Smith & Wesson Forum

Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present
o

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 01-16-2012, 09:59 PM
ShrinkMD ShrinkMD is offline
Member
Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag?  
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times in 13 Posts
Default

At first I was thinking about getting some 44 Special brass, but now that I'm more proficient with the magnum loads I think I'll save that power level of plinking for my my 625.

70 thousand rounds? Hmm, if I shoot 200 a week and keep at it, that will take seven years.

I'll get back to you on how the gun is holding up. Of course, that means never shooting anything else, so since that isn't going to happen, something tells me it will take many, many years to get up that high.

We'll see.
__________________
NRA Benefactor Member
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 01-16-2012, 10:25 PM
kvtcomdo kvtcomdo is offline
Member
Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag?  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Opinions are like *&%$)

Quote:
Originally Posted by scooter123 View Post
I am the Knucklehead that the OP was referring to posting on another forum.

Now, the points that I was trying to make. I should also note that I was basing my statement on the assumption that the query was for opinions on a standard production model 29. My normal preference for barrel length in a revolver is 4 inches because I like they way they "handle". Keep that in mind. In hindsight I should have asked about what barrel length was the subject of the query. However, even with a 6 1/2 inch semi lugged barrel the model 29 can be what I find to be a bit brutal with a heavy Magnum.

1) The model 29 and it's siblings are the revolvers most prone to developing End Shake when used with a heavy diet of 44 Magnums. IMO it's a result of the Yoke Tube peening and not a result of the frame stretching. I also stated that it's not a safety issue, simply something that someone using this model with a steady diet of heavy Magnum loads need to be cognizant of and something they need to keep an eye on.

Now I ask you, what model yields the most posts about End Shake on this forum. Number one is the 44 Magnums and number two is probably the 686 due to it's popularity.

2) I've never actually met someone who only shot 44 Magnum loads in their S&W 44 Magnums. Seen lots of claims on the net but apparently they don't live in Ohio or Michigan. In fact I've only seen full house 44 Magnums used for just 20-30 rounds, after that the shooter moved to 44 spl. or equivalent loads in a 44 Magnum case. Since the difference in volume and muzzle flash is quite obvious, it's pretty easy to tell when the shooter has backed off on what he's shooting. BTW, I've also never seen any 460 or 500 Magnum shooter expend more than 10 rounds in one range session, however I expect there are people on the net who claim to shoot 100 rounds or more in one range session.

There are some shooters here who have posted extensive use of 44 Magnums for steel silhouette shooting and I do not doubt them one bit. However, a model 29 with an 8 3/8 inch barrel is considerably heavier than a model 29 with a 4 inch barrel. In fact I expect that the long barreled model 29 would feel a lot like a 4 inch 44 Magnum X frame. It's the mass of that long barrel that made extensive use of 44 Magnums tolerable and your experience isn't quite the same as shooting the 44 Magnum in a shorter barrel.

Finally, when the 44 Magnum and the model 19 were designed the Standard Operating Principle was to use the Magnums for serious work and practice with the Specials. Design decisions made in the 50's that were perfectly reasoned have proven somewhat marginal in light of the way that shooters today operate their guns. Quite simply, IMO the model 29 and it's siblings are great 44 spl. revolvers that can be used on occasion with 44 Magnums. If someone wants to shoot purely 44 Magnums, they need to be aware of it's tendancy to develop End Shake and maintain it properly. If that's done, I see no reason why they won't last well beyond any or our lifetimes.

As for the cylinder unlocking, that issue was well resolved with the Endurance Package and this was carried on with the production models following the development of the Endurance Package. BTW, I expect that problem was most prevalent in the shorter barrel lengths because mass does a lot to tone down recoil reaction forces.

Finally, I've shot just 1 round of 44 Magnum at the urging of a friend. That was enough for me, I don't have any need to beat myself silly and have enough accumulated wrist injuries to know better. However, that 6 1/2 inch model 29 loaded with 44 spl. was a real cupcake to shoot and a real hoot. BTW, that friend also tried to talk me into trying his 4 inch 460, however after feeling the effect of a 44 Magnum in that model 29 those urgings fell on deaf ears.

If you all want to call me a Wimp, go ahead. However, at 56 years old I am directly aware of the result of long term repetive stress injuries to the hand and wrist because I live with the effect every single day. Quite simply, once you pass 50 you learn that some of the things you did in your 20's and 30's while lots of fun extract a price when you get older.

In closing, I'll stand by my opinion, That the model 29 is a great 44 spl. and use of full house Magnums should either be limited or done with the thought that it will increase the maintenance requirement. I also think the 4 and 6 1/2 inch versions are too light for the energy that the 44 Magnum can produce. I'll grant that this is the opinion of someone who does have some wrist injuries, however in another 20 years you may find yourself with those same injuries. BTW, mild Tunnel Carpal, Both Wrists AND arthrytis at the base of the thumb on Each Hand. Personally, if I ever do purchase a model 629, it's going to be treated as a 44 spl..
I certainly acquiesce to your extensive experience in this matter.

Have 3(three). Never shot a special in any; don't go for the super duper heaviest ridiculous loads that the 44 Mag was never designed to be and have NEVER had an issue nor felt I was ill equipped to handle the loads. Much ado about nothin' in my opinion.

Guns are all in excellent condition and prepared for more.

Last edited by kvtcomdo; 01-16-2012 at 10:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 01-16-2012, 11:24 PM
Stainless44 Stainless44 is offline
Member
Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag?  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 411
Likes: 236
Liked 578 Times in 192 Posts
Default

Just to add to the body of evidence...I have a 29 and a pair of 629s and all I shoot is 44 mag.

I put perhaps 100 rounds through them this weekend. Of all the activities I do (fishing, hiking, skydiving, mountain biking, weight lifting, hunting, fishing, and shooting) I would guess that shooting the 44 mag is the least likely to cause any type of injury to me.

A long day of fishing hurts my hands...but shooting the 44 doesn't.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 01-17-2012, 02:07 PM
Skeeziks Skeeziks is offline
Member
Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag?  
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 8 Posts
Default

Well sure......... And you know what else I heard??? Extensive driving with your car has been know to wear the tread right off the tires!
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 04-03-2013, 02:17 PM
SW&Larry SW&Larry is offline
Member
Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag?  
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Default

As a new 29-10 6.5" Nickel owner, I find this thread interesting. I've also read many similar to it elsewhere, as everyone else has.

I have to be honest and say it does leave room for some concern as I tend to go to the range at least twice a week and tend to shoot 100 rounds each visit of each gun I take.

The issue I have is there is considerable talk of Standard loads, Max Loads, Medium Loads, etc... but there is no definition of what these loads actually are. Every now and then there is discussion of powders and bullet weights, but that doesn't help us non-loaders

I use factory ammo only, at least for now.

So, what is a light, medium, heavy load?

This is what I currently have. Please indicate to me what they would be considered:
  • MagTech 240gr FMC-Flat (44c) 1178fps/739 ft. lb
  • American Eagle 240gr JPH 1230 fps/805 ft. lb
  • Buffalo Bore 270gr (4C) 1450 fps/1260 ft. lbs

I suspect that Buffalo Bore is pretty nasty. I only have 40 of them, and purchased them before I knew better. I may shoot one per range visit to use them up

But where do those others fall in line? Are they fine for shooting 50-100 every range visit, once or twice a month, and still expect many years of service?

BTW... Hickok45 has over 70,000 rounds through his 29-2, but I don't know the mixture.

Thanks

BTW... .44 Special is too damn expensive and too hard to find. I just got a case of the American Eagle 240gr Mag's in (1000 rounds) @ .66 a round. I can't shoot my 9mm cheaper than that these days.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 04-03-2013, 02:38 PM
M29since14 M29since14 is offline
SWCA Member
Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag?  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 11,907
Likes: 10,039
Liked 10,047 Times in 4,758 Posts
Default

The S&W should stand up pretty well to either of the first two loads listed. They are full-charge 44 Magnums, as far as I am concerned, but some might think of them as pretty sturdy mediums. The third one sounds a little rowdy.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 04-03-2013, 02:49 PM
LimaCharlie's Avatar
LimaCharlie LimaCharlie is offline
US Veteran
Absent Comrade
Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag?  
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 511
Likes: 63
Liked 651 Times in 269 Posts
Default

I am sixty-six and have arthritis. I have a 4” 29-2, an 8 3/8” 29-2, an 8” Colt Anaconda, a 10 ½” Ruger Super Blackhawk, a 6 ½” Ruger Super Blackhawk, and a 7 ½” Ruger Redhawk. None of them have ever had anything in them except full power factory .44 magnum rounds. If I need more power, I break out the S&W 460XVR. It gets only 460 S&W magnums through it.
__________________
U.S. Navy - U.S. Army, ret
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 04-03-2013, 03:34 PM
SW&Larry SW&Larry is offline
Member
Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag?  
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LimaCharlie View Post
I am sixty-six and have arthritis. I have a 4” 29-2, an 8 3/8” 29-2, an 8” Colt Anaconda, a 10 ½” Ruger Super Blackhawk, a 6 ½” Ruger Super Blackhawk, and a 7 ½” Ruger Redhawk. None of them have ever had anything in them except full power factory .44 magnum rounds. If I need more power, I break out the S&W 460XVR. It gets only 460 S&W magnums through it.
A 460 is on my bucket list. IMHO, the 460 is a smarter purchase than the 500 due to the Ammo choices it offers with little lost to overall power compared to the 500.

.460 rounds are a LOT cheaper too
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 04-03-2013, 05:11 PM
BigBill BigBill is offline
Absent Comrade
Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag?  
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 13,869
Likes: 2,079
Liked 13,353 Times in 5,549 Posts
Default

Its been said here before my new S&W model 29-10 will take any beating I put it thru with the normal 44mag loads. I shoot the hottest 44mag loads from my ruger super Blackhawk and my ruger redhawks. My new S&W is my baby I like it but I won't hammer it. The balance to weight ratio seems perfect. I hated shooting my redhawk with its 5 1/2" barrel in 44mag with the hotter loads the recoil is massive. I noticed right away with my new S&W model 58 in 41mag with its 4" barrel expecting the worst recoil of all it seemed really much tamer over the 44mag. I love this 58 in 41mag. I will shoot all of them just not the reloaded hotter ammo in all my S&W's.

First do not try this at home "I am a professional"; (kidding, man on fire quote)
In my younger crazy days I loaded a ruger super Blackhawk with probably proof loads spec wise. I had 15" of flame coming out of the barrel and 10" of flame out of both sides of the cylinder. The people next to me at the range left. This super blackhawk ate it all and wanted more. Do not try this at home please. I was young and dumb. Now I like the lower gun powder loads and enjoy the shoot. I did have to retighten up the grip frame screws often too....besafe and load it correctly.
I was loading the 44mag to the 1400 fps specs from the book that was my normal load. .

In my earlier days we didn't have the larger calibers that we have today. I'm 62yo and been interested in a BFR in 444 marlin and 45/70. The newer 500S&W scares me when I see hichcok45 on you tube says it punishes him so he doesn't shoot it that much. I been a 44mag guy ever since my beginning with guns since the early 70's.

Last edited by BigBill; 04-03-2013 at 05:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 04-03-2013, 10:32 PM
kwselke's Avatar
kwselke kwselke is offline
Member
Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag?  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,313
Likes: 35,286
Liked 16,951 Times in 3,692 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SW&Larry View Post
As a new 29-10 6.5" Nickel owner, I find this thread interesting. I've also read many similar to it elsewhere, as everyone else has.

I have to be honest and say it does leave room for some concern as I tend to go to the range at least twice a week and tend to shoot 100 rounds each visit of each gun I take.

The issue I have is there is considerable talk of Standard loads, Max Loads, Medium Loads, etc... but there is no definition of what these loads actually are. Every now and then there is discussion of powders and bullet weights, but that doesn't help us non-loaders

I use factory ammo only, at least for now.

So, what is a light, medium, heavy load?

This is what I currently have. Please indicate to me what they would be considered:
  • MagTech 240gr FMC-Flat (44c) 1178fps/739 ft. lb
  • American Eagle 240gr JPH 1230 fps/805 ft. lb
  • Buffalo Bore 270gr (4C) 1450 fps/1260 ft. lbs

I suspect that Buffalo Bore is pretty nasty. I only have 40 of them, and purchased them before I knew better. I may shoot one per range visit to use them up

But where do those others fall in line? Are they fine for shooting 50-100 every range visit, once or twice a month, and still expect many years of service?

BTW... Hickok45 has over 70,000 rounds through his 29-2, but I don't know the mixture.

Thanks

BTW... .44 Special is too damn expensive and too hard to find. I just got a case of the American Eagle 240gr Mag's in (1000 rounds) @ .66 a round. I can't shoot my 9mm cheaper than that these days.

I classify any 240 grain load that goes supersonic (1,150 ft./sec.) as a full power .44 Mag load. That being said, I like to shoot 240 grain jacketed bullets out of my 629-3 at 1,350 ft./sec. The 629-3 and subsequent engineering dash models should have no problem digesting any factory ammo that does not stick out the front of the cylinder. Your Buffalo Bore is safe to shoot in your gun, but is best saved for confrontations with critters that are very scary. If you anticipate such confrontations, think about getting a bigger gun.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Likes This Post:
  #61  
Old 08-18-2015, 01:48 PM
S.B.'s Avatar
S.B. S.B. is offline
Member
Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag? Model 29 cannot handle .44 Mag?  
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,618
Likes: 49
Liked 721 Times in 369 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmichna View Post
At another forum I frequent, a poster made the claim that the Model 29 will develop mechanical issues upon extensive use of .44 mag ammunition. He further stated that .44 Special should be used, and .44 Mag only sparingly, and that the Model 29 issue with .44 Mag ammunition was well known and acknowledged at Smith & Wesson forum.

>>>Copyrighted Material Deleted<<<

I'm looking for feedback... either confirmation that this fellow's claims are true, or any information/evidence to the contrary.
You have to remember that it's lock work was designed way back in the late 1800s and still serves today's S&W revolvers (and are very popular) but, significant changes have taken place such as the Performance Package has renewed interest in them. I consider anything made after the Performance Package safe with all modern factory ammo? One advantage to the 29 family is their weight compared to say, Ruger Redhawks along with their undeniable accuracy and packablity. I think one reason for the rivalry is IMHS associations competitions where damaging heavy loads were the norm hence you have the Dan Wesson's, Ruger's and others with much beefed up action works to survive the constant shooting of much heavier loads?
In closing, I would remind you that Doug Wesson(in 1935) took most all big game on this continent with the then new .357 magnum way before the .44 magnum was a figure in the mind of S&W engineers. Don't sell either of them short!
Steve
Steve

Last edited by S.B.; 08-18-2015 at 01:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
44 magnum, 586, 629, 686, carbine, cartridge, casull, crimp, endshake, endurance, extractor, gunsmith, l frame, lock, model 19, model 29, model 625, n-frame, redhawk, remington, ruger, silhouette, solvent, springfield, winchester

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sport Charging Handle - Adding Latch or Changing Handle ByTexas Smith & Wesson M&P15 Rifles 12 07-30-2014 03:48 PM
Model 19 with 2.5" barrel - how's it handle? USSR S&W Revolvers: 1961 to 1980 40 01-08-2014 07:19 AM
WTB - Handle screw for older model 27-2 djkelsey WANTED to Buy 4 07-07-2013 08:23 AM
Can Model 547's handle +P ammo? roscoepcoltraine S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 15 05-28-2010 08:33 AM
Value: H&R Model 1, "Saw Handle" RayGT3 S&W Antiques 4 03-19-2009 10:31 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:54 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)