Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-12-2011, 06:32 PM
amazingflapjack amazingflapjack is offline
US Veteran
Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question  
Join Date: May 2010
Location: North Central Florida
Posts: 5,947
Likes: 24,644
Liked 6,195 Times in 2,575 Posts
Default Model 25-5 ejection question

Hi All-my 25-5 8 3/8 45LC seems to get the casing (S) caught under the extractor star when removing spent cases. Is this generic to this gun, I haven't shot it that much? And is there a recommended procedure for shucking the spent hulls out of the big hawg leg? Thanks, Flapjack
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-12-2011, 06:50 PM
USBP SW USBP SW is offline
Member
Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 387
Likes: 101
Liked 296 Times in 127 Posts
Default

Any revolver with a swing open cylinder should have the empties ejected with the muzzle pointed straight up. Not only do the empties drop straight out but you don't get unburned powder under the extractor using this method. Basically, when you have fired your rounds, depress the cylinder release normally and push the cylinder out, using the middle and ring fingers of your left hand, the frame rests on the middle finger and you turn your wrist a quarter turn to position the muzzle straight up. Then you simply eject the spent casings using your left thumb. It actually works easier and more naturally than it sounds. Perhaps someone with better photo skills than I have could show you visually. Good luck,
Steve
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-12-2011, 07:34 PM
Dale53 Dale53 is offline
Member
Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question  
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southwestern Ohio
Posts: 2,337
Likes: 209
Liked 1,195 Times in 457 Posts
Default

Steve has given you excellent information.

The .45 Colt has a small rim that aggravates the problem. However, dumping the cases when the revolver is vertical will minimize this problem.

Dale53
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-12-2011, 11:10 PM
amazingflapjack amazingflapjack is offline
US Veteran
Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question  
Join Date: May 2010
Location: North Central Florida
Posts: 5,947
Likes: 24,644
Liked 6,195 Times in 2,575 Posts
Default

Thank You Gentlemen, that confirms my thoughts, and provides new knowledge. I appreciate it! Flapjack.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-13-2011, 01:59 AM
Dpris Dpris is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
Liked 679 Times in 313 Posts
Default

Having used revolvers in uniform & taught others on 'em, I'd add that the most positive way to eject is muzzle up & PUNCH the rod back with the palm of the left hand (for righties).
Much stronger ejection than using the thumb.
And I also say that having carried a 25-5 on duty.

The thumb method was dropped in most LE circles decades ago.
Denis
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-13-2011, 01:55 PM
USBP SW USBP SW is offline
Member
Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 387
Likes: 101
Liked 296 Times in 127 Posts
Default

Actually, I guess you could say revolvers were dropped from law enforcement circles decades ago. The law enforcement organization I trained in firearms, kept the thumb ejection to the bitter end. The thumb eject method allows the shooter to begin reloading with his free hand. The problem with the thumb eject method and the reason some law enforcement entities went to the palm method was because too many officers tended to catch the empties in their free hand. This was a habit formed during training and what you do in training carries on to what you do in an emergency. As I recall, there were law enforcement fatalities resulting from dropping empties in their hand during a gunfight. The casual shooter is fine using the thumb eject method and you won't bend the ejector rod.

Good luck,
Steve
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-13-2011, 02:55 PM
olskool's Avatar
olskool olskool is offline
Member
Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question  
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: the woods of S.C.
Posts: 538
Likes: 2,462
Liked 1,278 Times in 255 Posts
Default

i had all three barrel lengths for years, 4in 6in 8 3/8 and shot them all a lot with no problem.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-13-2011, 06:55 PM
fishcreekrim fishcreekrim is offline
Member
Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question  
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Oregon desert
Posts: 293
Likes: 419
Liked 310 Times in 132 Posts
Default

Also, the fact that 45LC cases are tapered makes extraction less positive.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-13-2011, 07:20 PM
Dpris Dpris is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
Liked 679 Times in 313 Posts
Default

I was "corrected" in the thumb method at our academy back in '81, and subsequently reinforced by Farnham, Ayoob & others. We taught it at our department after that till the end of revolvers in '88 with the issuance of the Glocks.
The thumb method is too vulnerable to leaving one or two empties still hanging on, and if that happens it's irrelevant how fast the rest of your reloading technique is, since you'll be adding time in getting your cylinder cleared.
The reasoning I was given was that you do not want to risk catching a rim under the extractor star at worst, or even having to shake, rattle & roll to get a partially extracted case to drop clear.

It's hard to jam a revolver (with good ammunition) in general, but one jam that can get you killed is a case under the star. Can't clear that one in a hurry with a Tap-Rack- Bang.

Over the years, I've had cases do both when just fooling around on my own time & using the thumb method in laziness.
Punching that rod, assuming you have adequate clearance with your grips, makes for a very positive full ejection.

Casual shooting offers no immediate risk beyond the nuisance of digging a case out from under the star, but as pointed out- under stress you'll revert to what you're used to doing, and I still carry a DA revolver now & then for serious purposes. I try to stay consistent in how I dump empties.

If range stuff is all you'll ever do with the DA revolver, doesn't matter as much.
Denis

Last edited by Dpris; 11-13-2011 at 10:03 PM. Reason: Spelig Erurs
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-14-2011, 04:54 AM
Ron H.'s Avatar
Ron H. Ron H. is offline
US Veteran
Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 33
Liked 249 Times in 118 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fishcreekrim View Post
Also, the fact that 45LC cases are tapered makes extraction less positive.
Sir, .45 Colt cases are not tapered. They're straight-wall, 0.480" from the head to the mouth.

Hope this helps, and Semper Fi.

Ron H.
__________________
Wishin' don't make it so.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-14-2011, 10:58 PM
fishcreekrim fishcreekrim is offline
Member
Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question  
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Oregon desert
Posts: 293
Likes: 419
Liked 310 Times in 132 Posts
Default

You are correct, somewhere I got the idea they had a slight taper.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-21-2011, 03:26 AM
Ron H.'s Avatar
Ron H. Ron H. is offline
US Veteran
Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question Model 25-5 ejection question  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 33
Liked 249 Times in 118 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fishcreekrim View Post
You are correct, somewhere I got the idea they had a slight taper.
Sir, no worries. A number of the .45 Colt's contemporaries did have tapers, such as the .44-40, .38-40 and .32-20, and those did sometimes give extraction troubles. Elmer Keith mentions it several times in "Sixguns."

Hope this helps, and Semper Fi.

Ron H.
__________________
Wishin' don't make it so.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
colt, ejector, extractor, model 25


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Model 41 Ejection Issues? wilburfan Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 1 03-08-2017 05:54 PM
New M&P ejection question dumbandugly Smith & Wesson M&P Pistols 30 09-07-2014 10:32 PM
New Model 41 Ejection Problems sneltyr Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 3 04-17-2013 10:28 PM
6906 ejection question... nscshwn08 Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 4 03-13-2012 01:52 AM
Ejection question sferguson53 Smith & Wesson SD & Sigma Pistols 1 08-13-2011 10:15 AM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:54 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)