load through the PP gun and a non-PP gun with absolutely no discernible difference in anything except muzzle noise and some combustion debris coming back into our faces from the PP gun due to an incoming breeze. I subsequently sold the PP gun.

I still have an unfired 686-4 PowerPort that is still in that condition and will remain so. Being discontinued, who knows how its value might change in the future.

To be effective, porting has to bleed off some combustion pressure prior to the bullet departing the muzzle. A reduction in pressure should result in a reduction in muzzle velocity but my chronograph indicated no meaningful difference; in fact, the PP gun was a few FPS faster which was no doubt just the normal variation between guns.

Porting IS effective in rifles because the pressure is high enough for some being bled off to be effective but the resulting drop in velocity can be fairly significant depending upon the caliber and how the ammo is loaded. A friend of mine had a Remington 700 in .300 Remington Ultra Mag ported and it now chronographs like a .300 Winchester Magnum. It does kick less though.

If a firearm is the type that will exhibit a reduction in felt recoil through extra holes in the barrel, a muzzle brake is the best method of reducing recoil in my opinion. They work without lowering velocity and can be removed if desired. But for shotguns and handguns, unless the latter is loaded super-hot, recoil reduction is mostly in the shooter's mind. We all know what barrel length means to velocity and porting effectively shortens barrels.

Ed
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Like Post:
  #4  
Old 11-28-2017, 12:19 AM
justintyme's Avatar
justintyme justintyme is offline
Member
686-5 Ported vrs non Ported? 686-5 Ported vrs non Ported? 686-5 Ported vrs non Ported? 686-5 Ported vrs non Ported? 686-5 Ported vrs non Ported?  
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Fort Collins CO
Posts: 381
Likes: 160
Liked 442 Times in 122 Posts
Default

I have shot my 686-5 Power port and my 686 no dash 6 inch Back to back with several loads along with my Son. There is not a huge difference, but there is one, and the hotter the load, like Buffalo bore or Underwood, the more noticeable it is. But still not a large difference in Recoil. Then in my opinion a 6 inch .357 is not a heavy recoiling gun anyway.

If you are paying attention though it does feel...different and the muzzle does not rise as much. I wear hearing protection, often double as I have hearing loss and ringing in my ears already but i don't really notice it being any louder or any more muzzle blast, other than my 3 inch 686 is way worse than any of my 3 six inch barrels. I have shot it indoors and out.

I don't know that I would really pay extra for the feature, but they seem to be frowned upon these days so I got a deal on mine. If you really need less recoil just load it with .38 special! It really is a tack driver though and I am super happy with mine
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-28-2017, 01:42 AM
colt_saa's Avatar
colt_saa colt_saa is offline
SWCA Member
686-5 Ported vrs non Ported? 686-5 Ported vrs non Ported? 686-5 Ported vrs non Ported? 686-5 Ported vrs non Ported? 686-5 Ported vrs non Ported?  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida
Posts: 10,559
Likes: 3,037
Liked 22,454 Times in 5,824 Posts
Default

I have many different models of firearms with ported and non-ported examples. I (and others) have shot many of them side by side for comparison. I have also chronographed many like models over the years.

Here are some of the ported versions, I won't bother showing their non-ported brothers.




















Ported handguns do not reduce actual recoil at all. They are not supposed to reduce recoil. The purpose of the ports is to reduce muzzle climb so that you can get back on target faster.

True muzzle brakes are a totally different animal and are designed to reduce recoil, not muzzle climb. Muzzle brakes direct propellant gasses rearward while ports and comps direct propellant gasses upwards


The effectiveness of the port or comp on handguns in reducing muzzle climb is dependent on both the port/comp design and the actual load being fired. What Smith and Wesson calls the Power Port is better at providing a reduction of muzzle climb than the Mag-Na-Port style when we are talking about low velocity cartridges like 45ACP. The amount of propellant gas volume is what is important

As to the issue of debris, that is dependent on the construction of the projectile being fired. Ammunition like the Sinterfire that use projectiles of compressed copper dust throw lots of true debris out the ports of the firearm. On the other end of the spectrum are projectiles that are truly jacketed, these throw almost zero debris out the ports.

What most folks express as debris is actually powder as it is just finishing burning (just like the blow-back from suppressed handguns).

So this brings powder selection and barrel length into the equation. A 2 1/2" Mag-Na-Ported Model 66 firing heavy loads of H110 does get this feeling of "debris" however they also get a significant reduction in muzzle climb.

Are the benefits worth the drawbacks? That depends on the shooter's perception of how it all works and the intended role of the firearm in question.

Obviously I think ports and comps are beneficial since I used to put tens of thousands of rounds downrange through them in my younger days. These days I do not get to the range as much as I would like to .
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Like Post:
  #6  
Old 11-28-2017, 11:44 AM
Ed Fowler's Avatar
Ed Fowler Ed Fowler is offline
Member
686-5 Ported vrs non Ported? 686-5 Ported vrs non Ported? 686-5 Ported vrs non Ported? 686-5 Ported vrs non Ported? 686-5 Ported vrs non Ported?  
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Central Wyoming
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 3,146
Liked 1,569 Times in 635 Posts
Default

Thanks for sharing the photos and comments, I enjoyed looking and reading.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-28-2017, 10:39 PM
629shooter 629shooter is offline
Member
686-5 Ported vrs non Ported? 686-5 Ported vrs non Ported? 686-5 Ported vrs non Ported? 686-5 Ported vrs non Ported? 686-5 Ported vrs non Ported?  
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The Midwest
Posts: 1,977
Likes: 4,273
Liked 1,275 Times in 810 Posts
Default

I've have shot both. My uncle had a 686 Power Port. I can't recall a noticeable difference between his Power Port and my 6" 686-4.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
M&P Shield Ported Question: Can I Change the Barrel to a Non-Ported Barrel? setherson93 Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols 18 07-05-2017 10:58 PM
9mm Performance Center Ported Shield vs Non ported Shield recoil help! marathonrunner Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols 37 04-06-2017 06:26 PM
Ported barrel or NO ported barrel for carry/self defense Emalone5 Concealed Carry & Self Defense 13 09-28-2016 05:45 PM
629 3" Ported vs Non-Ported buckslayer5676 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 12 12-31-2014 12:40 PM
Muzzle Vel: Ported vs Non-Ported R. G. Amos The Lounge 8 03-09-2013 09:24 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:07 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)