|
|
08-04-2011, 09:44 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Silverlake, Washington
Posts: 208
Likes: 4
Liked 6 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
OPINIONS OF S/W M396
LOOKING AT THIS 44 SPECIAL. CAN OWNERS OF THIS REVOLVER GIVE THE POSITIVES OR NEGATIVES OF CARRYING OR SHOOTING THIS REVOLVER. ALL INFORMATION IS GREATLY APPRECIATED.
|
08-05-2011, 11:14 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,046
Likes: 580
Liked 1,839 Times in 603 Posts
|
|
I have a 3"+ 396. I bought it as a backup for bow hunting elk in the Montana Rockies. As such it is loaded with 260gr WFNGC at a chronographed 1,000 fps. With that load, recoil is to me, is greater than the 329 PD with magnum loads -- painful with the Hogue Bantams -- mine is equipped with Hogue 500s. It is an absolute delight to carry however.
Here's a picture along with a 3 1/2" round butt Freedom Arms .45 Colt. The pictured gun is a 386 but my 396 looks exactly the same.
Paul
Last edited by Paul105; 08-05-2011 at 11:17 AM.
Reason: correct error
|
08-05-2011, 11:22 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 183
Likes: 2
Liked 21 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
I owned a 296 "hump back" -- a pleasure to carry -- uncomfortable to shoot. If they had made it like a Bodyguard (with a shrouded hammer) rather than a Centennial, I would have never parted with it. Anything heavier than a 200gr bullet was not advised because it would jump the crimp during recoil. I carried the CCI Blazer Gold Dot 200gr in it as a self defense load.
Given the choice, I would buy the 329 rather than the 396 -- just for the flexibility to carry Magnum loads if desired.
|
08-05-2011, 12:03 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: North Gawja
Posts: 561
Likes: 204
Liked 159 Times in 59 Posts
|
|
396 Mountain Lite
I absolutely love to carry mine. It's my woods/hunting backup gun. It rides on a belt holster and I don't even know it's there. I've had it on my belt doing some pretty heavy work, and never a problem. I keep 200 gr HP's in the gun, and .44 snake shot in my pocket.
It isn't a whole lot of fun to shoot, and I'm not able to shoot it like a target pistol, but it's really good for what it's intended for. I keep the rubber grips on it.
I have a 696, but it's so much heavier I never carry it around. I was happy to see they brought the 396 back out.
Munster
__________________
GO NAVY!
|
08-05-2011, 12:37 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Pinson, AL
Posts: 2,106
Likes: 57
Liked 656 Times in 307 Posts
|
|
I bought a 296 & 696, both new, over 8.5 yr ago. The 696 is a fun plinker - but a 4" 629 weighs only 6 oz more - and is likely cheaper and much easier to find, not to mention much more capable. Still, the original 296/396 - with their Ti cylinder - made a lite weight .44 Special possible. My 296 - in a Mika pocket holster - is a bit larger than my 642 so-carried - but it is viable in many of my pants' pockets. When woods bumming, I carry a 240gr LSWC first, followed by four 200 gr Gold Dots loaded by GA Arms, in that holster in my pocket. For normal urban carry, they are all GD's. They barely break 800 fps from the 2.5" barrel - make 830+ from the 696's 3" (... and, likely, from the 396, too.). The recoil is substantial in the OEM boots - a requirement for pocket carry. If it's in an OWB holster, even the recoil absorbing '.500 Magnum Hogues' will fit any of the L-frame .44's!
Yeah, my 296 looks silly so gripped - even if it is a lot less uncomfortable to shoot those brass-cased 200gr Gold Dots with so-gripped. I expect the similar original 396 would behave similarly, while the now no-longer-available 396 Night Guard, weighing 5+ oz more due to the black SS cylinder in place of the original models' Ti, likely recoils a bit less. It was up to an MSRP of $1,079 in the '09 S&W catalog. If you want it to plink with, get a 4" 629... to CC, get a 329NG. They are fine '.44 Special' revolvers... with a bit more power capability, too.
Stainz
|
08-05-2011, 01:39 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Moscow, Idaho USA
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 9,620
Liked 1,696 Times in 679 Posts
|
|
Had a 396 new back in 2006, Nice to carry, holster fit was iffy due to the FO front sight, sticks way up, holster drag.
Kicks like a bay mule and has bullet creep with lead bullets. At the time I had 5 44 Spls, let it go to a friend. He carried it on his person on a 4 wheeler. Holster wear took off the finish. He sold it.
|
08-05-2011, 06:38 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Silverlake, Washington
Posts: 208
Likes: 4
Liked 6 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
396 OPINIONS
THANKS FOR ALL OF YOUR OPINIONS. KIND OF THOUGHT THAT THOSE WERE GOING TO BE THE RESPONSES GIVEN. I OWN THE 386 MOUNTAIN LITE AND THE 386 PD. LOVE THEM BOTH. NOT BAD WITH THE 357'S FOR A 18 OUNCE REVOLVER. 44 SPECIALS WITH 18 OUNCES WOULD BE A DIFFERENT ANIMAL.................THANKS AGAIN.
|
08-05-2011, 09:00 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The free state of PA
Posts: 5,224
Likes: 5,721
Liked 8,584 Times in 2,782 Posts
|
|
As stated by others, a rough ride with an open backstrap grip. The big 500 grip makes it much more manageable. Doesn't do much for concealability though, but a lightweight 44 Sp is a great gun if you can learn to shoot it well and tolerate some discomfort. Had one, sold it.
|
08-05-2011, 10:16 PM
|
SWCA Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 19,208
Likes: 11,815
Liked 20,511 Times in 8,548 Posts
|
|
Love my 296. Best staged DA trigger I've ever owned. Can't stand rubber grips for concealed carry; way to sticky to pull from holster or clothing in a defensive situation. Comfortable enough to shoot with these grips and sane loads that are still good enough for serious social work like Winchester Silvertip defense loads and better than 357s. My added SS cylinder adds slight weight but also dampens recoil.
__________________
Jim
S&WCA #819
|
|
Tags
|
629, 642, 696, bodyguard, centennial, colt, concealed, crimp, hogue, m39, model 39, round butt, winchester |
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|