Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-30-2011, 09:46 PM
mc5aw's Avatar
mc5aw mc5aw is offline
Member
M&P 340 owners ... M&P 340 owners ... M&P 340 owners ... M&P 340 owners ... M&P 340 owners ...  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The free state of PA
Posts: 5,224
Likes: 5,721
Liked 8,584 Times in 2,782 Posts
Default M&P 340 owners ...

I'm trying to justify the $ for a M&P 340 (no IL) purchase, and am looking for reasons why it's superior to any other J frames. Does it offer anything more than my steel frames, Airweights, and Airlites? A big plus is the Hi-Viz sight, which is much easier to acquire on a target. I'm partial to Bodyguards and Centennials, and the 340 would be a primary CCW loaded with .38s. Waste of money? Superfluous purchase? Great idea? Insights and opinions, pro and con, are most welcome. Thank you in advance.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-30-2011, 10:30 PM
gyrhed gyrhed is offline
Member
M&P 340 owners ... M&P 340 owners ... M&P 340 owners ... M&P 340 owners ... M&P 340 owners ...  
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I struggled with the same question and I just bought a 340MP this afternoon myself. It came with the tritium front site and the crimson trace grips. It had left the store and come back without ever being fired. The story is that a guy bought it for his wife and the trigger pull was too much. I couldn't beat the price even if I found an equally unused j frame and bought crimsom trace grips for it, so I bought it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-30-2011, 11:40 PM
Marshal tom Marshal tom is offline
Member
M&P 340 owners ... M&P 340 owners ...  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cedaredge Co.
Posts: 2,293
Likes: 11
Liked 2,756 Times in 980 Posts
Default

I guess it depends on what you already have that is similar and what you are trying to accomplish that one of those guns does not already do for you. I have one right next to me as I write this. It was a replacement for my beloved 337 with bobbed hammer and fantastic trigger job that I carried for several years. It went to the factory with a problem that could not be fixed so I had it replaced with the M&P. I love mine even if it does have the IL. It is a tad heavier than my 337 Ti was but not that much. I like the night sight on it.

Tom
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-01-2011, 07:35 AM
Broadside Broadside is offline
Member
M&P 340 owners ... M&P 340 owners ... M&P 340 owners ... M&P 340 owners ... M&P 340 owners ...  
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Default

I must admit that the M&P 340 with night sight is on my "to buy" list someday.

Here are the three advantages I see over the Model 442:

1. Scandium alloy frame
2. Night sight or Hi-Viz sight
3. .357 Magnum caliber

To me, the Scandium alloy frame is worth the price difference. The sight is nice, but doesn't make it worth more to me. I'd actually prefer a .38 spl caliber because I'll never shoot .357 Magnum.

Any how, I think what you have to ask yourself is whether any or all three of the above items justify the additional cost in your mind.

My plan would be to eventually have the cylinder machined for moon clips. I prefer to have that done to a stainless steel cylinder rather than Titanium even though the gunsmiths that do the work say it is fine.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-01-2011, 07:53 AM
Roboto Roboto is offline
Member
M&P 340 owners ... M&P 340 owners ... M&P 340 owners ... M&P 340 owners ... M&P 340 owners ...  
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 99
Likes: 9
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default

I bought my M&P 340 because it weighed less, offered a great front sight that I could actually see in total darkness, its a .357MAG, and last but not least its a S&W Centennial J frame snubby without the internal lock. I'm not rich but the money factor meant nothing because I'm not buying anything that I can't afford, period!! So if you want it and can afford it go for it, I think you will be pleased.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-01-2011, 12:21 PM
Old cop Old cop is offline
US Veteran
M&P 340 owners ... M&P 340 owners ... M&P 340 owners ... M&P 340 owners ... M&P 340 owners ...  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,807
Likes: 4,238
Liked 15,203 Times in 4,161 Posts
Default

The only caution I would offer is that you should not use lead rounds in these super light J's, they jump crimp and lock up the gun. Aside from that they are great for pocket carry.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
340, 357 magnum, 442, ccw, centennial, crimp, crimson, j frame, lock, scandium, snubby, titanium, tritium


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NJ gun owners please help. Dan Camaro The Lounge 1 05-02-2014 07:12 PM
686 owners and 627 owners its time to do battle, convince me which is better Dodobird1589 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 56 02-18-2014 12:08 PM
Mod. 640 owners look here Dueeast The Lounge 5 01-10-2014 12:55 AM
Any other PC 15-22 owners out there? Hobie1 Smith & Wesson M&P 15-22 4 03-20-2011 12:24 PM
Any 686 DX owners? renroh S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 6 08-22-2009 12:29 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:35 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)