Smith & Wesson Forum

Advertise With Us Search
Go Back   Smith & Wesson Forum > Smith & Wesson Revolvers > S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present

Notices

S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present All NON-PINNED Barrels, the L-Frames, and the New Era Revolvers


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-06-2012, 10:04 AM
mcramblet mcramblet is offline
Member
Model 627 PC 2 5/8", size comparison photos Model 627 PC 2 5/8", size comparison photos Model 627 PC 2 5/8", size comparison photos Model 627 PC 2 5/8", size comparison photos Model 627 PC 2 5/8", size comparison photos  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Model 627 PC 2 5/8", size comparison photos

I'm very interested in having a new Model 627 PC 2 5/8" be my next gun purchase. I've yet been able to find one locally, so that I can actually hold it in my hand. Without seeing one in person, I'm having a hard time getting a good perspective on its size. Does anyone happen to have any pictures of their 627 revolver, shown either in hand or maybe even showing it's size compared to other guns or items (like compared to a full size 1911 for example), so I can get an idea of its size? I know I'll love the revolver, I'm just wondering about what conditions are necessary to make it feasible for any form of concealed carry. I currently have a little Glock 27 for concealed carry. I know the 627 is going to be much larger, but I also know that if I have one, I'll want to carry it some of the time, even if it's only on cold Michigan winters, when wearing a big, heavy coat.

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-06-2012, 12:17 PM
XTrooper's Avatar
XTrooper XTrooper is offline
Member
Model 627 PC 2 5/8", size comparison photos Model 627 PC 2 5/8", size comparison photos Model 627 PC 2 5/8", size comparison photos Model 627 PC 2 5/8", size comparison photos Model 627 PC 2 5/8", size comparison photos  
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NE PA
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 528
Liked 808 Times in 228 Posts
Default

It's an N-frame. Any N-frame revolver you find will be close enough to tell you what you want to know. Also, fwiw, I carry mine concealed nearly every day and have since I've owned it. It's just a matter of dressing around the weapon.
__________________
Steve
NJ State Trooper (rtd)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-06-2012, 05:48 PM
pdinphx's Avatar
pdinphx pdinphx is offline
Member
Model 627 PC 2 5/8", size comparison photos Model 627 PC 2 5/8", size comparison photos Model 627 PC 2 5/8", size comparison photos Model 627 PC 2 5/8", size comparison photos Model 627 PC 2 5/8", size comparison photos  
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Default

First off, the 627 UDR is an awesome gun ... I just qualified with mine for CY2012.

The bulk of this gun is in the cylinder width ... which I just measured at about 1.75". There are some belt holsters which position the cylinder above the beltline, so as to eliminate some of the protruding bulk. Nevertheless, as XTrooper noted, it is an N-frame revolver and thus, is big and heavy compared to other "compact" carry options.

However, don't let that dissuade you. I love and carry my 627 all the time, both on-duty and off.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-07-2012, 08:05 AM
Stainz's Avatar
Stainz Stainz is offline
Member
Model 627 PC 2 5/8", size comparison photos Model 627 PC 2 5/8", size comparison photos Model 627 PC 2 5/8", size comparison photos Model 627 PC 2 5/8", size comparison photos Model 627 PC 2 5/8", size comparison photos  
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Pinson, AL
Posts: 2,106
Likes: 57
Liked 656 Times in 307 Posts
Default

Here is my 2 5/8" PC627 UDR, upper right below, and, going CW, my 642 (J-frame), 2" 10 (K-frame), and 2.5" 296 (L-frame) for size comparison.



Here it is, bottom below, with a 4" 627 Pro and a 5" JM PC627 V-Comp:



Hope this helps. I liked the new re-release so much that I sold the 5" above and bought a second one!

Stainz
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-07-2012, 04:49 PM
mcramblet mcramblet is offline
Member
Model 627 PC 2 5/8", size comparison photos Model 627 PC 2 5/8", size comparison photos Model 627 PC 2 5/8", size comparison photos Model 627 PC 2 5/8", size comparison photos Model 627 PC 2 5/8", size comparison photos  
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the replies. I did a little work myself and thought I'd post this, in case it helped anyone else. Using information on gun sizes, I compared the 627 to a few guns that I was familiar with and put together some visuals. These are close approximations based on manufacturers websites. Not exact, but a good representation for my purposes.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1.jpg (59.7 KB, 277 views)
File Type: jpg 2.jpg (63.5 KB, 383 views)
File Type: jpg 3.jpg (65.5 KB, 362 views)
File Type: jpg 4.jpg (64.7 KB, 381 views)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-07-2012, 09:22 PM
dwever dwever is offline
Member
Model 627 PC 2 5/8", size comparison photos Model 627 PC 2 5/8", size comparison photos Model 627 PC 2 5/8", size comparison photos  
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Matsu Valley, Alaska
Posts: 881
Likes: 146
Liked 1,003 Times in 349 Posts
Default

I occasionally carry a PC 627 with the 2 5/8 inch barrel in a Galco Combat master holster; I also carry my duty Glock 22 of course in a duty holster, but also in a Galco Cop II. The issue for me carrying concealed with the PC 627 is not so much the size, it is the stinking weight, the recoil, and the capacity.

To have reasonable fire power with 8 rounds in the PC627 I carry Speer Short Barrel .357 giving me 290 Lbs. in muzzle energy. This is a manageable load for follow-up shots (unlike say some other Speer and Federal Premium .357 loads with over double the muzzle energy).

Problem is, I look at my duty Glock 22 (.40) with the Federal Premium 180 grain loads at 392 ft. lbs. of muzzle energy, and all of a sudden I have more energy, less recoil, faster follow-up shots, more accuracy, DOUBLE the capacity, better concealment, and my pants aren't being pulled down.

I'm not far from the off-duty OIS that happened up in or around Nashville a year or so ago when he was 3 on 1 in a motel lobby shoot out. The off-duty officer prevailed shooting all three armed robbers, but the difficulty/combat factor goes way way up if he'd been packing a 686 or PC 627. Then last month in NYC, there was an armed crew of nine people robbing drug dealers that thank God the arresting officers happened upon just two of the guys when the balance of the crew happened to be at another location, and the rest were arrested with planned overwhelming force.

I carry the Glock more and more, and on duty I wouldn't carry a revolver if I could although I used to think I would. I love my 627 PC, but it is increasingly relegated to a hunting side arm with full load .357 Federal Premium A Frames. And it may eventually be sold and replaced by a Wilson Combat Elite 1911 even with the capacity loss.

Last edited by dwever; 01-07-2012 at 09:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
1911, 627, 642, 686, concealed, galco, glock, k-frame, n-frame


Posting Rules
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What is the size comparison between the Model 60 and 69? Stopsign32v S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 8 07-12-2016 12:06 PM
642 Size Comparison cdt S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 9 07-21-2015 02:02 PM
659 size comparison twomoons Smith & Wesson Semi-Auto Pistols 1 08-22-2011 10:28 PM
NIB 2" Model 63.....w/ photos! *Added photos from 1st Range trip, 555 rounds later* Robinett_11B S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 33 03-20-2011 11:54 PM
686 and 629 size comparison audi403 S&W Revolvers: 1980 to the Present 5 12-17-2010 11:57 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3
smith-wessonforum.com tested by Norton Internet Security smith-wessonforum.com tested by McAfee Internet Security

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:57 AM.


Smith-WessonForum.com is not affiliated with Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation (NASDAQ Global Select: SWHC)