|
|
|
12-09-2011, 05:47 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 437
Likes: 43
Liked 114 Times in 52 Posts
|
|
Seeking opinions on a 686 for concealed carry
Used 686s seem as rare as hen's teeth so I'm considering a new one. I've narrowed it down to 4 choices and would appreciate some feedback to help me decide on one. First, barrel length: 2.5" or 3" and why do you hold this opinion? Second, 686 or 686+? The plus with 7 rounds is about $30 more, but is it really worth it in a cc gun? TIA
|
12-09-2011, 05:59 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: In Ohio or Arizona
Posts: 118
Likes: 1
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
If the 686 is what you want to carry go for it, that is one darn fine pistol. Just my own preference as to barrel length is I don't like shooting mag. loads in anything shorter than a 3 inch. 6 or 7 rounds depends, You want 1 more before reload or a little slimmer for C.C. me I go six and practice a lot with the speed loaders.
|
12-09-2011, 06:13 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
686
I got a pretty good deal on a 3" + and i like it alot. If i were buying new for cc i would probably go for a 6 shot. 2.5 or 3" wouldn't make much difference. Skip
|
12-09-2011, 06:19 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 7
Likes: 1
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
I too am interested in a 686 for CC. My question is do you shoot 357 or 38 P+. What about some wood grip options?
|
12-09-2011, 06:33 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 164
Likes: 5
Liked 334 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgms
6 or 7 rounds depends, You want 1 more before reload or a little slimmer for C.C. .
|
The 686 and the 686+ have the same diameter cylinder, so the 686 is not any slimmer than the 686+. The walls between each chamber are thinner to accommodate the additional round.
If I were buying a new 686 to carry, I'd get a 3" 686+. The 686 is already somewhat hefty, so why not go ahead and get the 3" barrel which gives you a full length ejector rod and the "plus" gives you an extra round. Now personally, I'd rather carry a more concealable (and lighter) K-Frame than the larger L-framed 686, but either will serve you well.
Last edited by 47D; 12-09-2011 at 06:38 PM.
|
12-09-2011, 06:34 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,656
Likes: 1,362
Liked 1,371 Times in 699 Posts
|
|
I've carried both the 2.5" regular 686 & the 3" 686+ and I preffered the 2.5-incher. The L-Frame is already considered large by some people so the 0.5" extra bbl length between the two may make a noticable difference when added to the overall weight & size of the 686, generally speaking.
I no longer carry either on a regular basis and have since switched to a 2.5" K-Frame Model 66-2, which, to me, is just the right size.......
For what it's worth I carry cross-draw and my favorite 686 between the two mentioned above is the 3" 686+, just not for carry purposes.
Your mileage may vary......
|
12-09-2011, 06:43 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 437
Likes: 43
Liked 114 Times in 52 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TDay
I too am interested in a 686 for CC. My question is do you shoot 357 or 38 P+. What about some wood grip options?
|
Most certainly practice with +P, and probably carry 357 (which will require some practice with that round. It's also possible that +P may be sufficient for carry with the option for 357.
|
12-09-2011, 06:46 PM
|
Banned
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
If I was making a buy on a new gun I would go for a 686+ with a 3"bbl, Gold bead front site and a 10-8 U-knotch rear sight. Granted you may not need an extra round, but later down the road how many 686's will you find in that configuration?
|
12-09-2011, 06:50 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 437
Likes: 43
Liked 114 Times in 52 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ogilvyspecial
I've carried both the 2.5" regular 686 & the 3" 686+ and I preffered the 2.5-incher. The L-Frame is already considered large by some people so the 0.5" extra bbl length between the two may make a noticable difference when added to the overall weight & size of the 686, generally speaking.
I no longer carry either on a regular basis and have since switched to a 2.5" K-Frame Model 66-2, which, to me, is just the right size.......
For what it's worth I carry cross-draw and my favorite 686 between the two mentioned above is the 3" 686+, just not for carry purposes.
Your mileage may vary......
|
I already have a 66 no dash with 4", so the 3" would be too similar that I hesitate to spend the $$ for what is almost a duplicate. In fact I have a 4" 67 no dash too.
I was planning on getting a cross draw from Lobo, but recently had GI surgery that eliminates the possibility of a belt, so I had Ray Cory make me a shoulder rig. I like it so much I may not go back to a holster on a belt. The increased weight of the 3" over the 2.5 will probably not be noticeable in that holster. I'm still not convinced the 7th chamber is worth extra $$.
|
12-09-2011, 07:01 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Iowa
Posts: 141
Likes: 4
Liked 21 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
The 686 is a great revolver, and my 4" is probably my favorite range gun now, but it is really to large for me to use CC. It's not the weight, just the size. Anyhow, I would go with the 7 shot and 3" barrel.
|
12-09-2011, 07:09 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Liked 20 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
I support whatever one chooses to carry, but to me that is a lot of iron to carry on a regular basis, But then I am not a very large person, I carried my 686 deer hunting this year, which with a good holster worked out OK, but for everyday it is a 442 for me. msn
|
12-09-2011, 07:22 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Great State of Texas
Posts: 5,056
Likes: 522
Liked 1,907 Times in 787 Posts
|
|
I would go for the 2.5" seven shot and a back brace.
__________________
Centennial Every Day
|
12-09-2011, 07:25 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ask the NSA
Posts: 2,208
Likes: 111
Liked 119 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 47D
The 686 and the 686+ have the same diameter cylinder, so the 686 is not any slimmer than the 686+. The walls between each chamber are thinner to accommodate the additional round.
If I were buying a new 686 to carry, I'd get a 3" 686+. The 686 is already somewhat hefty, so why not go ahead and get the 3" barrel which gives you a full length ejector rod and the "plus" gives you an extra round. Now personally, I'd rather carry a more concealable (and lighter) K-Frame than the larger L-framed 686, but either will serve you well.
|
I too prefer a K frame versus the larger and heavier L frame. I pack a 2.5" model 66 in a Lobo IWB and don't know it's there. With a quality IWB (Lobo) holster, a (Beltman) belt and a set of Ahrend FG Boot Grips it dissapears, never to be seen by anyone with the right outergarmet on. Recently drove 570 miles with it on and had no discomfort at all. I packed a 4" 586 OWB for a few months, years ago and much prefer my 66 to it. Much lighter, easier to conceal and will shoot .357's but they will recoil a bit more in the K frame. Been packing my model 66 here recently as a replacement to my Colt Commander and absolutely love it! Packed 1911's for over 20 years but due to rheumatoid arthritis in my right elbow and the pain from the recoil of a 230 gr. Speer GD had to go with something lighter. Glad I made the switch as the snub 66 is just as accurate at 25 yards and reloads are quick with a pair of speed loaders, but I put in alot of practice to speed my time up. If you treat the cylinders with Militec-1 lube/conditioner as directed, hold the revolver vertical and put a good whack to the ejector rod the cases will drop out from my experience with my 3 K frame snubs. Never have one not drop, including hot .357's. You can get a very good used one cheaper then a new 686. I load mine with Speer 135 gr. short barrel .38+P's and feel very, very well armed. It's an accurate round that will get the job done without all of the recoil, muzzle blast and flash of a .357. Accuracy is what really counts with a handgun and the recoil of these rounds is very controllable for fast follow up shots. Thanks 18DAI for the ammo tip!
If you do buy the 686 I recomend you immediately remove the IL and plug it up. I saw one activate itself at a shooting match a few years ago and would never carry one with it for SD. Chances of it happening are very slim, but IF it did happen would not want to be in that situation! JMO
__________________
V/R
Roger / SG
Last edited by Sportsterguy; 12-09-2011 at 07:56 PM.
|
12-09-2011, 07:33 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 826
Likes: 298
Liked 133 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
corgiS&W,
I am pondering a similar question also, and I am ranging from a 15 or 67 right on up to an N frame. (just missed a good deal on a 15)
Can you post some pics of that shoulder rig?
Due to my build I either carry owb or in pocket and that would be with a J frame or a small KAHR. Years ago I carried a model 10 OWB but then I did not have to worry about concealed but I was also alot younger and smaller in width.
|
12-09-2011, 08:36 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Florida,South,hell.
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 143
Liked 2,499 Times in 368 Posts
|
|
The 686 for concealed carry?
100% reliable.
Powerful with 357 magnum ammunition.
HEAVY , your pants will fall down .
Allen Frame
__________________
NRA cert.instructor&R.S.O.
|
12-09-2011, 08:59 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 826
Likes: 298
Liked 133 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Suspenders?
|
12-09-2011, 09:05 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 164
Likes: 5
Liked 334 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sportsterguy
I too prefer a K frame versus the larger and heavier L frame. I pack a 2.5" model 66 in a Lobo IWB and don't know it's there. With a quality IWB (Lobo) holster, a (Beltman) belt and a set of Ahrend FG Boot Grips it dissapears, never to be seen by anyone with the right outergarmet on.
|
I have this exact combo and couldn't agree more.
|
12-09-2011, 09:12 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: New England
Posts: 4,190
Likes: 3,543
Liked 3,996 Times in 1,627 Posts
|
|
A 2 1/2 inch 7 shooter W/O a lock in a crossdraw is how I roll........
__________________
'Nam 1968-69.DAV,VFW,NRA Inst.
|
12-09-2011, 09:19 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 437
Likes: 43
Liked 114 Times in 52 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by C.S.63
corgiS&W,
I am pondering a similar question also, and I am ranging from a 15 or 67 right on up to an N frame. (just missed a good deal on a 15)
Can you post some pics of that shoulder rig?
Due to my build I either carry owb or in pocket and that would be with a J frame or a small KAHR. Years ago I carried a model 10 OWB but then I did not have to worry about concealed but I was also alot younger and smaller in width.
|
Here's a link to Lobo; it's the 9th one down: Lobo Gun Leather - Other styles and accessories
|
12-09-2011, 09:20 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 437
Likes: 43
Liked 114 Times in 52 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by C.S.63
Suspenders?
|
Yep... The suspenders hold up the pants.
|
12-09-2011, 09:22 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: SC Missouri
Posts: 1,254
Likes: 281
Liked 331 Times in 221 Posts
|
|
Not 100% positive on this, but I believe the 3" has a full length Ejector Rod. That is a plus if you need to speed reload it. The 2.5" normally has a short ejector rod.
I would also look at a 386 Night Guard. L Frame Air Weight 7 shooter. Losing a bunch of weight makes more difference carrying to me than the size.
The question might be how much do you plan to shoot it, VS Concealed Carrying it? If the main plan is for CC I would look at the 386 pretty hard. If you plan to try and wear it out shooting it 357 Magnum ammo through it, I might go with the steel 686 that will be more pleasant to shoot with carry ammo.
Bob
__________________
ICORE MO2908
|
12-09-2011, 09:47 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: DAB, FL
Posts: 78
Likes: 4
Liked 8 Times in 5 Posts
|
|
I have a 3" 686 and love it; however, it is quite heavy for me to carry. The 66 is lighter; but, I really like my 642 for carry (Note: the 686 and 66 are my range guns.)
|
12-09-2011, 09:51 PM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: The Great Midwest
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 1,716
Liked 2,367 Times in 1,003 Posts
|
|
It would cost a lot to find out the difference in a 4" 66 vs. a 3" as the 3's are spendy. The 2 1/2" 66 on the other hand is more plentiful and doesn't carry anything like the 4". The 686 in 2 1/2" is noticeably heavier than the 66 in the same barrel. I have all these and choose the 66 for daily carry...that's what it was made for.
|
12-09-2011, 11:43 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 437
Likes: 43
Liked 114 Times in 52 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Photoman44
I would go for the 2.5" seven shot and a back brace.
|
My 4" 66 is only about 4oz heavier than the Colt Magnum Carry that I am currently carrying in the shoulder rig. A 2.5" 686 ought not to be significantly heavier than the 4" 66.
|
12-10-2011, 12:26 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 437
Likes: 43
Liked 114 Times in 52 Posts
|
|
What is the TALO edition
I just found some fair priced 686s on GunsAmerica, and a number are labeled as TALO and carry a price premium. The only thing I saw was the unfluted cylinder. Are these worth the extra $$?
|
12-10-2011, 09:20 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Florida Panhandle
Posts: 333
Likes: 13
Liked 266 Times in 103 Posts
|
|
Carry with S&W 4"
I have been shoulder holstering 4" magnums for many years now. It seems big at first but after a while you realize the length of the barrel is not what you feel its where the cylinder rides. So, adjusting the holster is key. I started with a Model 19-3 but carrry my primary shooter now which is a 686-6 6rnd 4"bbl. I would consider a 3" but I wouldnt want to spend a day at the range with anything less than 4" so I prefer to just carry it as well.
|
12-10-2011, 09:58 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Northwest Ohio
Posts: 71
Likes: 1
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
I have both a 4" 686 and a 6" 586 but for carry, I'd opt for a 386 Night Guard and consider .38+P in a good SD round. To me, it's weight, not so much barrel length that matters for CCW.
__________________
Northwest Ohio
|
12-10-2011, 10:02 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Deer Park, Texas
Posts: 3,357
Likes: 1,057
Liked 2,608 Times in 1,104 Posts
|
|
I would get a 4 inch--I would also not discount a 586 (I like blue) and I would get a shoulder holster or a rig as shown in the pics below. It is a smacked up, old school duty rig- Can also be used with suspenders.
It rides high and easy on the hips without pulling the pants down.
Lot of ways to skin this cat but I would do the 4 incher.
Blessings
PS---NoNoNO--I don't wear both at the same time. This picture was on a dare from my wife--the Hen who must be obeyed.
The flowered shirt is susposed to hide the undergrowth.
Blessings
__________________
TEXAS, by GOD
Last edited by williamlayton; 12-10-2011 at 10:06 AM.
|
12-10-2011, 10:31 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
If the gun is for concealed carry only, I would recommend a different one due to the weight. S&W has lighter options.
|
12-11-2011, 12:13 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 437
Likes: 43
Liked 114 Times in 52 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BarkSlayer
I have both a 4" 686 and a 6" 586 but for carry, I'd opt for a 386 Night Guard and consider .38+P in a good SD round. To me, it's weight, not so much barrel length that matters for CCW.
|
I have a 642 and sometimes carry it in an S&W shoulder holster. Admittedly it's much lighter than a 686 will be, but in a shoulder rig the increased weight is not that bothersome for me.
|
12-11-2011, 12:17 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 437
Likes: 43
Liked 114 Times in 52 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrisj357
I have been shoulder holstering 4" magnums for many years now. It seems big at first but after a while you realize the length of the barrel is not what you feel its where the cylinder rides. So, adjusting the holster is key. I started with a Model 19-3 but carrry my primary shooter now which is a 686-6 6rnd 4"bbl. I would consider a 3" but I wouldnt want to spend a day at the range with anything less than 4" so I prefer to just carry it as well.
|
Right now I'm leaning toward the 3" with 7 rounds since it's just a tad lighter than the 6 round version. Now the uestion is to search used or just buy new; even most used ones have the IL.
|
12-11-2011, 12:21 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 437
Likes: 43
Liked 114 Times in 52 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sportsterguy
If you do buy the 686 I recomend you immediately remove the IL and plug it up. I saw one activate itself at a shooting match a few years ago and would never carry one with it for SD. Chances of it happening are very slim, but IF it did happen would not want to be in that situation! JMO
|
I have generally disregarded/ignored any posts about the IL because none of my revolvers are that new. So, if I get a new 686 how to I go about removing the IL and plugging the hole? What is the procedure involved? Does it reuire a ualified smith?
|
12-11-2011, 12:25 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 164
Likes: 5
Liked 334 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by corgiS&W
Right now I'm leaning toward the 3" with 7 rounds since it's just a tad lighter than the 6 round version. Now the uestion is to search used or just buy new; even most used ones have the IL.
|
It's probably not any lighter once it is loaded with that 7th round.
The 686-4 can be found in a 3" barrel "plus" version without the lock, but they are pretty rare. If you were looking for a 4" or a 6" 686, I'd say "buy a pre-lock one." They are numerous. But since you are looking for a 3" 686 with the "plus" cylinder, I would advise you to just order the new one and disable the lock (unless you are a very patient man with extra money to spend).
|
12-11-2011, 12:29 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 164
Likes: 5
Liked 334 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by corgiS&W
I have generally disregarded/ignored any posts about the IL because none of my revolvers are that new. So, if I get a new 686 how to I go about removing the IL and plugging the hole? What is the procedure involved? Does it reuire a ualified smith?
|
It's pretty easy. I removed the lock on my 627 and installed "The Plug" with absolutely no difficulty. There are videos on youtube to walk you through it.
|
12-11-2011, 12:57 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico
Posts: 340
Likes: 85
Liked 25 Times in 16 Posts
|
|
There is one advantage to the 6-shot version of the 686 that no one has mentioned: you can shoot it in SSR class in IDPA with easy to obtain speedloaders. (I don't know if they make speedloaders for the 7-shot version, but it would be a pain to use even if they do, as you can't load more than six rounds at a time.)
I say this because I just traded into a 2.5 inch 686-4, which works much better than I would think in IDPA. (I usually shoot a 4-inch 686-4). With its short barrel, it is very fast out the holster. That would work for a self-defense scenario too.
That said, I'd spend the extra money for a three-inch 686, just for the full-length ejector rod. Of course, I've never seen one for sale in the flesh.
|
12-11-2011, 09:29 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 437
Likes: 43
Liked 114 Times in 52 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 47D
It's probably not any lighter once it is loaded with that 7th round.
(unless you are a very patient man with extra money to spend).
|
Hadn't thought about that. (I fit neither category.)
|
12-11-2011, 09:34 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 437
Likes: 43
Liked 114 Times in 52 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffrey
There is one advantage to the 6-shot version of the 686 that no one has mentioned: you can shoot it in SSR class in IDPA with easy to obtain speedloaders.
I say this because I just traded into a 2.5 inch 686-4, which works much better than I would think in IDPA. (I usually shoot a 4-inch 686-4). With its short barrel, it is very fast out the holster. That would work for a self-defense scenario too.
That said, I'd spend the extra money for a three-inch 686, just for the full-length ejector rod. Of course, I've never seen one for sale in the flesh.
|
That is an excellent point. But I think all the 3" versions I've seen listed are 7 rounds. Another decision.
|
12-11-2011, 09:55 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Location: DUNNELLON, FLORIDA USA
Posts: 11,102
Likes: 1,690
Liked 16,303 Times in 4,232 Posts
|
|
Six shot or seven shot, 2.5" or three inch barrel = if you going to CCW via shoulder rig it really doesn't matter.
If you already have a Model 19, why not carry it loaded with .38 Plus P such as 158gr. LSWC-HP?
When I was much younger I CCW a Model 29 6" or a Model 28 4". As I grew older the size and weight of the weapon became smaller and lighter.
At present the CCW is a Glock M-27 with a five shot 2" as secondary (BUG)
|
12-11-2011, 09:56 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 7
Likes: 1
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
I bought a 686 today with the 3" barrel. Any suggestions on a good defense load for this model?
|
12-14-2011, 12:40 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Georgia
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
I use a 3" 686+ as my primary carry. I keep it loaded with Remington 158gr LSWCHP+P, though I mostly shoot 158gr FMJ ammo at the range.
I carry it in a nice OWB holster made by Luke Adams of Adams Holsters.
|
12-14-2011, 11:10 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: OFallon, MO, USA
Posts: 4
Likes: 1
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
I sometimes carry a 4"bbl 586 in a high ride DeSantis Speed Scabbard or a shoulder holster. But I am looking to pick up a 2 1/2" L frame with the round butt for easier carry. As for 7 shot vs. 6 shot, I prefer the 6 because that is what I am familiar with and my Comp II speed loaders are all 6 shot. I don't think Safariland makes the Comp II for the plus, but HKS might make one. But I like the Comp II push release over the HKS twistys.
|
12-14-2011, 03:23 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Northeast Texas
Posts: 2,861
Likes: 921
Liked 1,326 Times in 723 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff45
The 686 is a great revolver, and my 4" is probably my favorite range gun now, but it is really to large for me to use CC. It's not the weight, just the size. Anyhow, I would go with the 7 shot and 3" barrel.
|
What he said.
My 686-4, plus, 4", RB is my FA-VO-RITE range gun. A friend has a new 686+ 3" and I've shot it a lot. It would make a great cc if you can deal with the weight. Likewise with the 2.5".
Personally, I don't carry .357 because, in the short barrel lengths (2.5" in my case) the thing is as much a flame-thrower as it is a gun. The noise would deafen me and the flash (at night) would blind me. I tested it, it was not pleasant. So I stick to .38+P for cc. YMMV, IMHO, etc, etc, etc.
Edit: my ccw's include a 66-4 in 2.5".
__________________
But then, what do I know?
|
12-14-2011, 11:50 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 645
Likes: 7
Liked 52 Times in 39 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 47D
The 686 and the 686+ have the same diameter cylinder, so the 686 is not any slimmer than the 686+. The walls between each chamber are thinner to accommodate the additional round.
|
Noteworthy that they also did move the cylinder notches.
Quote:
If I were buying a new 686 to carry, I'd get a 3" 686+. The 686 is already somewhat hefty, so why not go ahead and get the 3" barrel which gives you a full length ejector rod and the "plus" gives you an extra round. Now personally, I'd rather carry a more concealable (and lighter) K-Frame than the larger L-framed 686, but either will serve you well.
|
This is exactly what I was going to post!
__________________
NRA Certified Instructor
|
12-15-2011, 11:44 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 303
Likes: 18
Liked 101 Times in 38 Posts
|
|
You can also look for the 681+ (7 shot) 3". It's got the fixed sight, which IMHO is more appropriate for concealed carry. You can find the PC ones made for camfour on the used market; they have no interlock.
|
12-16-2011, 12:07 AM
|
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: AL
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Sorry to sort of hijack but my questions fit pretty well into this thread.
Im looking into a new 686/varient and it will be used to CC IWB most likely in a MS VMII. I would much prefer a regular 686 3in but alas S&W does not make one. I do not want the Plus model one as I dont like HKS speedloaders and as of right now Safariland doesnt make one for the Plus model. Does the 686 2.5in model SKU: 164231 have a full length ejector rod or no, and does anyone know if/when S&W will becoming back out with a regular 686 3in? As for weight im sorry to say man up lol, according to S&W website stats a 686 4in weighs 3ozs less unloaded then my TRP unloaded and the 686+3in is 6ozs less and the 686 2.5in is 8ozs less and I have a very bad back+leg injury from Iraq and have no problem IWBing my TRP in MS VMII w/ 1 1/2in horsehide from the beltman all day w/ 642-1 in Alessi ankle holster, its all in what gear you use and how its set up. So is the 2.5in model equipped with a standard length ejector rod or no and if not is it really a hindrence enough to wait for S&W to come out with a 686 3in and does anyone know if/when S&W is planing on coming out with the 686 3in again?
P.S. I hate plastic and love all steel 1911's so thats why the weight is not a factor for me. Again sorry for the sort of hijack.
__________________
Disabled Combat Veteran OIF
|
12-16-2011, 12:31 AM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 164
Likes: 5
Liked 334 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrobertson
Does the 686 2.5in model SKU: 164231 have a full length ejector rod or no ... ?
|
No. It takes a 3" barrel in a L-frame or K-frame .357 to accomodate a full length ejector rod.
|
01-30-2012, 07:23 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Every now and then I'll strap on the 686 6" six round in a Simply Rugged sourdough pancake held up with a 1.75" strap from Beltman. I throw two Safariland comp-2's in the pocket and I'm good to go. And then I sit down and that grip extends about four inches out of my back like some freakish birth defect under my shirt. I have some retro combat square butt grips from Ahrends on order, but I'm starting to doubt the whole concept.
I can deal with the weight, the bulge of the speedloaders, and the barrel length. But I cant overcome that massive grip. That's what you have to look out for.
|
01-30-2012, 03:52 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New England
Posts: 265
Likes: 5
Liked 28 Times in 20 Posts
|
|
I am able to CC a 686 2.5"
I do it IWB with a Side Guard holster and a good belt. Yes, it's heavy to tote all day, but it's doable, and I actually enjoy it. The lines of a revolver hide nicely against the human body. I practice with "full house" loads and carry the Speer Gold Dot Short Barrel .357 load. It's a really mild .357 load IMO.
I have Hogue Bantam grips installed by the way. Those are pretty compact.
Last edited by xopher88x; 01-30-2012 at 03:55 PM.
|
01-30-2012, 04:16 PM
|
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: La Conner, WA
Posts: 2,124
Likes: 8,945
Liked 2,149 Times in 961 Posts
|
|
"Noteworthy that they also did move the cylinder notches."
That is a function of having an odd number of chambers in the cylinder. With an even number, the notches fall at the center of the chambers. With an odd number, they are between the chambers, the same as the flutes.
rat
|
01-30-2012, 04:27 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9,656
Likes: 1,362
Liked 1,371 Times in 699 Posts
|
|
For what it might be worth, here's a photo taken after my first post in this thread for use in another 686 thread.
It should give someone an idea of the size difference between the 2.5" & 3" 686's
__________________
Ogy
|
|
|
Tags
|
1911, 586, 642, 686, beltman, ccw, colt, commander, concealed, desantis, ejector, glock, hogue, k frame, k-frame, l frame, model 19, model 27, model 28, model 29, model 66, round butt, safariland, snubnose |
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|